Notice of Meeting:
I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Dunedin City Council will be held on:
Date: Monday 23 January 2017
Time: 9.00am
Venue: Edinburgh Room, Municipal Chambers,
The Octagon, Dunedin
Sue Bidrose
Chief Executive Officer
Council
PUBLIC AGENDA
MEMBERSHIP
Mayor |
Mayor Dave Cull |
|
Deputy Mayor |
Cr Chris Staynes |
|
Members |
Cr David Benson-Pope |
Cr Rachel Elder |
|
Cr Christine Garey |
Cr Doug Hall |
|
Cr Aaron Hawkins |
Cr Marie Laufiso |
|
Cr Mike Lord |
Cr Damian Newell |
|
Cr Jim O'Malley |
Cr Conrad Stedman |
|
Cr Lee Vandervis |
Cr Andrew Whiley |
|
Cr Kate Wilson |
|
Senior Officer Sue Bidrose, Chief Executive Officer
Governance Support Officer Pam Jordan
Pam Jordan
Governance Support Officer
Telephone: 03 477 4000
Pam.Jordan@dcc.govt.nz
Note: Reports and recommendations contained in this agenda are not to be considered as Council policy until adopted.
Council 23 January 2017 |
|
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Introduction 4
2 Apologies 4
3 Confirmation of Agenda 4
4 Declaration of Interest 5
Reports
5 Draft 2017/18 Annual Plan Budget Material 11
6 Draft 2017/18 Budget - Water and Waste Group 31
7 Emissions Trading Scheme Liabilities and Proposed Carbon Management Policy 39
8 Draft 2017/18 Budget - Solid Waste 49
9 Update on the Tertiary Precinct Safety and Accessibility Upgrade 57
10 Draft 2017/18 Budget - Transport Group 63
11 Draft 2017/18 Budget - Parks and Recreation Group 70
12 Draft 2017/18 Budget - Property 89
13 Draft 2017/18 Budget - Arts and Culture Group 96
14 Draft 2017/18 Budget - Customer and Regulatory Group 107
15 Te Ao Tūroa Environment Strategy Funding 137
16 Review of the Allocation of Funding to Applicants to the Biodiversity Fund 143
17 Draft 2017/18 Budget - Community and Planning Group 156
18 Draft 2017/18 Budget - Enterprise Dunedin 168
19 Draft 2017/18 Budget - Corporate Services 174
20 Draft 2017/18 Budget - Corporate Support Services 180
21 Draft 2017/18 Budget - Waipori Fund 186
22 Draft 2017/18 Budget - Investment Account 190
Council 23 January 2017 |
|
1 INTRODUCTION
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
Note: Any additions must be approved by resolution with an explanation as to why they cannot be delayed until a future meeting.
Council 23 January 2017 |
|
Declaration of Interest
Department: Civic and Legal
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 Members are reminded of the need to recognise and declare interests and to manage any conflicts between those interests and their role as an elected representative.
2 Elected members are reminded to update their register of interests as soon as practicable, including amending the register at this meeting if necessary.
That the Council: a) Notes/Amends if necessary the Elected Members' Interest Register attached as Attachment A; and b) Confirms the proposed management plan for Elected Members' Interests. |
Signatories
Authoriser: |
Kristy Rusher - Manager Civic and Legal |
|
Title |
Page |
Elected Members' Register of Interests |
7 |
Council 23 January 2017 |
|
Draft 2017/18 Annual Plan Budget Material
Department: Community and Planning and Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides commentary on the budget material presented in the agenda for the 23 January 2017 Annual Plan Council Meeting.
2 Annual Plans are completed under revised legislation and are exception-only documents focused on changes from the relevant year in the Long Term Plan. The budgets for the 2017/18 year have been updated and changes are described in this report.
3 The draft budget for 2017/18 includes an overall rate increase of 2.99%. This is in line with the limit set in the Financial Strategy. Budget updates incorporated in the draft budget include timing changes to the capital expenditure programme in Transport and Property in the 2016/17 and 2017/18 years. Maintenance costs are increased, reflecting increased costs arising from contract renewals and the need to address maintenance of facilities.
4 The changes made to budgets are not significant or material meaning a consultation process is not required. Community engagement will explain why consultation is not required and indicate what is planned and programmed in the 2017/18 year.
5 In the third year of an LTP, work on the Annual Plan and development of the next LTP run concurrently. Staff plan to utilise the engagement process to introduce and lead into the new LTP.
6 The engagement process will provide opportunities for the community to provide feedback on the draft budgets for 2017/18 to the Council.
That the Council: a) Approves the draft 2017/18 budget as shown/amended in Attachment A. b) Confirms the proposed community engagement process for the 2017/18 Annual Plan budget, allowing work to proceed on development of engagement material and a detailed engagement plan for subsequent approval by the Council.
|
BACKGROUND
Annual Plan process
7 The Annual Plan is a core part of the local government planning and public accountability framework as shown in the diagram below. Completed in the second and third years of the three year LTP cycle, an Annual Plan is a ‘slice’ from the LTP and forms the link between the LTP and the process of setting rates for each year.
8 Amendments made to Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) in August 2014 changed the nature of the Annual Plan process. The Annual Plan is now an ‘exceptions only’ document focused on significant or material changes from year concerned in the LTP. The revised legislation also repealed the requirement to undertake a special consultative procedure when consulting on an annual plan, unless a formal amendment to the LTP is being made.
· If there are no significant or material changes between the LTP and proposed annual plan, a Council is not required to consult on their draft budget unless they choose to do so.
· If not consulting, a Council is however required to communicate with the community about the reasons for that decision.
· A council has to adopt an annual plan each year regardless of whether consultation is undertaken or not. The plan document will consist of the annual plan budget and funding impact statement for the year concerned along with rating base information and descriptions of any changes from the LTP.
9 The legislative changes removed duplications in consultation processes and reduced costs by not requiring information in the LTP to be reproduced in the Annual Plan unless it has changed. The purpose of consulting on Annual Plans is focused on any significant or material changes.
10 These changes reinforce the LTP’s position as the principal planning document in the Local Government planning framework.
11 Work on the development of the 2018-2028 LTP started in September 2016. An LTP takes a minimum of eighteen months to develop and consult on the required material which means this work overlaps with the completion of the 2017/18 Annual Plan.
Format of budget material
12 This year, for the first time, the material for discussion at the January Annual Plan Council Meeting is being distributed in an electronic format. Print copies can be made available upon request in the week immediately prior to the meeting.
13 Budget information for Council activities is presented in group reports within the agenda for the meeting rather than in a separate folder. The report groupings used for budget information are the same as those used for financial reporting and are slightly different from those used in the 2015/16 – 2024/25 Long Term Plan (LTP).
14 The agenda is ordered to allow reports with implications for group budgets to be considered immediately before the group budget report concerned.
15 All budget material is draft.
16 Budget material and commentary relates to Dunedin City Council activity only. Financial information for the wider Council group of companies is not required as part of the Annual Plan or LTP.
17 The Draft budget is attached to this report as well as the detailed capital expenditure programme.
Consideration of strategic fit, significance and materiality
18 All decisions made at the January Annual Plan Council meeting need to be considered in terms of fit with the purpose of local government, the Council’s strategic framework and level of significance or materiality of the decision. The Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy guides this consideration. The staff assessment of these matters is outlined in the ‘summary of considerations’ section of each of the reports.
DISCUSSION
19 This report supplements the budget material contained in group reports providing a commentary on the draft budgets for the 2017/18 Annual Plan.
Budget overview
20 The Financial Strategy sets an annual rate increase limit of 3% unless there are exceptional circumstances. The proposed budget for 2017/18 delivers an annual rate increase of 2.99%.
21 The draft budget was developed by staff over a three month period from September to November 2016 guided by budget parameters to deliver an overall budget increase of 3% or lower.
22 The budget process highlighted several matters that impacted our ability to reach the 3% rate increase limit set in the Financial Strategy and required attention. These issues will be addressed further in the next LTP 2018-2028. These include capacity to deliver capital expenditure, maintenance costs, and rates affordability.
Capacity to deliver capital expenditure
23 The timing of the capital programme included in the LTP in Transport and Property has been re-phased in the 2016/17 and 2017/18 years to more accurately reflect the capacity to deliver some projects.
24 Work on some projects has been reprogrammed to reflect how much progress can realistically be achieved each month, factoring in changes such as new health and safety requirements introduced since the projects were originally planned or reflecting updated resource procurement and contractor availability/tendering timelines.
Maintenance Costs
25 Over the past two years there has been a review of, and increased community interest in, the management of maintenance contracts and backlogs of deferred maintenance and renewals.
· The draft budget continues to address the backlog of water and waste renewals identified as an issue in the infrastructure strategy in the LTP.
· Service reviews and scheduled contract renewals highlighted the importance of contract monitoring and supervision in delivering promised levels of service to the community.
26 These issues have been acknowledged and resolved. There are visible results from contracts being more closely supervised and monitored. For example, the central activity area (CAA) is cleaner and attended to more regularly. Contractors are more visible in the city, especially the mud tank cleaning truck and street sweepers. This has come at a cost with contractors seeking higher prices in contract renewals.
27 Service reviews have highlighted deferred building maintenance in activities such as Parks and Recreation and Property.
28 The net result of this is an increase in maintenance costs.
29 While this is not seen as significant in terms of this Annual Plan, it does mean that there will potentially be some hard decisions in the next LTP regarding levels of service and affordability.
Affordability
30 Dunedin City Council rates are in the lower quartile when compared with other Councils in NZ.
31 There is an opportunity cost relating to lower rates. Pressure has been put on our ability to deliver services at the levels promised while balancing periods of challenging budgetary issues and financial constraint. As a result, deferred property and asset maintenance issues have started to emerge.
32 There is no ‘wiggle room’ left in the budget. If we want to add anything new to our work programmes, we will need to reduce spend elsewhere. There is always a tension in balancing affordability with community expectations.
33 The Financial Strategy sets a limit of 3% on rates increases; a higher rates increase would be inconsistent with this parameter.
34 The remainder of this report outlines the key budgetary changes.
Draft Operating Budget
35 The draft operating budget is attached (Attachment A). Explanations are provided below for all variances in excess of $1.000m.
Revenue
Rates
36 Overall rates revenue has increased by $3.992m, which is 2.99% higher than 2016/17. The main drivers of this increase are increases in maintenance and staff costs and the continued step-up in renewals expenditure in the Water and Waste group.
Fees and Charges
37 Fees and charges have been increased by 3% in most cases. The exceptions are activities where fees are set by statute, are linked to reviews of strategies, policies or by-laws or where increases would be a disincentive to utilisation/compliance.
38 Landfill fees in the Solid Waste activity have been increased by more than 3% in response to increasing Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) costs. Categories of waste attracting ETS costs have had user fees increased by an additional 8.5% on top of the 3% overall increase.
External Operating Revenue
39 The draft budgets show an increase in external operating revenue of $5.117m. The main drivers are additional New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) subsidy, Landfill revenue and property rental and recoveries.
External Capital Revenue
40 The draft budgets show an increase in external capital revenue of $7.195m. This relates to the capital expenditure programme and includes additional revenue for Transport projects from NZTA and the central government funded Urban Cycle Fund.
Expenditure
Staff Costs
41 The draft budgets show an increase in staff costs of $2.614m. This increase incorporates a 2% increase across all staff salaries and an allowance for incremental steps. The main changes over and above this are described in the table below.
a) City Development – additional resources were included in the 2016/17 budget to assist with the Second Generation District Plan and Central City Plan. These positions have been removed in the 2017/18 budget.
b) Civil Defence – the staff budget for Civil Defence has been removed due to the establishment of a new Civil Defence and Emergency Management model.
c) Council Communications and Marketing – an additional staff member has been included in this area to provide communications resource to the infrastructure group.
d) Customer and Regulatory Services – an additional staff member has been included in this area following restructuring within Building Services.
e) Enterprise Dunedin – an additional staff member is included in this area resulting from restructuring within Enterprise Dunedin.
f) Investment Account – additional resources have been included in the budget pending activity reviews. The ramping up of expenditure on infrastructure needs to follow an initial investment in asset management, contract management and project management resources.
g) Civic Leadership and Administration – provision has been made for an additional in-house lawyer.
h) Olveston – the draft budget incorporates all costs for Olveston, including the staff costs.
i) Solid Waste – the draft budget incorporates a City Custodian and an Education and Promotions Officer.
j) Transport - one additional staff member has been included in the Network Development team for corridor access work.
Asset operations and maintenance / materials, supplies and services
42 The draft budget shows an increase in asset operations and maintenance costs of $7.794m and a decrease in materials, supplies and services costs of $1.240m. The net increase of $6.554m incorporates the following changes:
· Parks and Recreation - Parks and Recreation have renewed contracts to maintain Dunedin’s parks and reserves, cemeteries and trees. The new contracts have resulted in an increase in cost. In addition, building maintenance budgets have been increased due to the need to address deferred maintenance on Parks and Recreation assets, in particular recreation facilities such as gyms, toilets and changing rooms.
· Transport - Roading maintenance costs have increased due to new maintenance contract prices. Street cleaning costs in the central business district have also increased in order to maintain required service levels. An increase is included for new bus shelters, funded by the ORC.
Premises Costs
43 A rate increase of 3% has been included in the budget assumption for rates expenditure on Council owned buildings and utilities. However, any further impact resulting from the revaluation of properties may need to be addressed when further rates modelling work is completed in time for the January 2017 budget meeting.
Internal Charges
44 Internal charges have increased by $1.046m. The main increases are from Business Information Services (BIS) due to increased expenditure needs and in Water and Waste as a result of increased landfill fees for sludge disposal.
Depreciation
45 Depreciation expense has increased by $5.626m. This is due to increases in infrastructure asset valuations completed at 1 July 2016.
Second Generation District Plan (2GP)
46 The Second Generation District Plan (2GP), which sets the rules for development within the city is nearing completion. When the 2GP project enters the appeals phase in mid-2017, legal expenses are likely to be incurred. It is however difficult to quantify and budget for these costs. When incurred, the Executive Leadership Team will manage these costs within the overall Council budget.
Capital Expenditure
47 The total capital expenditure programme included in draft budget is $58.147m for the 2017/18 year. This compares with $68.535m in the 2017/18 year of the LTP.
48 For the 2016/17 year, actual capital expenditure is forecast to be less than 2016/17 Annual Plan budget.
49 The reviewed timing has been incorporated in the Transport and Property areas. Details of the changes are included in the relevant group reports.
50 The capital expenditure programme will be reviewed in its entirety as part of the development of the next LTP. Issues relating to capacity, resourcing, affordability, ability to spend, deferred maintenance and renewals will be addressed within the constraints of financial strategy.
Comparison with Long Term Plan 2015/16
51 The 2017/18 budget is the third year of the Long Term Plan 2015/16 (LTP). Due to the nature of forecasts, a number of assumptions have changed since the LTP was developed.
52 The 2017/18 forecast included in the LTP has been compared to this draft budget. A number of the differences follow on from and are consistent with the changes made to the 2016/17 Annual Plan budget.
53 Rates revenue is less than forecast in the 2017/18 year of the LTP. The draft 2017/18 budget increases rates within the 3% limit set in the Financial Strategy. The LTP forecast 5%.
54 External revenue is higher than forecast in the 2017/18 year of the LTP. This is mainly due to the additional revenue now forecast for the Green Island Landfill.
55 Operational costs are higher than forecast in the 2017/18 year of the LTP. The staff costs reflect additional resources and revised activity structures. The additional operational costs also reflect the increase in maintenance costs.
56 Loan interest is lower than forecast in the 2017/18 year of the LTP and is consistent with the changes made in the 2016/17 Annual Plan. It reflects reduced debt levels and reduced interest rate assumption.
57 Depreciation is higher than forecast in the 2017/18 year of the LTP due to the increase in valuation for infrastructure assets.
58 The Balance Sheet has been updated to reflect the 2015/16 Annual Report results, carry forwards and revaluation for 1 July 2016.
59 Term loans are less than forecast in the LTP which is also consistent with the changes made in the 2016/17 Annual Plan. This is due to proceeds from property sales, additional cash being applied to debt reduction and changes in timing of the capital expenditure programme.
Community engagement on draft budgets
60 Amendments to the LGA in 2014 mean local authorities are no longer required to consult on the Annual Plan if the plan “does not include significant or material differences from the content of the long term plan for the financial year to which the proposed annual plan relates”.
61 The updates made to the budgets for the 2017/18 year are not currently viewed as significant or material.
62 It is proposed to still carry out a community engagement process in April 2017 to inform key stakeholders and the wider community on the content of the draft 2017/18 budgets and to provide opportunities for feedback. This engagement process will also introduce and lead in to the LTP 2018-2028.
63 The focus of the community engagement will be on:
· Describing any differences in draft budgets for 2017/18, including reasons for the differences and why they are not considered significant or material;
· Reminding the community about the activities and projects that were included in the LTP for the 2017/18 year and continue to be included in the draft budget; and
· Foreshadowing the LTP 2018-2028 process and opportunities for community involvement.
64 Opportunities for community feedback on the draft budgets will be confirmed in a subsequent report. The proposed community engagement activities will include:
· Information sent to every Dunedin household;
· Councillor face-to-face sessions open to all of the community;
· Social media through Facebook and Twitter;
· Networking with communities through Community Boards and other stakeholder groups; and
· Web information and feedback process (as well as hard copy).
65 All of the community feedback and an analysis of the feedback will be provided to the Council for its consideration prior to adopting the Annual Plan 2017/18. The feedback will also be used in the development of the LTP 2018-2028.
OPTIONS
66 Not applicable.
NEXT STEPS
67 Following confirmation of the proposed approach to community engagement by the Council, staff will develop an engagement document and a detailed engagement plan. This will be brought back to the Council for an initial review in late February 2017 and for final approval in March 2017.
68 Following the community engagement process, the community feedback will be provided to the Council in May 2017 to allow the Council to consider the community’s views on the draft budgets prior to adopting the 2017/18 Annual Plan in June 2017.
69 A budget update will be provided in May 2017 which will update the forecast for the 2016/17 year. This will take into account progress on the capital expenditure programme.
70 If you have questions about the budget materials please email them to Vivienne Harvey Personal Assistant to the Chief Executive Officer. Responses will be provided to all Councillors no later than Friday 20 January 2017.
Signatories
Author: |
Jane Nevill - Corporate Planner Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Sue Bidrose - Chief Executive Officer |
|
Title |
Page |
Draft Budget 2017/18 |
22 |
|
Capital Expenditure Programme |
25 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and meets the current and future needs of the Dunedin communities for good quality local infrastructure, public services and regulatory function in a way that is most cost effective for households and businesses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The Annual Plan is part of the Council’s strategic framework. Forecast budgets, projects and activities associated with the implementation of the other strategies are included in the Long Term Plan and reviewed in each Annual Plan Year. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. Engagement processes for the 2017/18 Annual Plan will need to ensure that there is opportunity for Māori to contribute. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability The LTP contains content regarding the Council’s approach to sustainability. Major issues and implications for sustainability are discussed in the 30 year infrastructure strategy and financial resilience is discussed in the Financial Strategy. This is reflected in the consideration of content in each Annual Plan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy This report notes the requirements for an Exceptions-Only Annual Plan. Accordingly this report indicates changes to LTP and Annual Plan budgets for the 2017/18 year. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The financial considerations are noted in the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance The Council’s budgets for 2017/18 have been updated and compared with the forecast for the 2017/18 year in the LTP. There are no significant or material changes to 2017/18 budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external The organisations involved in developing the budgets for 2017/18 are identified in the relevant reports. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The Executive Leadership Team, Finance staff, Policy staff and the Group and Activity Managers have been involved in developing the budgets and related financial information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflicts of interests. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards This material may be of interest to Community Boards. |
23 January 2017 |
|
Draft 2017/18 Budget - Water and Waste Group
Department: Community and Planning and Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides the draft 2017/18 budget for the Water and Waste Group. The Water and Waste Group includes the following activities:
· Water
· Wastewater
· Stormwater
That the Council: a) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the draft 2017/18 budget relating to Water and Waste as shown/amended in Attachment A. b) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the 2017/18 fees and charges for the Water and Wastewater activities as shown/amended in Attachment B. |
operating budgets
Revenue
Rates
2 The draft budgets incorporate an overall increase in rates of $1.699 million to fund the scheduled step-up in renewals expenditure and increases in staff and operational costs.
External revenue
3 External revenue has increased by $253k due to an increase in water meter charges and an increase in lease and licence to occupy revenue, for example, Swampy Summit.
Expenditure
Staff costs
4 Staff costs have increased by $298k. This increase incorporates an additional staff member to read water meters, previously contracted out, as well as provision for salary increases.
Asset operations and maintenance costs
5 Asset operations and maintenance costs have reduced by $265k due to savings in chemical costs.
Materials, supplies and services
6 The budget for materials, supplies and services has reduced by $108k. The main reason for this is the removal of the water meter reading contract costs which has been offset by an increase in staff costs.
Premises costs
7 Premises costs have increased by $151k, due mainly to increased rates expenditure.
Fees and levies
8 The budget for fees and levies has increased by $195k. This includes an allowance for engineering consultancy support to develop a preliminary South Dunedin flood mitigation plan, condition assessment of critical rising mains, support for ongoing system improvements and the provision of legal work that cannot be accommodated within the in-house legal team.
Internal Charges
9 Internal charges have increased by $378k. The main increases relate to sludge disposal costs, which have increased in line with the expected increase in landfill charges, and an increase in Fleet Operations charges due for an additional vehicle for a meter reader.
Depreciation
10 Depreciation has increased by $4.396 million due to an increase in the valuation of water and wastewater assets.
Interest
11 The budget for interest has reduced by $111k.
capital expenditure Budget
12 There is no change to the capital expenditure programme.
Fees and charges
13 Fees and charges for activities in Water and Waste have been increased by 3%. A copy of the group fees schedule is attached.
Service performance measures
14 There are no changes proposed to the measures and targets showing in the Long Term Plan 2015/16-2024/25 for Water and Waste in the 2017/18 year.
related reports
15 There are no related reports for Water and Waste.
Signatories
Author: |
Jane Nevill - Corporate Planner Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Laura McElhone - Group Manager Water and Waste |
|
Title |
Page |
Draft Budget 2017/18 - Water and Waste Group |
35 |
|
Fees and Charges - Water and Waste Group |
36 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and meets the current and future needs of the Dunedin communities for good quality local infrastructure in a way that is most cost effective for households and businesses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The activities of Water and Waste primarily contribute to the objectives and priorities of the above strategies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no known implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The report indicates changes to the LTP and Annual Plan budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The financial considerations are detailed in the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance and materiality There are no significant or material changes to the draft 2017/18 budgets for Water and Waste. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been no external engagement in developing the budgets for Water and Waste. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The Executive Leadership Team, Finance staff, Policy staff and the managers of Water and Waste have been involved in developing the budgets and related financial information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflict of interests. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards This material may be of interest to Community Boards. |
23 January 2017 |
|
Proposed Fees and Charges 2017/18
Fees include GST unless otherwise stated.
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Wastewater |
|||
Network Contributions for a Sewer Connection |
|||
Where there has been no prior contribution to the existing network there will be a standard Network Contribution fee for all of the Dunedin City Council areas |
5,000.00 |
5,000.00 |
5,150.00 |
Wastewater - Trade Waste Charges |
|||
The new charging model moves from three sets of unit rates for Trade Waste charging (one for each wastewater treatment plant catchment) to a single set of citywide unit rates. The new model introduces application fees based on customer category type. |
|||
City Wide Unit Rates |
|||
Volume per cubic metre |
0.07 |
0.08 |
0.08 |
BOD5 per kg |
0.07 |
0.08 |
0.08 |
NFR/TSS per kg |
0.17 |
0.19 |
0.19 |
Compliance Monitoring, Re-Inspection and Consent Breaches |
|||
Staff per hour |
105.00 |
108.15 |
111.00 |
Laboratory |
Variable Cost |
Variable Cost |
Variable Cost |
Mileage per km |
|
|
|
Tankered Waste Charges per tonne |
21.00 |
21.63 |
22.00 |
Consent Application Fee Category A |
969.00 |
998.07 |
1028.00 |
Consent Application Fee Category B |
321.00 |
330.63 |
340.00 |
Annual Fee |
161.00 |
165.83 |
171.00 |
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Water |
|||
Installation of New Services |
|||
Charges for the installation of new services are determined on a case-by-case basis and are provided as a fixed price quote to applicants. Alternatively, customers can elect to undertake this work themselves at their own risk by engaging a Council Approved Water Supply Connection Installer. That installer will do all work apart from making the connection to the live water main, which will be undertaken by Council staff. A fee for making the connection will be charged. |
|||
Network Contributions |
|||
Where there has been no prior contribution to the existing network there will be a standard Network Contribution fee for all of the Dunedin City Council areas |
5,000.00 |
5,000.00 |
5,000.00 |
New 20mm diameter domestic water connection |
Quoted |
Quoted |
Quoted |
Commercial or extraordinary water connection |
Quoted |
Quoted |
Quoted |
Disconnection of water supply |
207.00 |
207.00 |
213.00 |
Annual supply charge (meter rental) |
|||
20mm nominal diameter |
140.00 |
144.00 |
148.00 |
25mm nominal diameter |
179.00 |
184.00 |
190.00 |
30mm nominal diameter |
199.00 |
205.00 |
211.00 |
40mm nominal diameter |
225.00 |
232.00 |
239.00 |
50mm nominal diameter |
456.00 |
470.00 |
484.00 |
80mm nominal diameter |
564.00 |
581.00 |
598.00 |
100mm nominal diameter |
595.00 |
613.00 |
631.00 |
150mm nominal diameter |
855.00 |
881.00 |
907.00 |
300mm nominal diameter |
1,110.00 |
1,143.00 |
1,177.00 |
Hydrant Standpipe |
552.00 |
569.00 |
586.00 |
Re-connection Fee - Includes the removal of water restrictors installed due to non-compliance of the water bylaw |
371.00 |
371.00 |
382.00 |
Special Reading Fee |
50.00 |
50.00 |
52.00 |
Backflow Prevention Programme |
|||
Backflow Preventer Test Fee |
88.00 |
91.00 |
94.00 |
Rescheduled Backflow Preventer Test Fee |
52.00 |
53.00 |
54.00 |
Backflow programme - Incomplete Application Fees (hourly rate) |
39.00 |
39.00 |
39.00 |
Central Water Scheme Tariff for water sold by meter |
|||
Treated water per cubic metre |
1.43 |
1.47 |
1.56 |
Bulk Raw Water Tariff to: Merton, Hindon, and individual farm supplies (per cubic metre) |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
Rural Water Schemes have differing capital and connection charges—please contact the Water and Waste Services Department for further information. |
23 January 2017 |
|
Emissions Trading Scheme Liabilities and Proposed Carbon Management Policy
Department: Community and Planning and Strategy and Governance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 Changes to the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) will double the quantity of carbon credits (‘NZUs’) the Council needs to meet it ETS landfill liabilities (from around 25,000 to more than 50,000 NZUs) by 1 January 2019.
2 This impact of this is further exacerbated by changes to the cost of credits. In anticipation of the changes, the market price of NZUs’ increased from around $7 in mid-2015 to $13.50 in April 2016. NZUs are now trading at around $18.50 per NZU. An NZU price cap of $25 remains in place under the ETS.
3 This report responds to a Council resolution – from May 2016 when the Council considered a report on the (then) anticipated phase-out of the transitional treatment (one-for-one central Government subsidy) for landfill emission liabilities under the ETS – requesting options to reduce the Council’s ETS liability.
4 Options include: further recovery of costs through landfill charges; reducing the quantity of emissions to which the ETS directly applies; minimising the per-unit cost of NZUs through prudent purchasing and surrendering decisions; avoiding deforestation (and subsequent ETS liabilities) of Council-owned forest land; and evaluating opportunities to cost-effectively create NZUs through Council activities, business opportunities and strategic carbon management practices.
5 A DCC Carbon Management Policy is proposed for adoption, which would govern the management and minimisation of the Council’s carbon liabilities.
That the Council: a) Adopts the Carbon Management Policy attached to this report.
|
Background
6 The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) was established by the Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading) Amendment Act 2008, as the foundation for the country's principal greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme.
7 The DCC has a specific liability under the ETS as a landfill operator. The DCC must purchase or create enough NZUs to offset (the carbon equivalent of) methane emissions from its solid waste facilities and surrender these to the ETS administrator in May of each year to avoid statutory penalties.
8 Since 2009 ETS participants from the liquid fossil fuels, industrial processing, stationary energy and waste sectors have been allowed to surrender one NZU for every two tonnes of emissions (i.e. a 50% surrender obligation).
9 On 26 May 2016 the Government announced this one-for-two transitional measure would be phased out. From 1 January 2017 the surrender obligation will rise to 67%, then to 83% from 1 January 2018, and to 100% by 1 January 2019.
10 The Council also has contingent ETS liabilities as a result of its direct ownership of forest land, for which the Council previously received allocated NZUs from the Government. These direct holdings are in addition to forest land owned and managed by City Forests Limited (CFL), for which it also received allocated NZUs. If the Council or CFL were to deforest this land, it may be liable for the purchase, offsetting or creation of the corresponding number of NZUs.
11 Finally, the Council faces increased indirect costs arising from the ETS (e.g. through its purchase of energy).
12 In May 2016 the Council resolved:
“(Mayor Dave Cull/Cr Chris Staynes)
That the Council:
Requests a report back from staff identifying options for reducing Emissions Trading Scheme liability, no later than December 2016.
Motion carried (AP/2016/027)”
Discussion
13 A range of options to reduce the Council’s landfill ETS liabilities exist.
Landfill user charges
14 A first option is to recover ETS costs through user charges. The purpose of the ETS is to encourage reductions in emissions, rather than the purchase of NZUs. Accordingly, NZU pricing should be reflected in landfill charges as far as possible, to encourage waste minimisation by landfill users (but not so high as to encourage illegal dumping, which creates other costs). In the context of the current 2016/17 Annual Plan, the Council increased the budget for the Solid Waste activity to reflect the increase NZU prices from $7 in mid-2015 to $13.50 in May 2016, and increased relevant landfill user charges to recover these costs.
15 Since then the Government has confirmed the phase-out of transitional treatment of landfill ETS liabilities, and the NZU market price has further increased to around $18.50. The Council is yet to reflect the costs of increased NZU quantities required as a result of the ETS changes, or the latest market prices, in budgets or user charges.
16 The cost of the ETS changes based on indicative annual landfill emissions of around 50,000 tonnes is tabulated below over the phase-out period at the current budgeted price ($13.50), current market price ($18.50) and the ETS cap ($25.00):
DATE |
01/01/2016 |
01/01/2017 |
01/01/2018 |
01/01/2019 |
PRICE NZUs |
25,000 |
33,500 |
41,500 |
50,000 |
Budget ($13.50) |
$337,500 |
$452,250 |
$560,250 |
$675,000 |
Market ($18.50) |
$462,500 |
$619,750 |
$767,750 |
$925,000 |
ETS Cap ($25.00) |
$625,000 |
$837,500 |
$1,037,500 |
$1,250,000 |
17 Options for recovering actual costs will be addressed separately in the context of the Solid Waste activity budget for 2017/18.
Landfill liability reductions
18 A second option is to reduce the quantity of landfill emissions to which the ETS directly applies. Several potentially cost-effective actions previously reported to the Council (e.g. application for a Unique Emissions Factor, waste minimisation) are either being implemented or remain under consideration and development.
Prudent purchase and surrender of NZUs
19 A third option is to minimise the per-unit cost of NZUs through prudent NZU purchasing and surrendering decisions. This report recommends the adoption of a proposed Carbon Management Policy (the Policy), as presented in Attachment A, to more clearly govern NZU purchases, sales and reporting, aligned to the Dunedin City Council Treasury Risk Management Policy (Commodities).
Preservation and creation of NZUs
20 A fourth option is to consider opportunities to preserve or create NZUs (e.g. enhanced forestry management practices or additional tree planting on Council land). This will involve a degree of strategic innovation as well as risk, as the costs of preservation or creation must remain below the market value of NZUs for the activity to remain cost-effective. The proposed Policy (Attachment A) requires staff to identify and consider such opportunities within current and proposed business activities.
Indirect ETS cost reductions
21 The Council may also mitigate future indirect costs of the ETS (e.g. embedded in energy costs or project delivery) by reducing the Council’s carbon emissions generally. Again, the proposed Policy requires staff to identify and consider such opportunities.
22 The proposed Policy also aligns and addresses the Council’s other carbon management initiatives, objectives and obligations, including those outlined in the DCC Emissions Management and Reduction Plan, its participation in the Compact of Mayors, and its participation in the city-wide Energy Plan.
Options
Option One – Adopt the proposed Carbon Management Policy (Recommended Option)
23 It is recommended the Council adopt the proposed Carbon Management Policy.
Advantages
· Provides a policy framework for governing the management and minimisation of the Council’s ETS liabilities.
Disadvantages
· May not meet all of the Council’s expectations.
Option Two – Adopt a revised Carbon Management Policy
24 The Council may wish to revise the proposed Carbon Management Policy.
Advantages
· May better meet the Council’s preferences for a Carbon Management Policy.
Disadvantages
· None known.
Option Three – Do not adopt a Carbon Management Policy (Status Quo)
25 The Council may decline to adopt the proposed Carbon Management Policy.
Advantages
· None known.
Disadvantages
· The Council’s expectations for governing the management and minimisation of the Council’s ETS liabilities may be unclear.
· The Council is exposed to heightened risk of (ETS) statutory non-compliance, and potential financial, reputational and business sector damage.
Next Steps
26 If approved, the Carbon Management Policy will be implemented by management, including the development of associated operational guidelines, roles and responsibilities, and reporting/ monitoring and assurance mechanisms.
Signatories
Author: |
Bill Frewen - Senior Policy Analyst Andrew Slater - Risk and Internal Audit Manager |
Authoriser: |
Maria Ioannou - Corporate Policy Manager Sandy Graham - General Manager Strategy and Governance |
|
Title |
Page |
Proposed Carbon Management Policy |
45 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This proposal enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities, and to providing local infrastructure and it is considered good-quality and cost-effective. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
This proposal provides a policy framework for governing the management and minimisation of the Council’s ETS liabilities. The ETS is a national mechanism for participating in international climate change mitigation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement This proposal has no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability This proposal provides a policy framework for governing the management and minimisation of the Council’s ETS liabilities. The ETS is a national mechanism for participating in international climate change mitigation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy This proposal provides a policy framework for governing the management and minimisation of the Council’s ETS liabilities, which have direct costs to ratepayers and/or landfill users, and implications for the management of landfill, forest and other assets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The direct financial impacts of the ETS will be addressed separately in the context of the Solid Waste activity budget for 2017/18. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance The significance of this proposal is assessed as medium, as it involves the management of considerable risks or costs either to ratepayers and/or landfill users (or both). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external This proposal has not been subject to external consultation as the Council’s ETS liabilities are established by law. However, the public engagement during the development of Te Ao Tūroa – The Natural World: Dunedin’s Environment Strategy demonstrated strong public support for reducing city carbon emissions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal This proposal has been endorsed by all Groups expected to participate in the management and minimisation of the Council’s ETS liabilities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. This proposal provides a policy framework for governing the management and minimisation of the Council’s ETS liabilities. Non-compliance with ETS requirements could expose the council to potential liabilities and costs greater than the costs of ETS compliance. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There is no known conflict of interest associated with this proposal. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards There are no known impacts for Community Boards associated with this proposal. |
POLICY REGISTER
Department responsible: |
|
Policy number: |
|
Policy version: |
|
Review date: |
|
Contribution to strategic framework - specific priorities: |
|
Council 23 January 2017 |
|
Category Finance
Type Policy
Approved by Council
Date Policy Took Effect xxx
Last Approved Revision N/A
Sponsor Group Chief Financial Officer
Responsible Officer Group Chief Financial Officer
Review Date xxx
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Dunedin City Council (DCC) Carbon Management Policy (‘this Policy’) reflects the following statutory and strategic instruments articulating the Council’s carbon emission obligations and commitments.
1.2 NZ Emissions Trading Scheme
1.2.1 The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) is the New Zealand Government’s principal policy response to climate change. The ETS was established by the Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading) Amendment Act 2008 in order to: “… provide for the implementation, operation, and administration of a greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme in New Zealand that supports and encourages global efforts to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases.”
1.2.2 The ETS currently includes the NZ forestry, energy, industrial process and waste management sectors. Participants in the ETS are required to purchase and/or 'surrender' approved carbon credit units in exchange for equivalent tonnes of carbon emitted or released into the environment.
1.3 Dunedin City Strategic Framework
1.3.1 The DCC has adopted a framework of eight key strategies, including Te Ao Tūroa: The Natural World, which establishes a commitment to reducing city carbon emissions. As part of this commitment in 2015 the DCC became a signatory to the Compact of Mayors which involves reporting, planning and action towards reducing city carbon emissions.
1.3.2 Within Dunedin’s Economic Development Strategy, the Energy Plan is a Council-led city-wide initiative with amongst other goals, a goal of reducing city carbon emissions.
1.3.3 The internal DCC Emissions Management and Reduction Plan seeks to minimise the Council's direct carbon emissions.
1.4 This Policy also reflects the Council-wide commitment to sustainability and the principles of kaitiakitaka.
2 Policy PURPOSE
2.1 This Policy serves as a public commitment by the DCC to identify, manage and minimise carbon emissions.
2.2 This Policy seeks to ensure DCC continues to meet its statutory obligations with regard to carbon emissions and carbon credit trading activities, including in particular those responsibilities defined by the ETS.
2.3 This Policy also informs the effective management of all risks associated with DCC trading activities on the New Zealand and international carbon market, including fluctuations in emission unit prices and future liability exposure.
2.4 This Policy provides a clear set of guidelines by which the DCC shall manage its carbon management practices and associated business opportunities.
2.5 This Policy should be read in conjunction with the DCC Treasury Risk Management Policy (Commodities).
3 ORGANISATIONAL SCOPE
3.1 This Policy applies to:
3.1.1 All employees of the DCC, including temporary employees and contractors;
3.1.2 Any person who is involved in the operation of the DCC, including elected members, volunteers and those people with honorary or unpaid staff status;
3.1.3 Every business, service or activity of the DCC.
4 DEFINITIONS
4.1 'Carbon Credit': Generic term for any carbon emissions trading unit representing one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO²e). ETS-approved carbon credits include New Zealand issued units (NZUs) and Assigned Amount Units (NZAAUs). Carbon Credits may be purchased, sold, traded and/or offset against other carbon emitting activities on the carbon market as a means to manage an organisation's carbon footprint.
4.2 'Carbon Market': A system of carbon emissions trading that allows participants to buy and sell carbon credits and thereby manage their carbon footprints, targets and statutory responsibilities.
4.3 'Carbon Footprint': A formal measure of total CO2 emissions, calculated within a specific time period, organisation activity/ies or geographic boundary.
5 Carbon Management PRinciples
5.1 The DCC shall at all times:
5.1.1 Consider the impact of current and proposed business activities upon the DCC’s and the city's carbon footprint, as well as associated statutory obligations and carbon emission reduction targets.
5.1.2 Identify and preference those business opportunities that seek to minimise or reduce carbon emissions through operational efficiencies, energy and environmental sustainability, and increased carbon offsetting and sequestration potential.
5.1.3 Consider and prioritise energy and carbon-efficient alternatives when planning capital expenditure projects, including in particular those pertaining to DCC Property, Transport, Parks and Recreation, and Three Waters activities.
5.1.4 Identify, assess and monitor the carbon emission profiles and activities of external DCC contractors and other business partners engaged in project or service delivery.
6 Carbon Management Responsibilities
6.1 The DCC shall ensure appropriate delegated staff resourcing, responsibility and processes for responsible carbon management practices across all relevant business activities.
6.2 All DCC business units / teams shall ensure continued compliance with all applicable carbon emissions statutory obligations including the ETS, as well as DCC carbon management and emissions reduction initiatives, policies and procedures, staff responsibilities and delegations, financial practices and business activities.
6.3 Processes for the effective management and quantification of carbon emissions and ensuring protection against future liabilities (including those arising from business activities such as changes in land usage and deforestation, external market fluctuations and natural disasters) shall be established and maintained by Business Units/ teams, in collaboration with the DCC Finance Department and in accordance with the guidelines noted in this Policy.
6.4 All carbon credit transactions, including carbon market registration, credit purchases and sale/ transfers shall be undertaken with due probity and diligence by appropriately authorised staff and through accredited carbon market agents only.
6.5 Anticipated future liability and carbon credit risk exposure shall be established by relevant DCC departments in consultation with the DCC Finance Department, and reviewed no less than annually.
6.6 At a minimum, the DCC Finance Department shall maintain sufficient carbon credits to cover anticipated statutory obligations (including the NZ ETS) and future liability arising from DCC business activities, or alternatively allocate sufficient budget to purchase equivalent carbon credits on the carbon market.
6.7 Any decision to trade carbon credits, and/or offset liability shall reflect appropriate due diligence, be subject to appropriate DCC delegated approval processes, and consider all associated impacts including dividend and tax consequences.
6.8 Under no circumstances should DCC carbon credits be used for financial speculation. The DCC may take steps to realise value from carbon credits only if:
6.8.1 The transaction would result in a net benefit to the DCC, and;
6.8.2 Realising value from transactions will not compromise the DCC’s ability to meet its emissions targets, obligations and liabilities.
7 Reporting
7.1 Comprehensive carbon records shall be maintained by all relevant DCC departments that detail at a minimum business activity carbon emissions, carbon credit liabilities (ETS and other) and (current/ proposed) changes arising from business activities, carbon credit transactions (sale, purchase, surrender, offset) and emission reduction or management targets.
7.2 Carbon records will be monitored by the DCC Executive Leadership Team and the Financial Controller as required to ensure compliance with this Policy, an appropriate level of liability and risk management, and compliance with DCC carbon targets and obligations.
7.3 This Policy shall be subject to on-going review and updates as required to address changes in New Zealand and international carbon credit and emissions legislation and statutory obligations, and ensure alignment with DCC strategic objectives.
8 RELEVANT DOCUMENTS
8.1 Te Ao Tūroa: The Natural World – Dunedin’s Environment Strategy
8.2 Dunedin’s Economic Development Strategy and Energy Plan 1.0
8.3 DCC Emissions Management and Reduction Plan
8.4 DCC Treasury Risk Management Policy (Commodities)
23 January 2017 |
|
Draft 2017/18 Budget - Solid Waste
Department: Community and Planning and Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides the draft 2017/18 budget for Solid Waste.
That the Council: a) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the draft 2017/18 budget relating to Solid Waste as shown/amended in Attachment A. b) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the 2017/18 fees and charges for Solid Waste as shown/amended in Attachment B. |
operating budgets
Revenue
External revenue
2 External revenue has increased by $1.251 million due to increased emissions trading scheme (ETS) costs needing to be recovered as well as an increase in volumes of waste to the landfill.
Internal revenue
3 Internal revenue has increased by $415k due to higher landfill disposal revenue from the Water and Waste Group for the disposal of sludge. The increase is driven by the increase of prices at the landfill.
Expenditure
Asset operations and maintenance costs
4 Asset operations and maintenance costs have increased by $1.398 million. Landfill contract costs have increased by $772k due to increased volumes of waste and an inflationary adjustment. ETS costs have increased by $509k based on anticipated market price ($25 per tonne) and anticipated waste volumes.
Fees and levies
5 Fees and levies have increased by $205k. This provides funding for ongoing work on planning for the future of the landfill operation. It also provides additional funding for the waste disposal levy paid to the Ministry for the Environment, which is based on waste volume.
Net Surplus/(Deficit)
6 The annual contribution to rates from Solid Waste has increased by $353k due to additional revenue and reduced capital expenditure requirements for the 2017/18 year.
capital expenditure Budget
7 No change to the capital expenditure programme.
fees and charges
8 Fees and charges for Solid Waste have been reviewed and adjusted to reflect increases to ETS costs and more clearly differentiate the fee groups where ETS is applicable.
9 Fees have increased by 3% in line with budget parameters and by a further 8.5% for fees where ETS costs apply. A copy of the fees schedule is attached; fees where ETS costs do not apply are shown in bold blue font. Some fees are unchanged from 2016/17 or slightly reduced as a result of a review, for example fees for 100% vegetation loads. A copy of the fees schedule is attached.
Service performance measures
10 There are no changes proposed to the measures and targets showing in the Long Term Plan 2015/16-2024/25 for Solid Waste in the 2017/18 year.
related reports
11 There is a related report for Solid Waste: “Emissions trading scheme liabilities and proposed carbon management policy”.
Signatories
Author: |
Jane Nevill - Corporate Planner Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Laura McElhone - Group Manager Water and Waste |
|
Title |
Page |
Draft Budget 2017/18 - Solid Waste |
52 |
|
Fees and Charges - Solid Waste |
53 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and meets the current and future needs of the Dunedin communities for good quality local infrastructure and public services in a way that is most cost effective for households and businesses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The activities of Solid Waste primarily contribute to the objectives and priorities of the above strategies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no known implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The report indicates changes to the LTP and Annual Plan budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The financial considerations are detailed in the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance and materiality There are no significant or material changes to the draft 2017/18 budgets for Solid Waste. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been no external engagement in developing the budgets for Solid Waste. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The Executive Leadership Team, Finance staff, Policy staff and the managers of Solid Waste have been involved in developing the budgets and related financial information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflict of interests. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards This material may be of interest to Community Boards. |
23 January 2017 |
|
Proposed Fees and Charges 2017/18
Bold blue font indicates 3% fees increase.
Black font indicates fees where ETS costs apply. These are increased by 3% plus a further 8.5%.
Fees include GST unless otherwise stated.
|
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
Waste Management - Solid Waste Landfill Charges |
||
Landfill Charges – For all DCC landfills and transfer stations |
||
Small Vehicle Charges |
||
Non-DCC Refuse bag – per bag, (max size 80 litres) |
3.00 |
3.50 |
Multiple bags will be charged at $3 each. The maximum charge would be the appropriate vehicle rate. |
||
Car – small load |
14.00 |
16.00 |
Car – large load |
32.00 |
36.00 |
Wool pack per pack or part pack |
14.00 |
16.00 |
Wheelie Bin per bin or part bin |
14.00 |
16.00 |
Station wagon – small load |
23.00 |
26.00 |
Station wagons – large load |
51.00 |
57.00 |
Cars and single axle trailers, vans and utes – small load |
34.00 |
38.00 |
Cars and single axle trailers, vans and utes – large load |
64.00 |
72.00 |
Clay Cover (clay) |
10.00 |
10.00 |
Note: Clay cover charges are subject to seasonal variation in line with day light saving time i.e. is taken free of charge during the warmer months. Cover is not accepted at Middlemarch Transfer Station |
||
Cleanfill |
19.00 |
21.00 |
Note: Cleanfill is not accepted at Middlemarch Transfer Station |
||
Demolition |
31.00 |
32.00 |
Note: Demolition Waste is not accepted at Middlemarch Transfer Station |
||
Car tyres – each |
5.00 |
5.00 |
Vehicle bodies |
82.00 |
84.00 |
Vegetation |
||
Note: Mixed loads of vegetation and general waste must be clearly separable for composting and landfill disposal |
||
Car – small load (mixed load) |
10.00 |
10.00 |
Car – small load 100% veg |
|
9.00 |
Car – large load (mixed load) |
23.00 |
24.00 |
Car - large load 100% veg |
|
23.00 |
Wool pack 100% veg |
10.00 |
9.00 |
Wheelie Bin per bin 100% veg |
10.00 |
9.00 |
Station wagon – small (mixed load) |
14.00 |
14.00 |
Station wagon – small 100% veg |
|
13.00 |
Station wagon – large load (mixed load) |
35.00 |
36.00 |
Station wagon – large load 100% veg |
|
34.00 |
Car with single axle trailer, van or ute (small mixed load) |
21.00 |
22.00 |
Car with single axle trailer, van and ute 100% veg (small load) |
|
21.00 |
Car and single axle trailer, van and ute – (large mixed load) |
44.00 |
45.00 |
Car and single axle trailer, van and ute 100% veg |
|
42.00 |
Large Vehicle Charges |
|
|
Charges by weight at the Green Island Landfill (Weighbridge ) per tonne |
||
General solid waste per tonne |
153.00 |
171.00 |
minimum charge |
74.00 |
86.00 |
Green Waste per tonne (100% vegetation) |
88.00 |
91.00 |
minimum charge |
44.00 |
46.00 |
Clean fill per tonne (dry) |
15.00 |
15.00 |
minimum charge |
15.00 |
15.00 |
Clean fill per tonne |
36.00 |
37.00 |
minimum charge |
36.00 |
37.00 |
Cover per tonne |
5.00 |
5.00 |
minimum charge |
5.00 |
5.00 |
Demolition waste per tonne (no timber or organic material) |
36.00 |
37.00 |
minimum charge |
35.00 |
37.00 |
Public weigh (weigh only) |
12.60 |
12.60 |
Charges by volume at transfer stations/landfills without a weighbridge (Middlemarch and Waikouaiti) |
||
General solid waste per cubic metre |
82.00 |
95.00 |
minimum charge |
82.00 |
95.00 |
Vegetation per cubic metre |
67.00 |
69.00 |
minimum charge |
67.00 |
69.00 |
Special/hazardous waste |
||
Sludges and liquids (solids content at least 20%) – per tonne |
227.00 |
254.00 |
minimum charge |
113.00 |
127.00 |
Sludges and liquids (solids content less than 20%) per tonne |
284.00 |
319.00 |
minimum charge |
142.00 |
160.00 |
Foundry sands per tonne |
36.00 |
37.00 |
minimum charge |
36.00 |
37.00 |
Contaminated soil – per tonne (low level) |
36.00 |
37.00 |
minimum charge |
36.00 |
37.00 |
Tyres (per tonne) |
345.00 |
366.00 |
Oil (per litre) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Household chemicals (inclusive of Car small load fee) |
13.00 |
16.00 |
Gas bottles (each) |
10.00 |
10.00 |
Definitions: |
||
Cover: |
||
Cover is clay, sand and soil, which is free of contaminants that may cause harm to human health or the environment. |
||
Cleanfill: |
||
Cleanfill is a natural material such as clay, soil and rock and other such materials as concrete, brick or products which are free of combustible or organic materials and are therefore not subject to biological or chemical breakdown. |
||
Demolition: |
||
Demolition is concrete, bricks, roading material, concrete pipes and earthenware pipes. The maximum size of demolition material is one metre in any direction. Material is to be clean, no asbestos, no rubbish, no individual steel pieces included and contain less than 10% organic material (eg vegetation, wood) by volume. Reinforcing steel protruding from concrete must be less than 500 mm in length. |
||
Special/hazardous waste: |
||
The following materials require special handling to protect both the environment and human health. Green Island landfill is the only landfill in the city consented for special and hazardous waste disposal. You must advise the booth operator on your arrival to the landfill that you have special or hazardous waste on board. |
||
Special Waste: |
||
Materials that may pose a risk to the environment or human health if not disposed of carefully and include animal carcasses, commercial sludge’s and bio-solids from septic tanks and the Council's waste water treatment plants. |
||
Hazardous waste: |
||
Materials that have the following properties; are flammable, explosive, oxidising, corrosive, toxic, eco-toxic, radioactive, infectious, mutagenic, carcinogenic, and teratogenic. Examples include solvents and industrial cleaning fluids, medical waste, agricultural chemicals and many industrial wastes. |
||
Other Charges |
|
|
e-Waste at the Recycling Centre |
|
|
TVs |
As per recovery costs |
As per recovery costs |
Computer Monitors |
||
Desktop computers, laptops, laptop batteries and peripherals (keyboard/mouse/external hard drives) |
||
Printers, Faxes and Photocopiers – at Recycling Centre |
||
UPS Networking equipment |
||
After Hours Opening Fee |
|
|
Opening Fee |
433.00 |
433.00 |
Booth operation costs – per hour (plus any additional machine fees) |
88.00 |
88.00 |
Refuse Collection |
|
|
All Council-provided refuse collection services are ‘polluter pays’ with the authorised bags being available at a number of outlets throughout the city including supermarkets and dairies. The authorised bags are also available from Council Customer Service Agencies. |
||
65 Litre bags |
2.65 |
3.00 |
40 Litre bags |
2.50 |
2.80 |
23 January 2017 |
|
Update on the Tertiary Precinct Safety and Accessibility Upgrade
Department: Transport
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the Tertiary Precinct Safety and Accessibility Upgrade project.
2 The Tertiary Precinct Safety and Accessibility Upgrade is an unfunded project in the 2015/16 – 2024/25 Long Term Plan. This report summarises the work completed on this project and recommends that collaboration with the tertiary institutions continues and that staff report back to Council at the next Long Term Plan with options for implementation.
That the Council: a) Notes the update on the tertiary precinct safety and accessibility upgrade. b) Requests that staff report back to the 2018/2019 – 2027/28 Long Term Plan with funding and timing options to deliver the project. |
BACKGROUND
3 The aim of the Tertiary Precinct Safety and Accessibility Upgrade would be to improve the safety and accessibility of the Tertiary Precinct, with particular emphasis on the streetscape and pedestrian/cycling environment. The project is identified in the Dunedin City Integrated Transport Strategy (2013) as it would contribute to the vision and areas of focus (‘safety’ and ‘travel choices’) identified in the strategy.
4 The project has been driven by the Tertiary Sector Steering Group (consisting of the CEO and Mayor from the DCC, the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Otago, and the CEO of the Otago Polytechnic). The aims are in line with actions and priorities identified in the Tertiary Precinct Development Plan, which was developed and agreed by the partners in 2008.
5 At the Long Term Plan meeting in May 2015 the project was discussed and the following resolutions put and carried (MacTavish/Wilson):
"That the Council:
Continues to note the unfunded Tertiary Precinct Transportation project consulted on in the LTP consultation document as a line item in the 2015/16 – 2024/25 LTP.
Request staff continue to work with project partners, to scope funding requirements and timing, and report back in time for development of the 2018/21 – 2027/28 LTP."
6 Later in the meeting the projects were discussed again, and the following resolution was put and carried (MacTavish/Calvert):
“That the Council:
Request a report back in time for the 2016/17 annual plan process with more detail on the proposed scope, budget and timing of both:
- The Mosgiel Town Centre Upgrade and
- The Tertiary Precinct Safety and Accessibility Upgrade”
DISCUSSION
Project Objectives
7 The overarching objectives for the project were identified at a workshop with the Tertiary Precinct Steering Group as follows:
· Establish the Tertiary Precinct as a destination (not a through route)
· Establish future focussed, multi-purpose streets and an environment that enhances lifestyle as well as safety
· Improve the pedestrian and cycling experience in and around the tertiary campuses
· Establish improved network connections between tertiary campuses, Central City, harbour and Waters of Leith
· Address existing and / or potential future safety issues
· Maintain and improve wider transport network connections and functionality
8 In late 2014, the Tertiary Precinct Partners engaged consultants Chow Hill and Flow Transportation to develop the Tertiary Streets Improvement Options Report. The work was funded through a cost-sharing arrangement, with each of the three partners contributing a third of the cost.
9 The objectives of the Tertiary Streets Improvement Options Report were to;
· establish an overall approach to improving open space amenity, character and associated precinct identity
· address a number of safety and accessibility issues within the study area
· identify short, medium and long term physical works projects and project interdependencies
· identify a range of investment options; and provide recommendations for implementation.
10 The Tertiary Streets Improvement Options Report was received by the Tertiary Steering and Planning Groups in January 2015. Since that time the Tertiary Precinct Steering and Planning Groups have agreed at their meetings that their priorities for implementation are sections of Albany Street, Clyde Street, Union Street East, and Harbour Terrace (see Attachment 1 for map). The concepts and cross sections are shown in Attachment 2, and artist’s impressions in Attachment 3. The proposed changes are summarised in Table 2.
11 The Tertiary Precinct Steering and Planning Groups have agreed that the medium investment option is preferred. The concept estimates for street changes at the medium investment level are in the region of $5-$7 million. This does not include project management and developed design costs, which are estimated at $300,000. Should the project proceed, cost sharing between the organisations is anticipated, but is yet to be negotiated. The Partners’ have indicated a preference that any works be jointly planned and implemented, rather than completed ‘ad hoc’, but this arrangement has not yet been formally considered by the governance representatives of each organisation.
12 Targeted consultation with stakeholders in the area was carried out as part of the development of the concept plans (Sport Otago (representing Sports Clubs in the area), Blackhead Quarries, Forsyth Barr Stadium, Cerebos Greggs, Otago Regional Council and NZ Transport Agency). Representatives from the University of Otago, Dunedin City Council and Otago Polytechnic were involved throughout. However broad consultation is yet to take place with stakeholders or the wider community on the concept designs.
13 Water and Waste Services are planning to renew pipes in the Union Street sections, and in Harbour Terrace, plus undertake repairs in Clyde Street. Nothing is planned for Albany Street. Work is due to commence in 2016/17. However, there is some flexibility around timing, particularly if there is a confirmed improvement project proposed for the streets. It is possible to delay the works such that they are completed by 2020/21 at the latest.
Funding
14 The costs of the initial concept development work were split equally between the three partners. There is no cost sharing agreement in place between the three partner organisations for further work on this project. Developed design, project management and construction cost sharing would need to be negotiated if the Council and partners decide the project is to proceed.
15 For Dunedin City Council, the project is in the Integrated Transport Strategy and in currently in the Long Term Plan as an unfunded item.
16 Otago Polytechnic has confirmed it has provisionally set aside $1.5m in its 10 year capital budget plan for the project but there is no confirmed plan or timeframe associated with this funding.
17 The University of Otago is supportive of the project, which has been demonstrated by previous contributions. While it does not have a specific budget identified it will be considered at the appropriate time in the future.
18 If the project were to proceed, there are different ways in which costs could be split between the organisations. Consideration would need to be given to costs of developing the design, project management, detailed design, construction and ongoing maintenance/whole of life costs.
OPTIONS
19 As this is a report for noting there are no options to consider.
NEXT STEPS
20 Staff will continue to work with the Otago University and Otago Polytechnic staff to identify and deliver minor improvement projects in the precinct.
21 Work will commence on developing the designs, funding options and a potential delivery programme for the broader streetscape upgrade to be reported back to the 2018/19 – 2027/28 LTP.
Signatories
Author: |
Richard Saunders - Acting Group Manager Transport |
Authoriser: |
Ruth Stokes - General Manager Infrastructure and Networks |
There are no attachments for this report.
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This matter relates to providing good quality, cost effective local infrastructure for Dunedin. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The Tertiary Precinct Safety and Accessibility Upgrade would contribute to delivering the key city strategies by contributing to safety and accessibility within areas of high pedestrian activity and encouraging mode shift. A more attractive streetscape may bring economic benefits to the city particularly in terms of the attractiveness of the Tertiary institutions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability Making walking and cycling safer and more attractive options can contribute to sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The project is included in the LTP as an unfunded item. The next stage of work will be funded through existing budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations There are no financial implications from this report, it is an update only. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance Future changes to the Tertiary Precinct would be considered of medium significance and require public consultation. As there are no changes proposed at this time this report is considered of low significance. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external The Tertiary Precinct Partners have been engaged in the development of the Tertiary Streets Improvement Options Report. Sport Otago, Forsyth Barr Stadium, Cerebos Greggs, Blackhead Quarries, Otago Regional Council and NZ Transport Agency were also consulted as part of previous work. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal City Development and Water and Waste departments have been consulted. Further consultation will be required during the planning phase. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflicts of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards No consultation has been undertaken with Community Boards. |
Council 23 January 2017 |
|
Draft 2017/18 Budget - Transport Group
Department: Community and Planning and Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides the draft 2017/18 budget for the Transport Group.
That the Council: a) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the draft 2017/18 budget relating to the Transport Group as shown/amended in Attachment A. b) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the 2017/18 fees and charges for the Transport Group as shown/amended in Attachment B. |
operating budgets
Revenue
Rates
2 Rates revenue in Transport has reduced for the 2017/18 year by $956k. This change is the result of a reconsideration of capacity to complete programmed work within the timeframe of the 2016/17 and 2017/18 years.
External revenue
3 The external revenue budget has increased by $8.649 million. Most of this increase relates to NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) subsidies for capital expenditure projects.
4 NZTA Operational Subsidy – an increase of $1.273 million relates to increases in expenditure, improved processes resulting in additional revenue and a budget shift from internal revenue.
5 ORC Bus Route Maintenance and Shelters – an increase of $258k for the recovery of expenditure on new bus shelters.
6 NZTA Capital Subsidy – an increase of $4.545 million reflects the scheduled increase in the capital expenditure programme in Transport, particularly the Portobello/Harington Point Road Safety Improvement Project.
7 Urban Cycleway Funding – an increase of $2.600 million of Government funding to go towards capital expenditure on cycleways.
Internal revenue
8 Internal revenue is reduced by $674k. This was previously for the recovery of staff costs directly related to capital expenditure projects. This revenue is now reflected in NZTA operational subsidies.
Expenditure
Staff costs
9 Staff costs have increased by $107k. This increase incorporates the provision for salary increases and one additional staff member in the Network Development team for corridor access work.
Asset operations and maintenance / materials, supplies and services
10 Asset operations and maintenance expenditure has increased by $850k. Roading maintenance costs have increased due to new maintenance contract prices and reflecting costs required to maintain service levels. An increase of $253k is included for new bus shelters.
11 Offsetting these increases is a transfer of the vegetation control budget to Parks and Recreation and a reallocation of the energy budget for state highway lights and signals to energy costs.
Energy Costs
12 Energy costs have increased by $209k due to the reallocation of costs between maintenance and energy for street lights.
Insurance
13 The allocation of insurance expenditure has increased by $148k based on the insured value of infrastructure assets.
Internal Charges
14 Internal charges have increased by $164k mainly due to additional BIS costs and for additional support from the Council Communications and Marketing Activity.
Depreciation
15 Depreciation has increased by $745k due to an increase in valuation.
Interest
16 Interest expense has increased by $252k reflecting the capital expenditure programme.
capital expenditure Budget
17 The following changes have been incorporated into the capital expenditure programme:
a) Portobello/Harington Point Road Improvement – the following table provides the approved and anticipated spend for 2016/17 to 2018/19.
$m |
Annual Plan 2016/17 |
Draft budget 2017/18 |
2016/17 |
10.3 |
3.0 |
2017/18 |
9.4 |
9.0 |
2018/19 |
|
7.7 |
Total |
19.7 |
19.7 |
b) LED Street Lights – the revised timing of expenditure on LED streetlights reflects the focus for the 2016/17 year being on planning and procurement with implementation planned for the following two years. The following table provides the approved and anticipated spend for 2016/17 to 2018/19.
$m |
Annual Plan 2016/17 |
Draft budget 2017/18 |
2016/17 |
3.0 |
1.0 |
2017/18 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
2018/19 |
|
2.0 |
Total |
6.0 |
6.0 |
c) Strategic Cycle Network – revised timing with the focus for 2017/18 on the Urban Cycleway Fund project, therefore delaying other cycle network budget to future years. Delayed funding spread across three years. The following table provides the approved and anticipated spend for 2016/17 to 2018/19.
$m |
Annual Plan 2016/17 |
Draft budget 2017/18 |
2016/17 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
2017/18 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
2018/19 |
2.0 |
2.6 |
2019/20 |
1.4 |
2.1 |
2020/21 |
1.4 |
2.1 |
Total |
7.3 |
7.3 |
d) Central City Project – the urban amenity budget has been transferred from City Development so that all Central City budgets are in the same budget.
fees and charges
18 Fees and charges for Transport have been increased by 3%. A copy of the fees schedule is attached.
Service performance measures
19 There are no changes proposed to the measures and targets showing in the Long Term Plan 2015/16-2024/25 for the Transport Group in the 2017/18 year.
related reports
20 There is a related report for the Transport Group: “Tertiary precinct safety and accessibility upgrade”.
Signatories
Author: |
Jane Nevill - Corporate Planner Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Ruth Stokes - General Manager Infrastructure and Networks |
|
Title |
Page |
Draft Budget 2017/18 - Transport Group |
68 |
|
Fees and Charges - Transport Group |
69 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and meets the current and future needs of the Dunedin communities for good quality local infrastructure in a way that is most cost effective for households and businesses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The activities the Transport Group primarily contribute to the objectives and priorities of the above strategies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no known implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The report indicates changes to the LTP and Annual Plan budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The financial considerations are detailed in the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance and materiality There are no significant or material changes to the draft 2017/18 budgets for the Transport Group. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been no external engagement in developing the budgets for the Transport Group. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The Executive Leadership Team, Finance staff, Policy staff and the managers of the Transport Group have been involved in developing the budgets and related financial information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflict of interests. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards This material may be of interest to Community Boards. |
23 January 2017 |
|
Proposed Fees and Charges 2017/18
Fees include GST unless otherwise stated.
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Transport |
|||
The fee to process a road stopping proposal (the applicant must also pay the actual costs involved in the stopping and the value of the land) |
845.00 |
870.00 |
896.00 |
Encroachments on road reserve (per annum) |
|||
New application establishment administration fee |
52.00 |
52.00 |
54.00 |
Site development |
7.5% of adjacent unimproved rated value $/m2 |
7.5% of adjacent unimproved rated value $/m2 |
7.5% of adjacent unimproved rated value $/m2 |
Residential – Single garage <25m² |
116.00 |
119.00 |
123.00 |
Residential – Double garage <50m² |
233.00 |
240.00 |
247.00 |
Commercial Use |
Negotiated based upon 2014/15 valuation plus 3% |
Negotiated based upon 2015/16 valuation plus 3% |
Negotiated based upon 2016/17 valuation plus 3% |
Consent application fee for non-standard sign and other uses |
201.00 |
207.00 |
213.00 |
Fill points for private fuel lines on road reserve (per annum) |
52.00 |
52.00 |
54.00 |
Overhead/Underground pedestrian road crossings |
Varies* |
Varies* |
Varies* |
*Crossings are on a ‘lease’ basis with payment being on a ‘fixed term’ basis or subject to a yearly review. |
|||
Corridor Access Requests (CAR) |
|||
Corridor Access Fee (incorporating the completion and maintenance inspections) |
287.50 |
287.00 |
296.00 |
Re-inspection Fee (Non-Conforming works) |
115.00 |
115.00 |
118.00 |
Penalty Fee for No/Unapproved CAR |
575.00 |
575.00 |
592.00 |
Openings less than 0.25m² |
No fee* |
No fee* |
No fee* |
Footpath (shallow transverse crossings) |
No fee* |
No fee* |
No fee* |
*Providing an application is submitted |
23 January 2017 |
|
Draft 2017/18 Budget - Parks and Recreation Group
Department: Community and Planning and Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides the draft 2017/18 budget for the Parks and Recreation Group. The Parks and Recreation Group includes the following activities:
· Aquatic Services
· Botanic Garden
· Cemeteries and Crematorium
· Parks and Recreation
That the Council: a) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the draft 2017/18 budget relating to Parks and Recreation as shown/amended in Attachment A. b) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the 2017/18 fees and charges for Aquatics; Cemeteries and Crematorium; and Parks and Recreation activities as shown/amended in Attachment B. |
operating budgets
Revenue
Rates
2 The
overall increase in the rates requirement for this group of activities is
$3.711 million. The majority of this increase is in the Parks and
Recreation budget to fund increases in contracts and building maintenance
costs.
External revenue
3 Cemeteries and Crematorium – the revenue budget has reduced due to more accurate forecasting for burials and service fees.
4 Parks and Recreation – vegetation contracts previously included in the Transport budget have are now managed by the Parks and Recreation team. As a result, subsidies from New Zealand Transport Agency are recorded in this budget which is the main reason for the increase of $344k in external revenue.
Expenditure
Staff costs
5 Staff costs have increased by $119k. This includes an additional Parks Officer to manage the Transport vegetation contracts as well as an allowance for staff salary increases.
Asset operations and maintenance costs
6 Asset operations and maintenance costs have increased by $4.040 million. Parks and Recreation have renewed contracts to maintain Dunedin’s parks and reserves, cemeteries and trees. The new contracts have resulted in an increase in cost.
7 Vegetation control was previously managed and funded within the Transport activity but is now managed by Parks and Recreation (see income note 4).
8 Building maintenance budgets have increased due to deferred maintenance on Parks assets, in particular recreation facilities such as gyms, toilets and changing rooms and buildings at the Botanic Garden.
Fees and levies
9 The budget for fees and levies has increased by $217k to provide contract auditing and external legal advice.
Grants and subsidies
10 A reduction in grants and subsidies expenditure of $537k reflects the removal of one-off budgets in the 2016/17 year for the Kings Hockey turf of $510k and the cricket scoreboard of $70k.
Internal charges
11 Internal charges have increased by $221k. BIS charges represent $131k of this increase.
Depreciation
12 Depreciation increased by $338k. This is mainly due to an increase in the valuation of playground equipment.
capital expenditure Budget
13 Botanic Garden - a 2017/18 year budget of $150k for the renewal of an entranceway sculpture and paving has been removed from the budget.
14 Cemeteries and Crematorium – a 2017/18 budget of $105k for the renewal of vehicle and pedestrian access ways has been removed from the budget because these renewals will now be undertaken within the Transport activity.
fees and charges
15 Fees and charges for activities in the Parks and Recreation group have been increased by 3%. A copy of the fees schedule for is attached. Changes to the Aquatic Services fees schedule are highlighted.
Service performance measures
16 There are no changes proposed to the measures and targets showing in the Long Term Plan 2015/16-2024/25 for Parks and Recreation in the 2017/18 year.
related reports
17 There are no related reports for Parks and Recreation.
Signatories
Author: |
Jane Nevill - Corporate Planner Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Ruth Stokes - General Manager Infrastructure and Networks |
|
Title |
Page |
Draft Budget 2017/18 - Parks and Recreation Group |
74 |
|
Fees and Charges - Parks and Recreation Group |
75 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and meets the current and future needs of the Dunedin communities for good quality local infrastructure and public services in a way that is most cost effective for households and businesses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The activities of Parks and Recreation primarily contribute to the objectives and priorities of the above strategies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no known implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The report indicates changes to the LTP and Annual Plan budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The financial considerations are detailed in the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance and materiality There are no significant or material changes to the draft 2017/18 budgets for Parks and Recreation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been no external engagement in developing the budgets for Parks and Recreation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The Executive Leadership Team, Finance staff, Policy staff and the managers of Parks and Recreation have been involved in developing the budgets and related financial information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflict of interests. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards This material may be of interest to Community Boards. |
23 January 2017 |
|
Proposed Fees and Charges 2017/18
Fees include GST unless otherwise stated.
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
|||
$ |
$ |
$ |
||||
Aquatic Services |
||||||
Definitions: |
||||||
Concession rate: Current Community Services Card, Gold Card and Student Tertiary ID Card |
The word 'Student' was omitted in error in 2016/17 and is reinstated |
|||||
Child is recognised as anyone who has not left secondary school |
||||||
Family is either 2 adults and 2 children or 1 adult and up to 4 children |
||||||
CASUAL RATES - MOANA POOL |
||||||
Swim |
||||||
Adult Swim |
6.20 |
6.50 |
6.50 |
|||
Concession Swim |
3.70 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|||
Child Swim |
3.10 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
|||
Family Swim |
13.40 |
14.00 |
14.00 |
|||
Child – Clubcard holder |
2.10 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
|||
Toddler Time |
4.00 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|||
School Swim |
1.50 |
1.50 |
1.50 |
|||
External preemployment swim test |
|
|
10.00 |
new |
||
Moana Pool Hydro Slide |
||||||
Family Swim and Slide |
28.80 |
30.00 |
30.00 |
|||
Adult Swim and Slide |
11.20 |
11.50 |
11.50 |
|||
Concession Swim and Slide |
7.80 |
8.00 |
8.00 |
|||
Child Swim and Slide |
6.20 |
6.50 |
6.50 |
|||
Spectator |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
|||
Gym (includes swim) |
||||||
Adult |
12.40 |
13.00 |
13.00 |
|||
Concession |
7.40 |
7.50 |
7.50 |
|||
Child (14yrs+) |
6.20 |
6.50 |
6.50 |
|||
Group-fitness (includes swim) |
||||||
Adult |
6.20 |
6.50 |
6.50 |
|||
Concession |
5.10 |
5.50 |
5.50 |
|||
Child |
5.10 |
5.50 |
5.50 |
|||
MULTI-VISIT PASSES |
||||||
Adult |
||||||
Swim (12) |
62.00 |
64.00 |
64.00 |
|||
Swim (30) |
148.80 |
153.50 |
153.50 |
|||
Group-fitness (12) |
62.00 |
64.00 |
65.00 |
price change |
||
Group-fitness (30) |
|
|
169.00 |
Added to reflect demand from customers |
||
Concession |
||||||
Swim (12) |
37.00 |
38.00 |
38.00 |
|||
Swim (30) |
88.80 |
91.50 |
91.50 |
|||
Group-fitness (12) |
51.00 |
52.50 |
55.00 |
price change |
||
Group-fitness (30) |
|
|
143.00 |
Added to reflect demand from customers |
||
Child |
||||||
Swim (12) |
31.00 |
32.00 |
|
|||
Swim (30) |
74.40 |
76.50 |
|
|||
Group-fitness (12) |
51.00 |
52.50 |
55.00 |
Price change |
||
SWIM MEMBERSHIPS |
||||||
Note: Membership specials may be run periodically throughout the year at the discretion of Aquatic Services |
||||||
Adult |
||||||
6 Month Membership |
236.90 |
244.00 |
244.00 |
|||
12 Month Membership |
412.00 |
424.50 |
424.50 |
|||
Concession |
||||||
6 Month Membership |
142.10 |
146.50 |
146.50 |
|||
Student Swim membership (valid 1 March - 30 November) |
195.70 |
201.50 |
201.50 |
Wording changed to reflect the time limited concession |
||
12 Month Membership |
247.20 |
254.50 |
254.50 |
|||
Child |
||||||
6 Month Membership |
118.50 |
122.00 |
122.00 |
|||
12 Month Membership |
206.00 |
212.00 |
212.00 |
|||
ALL POOL PASSES (SWIM ONLY) (Annual Pass) |
||||||
Adult |
473.80 |
484.50 |
484.50 |
|||
Concession |
284.30 |
314.50 |
314.50 |
|||
Child |
236.90 |
272.00 |
272.00 |
|||
ALL POOL PASSES (GYM and SWIM) (Annual Pass) |
||||||
Adult |
|
824.00 |
824.00 |
|||
Concession |
|
518.50 |
518.50 |
|||
Child 14yrs + |
|
442.00 |
442.00 |
|||
GYM MEMBERSHIPS (includes swim) |
||||||
Note: Membership specials may be run periodically throughout the year at the discretion of Aquatic Services |
||||||
Adult |
||||||
1 month membership |
80.34 |
83.00 |
83.00 |
|||
3 Month Membership |
226.60 |
233.50 |
233.50 |
|||
6 Month Membership |
426.40 |
439.00 |
439.00 |
|||
12 Month Membership |
741.60 |
764.00 |
764.00 |
|||
Monthly direct debit membership |
80.34 |
83.00 |
83.00 |
|||
Concession |
||||||
3 Month Membership |
136.00 |
140.00 |
140.00 |
|||
6 Month Membership |
255.40 |
263.00 |
263.00 |
|||
Student membership (valid 1 March - 30 November) |
329.60 |
339.50 |
339.50 |
|||
12 Month Membership |
445.00 |
458.50 |
458.50 |
|||
Child 14yrs + |
||||||
3 Month Membership |
113.30 |
116.50 |
116.50 |
|||
6 Month Membership |
213.20 |
219.50 |
219.50 |
|||
12 Month Membership |
370.80 |
382.00 |
382.00 |
|||
HIRE (a refundable deposit applies to all hire items) |
||||||
Refundable Deposit |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
|||
Swim Togs (Hire) |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
|||
Towel (Hire) |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
|||
Gym Towel (Hire) |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
|||
Kayak (Hire) |
2.00 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
|||
Kayak and Spray Skirt (Hire) |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
|||
BBQ and gas for 2 hours |
16.00 |
18.00 |
11.00 |
This increased from $10.50 to $16 in 2014/15 in error and has been adjusted down to the correct level |
||
Lane Usage Fees per hour |
||||||
Lane usage fee for recognised user groups during peak times at Moana Pool |
||||||
Mon - Fri 6:00 am - 7:30am and 3:30pm - 7:30pm |
||||||
Lane hire per hour for each lane (up to 6 lanes) |
2.10 |
2.50 |
2.20 |
note price change |
||
Lane hire per hour for each lane over a total of 6 lanes |
10.30 |
10.50 |
10.50 |
|||
Group activity - lanes barriers removed (use of half pool per hour) |
10.30 |
10.50 |
10.50 |
|||
Pool Hire per hour (minimum of 30 min) |
||||||
50m pool (includes competitor pool entry) |
264.00 |
272.00 |
272.00 |
|||
School Swimming sports 50m (includes pool entry) |
|
|
136.00 |
new |
||
25m pools (includes competitor pool entry) |
132.00 |
136.00 |
136.00 |
|||
School Swimming sports 25m (includes pool entry) |
|
|
68.00 |
new |
||
Dive/lap pool (includes competitor pool entry) |
98.90 |
102.00 |
102.00 |
|||
Per 25m lane (excludes pool entry) |
16.50 |
17.00 |
18.00 |
|||
Old Dive Pool (excludes pool entry) |
37.10 |
38.00 |
38.00 |
|||
Old Dive Pool before 8am (excludes pool entry) |
|
|
Free |
new |
||
Learners pool (excludes pool entry) |
51.50 |
53.00 |
54.00 |
|||
Additional lifeguard/pool staff per hour (2 hour minimum) |
27.00 |
30.00 |
30.00 |
|||
Spectators (per person) |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
|||
The spectator fee is for all events and normal pool entry. Spectator fee is not used for all school swimming or large groups where adults are required to look after a large numbers of children. |
||||||
Administration fee |
|
35.00 |
|
Not used - to be removed |
||
Meeting Room |
||||||
Poolside meeting room per hour |
21.60 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
|||
Poolside meeting room all day hire |
108.00 |
112.50 |
112.50 |
|||
Corner meeting room per hour |
36.10 |
30.00 |
30.00 |
|||
Corner meeting room all day hire |
180.50 |
150.00 |
150.00 |
|||
Birthday Party room hire per hour |
|
|
16.50 |
new |
||
Group Booking Rates |
||||||
Gym booking (includes Instructor) |
||||||
School Group (per hour) per person |
5.10 |
5.30 |
|
Not used - to be removed |
||
(+ instructor fee per hour) 2 hour minimum |
26.80 |
27.60 |
|
Not used - to be removed |
||
Group fitness booking (includes Instructor) |
||||||
Private Group Fitness Class School |
77.20 |
79.50 |
79.50 |
|||
Schools (primary/secondary) and Holiday Programmes (Moana Pool) |
||||||
Child entry per head |
1.50 |
1.50 |
1.50 |
|||
Child entry per head swim and slide |
4.50 |
4.50 |
4.50 |
|||
Adult entry and spectators |
Free |
Free |
Free |
|||
Kayaks – school group hire (excludes pool entry) |
15.50 |
16.00 |
16.00 |
|||
Kayak Spray Skirt - school group hire (excludes pool entry) |
15.50 |
16.00 |
16.00 |
|||
Birthday parties and other group bookings (Moana Pool) |
||||||
Child entry per head |
1.50 |
1.50 |
1.50 |
|||
Child entry per head swim and slide |
4.50 |
4.50 |
4.50 |
|||
Adult entry per head |
3.70 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|||
Adult entry per head swim and slide |
7.80 |
8.00 |
8.00 |
|||
Spectators and birthday child |
Free |
Free |
free |
|||
SWIM SCHOOL |
||||||
Lessons |
||||||
Babies (10 weeks) |
65.00 |
67.00 |
67.00 |
|||
Baby lessons introductory talk |
|
|
10.00 |
|||
Pre-schoolers (10 weeks) |
115.00 |
118.50 |
118.00 |
Price change-addresses rounding issues for weekly cash payments. |
||
School age children (10 weeks) |
115.00 |
118.50 |
118.00 |
|||
Private Lessons (30 minutes duration) |
32.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
|||
Private Lessons (20 minutes duration) |
|
|
21.00 |
new |
||
Adult $18 per lesson x 5 |
|
|
90.00 |
new |
||
School holiday lessons x 5 lessons |
|
|
59.00 |
new |
||
Spike Squad (10 lesson block) |
80.00 |
82.50 |
82.00 |
Price change-addresses rounding issues for weekly cash payments. |
||
Mosgiel Pre-school and school age children (10 lesson block) |
95.00 |
97.50 |
97.00 |
|||
Waikouaiti Babies lessons per lesson |
|
|
6.00 |
new |
||
Waikouaiti preschoolers lessons per lesson |
|
|
10.00 |
new |
||
Lessons for Schools |
||||||
30 minute lesson 1:10 ratio – per child |
3.50 |
3.60 |
3.60 |
|||
30 minute lesson 1:8 ratio – per child |
4.40 |
4.50 |
4.50 |
|||
30 minute lesson 1:6 ratio – per child |
5.80 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
|||
20 minute lesson 1:5 ratio – per child |
3.90 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|||
School – Special Needs (10 lesson block) |
122.00 |
125.70 |
126.00 |
Price change-addresses rounding issues for weekly cash payments. |
||
Home School Groups (10 lesson block) |
110.00 |
115.00 |
115.00 |
|||
Lessons for Out Pools Schools |
||||||
30 minute lesson 1:10 ratio– per child |
|
|
4.20 |
New |
||
30 minute lesson 1:8 ratio– per child |
|
|
5.25 |
New |
||
30 minute lesson 1:6 ratio– per child |
|
|
7.00 |
New |
||
20 minute lesson 1:6 ratio – per child |
|
|
4.60 |
New |
||
|
|
|
|
|||
MOSGIEL POOL AND PORT CHALMERS POOL |
||||||
Casual Rates |
||||||
Adult |
3.70 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|||
Concession |
3.20 |
3.50 |
3.50 |
|||
Child |
2.70 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
|||
Toddler Time |
4.00 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|||
Family Swim |
|
|
10.00 |
new |
||
Schools per pupil |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|||
Multi visit Tickets |
||||||
Adult 12 swim |
34.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
|||
Concession 12 swim |
28.80 |
29.50 |
29.50 |
|||
Child 12 swim |
23.20 |
24.00 |
24.00 |
|||
Season Tickets (Mosgiel Pool - 7 months) |
||||||
Adult |
144.20 |
148.50 |
148.50 |
|||
Concession |
97.90 |
101.00 |
101.00 |
|||
Child |
92.70 |
95.50 |
95.50 |
|||
Family |
236.90 |
244.00 |
244.00 |
|||
Each extra child |
17.50 |
18.00 |
18.00 |
|||
Season Tickets (Port Chalmers Pool - 6 months) |
||||||
Adult |
118.50 |
122.00 |
122.00 |
|||
Concession |
63.90 |
66.00 |
66.00 |
|||
Child |
63.90 |
66.00 |
66.00 |
|||
Family |
175.10 |
180.50 |
180.50 |
|||
Each extra child |
16.50 |
17.00 |
17.00 |
|||
Pool Hire (Mosgiel and Port Chalmers Pools) |
||||||
Pool Hire per hour (min 2 hours, includes lifeguard, excludes pool entry) |
88.60 |
95.00 |
95.00 |
|||
ST CLAIR HOT SALT WATER POOL |
||||||
Casual Rates |
||||||
Adult |
6.20 |
6.50 |
6.50 |
|||
Concession |
3.70 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|||
Child |
3.10 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
|||
Toddler Time |
4.00 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|||
Family |
13.40 |
14.00 |
14.00 |
|||
Schools per pupil |
|
|
1.50 |
new |
||
Multi visit Tickets |
||||||
Adult 12 swim |
62.00 |
64.00 |
64.00 |
|||
Concession 12 swim |
37.00 |
38.00 |
38.00 |
|||
Child 12 swim |
31.00 |
32.00 |
32.00 |
|||
Season Tickets (6 months) |
||||||
Adult |
206.00 |
212.00 |
212.00 |
|||
Concession |
113.30 |
116.50 |
116.50 |
|||
Child |
87.60 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
|||
Family |
412.00 |
424.50 |
424.50 |
|||
Each extra child |
30.90 |
32.00 |
32.00 |
|||
Pool Hire (St Clair Hot Salt Water Pool) |
||||||
Pool Hire per hour (min 2 hours, includes 2 lifeguards, excludes pool entry) |
113.30 |
130.00 |
130.00 |
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Cemeteries |
|||
Allanton, Andersons Bay, Dunedin City, Green Park, Portobello, Broad Bay, Macandrew Bay, Northern, Southern, Green Island, Port Chalmers, West Taieri, East Taieri and Waikouaiti |
|||
Burial Rights (plot purchase) |
2,000.00 |
2,060.00 |
2,122.00 |
Burial Rights (plot purchase)(Green Park Natural Burial site only) |
2,000.00 |
2,060.00 |
2,122.00 |
Burial Rights (plot purchase) (Roman Catholic Sisters - Andersons Bay only) |
1,494.00 |
1,539.00 |
1,585.00 |
Burial Rights (plot purchase) - Children Under 10 Years (Green Park and East Taieri) |
1,006.00 |
1,036.00 |
1,067.00 |
Interments |
1,483.00 |
1,527.00 |
1,573.00 |
Interments - Children Under 10 Years (all cemeteries) |
976.00 |
1,005.00 |
1,035.00 |
Service (maintenance) Fee |
808.00 |
833.00 |
858.00 |
Exhumation |
2,640.00 |
2,720.00 |
2,820.00 |
Exhumation - Children Under 10 Years (all cemeteries) |
1,785.00 |
1,839.00 |
1,894.00 |
Hindon, Otokia, Waitati, Middlemarch and Purakanui |
|||
Adults |
|||
Burial Rights (plot purchase) |
676.00 |
696.00 |
717.00 |
Interments |
1,483.00 |
1,527.00 |
1,573.00 |
Service (maintenance) Fee |
676.00 |
696.00 |
717.00 |
Exhumation |
2,640.00 |
2,720.00 |
2,802.00 |
All Cemeteries |
|||
Monumental Permit |
74.00 |
76.00 |
78.00 |
Attach a plaque |
16.00 |
16.00 |
16.00 |
Cremations |
|||
Crematorium Fee |
855.00 |
881.00 |
907.00 |
Saturday and Public Holidays |
1,025.00 |
1,056.00 |
1,088.00 |
Children Under 10 years |
151.00 |
156.00 |
161.00 |
Saturday and Public Holidays |
206.00 |
212.00 |
218.00 |
Babies Under 48 Hours |
28.00 |
29.00 |
30.00 |
Pathology and Mortuary Department Remains |
536.00 |
552.00 |
569.00 |
Chapel Hire - Per Hour |
|||
Weekdays |
163.00 |
168.00 |
173.00 |
Saturdays and Public Holidays |
237.00 |
244.00 |
251.00 |
Post-Cremation Services |
|||
Ash Beam Purchase |
237.00 |
244.00 |
251.00 |
Purchase of Family Ash Plot |
478.00 |
492.00 |
507.00 |
Ash Beam Purchase – Waikouaiti (includes Metal Flower Container) |
310.00 |
319.00 |
329.00 |
Inter in Family Plot, Ash Beam, Family Ash Plot, Soldiers Plot or Child's Plot |
151.00 |
156.00 |
161.00 |
Service Fee for Ash Burials |
206.00 |
212.00 |
218.00 |
Ash Disinterment Fee |
179.00 |
184.00 |
190.00 |
Scatter - Andersons Bay, Rose Garden |
74.00 |
76.00 |
78.00 |
Placement of Plaque in Court of Reflections (150 x 100 mm) |
85.00 |
88.00 |
91.00 |
Columbarium Wall |
|||
Price per Niche |
198.00 |
204.00 |
210.00 |
Placement of Ashes |
168.00 |
173.00 |
178.00 |
Book of Remembrance |
|||
Entry in Book of Remembrance (per time) |
85.00 |
88.00 |
91.00 |
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Parks and Recreation - Facilities |
|||
Chingford Stables |
|||
Facility use per hour |
23.00 |
23.70 |
24.40 |
Functions (from 5.00pm to 11.00pm) – includes security patrol |
256.00 |
263.70 |
271.60 |
Stalls (including The Octagon) |
|||
Single not for profit/information only stall |
|||
Single not for profit stall (per stall, per day or part thereof) |
31.00 |
31.90 |
32.90 |
Single for profit stall (per stall, per day or part thereof) |
57.00 |
58.70 |
60.50 |
Lowering and raising of bollards in The Octagon |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.80 |
Marina |
|||
Deborah Bay Marina – Berth (annual fee) |
1,318.00 |
1,357.50 |
1,398.20 |
Event Use |
|||
Enclosed grounds (per day) |
482.00 |
496.50 |
511.40 |
Unenclosed ground (per day) |
444.00 |
457.30 |
471.00 |
Bond for Events |
|||
Bonds are negotiable from $200, depending on event size, area and numbers |
|||
Parks and Recreation - Sportsgrounds |
|||
Sportsgrounds – Winter Codes (Rugby, Rugby League, Hockey, Soccer) |
|||
Unenclosed Fields |
|||
With facilities (per season) |
1,603.00 |
1,651.10 |
1,700.60 |
Without facilities (per season) |
896.00 |
922.90 |
950.60 |
Touch Marked field with facilities (per season) |
444.00 |
457.30 |
471.00 |
With facilities (per day) |
136.00 |
140.10 |
144.30 |
Without facilities (per day) |
75.00 |
77.30 |
79.60 |
Casual Touch Sevens (per ground) per day |
36.00 |
37.10 |
38.20 |
Training use only for schools |
Free |
Free |
Free |
Union Street Pavilion Facilities only (per change room per hour) |
18.00 |
18.50 |
19.10 |
Enclosed Fields |
|||
Tahuna Park 1, Caledonian, University Oval 1 (per ground, per day, with facilities) |
268.00 |
276.00 |
284.30 |
Tahuna Park 2 (per ground, per day, with facilities) |
136.00 |
140.10 |
144.30 |
Sportsgrounds – Summer Codes (Cricket, Athletics, Softball, Marching) |
|||
Dunedin Cricket |
|||
First class pitch, per season |
2,761.00 |
2,843.80 |
2,929.10 |
Other pitch, per season |
2,233.00 |
2,300.00 |
2,369.00 |
Artificial wicket, per season |
689.00 |
709.70 |
731.00 |
Primary, intermediate and secondary schools |
Free |
Free |
Free |
Senior pitch, unenclosed, per day |
229.00 |
235.90 |
243.00 |
Artificial wicket, per day |
44.00 |
45.30 |
46.70 |
Otago Cricket |
|
|
|
Hire of change rooms |
29.00 |
29.90 |
30.80 |
(for the first two hours – minimum charge) |
(for the first two hours - minimum charge) |
(for the first two hours - minimum charge) |
|
15.00 |
15.50 |
16.00 |
|
per hour after that |
per hour after that |
per hour after that |
|
Hire of international practice strips (per hour/per strip) |
56.00 |
57.70 |
59.40 |
Hire of international practice strips (full day hire/per strip) |
171.00 |
176.10 |
181.40 |
Logan Park (Union Street Pavilion), per hour |
17.75 |
18.30 |
18.80 |
Logan Park 1, Practice, per full day |
68.00 |
70.00 |
72.10 |
Logan Park 1, Practice, per half day |
35.60 |
36.70 |
37.80 |
Logan Park 1, Practice, per hour |
8.50 |
8.80 |
9.10 |
Softball |
|||
Field without marking, per season |
898.00 |
924.90 |
952.60 |
Field without marking, per day |
60.00 |
61.80 |
63.70 |
Athletics |
|||
Marked 400m grass track (per season) |
723.00 |
744.70 |
767.00 |
Unmarked 1 hectare area (per season) |
898.00 |
924.90 |
952.60 |
Unmarked 1 hectare area (per day) |
45.00 |
46.40 |
47.80 |
Archery |
|||
Use per hectare (per season) |
898.00 |
924.90 |
952.60 |
Marching |
|||
Unmarked 1 hectare area (per day) |
60.00 |
61.80 |
63.70 |
Out of Season Work |
|||
Out of season play including marking out, erecting and removing goal posts (per field) |
562.00 |
578.90 |
596.30 |
Pre and Post season games all codes |
|||
With facilities |
147.00 |
151.40 |
155.90 |
Without facilities |
81.00 |
83.40 |
85.90 |
Athletics Caledonian Track and Ground |
|||
Enclosed ground competition use (per hour) |
164.00 |
168.90 |
174.00 |
Enclosed ground practice use (per hour) |
97.00 |
99.90 |
102.90 |
Enclosed ground competition use (primary, intermediate and secondary schools or junior club rate) |
79.00 |
81.40 |
83.80 |
Enclosed ground practice use (primary, intermediate and secondary schools or junior club rate) |
50.00 |
51.50 |
53.00 |
Gymnasium |
|||
Competition per hour |
61.00 |
62.80 |
64.70 |
Practice per hour |
39.00 |
40.20 |
41.40 |
Child’s rate |
9.00 |
9.30 |
9.60 |
Change and showers only per hour |
18.00 |
18.50 |
19.10 |
Kitchen and committee rooms per hour |
18.00 |
18.50 |
19.10 |
After hours call out fee |
44.00 |
45.30 |
46.70 |
23 January 2017 |
|
Draft 2017/18 Budget - Property
Department: Community and Planning and Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides the draft 2017/18 budget for Property, including the following activities and portfolios:
· Property Management and Land Advisory
· Housing
· Investment Property
· Operational Property
· Miscellaneous Property
That the Council: a) Approves, for the purpose of community engagement, the draft 2017/18 budget relating to Property as shown/amended in Attachment A. b) Approves, for the purpose of community engagement, the 2017/18 fees and charges for the Housing activity as shown/amended in Attachment B. |
operating budgets
Revenue
Rates
2 Rates revenue has decreased by $673k. This change is the result of a reconsideration of capacity to complete programmed work within the timeframe of the 2017/18 year.
External revenue
3 External revenue has increased by $1.147 million. Of this, $694k relates to the Investment Property portfolio. These increases combine the recovery of expenses such as electricity, marketing and rates as specified in tenant’s lease agreements, rent reviews and new lease agreements.
4 Operational Property portfolio external revenue is increased by $175k. This is due to the recovery of increased operating expenses as well as increased rental revenue. It also includes revenue for properties that were intended for sale in 2016/17 and were according not included in the 2016/17 budget. These properties were not sold.
5 Management and Land Advisory external revenue has increased by $183k to reflect the recovery of expenditure.
Internal revenue
6 Internal revenue has increased by $396k. Property related expenses that were previously included in the Dunedin Public Art Gallery and Toitū Otago Settlers Museum budgets have been moved to the Property budget where they will be managed centrally. This has resulted in increased rental to these activities.
Expenditure
Asset operations and maintenance
7 Asset operations and maintenance costs have increased by $479k. An increase in the Operational Property portfolio of $239k accounts for the increased costs of managing the Arts and Culture Group maintenance.
8 Investment Property portfolio increase of $142k brings budgeted maintenance spend in line with actual spend for 2015/16 taking into account expenditure on properties intended for future sale that were not included in the 2016/17 budget.
9 Miscellaneous Property portfolio increase of $27k is attributed to maintenance budgeted for Olveston with Property taking over the responsibility of managing their property requirements.
10 Housing maintenance increase of $70k results from sundry properties added to this portfolio.
Energy costs
11 Energy costs have increased by $234k. An overall small projected increase in electricity and gas costs has been included in the budget. The main increase of $166k is attributed to the Investment Property portfolio with budgets being brought in line with actual spend. These increases are recoverable from tenants and will be offset by a corresponding increase in recoverable revenue.
Premises costs
12 Premises costs have increased by $838k. This incorporates an overall increase in rates of 3%. An increase in the Operational Property portfolio of $337k accounts for the increased costs of managing the Arts and Culture Group’s property requirements; changes to cleaning contracts; and the short-term retention of property earmarked for sale.
13 Investment Property portfolio increase of $430k is due to the inclusion of ground rent not originally budgeted for as properties were intended for sale; changes to cleaning contracts; and meeting building WOF requirements.
14 Housing premises costs increase results from sundry properties added to this portfolio.
Depreciation
15 Depreciation has increased by $294k. Operational property portfolio’s $127k increase due to addition of property previously intended for sale. Depreciation costs for Housing have increased by $167k as a result of the additional properties transferred into this portfolio. In addition, depreciation is now aligned to actual costs reflecting changes to property valuations.
capital expenditure Budget
16 The following changes have been incorporated into the capital expenditure programme:
a) South Dunedin Community Complex – the following table provides the approved and anticipated spend for 2017/18 to 2018/19.
$m |
Annual Plan 2016/17 |
Draft budget 2017/18 |
2017/18 |
2.5 |
2.0 |
2018/19 |
2.8 |
3.3 |
b) New Housing Units – the following table provides the approved and anticipated spend for 2017/18 to 2018/19.
$m |
Annual Plan 2016/17 |
Draft budget 2017/18 |
2017/18 |
4.6 |
1.0 |
2018/19 |
1.6 |
5.2 |
c) CCTV Octagon Renewal – the following table provides the approved and anticipated spend for 2017/18 to 2018/19.
$m |
Annual Plan 2016/17 |
Draft budget 2017/18 |
2017/18 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
2018/19 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
d) Dunedin Centre Piano Replacement – the following table provides the approved and anticipated spend for 2017/18 to 2018/19.
$m |
Annual Plan 2016/17 |
Draft budget 2017/18 |
2017/18 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
2018/19 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
fees and charges
17 Fees and charges for the Housing activity are unchanged. The social housing portfolio operates on a breakeven basis. There is no requirement to increase rental charges on housing units in the 2017/18 year to meet this policy. A copy of the fees schedule is attached.
Service performance measures
18 There are no changes proposed to the measures and targets showing in the Long Term Plan 2015/16-2024/25 for Property in the 2017/18 year.
related reports
19 There are no related reports for Property.
Signatories
Author: |
Jane Nevill - Corporate Planner Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Ruth Stokes - General Manager Infrastructure and Networks |
|
Title |
Page |
Draft Budget 2017/18 - Property |
94 |
|
Fees and Charges - Property Group |
95 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and meets the current and future needs of the Dunedin communities for good quality local infrastructure and public services in a way that is most cost effective for households and businesses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The activities of Property primarily contribute to the objectives and priorities of the above strategies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no known implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The report indicates changes to the LTP and Annual Plan budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The financial considerations are detailed in the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance and materiality There are no significant or material changes to the draft 2017/18 budgets for Property. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been no external engagement in developing the budgets for Property. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The Executive Leadership Team, Finance staff, Policy staff and the managers of Property have been involved in developing the budgets and related financial information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflict of interests. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards This material may be of interest to Community Boards. |
23 January 2017 |
|
Proposed Fees and Charges 2017/18
Please note: Community Housing rental fees are GST exempt.
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Community Housing |
|||
Note: Increases take effect from 1 August each year. Community Housing is GST Exempt. |
|||
Bedsit |
104.50 |
104.50 |
104.50 |
Single (partitioned flat) |
106.60 |
106.60 |
106.60 |
Single (separate flat) |
110.70 |
110.70 |
110.70 |
Double (partitioned flat) |
149.00 |
149.00 |
149.00 |
Double (separate flat) |
154.20 |
154.20 |
154.20 |
1 Bedroom |
162.50 |
162.50 |
162.50 |
2 Bedroom |
190.40 |
190.40 |
190.40 |
23 January 2017 |
|
Draft 2017/18 Budget - Arts and Culture Group
Department: Community and Planning and Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides the draft 2017/18 budget for the Arts and Culture Group. The Arts and Culture Group includes the following activities:
· Dunedin Public Libraries (Libraries)
· Dunedin Public Art Gallery (DPAG)
· Toitū Otago Settlers Museum, including the Dunedin Chinese Garden
· Olveston
· Otago Museum Levy
That the Council: a) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the draft 2017/18 budget relating to the Arts and Culture Group as shown/amended in Attachment A. b) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the 2017/18 fees and charges for the Dunedin Public Libraries; Dunedin Public Art Gallery; Toitū Otago Settlers Museum; Dunedin Chinese Garden and Olveston as shown/amended in Attachment B. |
operating budgets
Olveston
2 This is the first year that the Council has included a detailed operational budget for Olveston. In prior years, a grant and additional funding to cover any Olveston shortfall were included in the Events and Community Development and Investment Account budgets.
Revenue
Rates
3 Rates
have increased overall in the Arts and Culture Group of activities by
$969k. Of this, the increase in the Libraries is $400k, Toitū Otago
Settlers Museum $253k, the DPAG $141k, Olveston $98k and the Otago Museum Levy
$77k.
External revenue
4 External revenue has increased by $607k. The main reason for this is due to the inclusion of Olveston revenue ($576k) and a $50k grant for DPAG to be sourced to meet the cost of additional painting storage racks.
Internal revenue
5 Internal revenue has decreased by $111k as recoveries from service centres and internal library information requests have been discontinued.
Expenditure
Staff costs
6 Staff costs have increased by $746k. This is due to the inclusion of a budget for Olveston of $475k and provision for staff salary increases.
Asset operations and maintenance
7 The asset operations and maintenance budget has reduced by $115k. This is because all building related budgets have been centralised in the Property budget.
Premises costs
8 Premises costs have reduced by $138k due to the centralisation of all property related costs to the Property budget.
General administration
9 The increase of $138k in this category is mainly attributed to the addition of the Olveston budget into the Arts and Culture Group and an increase in freight costs for DPAG to bring this in-line with previous actual expenditure.
Internal charges
10 Internal costs have increased by $425k. Budgets to cover property expenses now sit with the Property department resulting in a reduction in operational expenditure and an increase in internal charges for property costs of $383k. BIS internal charges have increased at Toitū Otago Settlers Museum by $63k.
capital expenditure Budget
11 The DPAG budget for additional collection painting racks has been brought forward one year and increased by $50k. The additional $50k will be externally funded.
fees and charges
12 Fees and charges for activities in the Arts and Culture Group are unchanged with the exception of Olveston and updates to two fees in Libraries and one fee at Toitū Otago Settlers Museum. Olveston fees for the 2017/18 year are as recommended by the Olveston Management Committee. A copy of the group fees schedule is attached.
Service performance measures
13 There are no changes proposed to the measures and targets showing in the Long Term Plan 2015/16-2024/25 for Arts and Culture in the 2017/18 year.
related reports
14 There are no related reports for the Arts and Culture Group.
Signatories
Author: |
Jane Nevill - Corporate Planner Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Bernie Hawke - Group Manager Arts and Culture |
|
Title |
Page |
Draft Budget 2017/18 - Arts and Culture Group |
100 |
|
Fees and Charges - Arts and Culture Group |
101 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and meets the current and future needs of the Dunedin communities for good quality public services in a way that is most cost effective for households and businesses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The activities of the Arts and Culture Group primarily contribute to the objectives and priorities of the above strategies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no known implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The report indicates changes to the LTP and Annual Plan budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The financial considerations are detailed in the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance and materiality There are no significant or material changes to the draft 2017/18 budgets for Arts and Culture. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external The Otago Museum and Olveston Management Committee have been involved in developing the budgets for their respective activities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The Executive Leadership Team, Finance staff, Policy staff and the managers of the Arts and Culture Group have been involved in developing the budgets and related financial information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflict of interests. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards This material may be of interest to Community Boards. |
23 January 2017 |
|
Proposed Fees and Charges 2017/18
Fees include GST unless otherwise stated.
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Dunedin Public Art Gallery |
|||
Admission |
Free |
Free |
Free |
Special Exhibition entry charges will vary depending on the exhibition. |
|||
Group tours by arrangement, cost negotiable. |
|||
Hire of conference and auditorium facilities by negotiation depending on the individual requirements of the hirer. |
|||
Photographic reproduction charges schedule available at the Art Gallery. |
|||
Note: The Dunedin Public Art Gallery reserves the right to periodically offer discounts on fees and services. |
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Chinese Garden |
|||
Adult Admission |
9.00 |
9.00 |
9.00 |
Child (under 13 years with Adult) |
Free |
Free |
Free |
Student or Beneficiary |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
Adult Season Ticket |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
Adult Season Ticket renewal |
17.00 |
17.00 |
17.00 |
Student or Beneficiary Season Ticket |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
Student or Beneficiary Season Ticket Renewal |
12.00 |
12.00 |
12.00 |
Guided Tour |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
Acoustiguide Audio Tour (Handheld Unit Hire) |
Free |
Free |
Free |
Hire of Garden facilities by negotiation depending on the individual requirement for the hirer. |
|||
Note: The Dunedin Chinese Garden reserves the right to periodically offer discounts on fees and services. |
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
|||
$ |
$ |
$ |
||||
Libraries |
||||||
Non-residential membership (per family per year) |
110.00 |
120.00 |
130.00 |
|||
Membership card replacement (Adult) |
4.00 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|||
Membership card replacement (Child) |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
|||
Inter-loan (plus any additional charges over the standard fee) |
5.00 |
5.00 |
10.00 |
Increase to bring into line with other libraries charges |
||
Overdue (per item, per day, Adult) |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
|||
Overdue Hot Picks (per item, per day, Adult) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|||
Holds charge (per item) |
1.00 |
1.50 |
1.50 |
|||
Holds Voucher Pack (6 Holds vouchers) |
4.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
|||
Photocopying (black and white, A4, per copy) |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
|||
Photocopying (black and white, A3, per copy) |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
|||
Photocopying (colour, A4, per copy) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|||
Photocopying (colour, A3, per copy) |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
|||
City Library parking (per hour) |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
|||
Research enquiries undertaken by staff (per hour) |
56.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
|||
Flash Drive, per item |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
|||
Create and supply digital image, per image |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
|||
Schedule of charges per hour available at the libraries. Database searching at cost plus staff time. |
||||||
Loss and damage charges vary depending on the item. |
||||||
Overdue/Account charge per lost item (Adult) |
7.50 |
7.50 |
7.50 |
|||
Overdue/Account charge per lost item (Child) |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
|||
Processing Fee per item |
5.00 |
5.00 |
10.00 |
Increase to cover cost of replacing lost/damaged items |
||
Item/Debt recovery charge (per referral). Collection agencies may levy additional charges. |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
|||
Rentals |
||||||
DVDs (1 week loan) |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
|||
DVDs (2 week loan) |
2.00 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|||
Compact Discs (two week loan) |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|||
Hot Picks |
||||||
Hot Picks Books (two week loan) |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
|||
Hot Picks DVDs (one week loan) |
4.00 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|||
Hot Picks CDs (two week loan) |
2.00 |
2.00 |
n/a |
|||
Hot Picks Voucher Pack (6 Hot Picks vouchers) |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
|||
Hot Picks Magazines (one week loan) |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
|||
Bindery |
||||||
Book guard paperback |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|||
Book Covering |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|||
Paperback minor mend* |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|||
Hardback rebind* |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|||
Thesis binding* |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|||
Periodical full binding* |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|||
Minutes full binding* |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|||
Book preservation enclosures* |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|||
*Subject to individual quotation. |
|
|
|
|||
Meeting Room Blueskin Bay Library |
||||||
(Available for meetings, etc) Charges vary from $15.00 for first hour, $10.00 thereafter, up to $60.00. Available at no charge to individuals or groups who are unfunded or provide a community service |
||||||
Downes Room, Mosgiel Library |
||||||
(Available for meetings, etc) Charges vary from $15.00 for first hour, $10.00 thereafter, up to $60.00.Available at no charge to individuals or groups who are unfunded or provide a community service |
||||||
Dunningham Suite, City Library |
||||||
Available for meetings and functions etc. Charges vary from: |
||||||
Small Meeting Room (half day) |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
|||
Small Meeting Room (full day) |
125.00 |
125.00 |
125.00 |
|||
Full Suite (half day) |
175.00 |
175.00 |
175.00 |
|||
Full Suite (full day) |
275.00 |
275.00 |
275.00 |
|||
Kitchen (half day) |
30.00 |
30.00 |
30.00 |
|||
Security Guard Service (After 8pm Monday – Friday, before 11am and after 4pm Saturday/Sunday) per hour |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Data projector (half day) |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
|||
DVD player per day |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
|||
Wedding Booking (includes full day for event, plus 2 half days for set up and clean up. Does not include security guard service) |
750.00 |
750.00 |
750.00 |
|||
Note: The Dunedin Public Library Service reserves the right to periodically offer discounts on fees and services. |
|
|
|
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Toitū Otago Settlers Museum |
|||
Admission |
Free |
Free |
Free |
Archives |
12.00 |
12.00 |
12.00 |
Archive/Collection queries over 30 mins |
No Charge |
No Charge |
$30 per 30 mins |
Group tours by arrangement, cost negotiable. |
|||
Hire of conference and auditorium facilities by negotiation depending on the individual requirement for the hirer. |
|||
Photographic reproduction charges schedule available at Toitū Otago Settlers Museum. |
|||
Note: Toitū Otago Settlers Museum reserves the right to periodically offer discounts on fees and services. |
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Olveston |
|||
Note: Fees are effective from 1 October annually |
|||
Retail /Free independent traveller (FIT) guided tour |
|||
Adult |
|
20.00 |
20.50 |
Child |
|
11.00 |
11.50 |
Concession ('friends') |
|
19.00 |
19.50 |
Local |
|
16.00 |
16.50 |
Group (10+) |
|
16.00 |
16.50 |
Family |
|||
2 adults and up to 3 children |
|
65.00 |
65.00 |
Additional adults |
|
16.00 |
16.50 |
Additional children |
|
11.00 |
11.50 |
1 hour guided tour followed by croquet and tea and biscuits |
|||
For up to 4 people |
|
100.00 |
120.00 |
Additional adults |
|
25.00 |
30.00 |
Additional children |
|
25.00 |
30.00 |
2 hour tours, Art Tours, Embroidery etc. (minimum group 8pax) |
|||
Adult |
|
32.50 |
35.00 |
Child |
|
17.50 |
20.00 |
Concession ('friends') |
|
27.50 |
30.00 |
Local |
|
27.50 |
30.00 |
Group (5+) |
|
27.50 |
30.00 |
Edwardian food/high tea and tour (minimum group 10pax) |
|||
Adult |
|
35.00 |
37.50 |
Child |
|
25.00 |
27.50 |
Concession ('friends') |
|
32.50 |
35.00 |
1 hour tour with high tea (for groups of 10 or more) |
|||
Servants' Tea per person |
|
25.00 |
27.50 |
Devonshire Tea per person |
|
30.00 |
35.00 |
Edwardian High Tea per person |
|
35.00 |
37.50 |
2 hour VIP private access tours |
|||
Adult RRP |
|
80.00 |
80.00 |
Adult wholesale |
|
60.00 |
60.00 |
Garden tours with tea/coffee and biscuits (minimum group 8pax) |
|||
Adult |
|
12.00 |
15.00 |
Child |
|
12.00 |
12.50 |
Paul's tour around Royal Terrace neighbourhood |
|||
Adult |
|
15.00 |
16.50 |
Child |
|
15.00 |
16.50 |
Education groups |
|||
Primary student |
|
8.00 |
8.50 |
Secondary student |
|
9.50 |
10.00 |
Tertiary student |
|
12.50 |
13.00 |
Adult |
|
16.00 |
16.50 |
Note: Olveston reserves the right to periodically offer discounts on fees and services. |
Note: Fees for Olveston are as recommended by the Olveston Management Committee.
23 January 2017 |
|
Draft 2017/18 Budget - Customer and Regulatory Group
Department: Community and Planning and Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides the draft 2017/18 budget for the Customer and Regulatory Group. The Customer and Regulatory Group includes the following activities:
· Animal Services and Parking Services (Enforcement)
· Building Services
· Customer Services Agency
· Environmental Health and Alcohol Licensing
· Fleet Operations
· Parking Operations
That the Council: a) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the draft 2017/18 budget relating to the Customer and Regulatory Group as shown/amended in Attachment A. b) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the 2017/18 fees and charges for Alcohol Services, Animal Services, Building Services, Environmental Health, Parking Enforcement and Parking Operations as shown/amended in Attachment B. |
operating budgets
Revenue
External revenue
2 External revenue has increased by $167k. The main reason for this is increased Building Services activity with commercial buildings at the University of Otago and residential housing from new subdivisions.
Expenditure
Staff costs
3 Staff costs have increased by $149k due to the provision for salary increases and an additional staff member in Building Services.
Internal charges
4 Internal charges have reduced by $165k mainly in Parking Operations due to a reduction in charges from the Customer Services Agency.
Depreciation
5 Depreciation has reduced by $224k due to Pay and Display parking meters purchased in 2009 being fully depreciated.
Net Surplus/(Deficit)
6 The annual contribution to rates has increased by $329k due to reductions in expenditure and loan repayments.
capital expenditure Budget
7 No changes to the capital expenditure programme.
Fees and charges
8 Fees and charges for activities in the Customer and Regulatory Group have been increased by 3%, unless set by statute or explained below. A copy of the group fees schedule is attached.
9 Exceptions in Animal Services are the adoption fee which has been increased by more than 3% to reflect actual costs and the registration fee for non-working dogs which has been increased by 1%.
10 Fees for Environmental Health have been restructured with the addition of some new fees groups in line with the implementation of the Food Act 2014.
11 In the Parking Enforcement schedule an error in the GST component of Towage fees has been corrected.
12 Fees in Parking Operations are unchanged apart from fees for leased weekly parking in parking buildings which are increased by 1% and fees for leased weekly parking in off-street carparks which are increased by 3%.
Service performance measures
13 There are no changes proposed to the measures and targets showing in the Long Term Plan 2015/16-2024/25 for the Customer and Regulatory Group in the 2017/18 year.
related reports
14 There are no related reports for the Customer and Regulatory Group.
Signatories
Author: |
Jane Nevill - Corporate Planner Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Adrian Blair - Group Manager Customer and Regulatory Services |
|
Title |
Page |
Draft Budget 2017/18 - Customer and Regulatory Group |
111 |
|
Fees and Charges - Customer and Regulatory Group |
112 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and meets the current and future needs of the Dunedin communities for good quality public services and regulatory functions in a way that is most cost effective for households and businesses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The activities of the Customer and Regulatory Group primarily contribute to the objectives and priorities of the above strategies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no known implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The report indicates changes to the LTP and Annual Plan budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The financial considerations are detailed in the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance and materiality There are no significant or material changes to the draft 2017/18 budgets for the Customer and Regulatory Group. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been no external engagement in developing the budgets for the Customer and Regulatory Group. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The Executive Leadership Team, Finance staff, Policy staff and the managers of the Customer and Regulatory Group have been involved in developing the budgets and related financial information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflict of interests. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards This material may be of interest to Community Boards. |
23 January 2017 |
|
Proposed Fees and Charges 2017/18
Fees include GST unless otherwise stated.
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Alcohol Licensing |
|||
Fees are set by the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Regulations 2013. |
|||
Licence application – very low risk |
368.00 |
368.00 |
368.00 |
Licence application – low risk |
609.50 |
609.50 |
609.50 |
Licence application – medium risk |
816.50 |
816.50 |
816.50 |
Licence application – high risk |
1,023.50 |
1,023.50 |
1,023.50 |
Licence application – very high risk |
1,207.50 |
1,207.50 |
1,207.50 |
Licence annual fee – very low risk |
161.00 |
161.00 |
161.00 |
Licence annual fee – low risk |
391.00 |
391.00 |
391.00 |
Licence annual fee – medium risk |
632.50 |
632.50 |
632.50 |
Licence annual fee – high risk |
1,035.00 |
1,035.00 |
1,035.00 |
Licence annual fee – very high risk |
1,437.50 |
1,437.50 |
1,437.50 |
Temporary Authority on/off licences |
296.70 |
296.70 |
296.70 |
Special Licence – small event with one to two events on licence |
63.25 |
63.25 |
63.25 |
Special Licence – small events with three to 12 events on the licence or one to three medium size events on one licence |
207.00 |
207.00 |
207.00 |
Special Licence – all other occasions including large events |
575.00 |
575.00 |
575.00 |
Permanent Club Charter Fee |
632.50 |
632.50 |
632.50 |
Manager’s Certificate application/renewal |
316.25 |
316.25 |
316.25 |
Extract from Record or Register |
57.50 |
57.50 |
57.50 |
Temporary Licence during repairs, etc. (Section 29(1)(j)) |
296.70 |
296.70 |
296.70 |
Gambling – Class 4 Venue Application |
|||
Territorial Authority Consent application |
56.00 |
56.00 |
58.00 |
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
|||
$ |
$ |
$ |
||||
Animal Services |
||||||
Dog Registration Fees |
|
|
|
|||
Non-working Dogs |
93.00 |
96.00 |
99.00 |
|||
Working Dogs (1st dog) |
47.00 |
48.00 |
49.00 |
|||
Working Dogs (2nd dog) |
23.00 |
24.00 |
25.00 |
|||
Working Dogs (3rd and subsequent dogs) |
23.00 |
24.00 |
25.00 |
|||
Selected Owner |
52.00 |
54.00 |
56.00 |
|||
Special Aid Dog |
18.00 |
19.00 |
20.00 |
|||
Dangerous Dogs |
139.50 |
144.00 |
148.50 |
|||
Late Fee Penalty (50% of full fee) |
||||||
Non-working Dogs |
46.50 |
48.00 |
49.50 |
|||
Working Dogs (1st dog) |
23.50 |
24.00 |
24.50 |
|||
Working Dogs (2nd dog) |
11.50 |
12.00 |
12.50 |
|||
Working Dogs (3rd and subsequent dogs) |
11.50 |
12.00 |
12.50 |
|||
Selected Owner |
26.00 |
27.00 |
28.00 |
|||
Special Aid Dog |
9.00 |
9.50 |
10.00 |
|||
Dangerous Dogs |
70.00 |
72.00 |
74.25 |
|||
Other Fees |
||||||
Rebate for Neutering/Spaying |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
|||
Permit to keep more than one dog |
79.00 |
81.00 |
83.00 |
|||
Selected Owner Site Visit |
40.00 |
41.00 |
42.00 |
|||
Microchip Implanting |
40.00 |
41.00 |
42.00 |
|||
Replacement Tag |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
|||
Adoption fee |
144.00 |
148.00 |
188.00 |
Increased by $40 to reflect actual cost to have the dogs neutered, registered and micro-chipped prior to adoption. |
||
Poo Bags (Bundle of 25) |
2.20 |
2.30 |
2.50 |
|||
Dog Bark Collar Fee |
31.00 |
32.00 |
33.00 |
|||
Withdrawal of Infringement Fee |
31.00 |
32.00 |
33.00 |
|||
Dog Euthanized Fee |
77.00 |
79.00 |
81.00 |
|||
Collar Medium |
9.00 |
9.00 |
9.00 |
|||
Collar Large |
11.00 |
11.00 |
11.00 |
|||
Collar X Large |
12.00 |
12.00 |
12.00 |
|||
Dog Impounding Charges |
||||||
First Impounding |
114.00 |
117.00 |
121.00 |
|||
Second Impounding |
153.00 |
158.00 |
163.00 |
|||
Third and Subsequent Impounding |
193.00 |
199.00 |
205.00 |
|||
After Hours Impounding |
153.00 |
158.00 |
163.00 |
|||
Boarding Fee Per Day |
20.00 |
21.00 |
22.00 |
|||
Advertisement |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
|||
Notification |
4.00 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|||
Stock Impounding Charges |
||||||
Horses, Asses, Mules, Cattle and Deer |
||||||
First Impounding |
55.00 |
57.00 |
59.00 |
|||
Second Impounding |
109.00 |
112.00 |
115.00 |
|||
Third Impounding |
164.00 |
169.00 |
174.00 |
|||
Sheep, Goats and Pigs |
||||||
First Impounding |
11.00 |
11.00 |
11.00 |
|||
Second Impounding |
22.00 |
23.00 |
24.00 |
|||
Third Impounding |
34.00 |
35.00 |
36.00 |
|||
Daily Sustenance Charge |
||||||
Horses, Cattle, Deer |
8.00 |
8.00 |
8.00 |
|||
Sheep and Goats |
3.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
|||
Asses, Mules, Pigs |
4.00 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|||
Droving Charges |
|
|
|
|||
Vehicles per km (Minimum charge of $5.65) |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
|||
Staff Cost (per hour) |
77.00 |
79.00 |
81.00 |
|||
Penal rates charged for Statutory Holidays and Overtime Stock Control on State Highways |
||||||
Hourly rate (including standby allowance) |
77.00 |
79.00 |
81.00 |
|||
Vehicle charge per km |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
|||
Infringement Offences and Fees set by Statute: Dog Control Act 1996, Control of Dog Bylaw 2004 |
||||||
Wilful obstruction of Dog Control Officer or ranger (section 18) |
750.00 |
750.00 |
750.00 |
|||
Failure or refusal to supply information or wilfully providing false particulars (section 19(2)) |
750.00 |
750.00 |
750.00 |
|||
Failure to supply information or wilfully providing false particulars about dog (section 19A(2)) |
750.00 |
750.00 |
750.00 |
|||
Failure to comply with any bylaw authorised by (section 20(5)) |
300.00 |
300.00 |
300.00 |
|||
Failure to comply with effects of disqualification authorised by (section 28(5)) |
750.00 |
750.00 |
750.00 |
|||
Failure to comply with effects of classification of dog as dangerous dog (section 32(2)) |
300.00 |
300.00 |
300.00 |
|||
Fraudulent sale or transfer of dangerous dog (section 32(4)) |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
|||
Failure to comply with effects of classification of dog as menacing dog (section 33E(2)) |
300.00 |
300.00 |
300.00 |
|||
Failure to implant microchip transponder in dog (section 36A(6)) |
300.00 |
300.00 |
300.00 |
|||
False statement relating to registration (section 41) |
750.00 |
750.00 |
750.00 |
|||
Failure to register dog (section 42) |
300.00 |
300.00 |
300.00 |
|||
Fraudulent procurement or attempt to procure replacement registration label or disc (section 46(4)) |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
|||
Failure to advise change of dog ownership (section 48 (3)) |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|||
Failure to advise change of address (section 49(4)) |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|||
Removal, swapping or counterfeiting of registration label or disc (section 51(1)) |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
|||
Failure to keep dog controlled or confined (section 52A) |
200.00 |
200.00 |
200.00 |
|||
Failure to keep dog under control (section 53(1)) |
200.00 |
200.00 |
200.00 |
|||
Failure to provide proper care and attention, to supply proper and sufficient food, water, and shelter, and to provide adequate exercise (section 54(2)) |
300.00 |
300.00 |
300.00 |
|||
Failure to carry leash in public (section 54A) |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|||
Allowing dog known to be dangerous to be at large unmuzzled or unleashed (section 62(4)) |
300.00 |
300.00 |
300.00 |
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Building Services |
|||
Building Consent Lists (Electronic Only) |
|||
Annual Subscription |
313.00 |
313.00 |
313.00 |
Monthly Subscription |
32.00 |
32.00 |
32.00 |
Report - Monthly Subscription (Generated Weekly) |
52.00 |
52.00 |
52.00 |
Disbursements – Copies of Plans and Records |
|||
Certificate of Title (C/T) |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
A3 and A4 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
A3 and A4 – Electronic Copy (hourly rate) |
88.00 |
91.00 |
93.00 |
Note: Plans and records sent electronically will be charged at the hourly rate rather than per page for collation. |
|||
Request for Information/Property Searches |
|||
Hourly rate |
88.00 |
91.00 |
93.00 |
Hourly rate charged for Commercial Property Information Requests plus $1.00 per photocopy |
88.00 |
91.00 |
93.00 |
Residential – Combined Building, Plumbing and Drainage Consents |
88.00 |
91.00 |
93.00 |
Electronic Report – Building Consents and Code Compliance Certificates issued |
23.00 |
24.00 |
25.00 |
Residential Building or Plumbing and Drainage plans (Building plans - site and floor plans) |
54.00 |
56.00 |
58.00 |
Requests for Residential Plans by Tradesmen, Designers and Building Consultants, plus $1.00 per photocopy |
30.00 |
31.00 |
32.00 |
Copy of Consent Documents required for one specific consent plus $1.00 per photocopy |
30.00 |
31.00 |
32.00 |
Faxing/Postage (additional to minimum charge) |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
Property Reports/Documents for Filing on Council Records |
|||
Submit Independent Building Report for filing on Council records (Safe and Sanitary Report) |
120.00 |
124.00 |
128.00 |
Submit As-Built plan for Schedule 1 Exempt Building work for filing on Council records (includes plans submitted for historic work) |
43.00 |
44.00 |
45.00 |
Private Foul and Stormwater Drain in Common |
|||
Private Foul and Stormwater Drain in Common Application |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Plus each Additional or Joining Party |
79.00 |
81.00 |
83.00 |
Site Evaluation |
|||
Guide to on-site wastewater disposal book |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
Sewer Connections – Foul and Stormwater |
|||
Standard Connection fee 100mm diameter |
449.00 |
449.00 |
463.00 |
Standard Connection fee 150mm diameter |
660.00 |
660.00 |
680.00 |
Connection fee greater than 150mm diameter. |
As quoted |
As quoted |
As quoted |
The fee will be quoted by Water and Waste Services on application |
|||
Seal Off |
207.00 |
207.00 |
213.00 |
Allanton – New Wastewater Reticulated Services |
|||
Capital Joining Fee Pressure Sewer System |
8,055.00 |
8,297.00 |
8,545.00 |
(New Developments – capital cost of network) |
|||
Installation Fees* |
*To be quoted |
*To be quoted |
*To be quoted |
*The installation costs will vary according to the market rate at the time of purchase of pump unit, chamber, control panel and ancillary equipment for that property. The fee will be quoted by Water and Waste Services on application. |
|||
Note: The above costs do not include the cost of connecting from the house drain to the pump chamber, pump power costs or the annual residential drainage charge. |
|||
After Hours Building and Drainage Inspections |
|||
Inspection (hourly rate) |
238.00 |
246.00 |
253.00 |
Building Warrant of Fitness Fees (BWOF) |
|||
BWOF Inspection fee and/or Audit fee then hourly rate thereafter |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
BWOF Return fee |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
BWOF Return fee and Form 12 |
175.00 |
180.00 |
185.00 |
Issue new or amended Compliance Schedule (hourly rate) |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Copy of Compliance Schedule |
30.00 |
31.00 |
32.00 |
Amusement Devices |
|||
One device, for the first seven days or part thereof |
11.50 |
11.50 |
11.50 |
Each additional device for first seven days or part thereof – same owner |
2.30 |
2.30 |
2.30 |
For each device $1.50 GST inclusive for a further seven days or part thereof |
1.50 |
1.50 |
1.50 |
Building Compliance Certificate – Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 |
|||
Application for Building Compliance Certificates Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act fee |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Inspections for Building Compliance Certificates (hourly rate) |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Certificate of Acceptance |
|||
Certificate of Acceptance- refer to building consent charges |
|||
Certificate for Public Use |
|||
Certificate for Public Use Construction/Occupation Application fee plus hourly rate thereafter |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Certificate for Public Use Inspection Charge (hourly rate) |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Certificate for Public Use amendments (hourly rate) |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Building Consent – General Charges |
|||
Processing charges (hourly rate) |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Inspection charges (hourly rate) |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Administration charges (hourly rate) |
|
90.00 |
93.00 |
Conversion of hard copy application to digital application (hourly rate) |
- |
- |
169.00 |
Administration cost for withdrawing building consent application (hourly rate) |
- |
- |
93.00 |
Amended Plan Application (deposit only plus hourly rate thereafter) |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Notice to Fix (NTF) preparation fee (hourly rate) |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Building Consent Exemption Fee – Schedule 1(2) (hourly rate) |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Building on land subject to natural hazards (S71 – S74) application fee plus LINZ Lodgement Fee plus hourly rate thereafter |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Building on two or more allotments (S75-S83) application fee plus LINZ Lodgement Fee plus hourly rate thereafter |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Application for a special exemption under section 6 Fencing of Swimming Pools Act |
250.00 |
258.00 |
266.00 |
Annual Inspection fee for special exemptions under section 6 Fencing of Swimming Pools Act |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Swimming Pool Fence Monitoring Inspection (per inspection) |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Extension of Time Application |
33.00 |
34.00 |
35.00 |
Functions Relating to Dangerous, Earthquake Prone or Insanitary Buildings (hourly rate) |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Change of Use Consideration – if no building work required – charged at hourly rate |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Non Commercial Fast Track Code Compliance Certificates (hourly rate) |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Pre-Application Meetings (hourly rate) |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Front Counter Advice 15 minutes free then hourly rate thereafter |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Grants, Waivers and Modification of the Building Code (hourly rate) |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Minor Plan Variation fee (no additional processing and very simple changes) |
80.00 |
125.00 |
95.00 |
Re-lodged/Split Building Consent application (no change in value of work) (hourly rate) |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Alternative Solution Approval (hourly rate) |
159.00 |
164.00 |
169.00 |
Heating Appliance Fee (domestic only) |
330.00 |
340.00 |
350.00 |
Relocate Hot Water Cylinder Fee |
337.00 |
347.00 |
350.00 |
Minor Plumbing, Installation of new fitting |
533.00 |
549.00 |
565.00 |
Building Applications Cost Estimates |
|||
Cost estimations payable are made up of a number of components including processing costs, an assumed number of inspections and provision for a code compliance certificate upon satisfactory completion of work. |
|||
Note: Residential and Commercial building applications over $700,000 are charged at the hourly rate plus administration and project information memorandum or project consideration fees. |
|||
Levies |
|||
Project values of $20,000 and over are required to pay the BRANZ and MBIE Building Levies. |
|||
BCA Levy |
|||
BCA Accreditation Levy payable on all building consent applications including amended and staged applications. |
7.00 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
Building Consent Application - Residential |
|||
New Construction – Residential |
|||
Erect Single Level Dwelling |
3,591.00 |
3,686.00 |
3,797.00 |
Erect Multiple Level Dwelling (including Basement) |
4,946.00 |
5,077.00 |
5,229.00 |
Multi-Unit Development (Single Level) Per Unit |
3,701.00 |
3,796.00 |
3,913.00 |
Multi-Unit Development (>1 Level) per Unit |
3,692.00 |
3,800.00 |
3,914.00 |
Erect Garage/Carport/Shed (Non-Habitable) |
1,348.00 |
1,380.00 |
1,423.00 |
Erect Habitable Garage/Sleepout |
2,172.00 |
2,230.00 |
2,298.00 |
Relocate Dwelling |
2,614.00 |
2,672.00 |
2,751.00 |
Additions and Alterations – Residential |
|||
Alter Dwelling less than $20,000 |
1,698.00 |
1,741.00 |
1,794.00 |
Alter Dwelling $20,000 to $50,000 |
2,463.00 |
2,529.00 |
2,606.00 |
Alter Dwelling $50,000 to $100,000 |
2,622.00 |
2,693.00 |
2,775.00 |
Alter Dwelling over $100,000 |
3,073.00 |
3,158.00 |
3,254.00 |
Demolition – Residential |
|||
Demolish Residential Building (per building). Values $20,000 and over will need to pay BRANZ and MBIE Building Levies. |
566.00 |
574.00 |
591.00 |
Drainage Seal Off fee of $213.00 may be required per each drain to be sealed off. |
|||
Other – Residential |
|||
Erect Deck |
1,097.00 |
1,121.00 |
1,155.00 |
Install Sump |
306.00 |
315.00 |
324.00 |
Foul/Stormwater Drainage (including Septic Tank) |
458.00 |
469.00 |
483.00 |
Retaining Walls (Specific Design) |
1,029.00 |
1,051.00 |
1,083.00 |
Reclad Existing Building |
646.00 |
666.00 |
686.00 |
Reroof |
471.00 |
485.00 |
500.00 |
Minor alteration < $5000.00 including installation of wet area shower |
523.00 |
539.00 |
555.00 |
Remove Internal Wall |
409.00 |
421.00 |
434.00 |
Swimming Pool Fences |
275.00 |
283.00 |
291.00 |
Pole/Veranda Signs |
275.00 |
283.00 |
291.00 |
Building Consent Application – Commercial |
|||
New Construction – Commercial |
|
|
|
New Single Level Commercial Building |
4,977.00 |
5,108.00 |
5,261.00 |
New Multi-Level Commercial Building |
8,853.00 |
9,103.00 |
9,377.00 |
Additions and Alterations – Commercial |
|||
Alterations to Existing Building (Single Floor) |
1,740.00 |
1,784.00 |
1,839.00 |
Alterations to Existing Building (Single Floor) including Plumbing and Drainage |
2,758.00 |
2,830.00 |
2,915.00 |
Alterations to Existing Building (Multi Level) |
2,441.00 |
2,506.00 |
2,582.00 |
Alterations to Existing Building (Multi Level) including Plumbing and Drainage |
3,840.00 |
3,945.00 |
4,064.00 |
Erect Garage/Carport/Shed (Non-Habitable) |
1,348.00 |
1,380.00 |
1,423.00 |
Demolition – Commercial |
|||
Demolish Commercial Building (per building). Values $20,000 and over will need to pay BRANZ and MBIE Building Levies. |
566.00 |
574.00 |
591.00 |
Drainage Seal Off fee of $213.00 may be required per each drain to be sealed off. |
|||
Other – Commercial |
|||
Retail Fitout |
914.00 |
942.00 |
970.00 |
Retail Fitout includes Plumbing and Drainage |
1,512.00 |
1,558.00 |
1,605.00 |
Minor Internal Alteration |
554.00 |
571.00 |
588.00 |
Minor External Alteration |
644.00 |
661.00 |
681.00 |
Fire Alarm/Sprinkler System |
378.00 |
389.00 |
400.00 |
Temporary Structures – Commercial |
|||
Marquee |
426.00 |
435.00 |
448.00 |
Building Infringement Offences and Fees set by Statute |
|||
Failing to comply with the requirement that building work must be carried out in accordance with a building consent (section 40) |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
Failing to apply for a certificate of acceptance for urgent building work as soon as practicable after completion of building work (section 42) |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
Person who is not licensed building practitioner carrying out restricted building work without supervision of licensed building practitioner with appropriate licence (section 85(1)) |
750.00 |
750.00 |
750.00 |
Licensed building practitioner carrying out restricted building work without appropriate licence section (section 85 (2)(a)) |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
Licensed building practitioner supervising restricted building work without appropriate licence (section 85(2)(b)) |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
Failing to comply with the requirement to obtain a compliance schedule (section 101) |
250.00 |
250.00 |
250.00 |
Failing to supply territorial authority with a building warrant of fitness (section 108(5)(aa)) |
250.00 |
250.00 |
250.00 |
Failing to display a building warrant of fitness required to be displayed (section 108(5)(a)) |
250.00 |
250.00 |
250.00 |
Displaying a false or misleading building warrant of fitness (section 108(5)(b)) |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
Displaying a building warrant of fitness other than in accordance with section 108 (section 108(5)(c)) |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
Using, or knowingly permitting the use of, a building for a use for which it is not safe or not sanitary (section 116B(1)(a)) |
1,500.00 |
1,500.00 |
1,500.00 |
Using, or knowingly permitting the use of, a building that has inadequate means of escape from fire (section 116B(1)(b)) |
2,000.00 |
2,000.00 |
2,000.00 |
Failing to comply with a notice, within the time stated in the notice, requiring work to be carried out on a dangerous, earthquake-prone, or insanitary building (section 124) |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
Using or occupying a building, or permitting another person to do so, contrary to a territorial authority’s hoarding, fence, or notice (section 128A(2)) |
2,000.00 |
2,000.00 |
2,000.00 |
Failing to comply with a notice to fix (section 168) |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
Person holding himself or herself out as being licensed to do or supervise building work or building inspection work while not being so licensed (section 314(1)) |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
Failing to provide prescribed disclosure information (section 362D(4)) |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
Failing to provide prescribed checklist (section 362D(4)) |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
Failing to have a written contract as prescribed (section 362F(4)) |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
Failing to provide prescribed information or documentation to specified persons (section 362T(4)) |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
Using, or permitting use of building having no consent or code compliance certificate or certificate for public use for premises for public use (section 363) |
1,500.00 |
1,500.00 |
1,500.00 |
Wilfully obstructing, hindering, or resisting a person executing powers conferred under the Act or its regulations (section 367) |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
Wilfully removing or defacing a notice published under the Act or inciting another person to do so (section 368) |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
||
$ |
$ |
$ |
|||
Environmental Health |
|||||
Food Premises Registered under the Food Act 2014 and Food Hygiene Regulations 1974 |
|||||
Opening Fee |
238.00 |
155.00 |
160.00 |
||
Miscellaneous Fees |
|
||||
Registration - new |
|
|
100.00 |
New fee created to reflect not only the administration time but also the EHOs time (15 - 30mins) in the new registration process |
|
Registration - renewal |
|
60.00 |
62.00 |
||
Food Control Plan Mentoring session |
|
155.00 |
160.00 |
||
Fee for cancelled verification |
|
155.00 |
160.00 |
||
Additional verification |
|
155.00 |
160.00 |
||
Verification |
Audit' replaced by 'Verification' |
||||
Class 1 |
|
311.00 |
320.00 |
||
Class 2 |
|
505.00 |
520.00 |
||
Class 3 |
|
738.00 |
760.00 |
||
Class 4 |
|
815.00 |
839.00 |
||
Corrective Action Request sign off |
|
155.00 |
160.00 |
||
Foodstalls |
|||||
Food Stall (for profit) |
31.00 |
32.00 |
33.00 |
||
Food Street Stalls (permanent) per day |
31.00 |
32.00 |
33.00 |
||
One-off Food Stall Inspections (if required) per event fee |
|||||
1–10 Food stalls: |
124.00 |
155.00 |
160.00 |
||
for the first 10 food stalls |
for the first 10 food stalls |
for the first 10 food stalls |
|||
11 or more food stalls: Fee for 1–10 food stalls plus |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
||
per each additional food stall |
per each additional food stall |
per each additional food stall |
|||
Other Premises |
|||||
Monitoring, enforcement and additonal visits |
|
|
60.00 |
New fee to cover staff time and allow for desk top assessments charged at a lesser fee |
|
Camping Grounds |
124.00 |
195.00 |
201.00 |
||
Hairdressers’ Salons |
181.00 |
195.00 |
201.00 |
||
Offensive Trades |
124.00 |
118.00 |
122.00 |
||
Funeral Directors |
124.00 |
195.00 |
201.00 |
||
Mobile Trading Permit |
|
40.00 |
41.00 |
||
Beautician, Tattooists and Skin Piercing Bylaw Annual Licensing Fees |
|||||
Secondary Business Activity (eg jewellers/beauty therapy services in conjunction with another activity) |
56.00 |
75.00 |
77.00 |
||
Sole Business Activity (eg Beauty Therapist, Tattooist) |
224.00 |
195.00 |
201.00 |
||
Other Charges |
|||||
Noise consultancy and survey work fee (per hour) |
154.00 |
159.00 |
160.00 |
This fee has been brought into line with the hourly fee |
|
Excessive noise equipment seizure fine |
255.00 |
263.00 |
263.00 |
No increase is recommended as there is a possiblity that seized equipment will not be claimed if the fee is greater than the value of the equipment |
|
Seized equipment storage fee (per day) |
30.00 |
31.00 |
31.00 |
||
Monitoring under the Resource Management (Infringement Offences) Regulations 1999. |
|||||
Note: These fees are set by statute. |
|||||
Contravention of an excessive noise direction under section 327 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
||
Contravention of an abatement notice for an unreasonable noise under section 322(1)(c) |
750.00 |
750.00 |
750.00 |
||
Food Regulations 2015, Schedule 2, Part 1, Infringement Offences and Fees |
New offences brought in under the Food Act 2015 |
||||
Failing to register a food control plan or to ensure that a food control plan is registered with the appropriate authority ss48, 240 (2) |
|
|
450.00 |
||
Failing to ensure that a food business that is subject to a national programme is registered with the appropriate authority ss 79, 240(2) |
|
|
450.00 |
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
|||
$ |
$ |
$ |
||||
Parking Enforcement |
||||||
Authorised Vehicle Parking |
|
|
|
|||
Authorised Vehicle Permit (annually) |
26.00 |
27.00 |
32.00 |
Increase to reflect departments hourly rate to process this permit |
||
Replacement Permit |
|
|
10.00 |
New administration fee |
||
Residents’ Parking |
||||||
Residents’ parking permit (annually) |
180.00 |
185.50 |
191.00 |
|||
Replacement Permit |
|
|
10.00 |
New administration fee |
||
Pro Rata Fees (Month of Application ) |
||||||
October |
210.00 |
216.50 |
223.00 |
|||
November |
195.00 |
201.00 |
207.00 |
|||
December |
180.00 |
185.50 |
191.00 |
|||
January |
165.00 |
170.00 |
175.00 |
|||
February |
150.00 |
155.00 |
160.00 |
|||
March |
135.00 |
139.00 |
143.00 |
|||
April |
120.00 |
124.00 |
128.00 |
|||
May |
105.00 |
108.00 |
111.00 |
|||
June |
90.00 |
93.00 |
96.00 |
|||
July |
75.00 |
77.50 |
80.00 |
|||
August |
60.00 |
62.00 |
64.00 |
|||
September |
45.00 |
46.50 |
48.00 |
|||
Abandoned Vehicle (Fees recovered from owner) |
||||||
Impound Fee |
460.00 |
474.00 |
488.00 |
|||
Storage (daily) |
6.00 |
6.50 |
7.00 |
|||
Unwanted Vehicle Removal |
42.00 |
43.50 |
45.00 |
|||
Commercial Use of Footpaths (Permits) |
||||||
Initial application fee |
|
|
64.00 |
This fee has been introduced to cover the staff related costs of assessing a new application on-site and administration time |
||
Replacement Permit |
|
|
10.00 |
New administration fee |
||
Table with up to a maximum of four chairs (annually) |
182.50 |
188.00 |
194.00 |
|||
Signs, Screens, or any other object per item (annually) |
36.50 |
37.60 |
39.00 |
|||
Display of Goods (annually) |
92.00 |
95.00 |
98.00 |
|||
Impounding of sign or any other object (per item) |
64.00 |
66.00 |
68.00 |
|||
Construction Parking Areas |
||||||
Installation and Reinstatement of Area: |
||||||
6m length |
550.00 |
567.00 |
584.00 |
|||
12m length |
650.00 |
670.00 |
690.00 |
|||
18m length |
750.00 |
773.00 |
796.00 |
|||
Investigation and administration |
60.00 |
62.00 |
64.00 |
|||
Relocation of pay and display machines. |
900.00 |
927.00 |
955.00 |
|||
Monthly Hire, All zones except “Residential Zones” as defined in the Dunedin City District Plan |
||||||
6m length |
250.00 |
257.00 |
265.00 |
|||
12m length |
500.00 |
515.00 |
530.00 |
|||
18m length |
750.00 |
773.00 |
796.00 |
|||
Monthly Hire, All “Residential Zones” as defined in the Dunedin City District Plan |
||||||
6m length |
125.00 |
129.00 |
133.00 |
|||
12m length |
250.00 |
257.50 |
265.00 |
|||
18m length |
375.00 |
386.50 |
398.00 |
|||
Skips and Containers (Permits) |
||||||
Skips |
||||||
All zones except “Residential Zones” as defined in the Dunedin City District Plan: (daily) |
40.00 |
41.50 |
43.00 |
|||
Monthly Charge (all zones) |
600.00 |
618.50 |
637.00 |
|||
Containers |
||||||
20 foot container (daily) |
40.00 |
41.50 |
43.00 |
|||
40 foot container (daily) |
80.00 |
82.50 |
85.00 |
|||
Towage – set by Statute – Transport (towage fees) Notice 2004 |
||||||
Where the vehicle gross weight does not exceed 3500 kgs – between hours of 7.00 am and 6.00 pm Monday to Friday (other than public holiday) |
53.60 |
52.50 |
53.60 |
Fees corrected to show 15% GST.(Fees for 2016/17 were copied from the schedule in the Transport (towage fees) Notice 2004 which does not show the increase in GST from 1 October 2010.) |
||
Where the vehicle gross weight does not exceed 3500 kgs – between hours of 6.00 pm and 7.00 am Monday to Friday, Saturday, Sunday and Public Holidays |
71.50 |
70.00 |
71.50 |
|||
Where the vehicle gross weight exceeds 3500 kgs – between hours of 7.00 am and 6.00 pm Monday to Friday (other than public holiday) |
132.80 |
130.00 |
132.80 |
|||
Where the vehicle gross weight exceeds 3500 kgs – between hours of 6.00 pm and 7.00 am Monday to Friday, Saturday, Sunday and Public Holidays |
204.40 |
200.00 |
204.40 |
|||
Infringement Fees – set by Statute – Land Transport Act 1998 |
||||||
Parked in a Pay and Display area displaying an invalid receipt |
12.00– 57.00 |
12.00– 57.00 |
12.00– 57.00 |
|||
Parked in a Pay and Display area in excess of maximum time |
12.00– 57.00 |
12.00– 57.00 |
12.00– 57.00 |
|||
Displaying an expired receipt |
12.00– 57.00 |
12.00– 57.00 |
12.00– 57.00 |
|||
Parked in breach of a time limit |
12.00– 57.00 |
12.00– 57.00 |
12.00– 57.00 |
|||
Failing to display a parking receipt |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Failing to display a valid parking receipt |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Parked within an intersection |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
|||
Parked within 6m of an intersection |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
|||
Parked on or within 6m of a pedestrian crossing |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
|||
Parked in a no stopping area |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Parked on a broken yellow line |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
|||
Parked on a bus stop or taxi stand |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
|||
Parked over or within 1m of a vehicle entrance |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Parked on or within 500 mm of a fire hydrant |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Double parked |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
|||
Incorrect kerb parking |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Parked on a footpath |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Parked a trailer on a road in excess of seven days |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Inconsiderate parking |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
|||
Parked on a Roadside grass plot, shrubs or flower bed |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Parked on a clearway |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
|||
Parked a vehicle on or over a marking indicating the limits of a parking space |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Parked unlawfully in a Pickup and Drop off area |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Parked in a reserved area without authority |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Parked in an area reserved for authorised residents vehicles only |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Parked in an area reserved for motorcycles only |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Parked in an area reserved for mobility card holders only |
150.00 |
150.00 |
150.00 |
|||
Parked facing the wrong direction |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Bus parked unattended on a Bus Stop |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
|||
Parked on a Cycle Lane |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
|||
Failing to display a red marker light on a GSV |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
|||
Failing to display current evidence of vehicle inspection (WOF) (light) |
200.00 |
200.00 |
200.00 |
|||
Failing to display current evidence of vehicle inspection (COF) (commercial or heavy) |
600.00 |
600.00 |
600.00 |
|||
Operated an unregistered motor vehicle |
200.00 |
200.00 |
200.00 |
|||
Operated an unlicensed motor vehicle |
200.00 |
200.00 |
200.00 |
|||
Registration Plates not affixed in prescribed manner |
200.00 |
200.00 |
200.00 |
|||
Displayed other than authorised registration plate |
200.00 |
200.00 |
200.00 |
|||
Displayed other than authorised registration plate (Body Corporate) |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
|||
Displayed other than authorised motor vehicle license |
200.00 |
200.00 |
200.00 |
|||
Displayed other than authorised motor vehicle license (Body Corporate) |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
|||
Displayed item likely to be mistaken for a Registration Plate |
200.00 |
200.00 |
200.00 |
|||
Displayed item likely to be mistaken for a Registration Plate (Body Corporate) |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
|||
Displayed item likely to be mistaken for a motor vehicle license |
200.00 |
200.00 |
200.00 |
|||
Displayed item likely to be mistaken for a motor vehicle license (Body Corporate) |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
|||
Obscured or indistinguishable registration plate |
200.00 |
200.00 |
200.00 |
|||
Obscured or indistinguishable registration plate (Body Corporate) |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
|||
Obscured or indistinguishable license label |
200.00 |
200.00 |
200.00 |
|||
Obscured or indistinguishable license label (Body Corporate) |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
|||
Used a vehicle with exemption from continuous licensing |
200.00 |
200.00 |
200.00 |
|||
Used a vehicle with exemption from continuous licensing (Body Corporate) |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Parking Operations |
|||
Car Park Building Fees (hourly) Monday to Friday between opening and 6pm |
|||
Great King Street |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
Lower Moray Place |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
Wall Street |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
Early bird parking before 10.00am (hourly) Great King Street ONLY |
1.00 |
1.00 |
2.50 |
Car Park Building Fees (hourly) Saturday between opening and 6pm |
|||
Great King Street |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Lower Moray Place |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Wall Street |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Car Park Building Fees (hourly) Monday to Saturday between 6pm and closing |
|||
Great King Street |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Lower Moray Place |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Wall Street |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Car Park Building Fees (hourly) Sunday and Public Holidays between opening and closing |
|||
Great King Street |
Free |
Free |
Free |
Lower Moray Place |
Free |
Free |
Free |
Wall Street |
Free |
Free |
Free |
Car Park Buildings Leased Parking Fees (weekly) |
|||
Great King Street |
39.00 |
40.00 |
41.00 |
Lower Moray Place |
39.00 |
40.00 |
41.00 |
Wall Street |
55.00 |
57.00 |
58.50 |
Leased car park lost card replacement (car park building) |
25.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
Off-Street Car Parks Metered Parking Flat Fee (per day) |
|||
Thomas Burns |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
Railway North |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
St Andrew Street |
3.00 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
On-Street Meters (hourly) Monday to Saturday between the hours of 9am to 6pm |
|||
Main Street (30 minutes maximum stay) |
1.50 |
1.50 |
1.50 |
Core Zone (one hour maximum stay) |
3.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
Inner Zone (variable maximum stay) |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
Outer Zone (four hours maximum stay) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Outer Zone All Day Parking (per day) |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
Off-Street Metered Car Parks (hourly) between the hours of 9am and 6pm |
|||
Railway Station North |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
Railway Station South |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
Dowling Street (four hours maximum) |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
Frederick Street (four hours maximum) |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
Filleul Street |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
Off-Street Metered Car Parks (hourly) between the hours of 9am and 6pm Saturday |
|||
Note: Casual hourly parking not available at St Andrew Street from 2011/12 |
|||
Railway Station North |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Railway Station South |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Dowling Street (four hours maximum) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Frederick Street (four hours maximum) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Filleul Street |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Off-Street Metered Car Parks – Sunday and Public Holidays |
|||
Railway Station North |
Free |
Free |
Free |
Railway Station South |
Free |
Free |
Free |
Dowling Street (four hours maximum) |
Free |
Free |
Free |
Frederick Street (four hours maximum) |
Free |
Free |
Free |
Filleul Street |
Free |
Free |
Free |
St Andrew Street |
Free |
Free |
Free |
Off-Street Leased Parking Fees (weekly) |
|||
Dowling Street |
35.00 |
36.00 |
37.00 |
Queens Gardens |
35.00 |
36.00 |
37.00 |
Crawford Street (from 1/7/15) |
35.00 |
38.00 |
39.00 |
Filleul Street |
35.00 |
36.00 |
37.00 |
York Place |
35.00 |
36.00 |
37.00 |
Thomas Burns |
20.00 |
21.00 |
37.00 |
Station |
20.00 |
21.00 |
22.00 |
Lorne Street |
16.00 |
17.00 |
18.00 |
Parking Permit Charges (minimum charge 1/2 day) |
|||
Permit (1 day) except Octagon and George Street (Octagon – Albany Street) |
20.00 |
20.50 |
21.00 |
Permit (1 day) Octagon and George Street (Octagon – Albany Street) |
30.00 |
31.00 |
32.00 |
Permit (6 days) except Octagon and George Street (Octagon – Albany Street) |
96.00 |
99.00 |
102.00 |
Permit (6 days) Octagon and George Street (Octagon – Albany Street) |
144.00 |
148.50 |
153.00 |
Permit (month) except Octagon and George Street (Octagon – Albany Street) |
400.00 |
412.00 |
424.50 |
Permit (month) Octagon and George Street (Octagon – Albany Street) |
600.00 |
618.00 |
636.50 |
23 January 2017 |
|
Te Ao Tūroa Environment Strategy Funding
Department: Corporate Policy and Community and Planning
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides funding options for resourcing the implementation of Te Ao Tūroa – Our Natural World: Dunedin’s Environment Strategy (Te Ao Tūroa) for the Council’s consideration.
That the Council: a) Considers providing funding for the delivery of Te Ao Tūroa in the draft Annual Plan 2017/18. |
BACKGROUND
2 Te Ao Tūroa was adopted by the Council on 23 May 2016. Te Ao Tūroa is a city-wide strategy developed in close consultation with Kāi Tahu, a range of key city stakeholders, and the community. Currently the delivery of Te Ao Tūroa’s strategic objectives is driven through a partnership approach that leverages existing resourcing, expertise and priorities.
3 Te Ao Tūroa Partnership has been established as a governance group providing oversight on funding, managing, delivering and supporting the implementation of Te Ao Tūroa.
4 The Annual Plan 2016/17 provided initial funding of $150,000 to kick-start delivery on the goals and objectives of Te Ao Tūroa. To date, that funding has been used to: employ a Policy Analyst - Environment Strategy to manage and coordinate the work programme for delivery of the Strategy goals (e.g. Compact of Mayors, Energy Plan activities, Biodiversity Fund); establish an internal group of environmental staff across the Council; stocktake of initial actions; and design, for publishing and launching the Strategy document.
5 The funding for the remainder of the current financial year has been earmarked towards supporting: town belt boost project; backyard biodiversity; and establishing baseline data (initial actions set out in the adopted Strategy).
DISCUSSION
OPTIONS
6 Some initial actions have been identified and a review of existing activities is proposed. There is currently no funding dedicated to the delivery of Te Ao Tūroa in the draft Annual Plan 2017/18. Options for funding the delivery of Te Ao Tūroa are provided for the Council’s consideration.
7 The following table summarises the options:
Option One |
Option Two |
Option Three |
Option Four |
Coordination and management of Te Ao Tūroa delivery activities across the Council and in partnership with the community and Te Ao Tūroa Partnership |
No coordination and management of Te Ao Tūroa delivery activities |
||
No additional projects |
Project delivery begun: Environment Envoy Working with landowners Managing pests |
Project delivery begun: Environment Envoy Working with landowners Managing pests City know how State of the Environment events and report Te Ao Tūroa grants |
No additional projects |
$90K |
$150K |
$200K |
No additional funding |
Option One – provides $90K funding for the delivery of Te Ao Tūroa in the draft Annual Plan 2017/18
8 Funding for coordination and management of Te Ao Tūroa delivery activities across the Council and in partnership with the community and Te Ao Tūroa Partnership.
Advantages
· Council would demonstrate a commitment to deliver on the goals and aspirations of Te Ao Tūroa.
· Activity to align and leverage the Council and city stakeholder work and investment with Te Ao Tūroa would be able to take place.
· Te Ao Tūroa Partnership would have dedicated staff support.
Disadvantages
· $90K funding would need to be sought from budgets.
· Te Ao Tūroa actions and projects would be delivered fairly slowly.
· Limited capacity to develop more relationships and work programmes with key city stakeholders to embed environmental goals.
Option Two – provides $150K funding for the delivery of Te Ao Tūroa in the draft Annual Plan 2017/18
9 Funding for coordination and management of Te Ao Tūroa delivery activities across the Council and in partnership with the community and the Te Ao Tūroa Partnership, as well as supporting projects such as: Environment Envoy; working with landowners; and managing pests.
Advantages
· Some initial Te Ao Tūroa actions and projects will be delivered.
· Council would demonstrate a strong commitment to deliver on the goals and aspirations of Te Ao Tūroa.
· Activity to align and leverage the Council and city stakeholder work and investment with Te Ao Tūroa would be able to take place.
· Te Ao Tūroa Partnership would have dedicated staff support.
Disadvantages
· $150K funding would need to be sought from budgets.
· Limited capacity for engagement with external stakeholders and Council activities in progressing the Strategy’s initial actions.
Option Three – provide $200K funding for the delivery of Te Ao Tūroa in the draft Annual Plan 2017/18
10 Funding for coordination and management of Te Ao Tūroa delivery activities across the Council and in partnership with the community and the Te Ao Tūroa Parternship, as well as supporting projects such as: as well as supporting projects such as: Environment Envoy; working with landowners; managing pests; City know how; State of the Environment events and reports; and establish a grant to support Te Ao Tūroa environmental goals as part of the DCC community grants scheme.
Advantages
· More Te Ao Tūroa initial actions and projects would be delivered, more quickly.
· Council would demonstrate a stronger commitment to deliver on the goals and aspirations of Te Ao Tūroa.
· Activity to align and leverage the Council and city stakeholder work and investment with Te Ao Tūroa would be able to take place.
· There would be capacity to develop more relationships and work programmes with key city stakeholders to embed environmental goals.
· Te Ao Tūroa Partnership would be supported by staff.
Disadvantages
· $200K funding would need to be sought from budgets.
Option Four – Status Quo: provide no funding for the delivery of Te Ao Tūroa in the draft Annual Plan 2017/18
11 No dedicated funding for the coordination, management and delivery of Te Ao Tūroa would be provided.
Advantages
· No funding would need to be sought from budgets.
Disadvantages
· Activity to align the Council and city stakeholder work and investment with TAT will be limited.
· Te Ao Tūroa will be delivered very slowly and some Te Ao Tūroa actions and projects will not be delivered.
· The Te Ao Tūroa Partnership will not have dedicated staff support.
· Engagement with external stakeholders and Council activities in progressing the Strategy’s initial actions would be limited.
NEXT STEPS
12 The next steps for Te Ao Tūroa will depend upon the resourcing option approved by the Council.
Signatories
Author: |
Junichi Sugishita - Policy Anlayst Tami Sargeant - Senior Policy Analyst |
Authoriser: |
Maria Ioannou - Corporate Policy Manager Nicola Pinfold - Group Manager Community and Planning |
There are no attachments for this report.
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This decision enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and relates to providing local infrastructure and public services it is considered good-quality and cost-effective. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The goals and delivery of Te Ao Tūroa are linked with those of the other key strategies, particularly the Integrated Transport Strategy, 3 Waters Strategy, the Economic Development Strategy and Spatial Plan. The Strategy also has close links to the Energy Plan 1.0 and the Waste Management and Minimisation Plan. Delivery of Te Ao Tūroa will recognise linkages with other DCC strategies, projects and plans. The strategy is high-level and cross-cutting and will affect activity across the DCC and the city. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement As kaitiakitaka, Kāi Tahu have a special role in protecting, restoring and enhancing the natural environment, especially those sites of particular cultural significance. Kāi Tahu was consulted throughout the development of Te Ao Tūroa, and is a key partner in the Strategy’s implementation and delivery. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability The goals and objectives of Te Ao Tūroa will provide Dunedin with long-term environmental, economic and social benefits, and governance of the Strategy’s delivery is key to ensuring this is effective. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The resourcing requested in the options is not included in the draft Annual Plan 2017/18. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The resourcing requested in the options is not included in budgets and if approved, would have a financial impact, unless savings are found from another area. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance Whilst there is high community interest in the goals and aspirations of Te Ao Tūroa, the decision to fund the delivery of Te Ao Tūroa has a low impact on Council’s finances, capacity and capability and has therefore been assessed under the Council's Significance and Engagement Policy as being of low significance. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external The initial actions, governance and resourcing of the strategy has been developed in partnership with Te Ao Tūroa Partnership. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal Staff from Corporate Policy; Finance; Parks and Recreation; City Development and Events and Community Development have been involved in the drafting of this report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflicts of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards There are no implications for Community Boards. |
Council 23 January 2017 |
|
Review of the Allocation of Funding to Applicants to the Biodiversity Fund
Department: Community and Planning
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 The Biodiversity Fund currently has a maximum total grant allocation of $5000 with no minimum grant allocation.
2 A submission to the Annual Plan 2016/17 requested “the current limit of 50% of total funding of the project should be made more flexible” due to financial pressure resulting from the current agricultural financial climate. The decision presented as a result of this submission was that the 50/50 cost share between the Council and the applicant was consistent with many similar environmental funds, and that an alternative approach would be to increase the current grant limit of $5000. The Council requested that staff prepare a report reviewing the $5000 limit.
3 This report reviews the $5000 limit currently placed on the individual grants allocated through the Biodiversity Fund and suggest options that may provide more financial assistance to those wishing to carry out works that contribute to Dunedin’s biodiversity.
4 The recommended option is to increase the funding limit for one or two flagship projects in each funding round. The increase in the funding limit would need to be accommodated by an increase in the overall fund available for each round of funding.
That the Council: a) Decides which option to proceed with for future rounds of the Dunedin Biodiversity Fund. |
BACKGROUND
5 The purpose of the Dunedin Biodiversity Fund (the Fund) is to “to maintain a network of viable habitats and ecosystems in Dunedin by encouraging and supporting those landowners who are committed to protecting, enhancing and managing indigenous biodiversity.”
6 The current funding criteria, timing of applications and rules related grants are outlined in the Dunedin Biodiversity Fund Brochure (Attachment A).
7 Of most relevance to this report are two restrictions on the grant that:
a) A cost-sharing arrangement of 50:50 meaning the Council will only fund up to half of the project cost.
b) A maximum grant of $5000 per project.
8 During consultation on the Annual Plan 2016/17 one submitter requested the Council should:
“Increase funding for biodiversity in line with our wildlife city image. The current limit of 50% of the total funding of the project should be made more flexible as in the current agricultural financial climate it is difficult for some landowners to free up funds for these projects.”
9 The decision as a result of this submission was:
The Biodiversity Fund has a current annual limit of $60,000, which is largely consistent with the amount of money requested through grant applications. The 50/50 cost share between the Council and the applicant is a standard practice for many similar environmental funds. An alternative to increasing Council's share might be to increase the maximum amount of money that can be requested through the fund (currently limited at $5000) while maintaining the 50/50 cost share. This would provide more financial assistance to landholders and groups undertaking larger projects. If this were to occur it may be necessary to increase the annual allocation to the fund. The Council has requested that staff prepare a report reviewing the $5,000 limit currently in place on grants from the Biodiversity Fund.
10 This report reviews the $5000 limit currently placed on the grants allocated through the Fund and suggests options that would provide more financial assistance to landholders and groups undertaking larger projects.
DISCUSSION
11 The initial concern raised by the submitter was thet 50/50 cost share arrangement was insufficient to support landholders who wish to carry out projects in the current farming financial climate. However, if the cost share ratio was increased in favour of the applicants, the viability of the Fund, in terms the amount of work leveraged, would be reduced. Further, the 50/50 cost share is consistent with many other similar environmental funds in New Zealand and Australia. Rraising the $5000 restriction per project was proposed as a potential alternative.
12 Since 2013 the Fund has been fully-subscribed or over-subscribed on an annual basis. If this pattern of subscription continues and the funding limit was to be raised, even if only for one or two projects per funding round, it would affect the allocation of funding to smaller projects. This problem could be avoided if the change was accompanied by an increase in the funding allocated to the Fund.
13 If the limit on funding were to increase it could also be worthwhile imposing a further set of criteria on those projects seeking the increased funding. These criteria could consider
· potential biodiversity gains
· the ecological community or environment that will be enhanced by the project
· the location of the project (the Fund is under-represented in many parts of Dunedin)
· the contribution to our understanding of Dunedin’s natural environment (if the project involves research).
OPTIONS
Option One –Increase the funding limit and increase the annual funding amount by the same amount.
14 This option would increase the funding limit for one or two flagship projects in each funding round (for example increase the maximum to $10k and increase the amount allocated to the Fund by $20k per annum).
15 Additional sub-options could be to direct the extra funding toward specific environments, areas or project types. Another sub-option would be to use this money to increase the 50/50 funding ratio in favour of the applicant in special circumstances.
Advantages
· The new funding model could leverage more money from applicants resulting in larger projects.
· The new funding model could attract new applicants to the fund.
· The proposed Second Generation Dunedin City District Plan is likely to impose stricter controls on vegetation clearance. Increased funding could be used an incentive to for landholders that are impacted by these new rules.
· The new funding model could encourage more innovative projects.
· The new funding model could be used to provide more financial assistance to worthy projects carried out by applicant with reduced financial capacity.
Disadvantages
· The increased funds may simply be absorbed into large projects to pay for work that the applicant would otherwise have covered.
Option Two –Increase the funding limit and but maintain the existing funding amount
16 This option would increase the funding limit for one or two flagship projects in each funding round with no increase in the amount allocated to the Fund.
Advantages
· The increased limit could leverage more money from applicants resulting in larger projects.
· The increased limit could attract new applicants to the fund.
· The increased limit could encourage more innovative projects.
Disadvantages
· The increased funding may simply be absorbed into large projects to pay for work that the applicant would otherwise have paid for.
· This option could impact smaller projects. Without an associated increase in the overall level of funding it may mean that smaller projects lose money to large flagship projects.
· If the limit was only increased when the fund was under-subscribed it is likely the increased limit would seldom be available.
· If the funding limit were contingent on the funding round being undersubscribed, the amount in each round would be uncertain. This would make budgeting difficult and may put off potential applicants. The lack of certainty would also make it difficult to advertise the improved funding conditions.
Option Three – Maintain the funding limit at $5000 per application and do not increase the funding amount (Status Quo)
17 The funding model of 50/50 cost share with a $5000 limit has been largely successful, and is likely to carry on being so. However, it does not allow much scope for diversification or expansion.
Advantages
· The current funding model has been used successfully for the last nine years.
Disadvantages
· The existing model of funding does not allow for diversification or expansion of the Fund.
· The existing model of funding provides little opportunity for meaningful levels of financial assistance for those that wish to carry out large-scale biodiversity projects but may not have the necessary funds available.
NEXT STEPS
18 Depending on the outcome of this decision next steps may include consultation on an increased level of funding through the Annual Plan and amendments to biodiversity fund rules and guidance materials.
Signatories
Author: |
Garreth Kyle - Research and Monitoring Officer |
Authoriser: |
Anna Johnson - City Development Manager Maria Ioannou - Corporate Policy Manager Sandy Graham - General Manager Strategy and Governance |
|
Title |
Page |
Dunedin Biodiversity Fund Brochure |
148 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The Biodiversity Fund contributes to the strategic objectives of the Environment Strategy. Any changes to the Biodiversity Fund could affect the commitments under the Environment Strategy, for better or worse. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability If the preferred option is chosen it may result in improved long-term gains for biodiversity. If the alternative option or the status quo are chosen there is likely to be little change. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy An increase in the Fund is currently unbudgeted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The preferred option would result in an increase in Biodiversity Fund. The amount has not been decided, and is unbudgeted. The alternative option and the status quo would result in no financial change. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance The significance has been assessed as low. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been no external engagement. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal There has been no internal engagement. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There is no conflict of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards There are no implications for community boards. |
23 January 2017 |
|
Draft 2017/18 Budget - Community and Planning Group
Department: Community and Planning and Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides the draft 2017/18 budget for the Community and Planning Group. The Community and Planning Group includes the following activities:
· City Development
· Resource Consents
· Events and Community Development
· Corporate Policy
That the Council: a) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the draft 2017/18 budget relating to Community and Planning as shown/amended in Attachment A. b) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the 2017/18 fees and charges for the Community Art Gallery and City Planning (Community Planning and Resource Consents) as shown/amended in Attachment B. |
operating budgets
Revenue
Rates
2 General Rates have reduced in the Community and Planning budget by $303k. The reduction in the City Development Activity is $541k. The reduction incorporates the removal of funding included in the 2016/17 year for one year only and a transfer of budgets to Civic and Administration Services (Second Generation District Plan (2GP)) and Transport (Central City Plan).
3 Rates in the Events and Community Development Activity have increased by $169k. This increase provides funding of $50K for Ara Toi and $58K for Enviroschools, as well as increases in staff costs and internal charges. Ara Toi expenditure for 2016/17 was not entirely funded through rates revenue as $50k surplus cash from the 2015/16 year was used. For 2017/18, the entire budget for Ara Toi will be funded by rates revenue.
External revenue
4 External revenue has increased by $130k, primarily due to the recovery of expenditure from the New Zealand Masters Games Trust for the 2018 Masters Games.
Expenditure
Staff costs
5 Staff costs have reduced by $306k. The main change is in City Development where additional resources were included in the 2016/17 budget, for the Second Generation District Plan and Central City Plan, for one year only.
6 The budget for Enviroschools has been moved from Solid Waste to Events and Community Development.
Materials, supplies and services
7 Materials, supplies and services have reduced by $211k. This is due to the inclusion of funding of $200k in the 2016/17 year only for the legislatively required reviews of service delivery and to accelerate ongoing work developing the plan for responding to groundwater and sea level rise in lower lying areas of Dunedin.
8 The delivery of services reviews is required by section 17A of the Local Government Act 2002. The Council has used the funding to conduct initial work in liaison with other Councils in the Otago region.
Fees and levies
9 Fees and levies have reduced by $149k. The reduction in City Development is $327k. This reduction is attributed to reduced budgets for 2GP and Central City Plan as explained below.
10 The remaining 2GP budget is now centralised in Civic and Administration Services.
11 Provision has been made in the Transport budget in 2017/18 for project management resources for the Central City Plan. This consolidates all budgets for the Central City Plan within the Transport budget.
12 An increase in fees and levies is provided in the Corporate Policy budget of $118k to fund the audit of the Long Term Plan.
13 The Resource Consents budget contains an increase in budget for litigation costs of $45k which brings the budget into line with actual costs.
capital expenditure Budget
14 The City Development budget for Amenity Improvements related to the Central City Plan have been moved to the Transport budget. All Central City Plan budgets are now grouped together so that they can be managed as one Council project.
FEES AND CHARGES
15 Fees and charges for activities in the Community and Planning Group are unchanged with the exception of deposits for Notified and Non-notified Subdivision consents in City Planning. A copy of the fees schedule is attached.
Service performance measures
16 There are no changes proposed to the measures and targets showing in the Long Term Plan 2015/16-2024/25 for Community and Planning in the 2017/18 year.
related reports
17 There are two related reports for the Community and Planning Group:
· Te Ao Tūroa Environment Strategy funding
· Review of Biodiversity Fund allocation
Signatories
Author: |
Jane Nevill - Corporate Planner Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Nicola Pinfold - Group Manager Community and Planning |
|
Title |
Page |
Draft Budget 2017/18 - Community and Planning |
160 |
|
Fees and Charges - Community and Planning Group |
161 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and meets the current and future needs of the Dunedin communities for good quality public services and regulatory functions in a way that is most cost effective for households and businesses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The activities of the Community and Planning Group primarily contribute to the objectives and priorities of the above strategies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no known implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The report indicates changes to the LTP and Annual Plan budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The financial considerations are detailed in the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance and materiality There are no significant or material changes to the draft 2017/18 budgets for the Community and Planning. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been no external engagement in developing the budgets for the Community and Planning Group. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The Executive Leadership Team, Finance staff, Policy staff and the managers of the Community and Planning Group have been involved in developing the budgets and related financial information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflict of interests. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards This material may be of interest to Community Boards. |
23 January 2017 |
|
Proposed Fees and Charges 2017/18
Fees include GST unless otherwise stated.
City Planning (Resource Consents and City Development)
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
City Planning |
|||
Section 36(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 enables the Council to charge a fixed deposit. Section 36(3) allows for additional fees to recover actual and reasonable costs in cases where the fixed deposit is inadequate. Application costs that exceed the deposit will be subject to additional charges at the rates and disbursements set out in the following schedules. For those applications that attract a fixed deposit, a receipt will be issued at the time of payment. A GST invoice will be issued at the completion of processing. |
|||
Fees for Land Use Planning Activities |
|||
Non-Notified Land Use Consents |
|||
Category A |
No charge |
No charge |
No charge |
Category B (deposit) |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
Category C (deposit) |
800.00 |
820.00 |
820.00 |
Category D (deposit) |
1,300.00 |
1,350.00 |
1,350.00 |
Notified Land Use Consents |
|||
Publicly Notified Land Use Consents (deposit) |
7,000.00 |
7,500.00 |
8,000.00 |
Limited Notified Land Use Consents (deposit) |
4,000.00 |
4,500.00 |
5,000.00 |
Related Land Use Consents |
|||
Extension of time for land use consents. (Section 125(1)(b)) (deposit) |
600.00 |
650.00 |
650.00 |
Change or cancellation of conditions of land use consents (Section 127(1)(b)) (deposit) |
650.00 |
700.00 |
700.00 |
Objections to decisions of land use consents (Section 357) and fees (Section 357B) |
No charge |
No charge |
No charge |
Certificates of compliance (Section 139) (deposit) |
700.00 |
750.00 |
800.00 |
Outline plan of works (Section 176A) (deposit) |
1,100.00 |
1,100.00 |
1,100.00 |
Existing use certificate (Section 139A) (deposit) |
850.00 |
850.00 |
850.00 |
If the application is complex or significant, or specialist advice is needed, a higher deposit may be required before proceeding. Fees will be discussed with the applicant in advance. |
|||
Categories of Fees for Non-Notified Land Use Consents |
|||
Category A: |
|||
Schedule 25.3 trees |
|||
Temporary signs for one-off not-for-profit cultural events (determination by Resource Consent department) |
|||
Murals |
|||
Replacing roof on buildings that are located in a townscape or heritage precinct, or on a scheduled building |
|||
Painting of buildings that are located in the townscape or heritage precincts, or a scheduled building |
|||
Modifying windows above verandah height of buildings located in a townscape or heritage precinct, or a scheduled building, or replacing a door on a scheduled building |
|||
Consents required for activities under Rule 16.6 (Interim Rule for Areas of Significant Conservation Value) |
|||
Except for Schedule 25.3 trees, Category A provides only for non-notified applications |
|||
Category B: |
|||
Dwelling alterations and accessory buildings in a residential zone only breaching side/rear yard and/or height plane angle where written approval of adjoining neighbour(s) is provided on lodgement |
|||
Category C: |
|||
Rural or rural-residential zone accessory buildings, and Residential zone accessory buildings including carports and garages (except as covered by Categories B or D) |
|||
Dwelling alterations including decks and pergolas resulting in minor breach of bulk and location performance standard where density of residential activity complies (except as covered by Category B) |
|||
New dwellings where density of residential activity complies (except as covered by Category D) |
|||
Signs except for permanent hoardings |
|||
Category D: |
|||
Retaining walls and/or earthworks |
|||
Structures, which includes new dwellings and accessory buildings located in a Landscape Management Area or an Urban Landscape Conservation Area |
|||
New dwellings and dwelling alterations not covered by Categories A to C |
|||
New buildings in a townscape/heritage precinct |
|||
Alteration to buildings located in a townscape/heritage precinct or to scheduled buildings not covered by Category A |
|||
Community support activities |
|||
Permanent hoarding signs |
|||
National Environmental Standard (Soil) |
|||
All non-notified resource consent applications not provided for by other categories will be charged at the Category D rate (deposit and actual cost above the deposit) |
|||
Fees for Subdivision Activities |
|||
Non-Notified Subdivision Consents (deposit) |
1,700.00 |
1,800.00 |
1,850.00 |
Notified Subdivision Consents |
|||
Publicly Notified Subdivision Consents (deposit) |
7,000.00 |
7,500.00 |
8,000.00 |
Limited Notified Subdivision Consents (deposit) |
3,500.00 |
4,000.00 |
4,500.00 |
Related Subdivision Consent Matters |
|||
Section 226 application including certification (deposit) |
700.00 |
700.00 |
700.00 |
Sealing, certification fee for survey plans (except 224(c)) (per certificate) (deposit) |
450.00 |
460.00 |
460.00 |
Compliance with subdivision consent conditions (Section 224(c)) (deposit) |
450.00 |
460.00 |
460.00 |
Combined 223 and 224(c) application (deposit) |
580.00 |
600.00 |
600.00 |
Objections to decisions of subdivision consents (Section 357) and fees (Section 357B) |
No charge |
No charge |
No charge |
Extension of time for subdivision consents (Section 125(1)(b)) (deposit) |
600.00 |
700.00 |
700.00 |
Change or cancellation of conditions of subdivision consents (Section 127(1) (deposit)) |
1,200.00 |
1,100.00 |
1,150.00 |
s240 Covenants (deposit) |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
s241 Amalgamation of Allotments (deposit) |
200.00 |
300.00 |
300.00 |
Preparation of consent notices, certificates, bonds, partial or full release/discharge of bonds, revocation of easements (fixed fee, but any legal fees recovered at cost) |
200.00 |
250.00 |
250.00 |
Certified copy of Council Resolution (fixed fee) |
180.00 |
180.00 |
190.00 |
Section 221 application (deposit) |
1,050.00 |
1,000.00 |
1,000.00 |
Section 243 application (deposit) |
400.00 |
400.00 |
400.00 |
If the application is complex or significant, or specialist advice is needed, a higher deposit may be required before proceeding. Fees will be discussed with the applicant in advance. |
|||
Engineering, geotechnical, contamination and any other technical input will be an additional fee that recovers actual cost. |
|||
Payment of Final Fee for Subdivision Applications |
|||
The final fee should be paid promptly after being sent an invoice. If there are any outstanding interim invoices they will be required to be paid before the Section 224 Certificate will be released. |
|||
Planning – Other Legislation |
|||
Planning certificates for the sale of liquor (deposit) |
240.00 |
240.00 |
240.00 |
Cancellation of building line restriction (Section 327A Local Government Act 1974) (deposit) |
240.00 |
240.00 |
240.00 |
Right of way (Section 348 Local Government Act 1974) (includes processing of application and sealing) (deposit) |
600.00 |
600.00 |
600.00 |
Overseas Investment Commission Certificate (deposit) |
290.00 |
290.00 |
290.00 |
Designations/Heritage Orders/Plan Changes |
|||
For Designations/Heritage Orders/Plan Changes (privately initiated) following payment of the relevant deposit, the Council may, at its discretion, invoice for the additional charges at cost on a monthly basis and may stop work on the application until such time as the relevant invoice has been paid. |
|||
Plan changes (privately initiated) (deposit and additional charges at cost) |
20,000.00 |
20,000.00 |
20,000.00 |
Heritage order applications (deposit and additional charges at cost) |
2,000.00 |
2,000.00 |
2,000.00 |
Notice of requirement for designations (Section 168 & Section 181(2)) (deposit and additional charges at cost) |
6,500.00 |
6,500.00 |
6,500.00 |
Minor modifications (Section 181 (3)) (deposit and additional charges at cost) |
560.00 |
560.00 |
560.00 |
Uplifting designations |
No charge |
No charge |
No charge |
Purchase of District Plan (available online only, for free) |
- |
- |
- |
Additional Fees and Charges |
|||
Processing of notified land use and subdivision applications and any additional charges applying to any other planning application listed above will be charged at the following rates: |
|||
Processing Costs |
|||
Principal Advisor/Team Leader/Specialist input (senior level) from another council department (per hour) |
160.00 |
165.00 |
165.00 |
Senior Planner and specialist input (junior/intermediate level) from another Council department (per hour) |
160.00 |
165.00 |
165.00 |
Planners (per hour) |
145.00 |
149.00 |
149.00 |
Graduate Planners or Monitoring officer (per hour) |
114.00 |
117.00 |
117.00 |
Development contributions officer (per hour) |
114.00 |
117.00 |
117.00 |
Compliance Officer (per hour) |
|
110.00 |
110.00 |
Administrative Officers (per hour) |
89.00 |
92.00 |
92.00 |
External consultants |
At Cost |
At Cost |
At Cost |
Reports commissioned by the Council |
At Cost |
At Cost |
At Cost |
Disbursements |
|||
Postage |
At Cost |
At Cost |
At Cost |
Photocopying (per A4 copy) |
At Cost |
At Cost |
At Cost |
Public notices |
At Cost |
At Cost |
At Cost |
Site signs |
At Cost |
At Cost |
At Cost |
Site inspections |
At Cost |
At Cost |
At Cost |
Vehicle usage (calculated on time basis (per min)) |
0.26 |
0.26 |
0.26 |
Refund or Cost Recovery Threshold |
|||
There is a $25 threshold either side of the final cost whereby if the amount to be refunded or recovered is less than $25 it will be absorbed to cover the processing cost. |
|||
Hearing Costs |
|||
For all applications involving elected members attendance at hearings for commercial applicants (GST registered only) |
|||
Hearing up to 3 hours (fixed fee) |
678.00 |
780.00 |
780.00 |
Hearings over 3 hours (per day) |
1,355.00 |
1,560.00 |
1,560.00 |
Staff attendance at hearings – cost of staff attending hearing (charged at hourly rates above). For resource consents, only the processing planner will be charged. |
|||
Request to Use Commissioner |
|||
1. The applicant requesting a commissioner in accordance with Section 100A will be charged at the actual cost of the commissioner, even if submitters also make the same request. If submitters request a commissioner, and the applicant does not, then the submitters must pay for the additional costs associated with the commissioner, with the costs being equally shared between the submitters requesting it. |
|||
2. Plan changes or Notice of Requirements which require the use of a commissioner will be charged at the actual cost of the commissioner. |
|||
Pre-hearing Meetings |
|||
Staff attendance at hearings – cost of staff attending hearing (charged at hourly rates above). For resource consents, only the processing planner will be charged. |
|||
Consent Monitoring |
|||
Resource Consent monitoring fees (fixed fee) |
164.00 |
170.00 |
170.00 |
(Each inspection) |
(Each inspection) |
(Each inspection) |
|
State of the Environment monitoring fee (fixed fee) |
111.00 |
111.00 |
111.00 |
Monitoring of activities subject to requirements of the HSNO Act (fixed fee) |
120.00 |
125.00 |
125.00 |
Fees set by the Resource Management (Infringement Offences) Regulations 1999 adopted in 2000/01 |
|||
Contravention of Section 9 (restrictions of use of land) |
300.00 |
300.00 |
300.00 |
Contravention of an abatement notice (other than a notice under Section 322(1)(c)) |
750.00 |
750.00 |
750.00 |
Contravention of an excessive noise notice direction under Section 327 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
Contravention of Section 22 (failure to provide certain information to an Enforcement Officer) |
300.00 |
300.00 |
300.00 |
Terms of payment: Payment of additional fees are due within 20 working days of the invoice date or 20th of the month, whichever is the latest. |
|||
Site Contamination Search |
|||
Information search to meet requirement (method) of section 6(2) of the Resource Management (National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health) Regulations 2011 |
|||
Residential and rural (fixed fee per site) |
145.00 |
155.00 |
155.00 |
Commercial and Industrial (fixed fee per site) |
290.00 |
300.00 |
300.00 |
Development Contributions |
|||
The Local Government Act provides for full cost recovery. Application costs that exceed the deposit will be subject to additional charges at the rates and disbursements set out in this schedule. For those applications that attract a fixed deposit, a receipt will be issued at the time of payment. A GST invoice will be issued at the completion of processing. |
|||
Remissions, unusual developments and deferral of payment (deposit) |
400.00 |
410.00 |
410.00 |
Objections (Full cost recovery for commissioners, council staff and other support) (deposit) |
400.00 |
410.00 |
410.00 |
Commissioners are selected and appointed independently of Council and their full costs will be recovered. |
Community Art Gallery
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Community Art Gallery |
|||
A $100 bond is required by all tenants prior to picking up the key. |
|||
Community Groups (non-commercial/display only) (per week) |
146.00 |
146.00 |
146.00 |
Community Groups (non-commercial/sell products) (per week) |
292.00 |
292.00 |
292.00 |
Community Groups (non-commercial/display only) (per day) |
21.00 |
21.00 |
21.00 |
Community Groups (non-commercial/sell products) (per day) |
42.00 |
42.00 |
42.00 |
Commercial Organisations (display purposes only) (per week) |
1,045.00 |
1,045.00 |
1,045.00 |
Commercial Organisations (commercial venture/selling) (per week) |
1,045.00 |
1,045.00 |
1,045.00 |
or 10% of gross revenue (whichever is the greater) |
or 10% of gross revenue (whichever is the greater) |
or 10% of gross revenue (whichever is the greater) |
23 January 2017 |
|
Draft 2017/18 Budget - Enterprise Dunedin
Department: Community and Planning and Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides the draft 2017/18 budget for Enterprise Dunedin. Enterprise Dunedin includes the following activities:
· Economic Development
· Destination Dunedin
· Dunedin Visitor Centre i-Site
That the Council: a) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the draft 2017/18 budget relating to Enterprise Dunedin as shown/amended in Attachment A. b) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the 2017/18 fees and charges for the Economic Development activity as shown/amended in Attachment B. |
operating budgets
Revenue
Rates
2 Rates revenue is increased by $564k. The GigCity expenditure for 2016/17 was not funded through rates revenue as surplus cash from the 2015/16 year was used. For 2017/18, $185k will be funded by rates revenue. The remaining rates revenue increases relate to additional staff costs, an increase in internal costs and an increase of $50k for major events.
External revenue
3 External operating revenue has increased by $210k. This is mainly due to additional revenue budgets included in Economic Development relating to partnerships with external organisations such as Education New Zealand and New Zealand Trade & Enterprise.
Expenditure
Staff costs
4 Staff costs have increased by $211k. This increase incorporates an additional staff member resulting from the new Enterprise Dunedin staffing structure as well as the provision for salary increases.
Materials, supplies and services
5 Materials, supplies and services costs have reduced by $133k. This is due to a reduction in marketing costs of $300k which are reclassified as general administration expenses for advertising and promotions.
6 Offsetting this is the inclusion of the GigCity budget of $98k previously included in grants and subsidies.
7 Additional expenditure of $50k is included to develop and implement a major events plan.
General administration expense
8 General administration expenses have increased by $422k. This increase incorporates the $300k reclassified from materials, supplies and services, as well as increases in advertising, branding and marketing.
Grants and subsides
9 The GigCity budget of $98k now included in materials, supplies and services costs.
Internal charges
10 Internal charges have increased by $123k mainly due to increased BIS charges.
capital expenditure Budget
11 No capital expenditure.
Fees and charges
12 Fees and charges for activities in Enterprise Dunedin remain as approved in the 2015/16 - 2024 Long Term Plan. A copy of the fees schedule is attached.
Service performance measures
13 There are no changes proposed to the measures and targets showing in the Long Term Plan 2015/16-2024/25 for Enterprise Dunedin in the 2017/18 year.
related reports
14 There are no related reports for Enterprise Dunedin.
Signatories
Author: |
Jane Nevill - Corporate Planner Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
John Christie - Director Enterprise Dunedin |
|
Title |
Page |
Draft Budget 2017/18 - Enterprise Dunedin |
172 |
|
Fees and Charges - Enterprise Dunedin |
173 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and meets the current and future needs of the Dunedin communities for good quality public services in a way that is most cost effective for households and businesses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The activities of Enterprise Dunedin primarily contribute to the objectives and priorities of the above strategies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no known implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The report indicates changes to the LTP and Annual Plan budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The financial considerations are detailed in the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance and materiality There are no significant or material changes to the draft 2017/18 budgets for Enterprise Dunedin. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been no external engagement in developing the budgets for Enterprise Dunedin. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The Executive Leadership Team, Finance staff, Policy staff and the managers of Enterprise Dunedin have been involved in developing the budgets and related financial information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflict of interests. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards This material may be of interest to Community Boards. |
23 January 2017 |
|
Proposed Fees and Charges 2017/18
Fees include GST unless otherwise stated.
Enterprise Dunedin
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Economic Development |
|||
Film Permit Fee |
|
|
|
Fee for a permit to conduct commercial film activity in public places |
500.00 |
500.00 |
500.00 |
per day |
per day |
per day |
|
250.00 |
250.00 |
250.00 |
|
per half day |
per half day |
per half day |
23 January 2017 |
|
Draft 2017/18 Budget - Corporate Services
Department: Community and Planning and Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides the draft 2017/18 budget for Corporate Services, which includes the following activities:
· Council Communications and Marketing
· Civic Leadership and Administration
· Civil Defence
That the Council: a) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the draft 2017/18 budget relating to Corporate Services as shown/amended in Attachment A. b) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the 2017/18 fees and charges for Civic Leadership and Administration as shown/amended in Attachment B. |
operating budgets
Civil Defence
2 Otago councils have agreed to move to a model that manages Civil Defence and Emergency Management across the region as a single group. The draft budgets reflect this change.
3 In addition, the NZ Fire Service Commission are consulting on a new proposal to fund rural fire services. Rural fire services would be funded from a new levy, replacing the current range of rural fire funding source, including local government rates. These changes have not yet been incorporated into the draft budgets.
Revenue
Rates
4 Rates in this group of activities have reduced by $493k. This saving is due to changes in the management of Civil Defence and because no election budget is required in the 2017/18 year.
External revenue
5 The decrease in external revenue of $143k is associated with recoveries for the local body elections that were applicable in 2016/17 only.
Expenditure
Staff costs
6 Staff
costs have reduced overall by $55k. The reduction is due to the removal
of the Civil Defence staff budget. Partially offsetting this is the
provision for an additional
in-house lawyer, an additional internally funded position in Council
Communications and Marketing and the provision for staff salary increases.
Materials, supplies and services
7 Materials, supplies and services costs have decreased by $174k due to costs associated with the local body election.
Fees and levies
8 Fees and levies have increased by $153k. Additional funding is included for external legal advice. Other increases in fees and levies are offset by savings in general administration. Budgets have been moved to where actual expenditure occurs.
9 A Second Generation District Plan (2GP) budget provision is included in this budget however it is limited to project management and hearing costs. When the 2GP project enters the appeals phase, legal expenses are likely to be incurred. It is however difficult to quantify and budget for these costs. When incurred they will be managed within the overall Council budget by the Executive Leadership Team.
General administration
10 General administration expenses have reduced by $350k. In Civic Leadership and Administration a decrease of $103k reflects local body election administration costs. In Civil Defence a decrease of $73k reflects the removal of budget lines no longer required. The reduction in Council Communications and Marketing of $110k is because the budget has been reclassified to other areas, such as fees and levies.
capital expenditure Budget
11 The capital expenditure budget for the renewal of Civil Defence equipment has been removed.
FEES AND CHARGES
12 Fees and charges for activities in Corporate Services are set by statute and are unchanged. A copy of the fees schedule is attached.
Service performance measures
13 There are no changes proposed to the measures and targets showing in the Long Term Plan 2015/16-2024/25 for Corporate Services in the 2017/18 year.
related reports
14 There are no related reports for Corporate Services.
Signatories
Author: |
Jane Nevill - Corporate Planner Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Sandy Graham - General Manager Strategy and Governance |
|
Title |
Page |
Draft Budget 2017/18 - Corporate Services |
178 |
|
Fees and Charges - Corporate Services |
179 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and meets the current and future needs of the Dunedin communities for good quality public services in a way that is most cost effective for households and businesses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
Corporate Services indirectly contribute to all of the objectives and priorities of the strategic framework by providing support to all of the Council’s activities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no known implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The report indicates changes to the LTP and Annual Plan budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The financial considerations are detailed in the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance and materiality There are no significant or material changes to the draft 2017/18 budgets for Corporate Services. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been no external engagement in developing the budgets for Corporate Services. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The Executive Leadership Team, Finance staff, Policy staff and the managers of Corporate Services have been involved in developing the budgets and related financial information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflicts of interests. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards This material may be of interest to Community Boards. |
23 January 2017 |
|
Proposed Fees and Charges 2017/18
Fees include GST unless otherwise stated.
Civic Leadership and Administration
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Administration Services |
|||
First three hours free, thereafter charged per half hour |
38.00 |
38.00 |
38.00 |
per half hour |
per half hour |
per half hour |
|
Photocopy first 20 pages black and white free, thereafter charged per page |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
per page |
per page |
per page |
23 January 2017 |
|
Draft 2017/18 Budget - Corporate Support Services
Department: Community and Planning and Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides the draft 2017/18 budget for the following Corporate Activities:
· Business Information Services (BIS)
· Corporate Leadership
· Finance
· Organisation Development and Performance
· Warm Dunedin
That the Council: a) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the draft 2017/18 budget relating to other Corporate Activities as shown/amended in Attachment A. b) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the 2017/18 fees and charges for Business Information Services as shown/amended in Attachment B. |
operating budgets
Revenue
Rates
2 General rates revenue has increased by $402k due to increased operating and capital expenditure in Business Information Services (BIS).
3 Warm Dunedin rates have increased by $105k. This is due the actual and anticipated uptake of the targeted rate scheme.
Internal revenue
4 Internal revenue has increased by $818k due to increased expenditure in BIS and Corporate Leadership.
5 BIS revenue is allocated to other Council activities through internal charges. The BIS charging model has been reviewed and simplified this year and as a result some activities will pay more and others will pay less, with a net increase overall.
Expenditure
Staff costs
6 Staff costs have increased by $319k. This increase incorporates a provision for salary increases and an additional staff member transferred from Civic Leadership and Administration Services to Corporate Leadership.
Asset operations and maintenance
7 Asset operations and maintenance costs have increased by $957k. This is attributed to an increase in outsourced services in BIS $105k and a re-categorisation of expenses from materials, supplies and services.
Materials, supplies and services
8 Materials, supplies and services costs have reduced by $857k with expenses re-categorised into asset operations and maintenance.
Fees and levies
9 Fees and levies have increased by $144k. An increase in BIS of $318k for data digitalisation and GigCity wifi is partially offset by a reduction in Corporate Leadership due to a one-off budget being included in the 2016/17 year for implementation of the Environment Strategy.
Internal charges
10 Internal charges have reduced by $106k.
capital expenditure Budget
11 No capital expenditure.
Fees and Charges
12 Fees and charges for Business Information Services (Land Information Memorandum) are increased by 3%. Fees for Archive Reference Services are unchanged. A copy of the fees schedule is attached.
Service performance measures
13 As these are corporate support activities there are no measures and targets shown in the Long Term Plan 2015/16-2024/25.
related reports
14 There are no related reports.
Signatories
Author: |
Jane Nevill - Corporate Planner Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Gavin Logie - Acting Chief Financial Officer Simon Pickford - General Manager Community Services |
|
Title |
Page |
Draft Budget 2017/18 - Corporate Support Services |
184 |
|
Fees and Charges - Corporate Support Services |
185 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and meets the current and future needs of the Dunedin communities for good quality public services in a way that is most cost effective for households and businesses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The Corporate Activities indirectly contribute to all of the objectives and priorities of the strategic framework by providing support to all of the Council’s activities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no known implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The report indicates changes to the LTP and Annual Plan budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The financial considerations are detailed in the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance and materiality There are no significant or material changes to the draft 2017/18 budgets for other Corporate Activities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been no external engagement in developing the budgets for other Corporate Activities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The Executive Leadership Team, Finance staff, Policy staff and the managers of the Corporate Activities have been involved in developing the budgets and related financial information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflict of interests. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards This material may be of interest to Community Boards. |
23 January 2017 |
|
Proposed Fees and Charges 2017/18
Fees include GST unless otherwise stated.
Business Information Services (BIS)
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Archives Reference Services |
|||
The first half-hour of the Archivist’s time is free, thereafter $50.00 per hour. Full details are provided in the DCC Reference Service Policy available from DCC Archives. |
|
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Information Services |
|||
Land Information Memorandum |
|||
Residential |
317.00 |
327.00 |
337.00 |
Residential (non-urgent) |
267.00 |
275.00 |
285.00 |
Commercial |
347.00 |
357.00 |
367.00 |
Mapping Services |
|||
GIS services available – cost on application. |
23 January 2017 |
|
Draft 2017/18 Budget - Waipori Fund
Department: Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides the draft 2017/18 budget for the Waipori Fund.
That the Council: a) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the draft 2017/18 budget for the Waipori Fund as shown/amended in Attachment A. |
operating budgets
Revenue
External revenue - fees
2 The reduction in revenue from the Waipori Fund of $414k reflects market conditions in a low interest rate environment. The portfolio has been changed to reduce property equities and increase fixed interest deposits. This lower risk strategy was implemented from 1 August 2016.
Expenditure
Fees and levies
3 The increase in expenditure of $68k reflects the actual management fees paid to Dunedin City Treasury Limited for managing the Waipori Fund as well as external financial advisors who manage the equity investments.
Net Surplus/(Deficit)
4 The annual contribution to rates from the Waipori Fund has reduced by $482k as a result of the above changes.
capital expenditure Budget
5 No capital expenditure.
Service performance measures
6 The budgeted non-rates income from the Waipori Fund in 2017/18 is less than the annual target of $3.660 million in the Long Term Plan 2015/16-2024/25.
related reports
7 There are no related reports for the Waipori Fund.
Signatories
Author: |
Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Gavin Logie - Acting Chief Financial Officer |
|
Title |
Page |
Draft Budget 2017/18 - Waipori Fund |
189 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and meets the current and future needs of the Dunedin communities for good quality public services in a way that is most cost effective for households and businesses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The Waipori Fund indirectly contributes to all of the objectives and priorities of the strategic framework, by offsetting the rates requirement for all Council activities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no known implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The report indicates changes to the LTP and Annual Plan budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The financial considerations are detailed in the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance and materiality There are no significant or material changes to the draft 2017/18 budgets for the Waipori Fund. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been no external engagement in developing the budgets for the Waipori Fund. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The Executive Leadership Team, Finance staff, Policy staff and Dunedin City Treasury Limited staff have been involved in developing the budgets and related financial information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflict of interests. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards This material may be of interest to Community Boards. |
23 January 2017 |
|
Draft 2017/18 Budget - Investment Account
Department: Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides the draft 2017/18 budget for the Investment Account.
That the Council: a) Approves, for the purposes of community engagement, the draft 2017/18 budget relating to the Investment Account as shown/amended in Attachment A. |
operating budgets
2 The Investment Account is used to manage the Council finances at a high level. It allows for high level adjustments to rates revenue, staff costs, interest and debt across all Council activities. It is also where the net effect of the operational carry forward budgets, approved by the Council in August 2016, is included.
Revenue
Rates
3 Rates have reduced overall in the Investment Account by $1.132 million. This change is the result of a reconsideration of capacity to complete programmed capital work within the timeframe of the 2016/17 and 2017/18 years.
Expenditure
Staff costs
4 Staff costs in the Investment Account are increased by $972k. This increase combines an allowance for a further 1% increase in salary costs as well as six additional FTEs. The additional positions have been included in the budget pending activity reviews. The ramping up of expenditure on infrastructure will follow on from this initial investment in asset management, contract management and project management personnel.
Asset operations and maintenance
5 A budget of $280k is provided for increased maintenance on Council buildings pending asset management plan requirements being finalised. Deferred maintenance in a number of buildings has resulted in a backlog of work that needs to be addressed. The Long Term Plan 2018 process will involve a bottom up review of operating and capital expenditure requirements which will assist in establishing the priorities for ongoing work. This budget provides some additional maintenance funding for the 2017/18 year.
Materials, Supplies and Services
6 The decrease of $158k in materials, supplies and services relates to expenditure budgets carried forward from the 2015/16 year to the 2016/17 year.
Fees and Levies
7 The decrease of $118k in fees and levies relates to expenditure budgets carried forward from the 2015/16 year to the 2016/17 year.
Grants and subsidies
8 Of the $201k reduction in grants and subsidies, $100k relates to Olveston. In the 2016/17 year, an allowance was made in the budget to fund the shortfall in Olveston by way of a grant. In 2017/18, the full Olveston budget is included within the Arts and Culture group.
9 The $101k reduction relates to expenditure budgets carried forward from the 2015/16 year to the 2016/17 year.
Interest costs
10 A decrease of $172k in interest costs is due to reduced interest rates and less debt being raised.
capital expenditure Budget
11 No capital expenditure.
related reports
12 There are no related reports for the Investment Account.
Signatories
Author: |
Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Gavin Logie - Acting Chief Financial Officer |
|
Title |
Page |
Draft Budget 2017/18 - Investment Activity |
193 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and meets the current and future needs of the Dunedin communities for good quality public services a way that is most cost effective for households and businesses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The Investment Account indirectly contributes to all of the objectives and priorities of the strategic framework as it provides an overall view of rates revenue, staff costs, interest and debt across all Council activities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no known implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The report indicates changes to the LTP and Annual Plan budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The financial considerations are detailed in the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance and materiality There are no significant or material changes to the draft 2017/18 budgets for the Investment Account. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been no external engagement in developing the budgets for the Investment Account. The draft budgets are consistent with the DCHL Statement of Intent 2016. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The Executive Leadership Team, Finance staff and Policy staff have been involved in developing the budgets and related financial information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflict of interests. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards This material may be of interest to Community Boards. |