Notice of Meeting:
I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Dunedin City Council will be held on:
Date: Tuesday 26 June 2018
Time: 1.00 pm
Venue: Council Chamber, Municipal Chambers, The Octagon, Dunedin
Sue Bidrose
Chief Executive Officer
Council
PUBLIC AGENDA
MEMBERSHIP
Mayor |
Mayor Dave Cull |
|
Deputy Mayor |
Cr Chris Staynes |
|
Members |
Cr David Benson-Pope |
Cr Rachel Elder |
|
Cr Christine Garey |
Cr Doug Hall |
|
Cr Aaron Hawkins |
Cr Marie Laufiso |
|
Cr Mike Lord |
Cr Damian Newell |
|
Cr Jim O'Malley |
Cr Conrad Stedman |
|
Cr Lee Vandervis |
Cr Andrew Whiley |
|
Cr Kate Wilson |
|
Senior Officer Sue Bidrose, Chief Executive Officer
Governance Support Officer Pam Jordan
Pam Jordan
Governance Support Officer
Telephone: 03 477 4000
Pam.Jordan@dcc.govt.nz
Note: Reports and recommendations contained in this agenda are not to be considered as Council policy until adopted.
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Opening 4
2 Public Forum 4
2.1 Joy Hall - Building Consent 4
3 Apologies 4
4 Confirmation of Agenda 4
5 Declaration of Interest 5
6 Confirmation of Minutes 19
6.1 Ordinary Council meeting - 29 May 2018 19
Minutes of Committees
7 Infrastructure Services and Networks Committee - 11 June 2018 20
8 Community and Culture Committee - 12 June 2018 21
9 Planning and Environment Committee - 12 June 2018 22
Minutes of Community Boards
10 Waikouaiti Coast Community Board - 18 April 2018 23
11 Otago Peninsula Community Board - 19 April 2018 24
12 Strath Taieri Community Board - 19 April 2018 25
13 Mosgiel-Taieri Community Board - 2 May 2018 26
14 West Harbour Community Board - 2 May 2018 27
15 Saddle Hill Community Board - 3 May 2018 28
Reports
16 Adoption of the 10 Year Plan 2018-28 29
17 Setting of Rates for the 2018/19 Financial Year 34
18 Local Easter Sunday Shop Trading Policy Review 2018 59
19 Waste Futures 2023 Project 88
20 Statements of Intent for Dunedin City Holdings Limited, Subsidiaries and Associate Companies 97
21 Revocation of Bylaws 98
22 Naming of Two New Roads off Hagart-Alexander Drive, Mosgiel 108
23 Parking Survey Feedback 115
24 Traffic and Parking Bylaw Review 132
Resolution to Exclude the Public 149
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
Dr Lux Selvanesan, Dunedin Hindu Community, will open the meeting with a prayer.
2.1 Joy Hall - Building Consent
Joy Hall wishes to address the Council on an issue with zoning which has an impact on their Building Consent.
An apology has been received from Cr Aaron Hawkins.
That the Council:
Accepts the apology from Cr Aaron Hawkins.
Note: Any additions must be approved by resolution with an explanation as to why they cannot be delayed until a future meeting.
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. Members are reminded of the need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.
2. Elected members are reminded to update their register of interests as soon as practicable, including amending the register at this meeting if necessary.
That the Council: a) Notes/Amends if necessary the Elected Members' Interest Register attached as Attachment A; and b) Confirms/Amends the proposed management plan for Elected Members' Interests. |
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
Elected Members Register of Interest |
7 |
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. Members are reminded of the need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as a staff member and any private or other external interest they might have.
2. Staff members are reminded to update their register of interests as soon as practicable, including amending the register at this meeting if necessary.
That the Council: a) Notes the Executive Leadership Team's Interest Register.
|
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
Executive Leadership Team Register of Interest |
17 |
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
Ordinary Council meeting - 29 May 2018
That the Council: Confirms the public part of the minutes of the Ordinary Council meeting held on 29 May 2018 as a correct record.
|
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
Minutes of Ordinary Council meeting held on 29 May 2018 (Under Separate Cover) |
|
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
Infrastructure Services and Networks Committee - 11 June 2018
gg
That the Council: a) Notes the minutes of the Infrastructure Services and Networks Committee meeting held on 11 June 2018.
|
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
Minutes of Infrastructure Services and Networks Committee held on 11 June 2018 (Under Separate Cover) |
|
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
Community and Culture Committee - 12 June 2018
gg
That the Council: a) Notes the minutes of the Community and Culture Committee meeting held on 12 June 2018.
|
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
Minutes of Community and Culture Committee held on 12 June 2018 (Under Separate Cover) |
|
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
Planning and Environment Committee - 12 June 2018
gg
That the Council: a) Notes the minutes of the Planning and Environment Committee meeting held on 12 June 2018.
|
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
Minutes of Planning and Environment Committee held on 12 June 2018 (Under Separate Cover) |
|
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
Waikouaiti Coast Community Board - 18 April 2018
gg
That the Council: a) Notes the minutes of the Waikouaiti Coast Community Board meeting held on 18 April 2018. |
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
Minutes of Waikouaiti Coast Community Board held on 18 April 2018 (Under Separate Cover) |
|
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
Otago Peninsula Community Board - 19 April 2018
gg
That the Council: a) Notes the minutes of the Otago Peninsula Community Board meeting held on 19 April 2018. |
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
Minutes of Otago Peninsula Community Board held on 19 April 2018 (Under Separate Cover) |
|
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
Strath Taieri Community Board - 19 April 2018
gg
That the Council: a) Notes the minutes of the Strath Taieri Community Board meeting held on 19 April 2018. |
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
Minutes of Strath Taieri Community Board held on 19 April 2018 (Under Separate Cover) |
|
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
Mosgiel-Taieri Community Board - 2 May 2018
gg
That the Council: a) Notes the minutes of the Mosgiel-Taieri Community Board meeting held on 2 May 2018.
|
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
Minutes of Mosgiel-Taieri Community Board held on 2 May 2018 (Under Separate Cover) |
|
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
West Harbour Community Board - 2 May 2018
gg
That the Council: a) Notes the minutes of the West Harbour Community Board meeting held on 2 May 2018
|
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
Minutes of West Harbour Community Board held on 2 May 2018 (Under Separate Cover) |
|
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
Saddle Hill Community Board - 3 May 2018
gg
That the Council: a) Notes the minutes of the Saddle Hill Community Board meeting held on 3 May 2018.
|
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
Minutes of Saddle Hill Community Board held on 3 May 2018 (Under Separate Cover) |
|
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
Adoption of the 10 Year Plan 2018-28
Department: Community and Planning and Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report recommends the adoption of the final 10 year plan 2018-28 and describes changes made to the 10 year plan 2018-28 since it was approved for consultation in February 2018.
2 Audit New Zealand is currently auditing the 10 year plan 2018-28 document and will provide the Council with an ‘Independent Auditor’s report’ at the meeting.
That the Council: a) Adopts the revenue and financing policy, development contributions policy and rates remission and postponement policy for inclusion in the 10 year plan 2018-28. b) Adopts the 10 year plan 2018-28. c) Authorises the Council’s Chief Executive Officer, to make any minor editorial changes resulting from the final quality checks that will occur prior to the final printing of the 10 year plan 2018-28 document.
|
BACKGROUND
3 The Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) requires all local authorities to develop a 10 year plan (also known as a long term plan or LTP). The purpose of a 10 year plan is to: describe the Council’s activities; describe the community outcomes of Dunedin; provide integrated decision-making and co-ordination of resources; provide a long-term focus for the decisions and activities of the Council; and provide a basis for accountability of the local authority to the community.
4 Schedule 10 of the LGA specifies the minimum information and content that must be included in the 10 year plan, including: community outcomes that describe the strategic directions; groups of activities (describing levels of service, capital expenditure, and funding impact statement); Council controlled organisations; financial strategy; infrastructure strategy; policies; forecast financial statements; significant forecasting assumptions; and other statements.
5 The 10 year plan 2018-28 must be adopted before the commencement of the first year to which it relates (1 July 2018), and continues in force until the close of the third consecutive year to which it relates.
6 Feedback from the community on the proposals for the 10 year plan 2018-28 and consultation document was sought from 14 March to 23 April 2018. The Council met in April and May 2018 to hear submissions, deliberate and make final decisions regarding submissions and community feedback received on the 10 year plan 2018-28.
DISCUSSION
7 The final 10 year plan 2018-28 document has been developed based on the content of the consultation document and supporting documents approved by the Council on 27 February 2018. The substantive changes are:
a) The document reflects the resolutions made by the Council during deliberations and decision making in May 2018;
b) The financial statements have been updated to reflect a forecast year end position at 30 June 2018. Debt is forecast to be $199 million;
c) The capital expenditure budgets for renewals in Property and 3 Waters include an additional allowance for inflation in the 2022-28 years;
d) The operating budget reflects updated interest expense due to the revised debt profile, additional funding for project planning and feasibility work and increased maintenance budget in the last three years of the plan due to the retention of investment properties; and
e) The financial strategy includes additional content regarding affordability and financial resilience.
Audit of the 10 year plan 2018-28
8 The final 10 year plan 2018-28 will include an opinion from the Auditor General on the extent to which the Council has complied with the legislative purpose of a 10 year plan and the quality of the information and assumptions underlying the forecast information provided in the 10 year plan 2018-28.
9 Audit New Zealand (Audit NZ) and the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) have reviewed the changes made to the 10 year plan 2018-28 content since the audit of the consultation document and supporting documents in February 2018. Consideration has also been given to the special consultative procedure undertaken by the Council.
10 An update on the status of the audit opinion will be given at the meeting. Audit NZ will also present an ‘Independent Auditor’s Report’ at the meeting and this report will be included in the final 10 year plan 2018-28 document.
Final quality checks
11 To ensure high editorial standards are achieved in the final 10 year plan 2018-28, the adopted version will require a full editorial quality check. This check will be completed within the statutory timeframes. Any required editorial changes can be achieved through delegating authority to approve editorial changes to the Chief Executive.
OPTIONS
12 The Council is legislatively required to adopt the 10 year plan 2018-28 by 30 June 2018, therefore there are no options applicable to this report.
NEXT STEPS
13 Once adopted the 10 year plan 2018-28 will be subject to final quality checks, graphic designed and printed for public distribution in hard copy and on the Council’s website. A Microsoft Word copy of the 10 year plan 2018-28 will be available on the website from 1 July 2018 and will be replaced by the final graphic designed version as soon as the print files are completed.
14 Print copies of the 10 year plan 2018-28 will be available for the public by mid July 2018.
Signatories
Author: |
Tami Sargeant - Senior Policy Analyst Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Sandy Graham - General Manager Strategy and Governance Dave Tombs - General Manager Finance and Commercial |
To follow.
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government The development of the 10 year plan enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and meets the current and future needs of the Dunedin communities for good quality public services in a way that is most cost effective for households and businesses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The 10 year plan contributes to all of the objectives and priorities of the strategic framework as it describes the Council’s activities; the community outcomes; and provides a long term focus for decision making and coordination of the Council’s resources, as well as a basis for community accountability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement The 10 year plan provides a mechanism for Māori to contribute to local decision-making. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability The 10 year plan contains content regarding the Council’s approach to sustainability. Major issues and implications for sustainability are discussed in the 50 year Infrastructure Strategy and financial resilience is discussed in the Financial Strategy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy This report concludes the development of the 10 year plan 2018-28. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The financial implications of the 10 year plan are discussed in this report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance The report concludes the 10 year plan process which required full formal consultation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external The use of new, more accessible consultation materials and channels saw a high level of community engagement on this 10 year plan, with 5,661 separate items of feedback received. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal Staff and managers from across the Council have been involved in the development of the 10 year plan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. As noted in this report, the Council is legislatively required to adopt the 10 year plan 2018-28 by 30 June 2018. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflicts of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards Projects identified in Community Board Plans have been considered in the development of the 10 year plan; and Community Boards are involved in the development of the 10 year plan. |
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
Setting of Rates for the 2018/19 Financial Year
Department: Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 The Council has adopted the 10 year plan 2018-28 including the Funding Impact Statement. Council now needs to resolve to set the rates as provided for in the Funding Impact Statement for the 2018/19 year.
That the Council: a) Set the following rates under the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 on rating units in the district for the financial year commencing 1 July 2018 and ending on 30 June 2019. 1 General Rate A general rate set under section 13 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 made on every rating unit, assessed on a differential basis as described below: · A rate of 0.3181 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "residential" category. · A rate of 0.3022 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "lifestyle" category. · A rate of 0.7795 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "commercial" category. · A rate of 0.5567 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "residential heritage bed and breakfasts" category. · A rate of 0.2543 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "farmland" category. · A rate of 0.0600 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on the Forsyth Barr Stadium category. 2 Community Services Rate A targeted rate for community services, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential basis as follows: · $233.50 (including GST) per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit for all rating units in the "residential, residential heritage bed and breakfasts, lifestyle and farmland" categories. · $233.50 (including GST) per rating unit for all rating units in the "commercial and Forsyth Barr Stadium" categories. 3 Kerbside Recycling Rate A targeted rate for kerbside recycling, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential basis as follows: · $66.30 (including GST) per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit for all rating units in the "residential, residential heritage bed and breakfasts, lifestyle and farmland" categories. · $66.30 (including GST) per rating unit for all rating units in the "commercial" category. 4 Drainage Rates A targeted rate for drainage, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential basis as follows: · $535.00 (including GST) per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit for all rating units in the "residential, residential heritage bed and breakfasts, lifestyle and farmland" categories and which are "connected" to the public sewerage system. · $267.50 (including GST) per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit for all rating units in the "residential, residential heritage bed and breakfasts, lifestyle and farmland" categories and which are "serviceable" by the public sewerage system. · $535.00 (including GST) per rating unit for all rating units in the "commercial, residential institutions, schools and Forsyth Barr Stadium" categories and which are "connected" to the public sewerage system. · $267.50 (including GST) per rating unit for all rating units in the "commercial, residential institutions and schools" categories and which are "serviceable" by the public sewerage system. · $102.25 (including GST) per rating unit for all rating units in the "church" category and which are "connected" to the public sewerage system. Rating units which are not "connected" to the scheme and which are not "serviceable" will not be liable for this rate. Drainage is a combined targeted rate for sewage disposal and stormwater. Sewage disposal makes up 83.9% of the drainage rate, and stormwater makes up 16.1%. Non-rateable land will not be liable for the stormwater component of the drainage targeted rate. Rates demands for the drainage targeted rate for non-rateable land will therefore be charged at 83.9%. 5 Commercial Drainage Rates – Capital Value A targeted rate for drainage, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential basis as follows: · A rate of 0.2881 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "commercial and residential institution" category and which are "connected" to the public sewerage system. · A rate of 0.1441 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "commercial" category and which are "serviceable" by the public sewerage system. · A rate of 0.2161 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "school" category and which are "connected" to the public sewerage system. · A rate of 0.1081 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "school" category and which are "serviceable" by the public sewerage system. · A rate of 0.0225 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on the Forsyth Barr Stadium category. This rate shall not apply to properties in Karitane, Middlemarch, Seacliff, Waikouaiti and Warrington. This rate shall not apply to churches. Drainage is a combined targeted rate for sewage disposal and stormwater. Sewage disposal makes up 83.9% of the drainage rate, and stormwater makes up 16.1%. Non-rateable land will not be liable for the stormwater component of the drainage targeted rate. Rates demands for the drainage targeted rate for non-rateable land will therefore be charged at 83.9%. 6 Water Rates A targeted rate for water supply, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential basis as follows: · $387.00 (including GST) per separately used or inhabited part of any "connected" rating unit which receives an ordinary supply of water within the meaning of the Dunedin City Bylaws excepting properties in Karitane, Merton, Rocklands/Pukerangi, Seacliff, Waitati, Warrington, East Taieri, West Taieri and North Taieri. · $193.50 (including GST) per separately used or inhabited part of any "serviceable" rating unit to which connection is available to receive an ordinary supply of water within the meaning of the Dunedin City Bylaws excepting properties in Karitane, Merton, Rocklands/Pukerangi, Seacliff, Waitati, Warrington, East Taieri, West Taieri and North Taieri. · $387.00 (including GST) per unit of water being one cubic metre (viz. 1,000 litres) per day supplied at a constant rate of flow during a full 24 hour period to any "connected" rating unit situated in Karitane, Merton, Seacliff, Waitati, Warrington, West Taieri, East Taieri or North Taieri. · $193.50 (including GST) per separately used or inhabited part of any "serviceable" rating unit situated in Waitati, Warrington, West Taieri, East Taieri or North Taieri. This rate shall not apply to the availability of water in Merton, Karitane or Seacliff. 7 Fire Protection Rates A targeted rate for the provision of a fire protection service, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential basis as follows: · A rate of 0.0800 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on all rating units in the "commercial" category. This rate shall not apply to churches. · A rate of 0.0600 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on all rating units in the "residential institutions" category. · A rate of 0.0090 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on the Forsyth Barr Stadium category. · $116.10 (including GST) for each separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit within the "residential, residential heritage bed and breakfasts, lifestyle and farmland" category that is not receiving an ordinary supply of water within the meaning of the Dunedin City Bylaws. 8 Water Rates – Quantity of Water A targeted rate for the quantity of water provided to any rating unit fitted with a water meter, being an extraordinary supply of water within the meaning of the Dunedin City Bylaws, set under section 19 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, according to the following scale of charges (GST inclusive):
Where the supply of a quantity of water is subject to this Quantity of Water Targeted Rate, the rating unit will not be liable for any other targeted rate for the supply of the same water.
9 Allanton Drainage Rate A targeted rate for the capital contribution towards the Allanton Wastewater Collection System, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, of $411.00 (including GST) per rating unit, to every rating unit paying their contribution towards the scheme as a targeted rate over 20 years. Liability for the rate is on the basis of the provision of the service to each rating unit. The Allanton area is shown in the map below: 10 Blanket Bay Drainage Rate A targeted rate for the capital contribution towards the Blanket Bay Drainage System, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, of $636.00 (including GST) per rating unit, to every rating unit paying their contribution towards the scheme as a targeted rate over 20 years. Liability for the rate is on the basis of the provision of the service to each rating unit. The Blanket Bay area is shown in the map below: 11 Curles Point Drainage Rate A targeted rate for the capital contribution towards the Curles Point Drainage System, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, of $749.00 (including GST) per rating unit, to every rating unit paying their contribution towards the scheme as a targeted rate over 20 years. Liability for the rate is on the basis of the provision of the service to each rating unit. The Curles Point area is shown in the map below: 12 Tourism/Economic Development Rate A targeted rate for Tourism/Economic Development, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential basis as follows: · 0.0142 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "commercial" category. · 0.0013 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on the Forsyth Barr Stadium category. 13 Warm Dunedin Targeted Rate Scheme A targeted rate for the Warm Dunedin Targeted Rate Scheme, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, per rating unit in the Warm Dunedin Targeted Rate Scheme. The targeted rate scheme provides a way for homeowners to install insulation and/or clean heating. The targeted rate covers the cost and an annual interest rate. The interest rates have been and will be: Rates commencing 1 July 2013 and 1 July 2014 8% Rates commencing 1 July 2015 and 1 July 2016 8.3% Rates commencing 1 July 2017 7.8% Rates commencing 1 July 2018 7.2% 14 Private Street Lighting Rate A targeted rate for the purpose of recovering the cost of private street lights, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential basis as follows: · $149.40 (including GST) per private street light divided by the number of separately used or inhabited parts of a rating unit for all rating units in the "residential and lifestyle" categories in the private streets as identified in the schedule below. · $149.40 (including GST) per private street light divided by the number of rating units for all rating units in the "commercial" category in the private streets as identified in the schedule below.
Differential Matters and Categories b) Adopt the following differential categories for the 2018/19 financial year. The differential categories are determined in accordance with the Council's land use codes. The Council's land use codes are based on the land use codes set under the Rating Valuation Rules 2008 and are set out in Attachment A. In addition, the Council has established categories for residential institutions, residential heritage bed and breakfasts, the Forsyth Barr Stadium, churches, and schools. 1 Differentials Based on Land Use The Council uses this matter to: · Differentiate the General rate. · Differentiate the Community Services rate. · Differentiate the Kerbside Recycling rate. · Differentiate the Private Street Lighting rate. · Differentiate the Tourism/Economic Development rate. · Differentiate the Fire Protection rate. The differential categories based on land use are: · Residential – includes all rating units used for residential purposes including single residential, multi-unit residential, multi-use residential, residential special accommodation, residential communal residence dependant on other use, residential bach/cribs, residential carparking and residential vacant land. · Lifestyle – includes all rating units with Council's land use codes 2, 20, 21, 22 and 29. · Commercial – includes all rating units with land uses not otherwise categorised as Residential, Residential Heritage Bed and Breakfasts, Lifestyle, Farmland or Forsyth Barr Stadium. · Farmland - includes all rating units used solely or principally for agricultural or horticultural or pastoral purposes. · Residential Heritage Bed and Breakfasts – includes all rating units meeting the following description: · Bed and breakfast establishments; and · Classified as commercial for rating purposes due to the number of bedrooms (greater than four); and · Either: · the majority of the establishment is at least 80 years old, or · the establishment has Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Registration, or · the establishment is a Dunedin City Council Protected Heritage Building as identified in the District Plan; and · The bed and breakfast owner lives at the facility. · Forsyth Barr Stadium – this includes land at 130 Anzac Avenue, Dunedin, Assessment 4026695, Valuation reference 27190-01403. 2 Differentials Based on Land Use and Provision or Availability of Service The Council uses these matters to differentiate the drainage rate and the commercial drainage rate. The differential categories based on land use are: · Residential – includes all rating units used for residential purposes including single residential, multi-unit residential, multi-use residential, residential special accommodation, residential communal residence dependant on other use, residential bach/cribs, residential carparking and residential vacant land. · Lifestyle - includes all rating units with Council's land use codes 2, 20, 21, 22 and 29. · Farmland - includes all rating units used solely or principally for agricultural or horticultural or pastoral purposes. · Commercial – includes all rating units with land uses not otherwise categorised as Residential, Residential Heritage Bed and Breakfasts, Lifestyle, Farmland, Residential Institutions, Forsyth Barr Stadium, Churches or Schools. · Forsyth Barr Stadium – this includes land at 130 Anzac Avenue, Dunedin, Assessment 4026695, Valuation reference 27190-01403. · Residential Heritage Bed and Breakfasts – includes all rating units meeting the following description: · Bed and breakfast establishments; and · Classified as commercial for rating purposes due to the number of bedrooms (greater than four); and · Either: · the majority of the establishment is at least 80 years old or · the establishment has Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Registration or · the establishment is a Dunedin City Council Protected Heritage Building as identified in the District Plan; and · The bed and breakfast owner lives at the facility. · Residential Institutions - includes only rating units with the Council's land use codes 95 and 96. · Churches – includes all rating units used for places of religious worship. · Schools - includes only rating units used for schools that do not operate for profit. The differential categories based on provision or availability of service are: · Connected – any rating unit that is connected to a public sewerage drain. · Serviceable – any rating unit that is not connected to a public sewerage drain but is capable of being connected to the sewerage system (being a property situated within 30 metres of a public drain). 3 Differentials Based on Provision or Availability of Service The Council uses this matter to differentiate the water rates. The differential categories based on provision or availability of service are: · Connected – any rating unit that is supplied by the water supply system. · Serviceable – any rating unit that is not supplied but is capable of being supplied by the water supply system (being a rating unit situated within 100 metres of the nearest water supply). Minimum Rates c) Approves that where the total amount of rates payable in respect of any rating unit is less than $5.00 including GST, the rates payable in respect of the rating unit shall be such amount as the Council determines but not exceeding $5.00 including GST. Low Value Rating Units d) Approves that rating units with a capital value of $3,500 or less will only be charged the general rate. Land Use Codes e) Approves that the land use codes attached to this report are adopted as the Council's land use codes for the purpose of the rating method. Separately Used or Inhabited Part of a Rating Unit f) Adopts the following definition of a separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit: "A separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit includes any portion inhabited or used by the owner/a person other than the owner, and who has the right to use or inhabit that portion by virtue of a tenancy, lease, licence, or other agreement. This definition includes separately used parts, whether or not actually occupied at any particular time, which are provided by the owner for rental (or other form of occupation) on an occasional or long term basis by someone other than the owner. For the purpose of this definition, vacant land and vacant premises offered or intended for use or habitation by a person other than the owner and usually used as such are defined as 'used'. For the avoidance of doubt, a rating unit that has a single use or occupation is treated as having one separately used or inhabited part." Lump Sum Contributions g) Approves that no lump sum contributions will be sought for any targeted rate. Rating by Instalments h) Approves the following schedule of rates to be collected by the Council, payable by four instalments. The City is divided into four areas based on Valuation Roll Numbers, as set out below:
Area 4 comprises ratepayers with multiple assessments who pay on a schedule. Due Dates for Payment of Rates i) Approves the due dates for all rates with the exception of water rates, which are charged based on water meter consumption, will be payable in four instalments due on the dates below:
Water meter invoices are sent separately from other rates at intervals depending on the quantity of water consumed. Penalties j) Resolves to charge the following penalties on unpaid rates: 1 A charge of 10% of the unpaid rates instalment will be added to the amount of any instalment remaining unpaid the day after the instalment due date set out above. 2 Where a ratepayer has not paid the first instalment by the due date of that instalment, and has paid the total rates and charges in respect of the rating unit for the 2018/19 rating year by the due date of the second instalment the 10% additional charge for the first instalment shall be remitted. 3 For amounts levied in any previous financial year and which remain unpaid on 1 October 2018, 10% of that sum shall be charged, including additional charges (in any). 4 For amounts levied in any previous financial year and which remain unpaid on 1 April 2019, 10% of that sum shall be charged, including additional charges (if any). Assessing and Recovering Rates k) Approves that the Chief Executive Officer, General Manager Finance and Commercial, Financial Controller and Rates and Revenue Team Leader be authorised to take all necessary steps to assess and recover the above rates. |
BACKGROUND
2 The rating method for the 2018/19 year formed part of the supporting documentation made available during the community engagement period of the draft 10 year plan 2018-28.
DISCUSSION
3 The rating method for the 2018/19 year incorporates the following changes:
· An increase in the community services targeted rate of 1.5%.
· An increase in the Forsyth Barr Stadium differential rates of 1.5%.
Community Services Targeted Rate
4 In the 2015/16 year, the Council agreed that the community services targeted rate should be increased annually by the Local Government Cost Index (LGCI). An allowance for the June 2017 LGCI of 1.5% increases this from $230.00 to $233.50 for the 2018/19 year.
Forsyth Barr Stadium Differentiated Rates
5 In the 2013/14 year, the differentiated Forsyth Barr Stadium rates have been inflation adjusted annually. For the 2018/19 year, these rates are increased by the June 2017 LGCI of 1.5%.
Limit on "Fixed" Charging
6 Section 21 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 includes a limit on certain rates. In any one year, the Council may not collect more than 30% of its total rates revenue by way of:
· Any uniform annual general charge.
· Any targeted rate that is calculated as a fixed amount per rating unit or separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit (and which is not used solely for water supply or sewage disposal).
7 The Council does not use a uniform annual general charge. The relevant targeted rates for the 2018/19 year are the kerbside recycling rate, the community services rate and the drainage fixed charge. These rates equate to 25% of total rates revenue.
OPTIONS
8 The option provided is to set rates in accordance with the Local Government Act 2002 and the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 in order to provide rates funding in the 2018/19 year in accordance with the 2018/19 budget.
NEXT STEPS
9 The Council can now set and assess the rates described in its Funding Impact Statement.
Signatories
Author: |
Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Gavin Logie - Financial Controller Dave Tombs - General Manager Finance and Commercial |
|
Title |
Page |
Dunedin City Council Land Use Codes |
56 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This decision enables the Council to collect the necessary rates funding in order to provide local infrastructure, public services and regulatory functions for the community. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
This decision fits with the strategic framework because it provides the necessary rates funding to implement the activities outlined in the 2018/19 budget. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The Council has adopted the 10 year plan 2018-28 and can now set and assess the rates described in its Funding Impact Statement. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The Council has adopted the 10 year plan 2018-28 and can now set and assess the rates described in its Funding Impact Statement, for the 2018/19 year. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance The decision sets the rates for the 2018/19 year as outlined in the 10 year plan 2018-28. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external The proposed rating method formed part of the Supporting Documentation for the 10 year plan 2018-28 consultation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal Internal engagement has occurred with staff in the relevant departments. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. Legal risks were considered and appropriate advice sought. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflicts of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards There are no known implications for Community Boards. |
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
Dunedin City Council Land Use Codes |
||
Land Use Code |
Land Use Description |
Differential Category |
0 |
Multi-use: Vacant/Indeterminate |
Commercial |
1 |
Multi-use: Rural Industry |
Farmland |
2 |
Multi-use: Lifestyle |
Lifestyle |
3 |
Multi-use: Transport |
Commercial |
4 |
Multi-use: Community Services |
Commercial |
5 |
Multi-use: Recreational |
Commercial |
6 |
Multi-use: Utility Services |
Commercial |
7 |
Multi-use: Industrial |
Commercial |
8 |
Multi-use: Commercial |
Commercial |
9 |
Multi-use: Residential |
Residential |
10 |
Rural: Multi-use within Rural Industry |
Farmland |
11 |
Rural: Dairy |
Farmland |
12 |
Rural: Stock Finishing |
Farmland |
13 |
Rural: Arable Farming |
Farmland |
14 |
Rural: Store Livestock |
Farmland |
15 |
Rural: Market Gardens and Orchards |
Farmland |
16 |
Rural: Specialist Livestock |
Farmland |
17 |
Rural: Forestry |
Farmland |
18 |
Rural: Mineral Extraction |
Commercial |
19 |
Rural: Vacant |
Farmland |
20 |
Lifestyle: Multi-use within Lifestyle |
Lifestyle |
21 |
Lifestyle: Single Unit |
Lifestyle |
22 |
Lifestyle: Multi Unit |
Lifestyle |
29 |
Lifestyle: Vacant |
Lifestyle |
30 |
Transport: Multi-use within Transport |
Commercial |
31 |
Transport: Road Transport |
Commercial |
32 |
Transport: Parking |
Commercial |
33 |
Transport: Rail Transport |
Commercial |
34 |
Transport: Water Transport |
Commercial |
35 |
Transport: Air Transport |
Commercial |
39 |
Transport: Vacant |
Commercial |
40 |
Community Services: Multi-use within Community Services |
Commercial |
41 |
Community Services: Educational |
Commercial |
42 |
Community Services: Medical and Allied |
Commercial |
43 |
Community Services: Personal and Property Protection |
Commercial |
44 |
Community Services: Religious |
Commercial |
45 |
Community Services: Defence |
Commercial |
46 |
Community Services: Halls |
Commercial |
47 |
Community Services: Cemeteries and Crematoria |
Commercial |
49 |
Community Services: Vacant |
Commercial |
50 |
Recreational: Multi-use within Recreational |
Commercial |
51 |
Recreational: Entertainment |
Commercial |
52 |
Recreational: Active Indoor |
Commercial |
53 |
Recreational: Active Outdoor |
Commercial |
54 |
Recreational: Passive Indoor |
Commercial |
55 |
Recreational: Passive Outdoor |
Commercial |
59 |
Recreational: Vacant |
Commercial |
60 |
Utility Services: Multi-use within Utility Services |
Commercial |
61 |
Utility Services: Communications |
Commercial |
62 |
Utility Services: Electricity |
Commercial |
63 |
Utility Services: Gas |
Commercial |
64 |
Utility Services: Water Supply |
Commercial |
65 |
Utility Services: Sanitary |
Commercial |
66 |
Utility Services: Other |
Commercial |
67 |
Utility Services: Post Boxes |
Commercial |
69 |
Utility Services: Vacant |
Commercial |
70 |
Industrial: Multi-use within Industrial |
Commercial |
71 |
Industrial: Food, Drink and Tobacco |
Commercial |
72 |
Industrial: Textiles, Leather and Fur |
Commercial |
73 |
Industrial: Timber Products and Furniture |
Commercial |
74 |
Industrial: Building Materials Other than Timber |
Commercial |
75 |
Industrial: Engineering, Metalworking, Appliances and Machinery |
Commercial |
76 |
Industrial: Chemicals, Plastics, Rubber and Paper |
Commercial |
77 |
Industrial: Other Industries – including Storage |
Commercial |
78 |
Industrial: Depots, Yards |
Commercial |
79 |
Industrial: Vacant |
Commercial |
80 |
Commercial: Multi-use within Commercial |
Commercial |
81 |
Commercial: Retail |
Commercial |
82 |
Commercial: Services |
Commercial |
83 |
Commercial: Wholesale |
Commercial |
84 |
Commercial: Offices |
Commercial |
85 |
Commercial: Carparking |
Commercial |
89 |
Commercial: Vacant |
Commercial |
90 |
Residential: Multi-use within Residential |
Residential |
91 |
Residential: Single Unit excluding Bach |
Residential |
92 |
Residential: Multi Unit |
Residential |
93 |
Residential: Public Communal – Unlicensed |
Commercial |
94 |
Residential: Public Communal – Licensed |
Commercial |
95 |
Residential: Special Accommodation |
Residential |
96 |
Residential: Communal Residence Dependent on Other Use |
Residential |
97 |
Residential: Bach |
Residential |
98 |
Residential: Carparking |
Residential |
99 |
Residential: Vacant |
Residential |
26 June 2018 |
|
Local Easter Sunday Shop Trading Policy Review 2018
Department: Corporate Policy
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 In December 2017, the Council adopted a Local Easter Sunday Shop Trading Policy which permitted all shops in Dunedin the option of trading on Easter Sunday. The Council resolved to start a review of the policy 90 days after Easter Sunday.
2 This report presents initial feedback about Easter Sunday shop trading in 2018 and recommends a Statement of Proposal be adopted as part of the special consultative procedure which must be followed under the Local Government Act (LGA).
That the Council: a) Adopts the Local Easter Sunday Shop Trading Policy Statement of Proposal. b) Reappoints the members of the Hearings Committee as follows: i) Councillor Andrew Whiley (Chair) iii) Councillor Kate Wilson iv) Councillor Damian Newell.
|
BACKGROUND
3 The 2016 Amendment to the Shop Trading Hours Act 1990 (the Act) allows territorial authorities to create a local policy to allow Easter Sunday shop trading in its area. If adopted, an Easter Sunday shop trading policy means that opening to trade is permitted.
4 Without a policy, current restrictions apply i.e. on Easter Sunday only pharmacies, restaurants, souvenir shops and garden centres are able to trade. Licensed premises (including restaurants) are also able to trade, however they are subject to restrictions imposed by the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act, limiting the sale of alcohol to people present on the premises for dining.
5 Local policies must comply with shop trading provisions in other legislation, such as opening hours or determining what types of shops may open. Restrictions already in place pursuant to the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 are not affected by such a policy.
6 The Act acknowledges that Easter Sunday continues to be a day of significance across New Zealand and some people would prefer not work on this day. Shop employees can refuse to work on Easter Sunday and employers must not compel or treat shop employees adversely if they refuse.
7 Likewise, an Easter Sunday Shop Trading Policy does not compel businesses to open on Easter Sunday; however it gives them the option to trade should they wish to do so.
8 Mandatory opening provisions in shop leases may not be interpreted as requiring a shop to trade on Easter Sunday (unless it is the type of lease for which there is a specified exception in the Act).
9 If adopted, a Local Easter Sunday shop trading policy must be reviewed within five years. The special consultative procedure must be used to decide whether to:
a) Amend the policy
b) Revoke the policy
c) Replace the policy or
d) Continue the policy without amendment.
10 After this first review, no further reviews are required by legislation. Further reviews may be made at any time and the Council may wish to specify a review period.
11 In August 2017, following a request from the Otago Chamber of Commerce to consider the introduction of a policy in Dunedin, the Council resolved to approve a draft Easter Sunday Shop Trading Policy for consultation.
12 In December 2017, the Council resolved that it:
Adopts a Local Easter Sunday Shop Trading Policy with the date of effect 1 January 2018 so that any type of shop may trade on Easter Sunday.
i) Decides to schedule a review of the Local Easter Sunday Shop Trading Policy to begin 90 days after Tuesday 3 April 2018.
ii) Writes to the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment requesting that advertising is undertaken to increase awareness of employers' statutory obligations for offering employees work on Easter Sunday.
Moved (Cr Andrew Whiley/Cr Doug
Hall).
DISCUSSION
Initial stakeholder feedback
13 In December, the Hearings Committee specified that the 2018 review canvas views of employees, employers, those who submitted in 2017 and the wider public. Following Easter Sunday 2018, there has been initial engagement with these key stakeholder groups to find out how Easter Sunday shop trading affected them. This pre-consultation is intended to inform Councillors of the impact of the policy and key issues before the special consultative procedure is used to formally review the policy.
14 Questionnaires were developed for each of the stakeholder groups: retailers, employees and the public to find out how the policy affected them on Easter Sunday 2018. Key stakeholders were contacted and asked to forward information and links through their networks. These organisations were the Otago Chamber of Commerce, the Otago Southland Employers Association, First Union, Unite and Knox Church.
15 Information and the links were made available from 30 April until 18 May. They were promoted through social media, FYI and on the DCC website. The Dunedin People’s Panel was also surveyed for feedback. Online submitters who had made submissions in September 2017 were contacted and invited to complete relevant questions.
16 See Attachment A for the full summary of feedback from stakeholders.
Retailers
17 This table summarises the feedback from retailers.
Table 1: Retailers’ summary of feedback
18 Issues raised by retailers in order of frequency were: retailers, employees and shoppers should have the choice of opening, working and shopping on Easter Sunday; trading should be a one-off for the Ed Sheeran concerts or other major events only; and that it impacted on family time.
Employees
19 This table summarises feedback from employees.
Table 2: Employees’ summary of feedback
20 Issues raised by employees in order of frequency were: it is important to protect this non trading day as it is one of 3.5 guaranteed holidays for employees; that the day is important for family, friends, health and community; that the policy should be a one-off for major events; that benefits such as time and a half and a day in lieu should be offered; that the policy should be retained to give retailers and shoppers the choice; and that they felt pressured, obligated or expected to work when they did not want to.
Public
21 This table summarises feedback from the public.
Table 3: Public summary of feedback
|
Yes |
No |
Unsure |
Support continuation of policy |
46% |
45% |
9% |
Shopped on Easter Sunday |
35% |
65% |
N/A |
Appreciated opportunity to shop Easter Sunday |
45% |
45% |
10% |
22 Issues raised by the public in order of frequency were: it is important to retain the non-trading day for family, friends, health and rest; protect the day and workers’ rights; retain the policy to allow retailers and shoppers the choice to open or shop; policy is great for tourism, economy and Dunedin’s future; there is no need to shop on this day; concern for workers being pressured to work; should be a one-off for major events; the day is outdated with little significance; other countries protect their workers’ rights and holidays better; and the day should be acknowledged for its religious significance.
People’s Panel
23 The Dunedin People’s Panel aims to provide an opportunity for people in Dunedin to get involved with a range of Dunedin City Council issues, giving feedback by completing online surveys. The Panel ideally supplements other research, using consultation to provide public perceptions to help inform decision-making processes. Panellists are recruited to be ‘typical’ members of the public – that is they come from a range of backgrounds and have a range of involvement with the DCC. The People’s Panel is not a statistically representative sample of the Dunedin population because panellists choose to sign up although representation from a variety of groups is encouraged. The People’s Panel was invited to answer questions about Easter Sunday shop trading.
24 This table summarises feedback from the People’s Panel.
Table 4: People’s Panel summary of feedback
|
Yes |
No |
Unsure |
Support continuation of policy |
55% |
38% |
7% |
Shopped on Easter Sunday |
20% |
80% |
N/A |
Appreciated opportunity to shop Easter Sunday |
45% |
44% |
11% |
25 Issues raised by People’s Panellists in order of frequency were: there is no need to shop on this day; concern for workers’ rights; it is an important day for family, recreation and rest; shops should have the choice to trade; the day no longer has religious significance; concern that workers will be pressured to work; should be for special events only; it was good and convenient to be able to shop; should acknowledge the religious significance of the day; and staff who work should get extra benefits.
Social media
26 Posts on social media prompted various discussions with key topics concern for workers’ rights, the day should be a guaranteed day off for holiday and family time, and that it was great for shopping.
Other Councils
27 At 30 May 2018, 41 councils in New Zealand have Local Easter Sunday Shop Trading Policies. Of these, 39 are district councils and two are city councils (Tauranga and Dunedin).
Further consultation
28 The special consultative procedure is required to review the policy and a Statement of Proposal is required as part of this process. The Statement of Proposal outlines the options of continuing the policy and of not continuing the policy and provides advantages and disadvantages for each option. It seeks specific feedback on both options – see Attachment B.
Hearings Committee
29 A Hearings Committee is required to hear feedback and deliberate on submissions. It is proposed that the Committee that heard submissions in 2017 is reappointed, given their previous involvement with this policy. Members of that Hearings Committee were:
· Councillor Andrew Whiley (Chair)
· Councillor Marie Laufiso
· Councillor Kate Wilson and
· Councillor Damian Newell.
OPTIONS
30 There are no options associated with this report as, in December 2017, the Council resolved to review the policy.
NEXT STEPS
31 If the draft Statement of Proposal is approved for consultation, the following timeline for this review is proposed:
26 June 2018 |
Council approves draft Statement of Proposal for consultation. |
2 July – 3 August 2018 |
Special consultative procedure. |
August |
Summarise feedback and prepare report for Hearings Committee. |
September |
Hearings and Deliberations. |
27 November 2018 |
Hearings Committee report to Council with recommendations. Council decides to continue or revoke the policy. |
Signatories
Author: |
Anne Gray - Policy Analyst |
Authoriser: |
Simon Pickford - General Manager Community Services |
|
Title |
Page |
Summary of feedback on Easter Sunday shop trading 2018 |
67 |
|
Statement of Proposal for Local Easter Sunday Shop Trading Policy review 2018 |
79 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This decision/report/proposal relates to providing a regulatory function and it is considered good-quality and cost-effective. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
Easter Sunday shop trading both contributes to and detracts from the standard of living and vibrant and cohesive communities priorities of the Social Wellbeing Strategy. It contributes to the business vitality and compelling destination priorities of the Economic Development Strategy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no specific implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy There are no implications. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations There are no financial implications. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance The significance of a decision relating to a Local Easter Sunday Shop Trading Policy is considered medium – high in terms of the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy with regard to community interest and involvement. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external Pre-consultation for the 2018 policy review has involved engagement with stakeholder groups and the public as outlined in the Discussion section of the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal Input to this report was provided by Customer & Regulatory Services, Corporate Policy and in-house legal counsel. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no identified risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no identified conflicts of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards There are no specific implications for Community Boards. |
26 June 2018 |
|
Waste Futures 2023 Project
Department: Waste and Environmental Solutions
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 The purpose of this report is to inform Council of the establishment of the Waste Futures 2023 project, and to describe the project execution plan for completion of phase one of the project.
2 This report provides a high level overview of the Waste Futures 2023 project.
3 The report details a high level plan and outlines the next phases in the project and the reporting mechanisms to inform councillors.
That the Council: a) Notes the Waste Futures 2023 Project report. |
BACKGROUND
4 Dunedin City Council is at an important decision point for shaping the future of solid waste management in the Dunedin region. The resource consents from the Otago Regional Council for Green Island Landfill expire in October 2023. Council has a designated alternative site available; however, the original Environmental Impact Assessment of that site was completed in October 1992 and is therefore 26 years old. Current advice is that the consent, procurement and establishment process for a new Class 1 landfill could take approximately seven to eight years.
5 Several studies to investigate development arrangements and governance options for solid waste have been carried out over the last 14 years. These options have included Council Controlled Organisations, Council Controlled Trading Organisations, Private Public Partnerships, or exiting the landfill market. This work has been carried out by staff assisted by external consultants and culminated in an EOI process in 2014 and subsequent RFP ‘Contract 5471 Partnering arrangement for Solid Waste Disposal’ which concluded unsuccessfully in 2016.
6 Following the 2016 RFP process for Contract 5471 staff moved forward with the tender process for three operational contracts ‘Contract 6865 Green Island Landfill and Transfer Station Management; Contract 6863 Landfill Environmental Monitoring and Reporting; Contract 7642 Rural Skip Days and Transfer Stations Operation’ in time for commencement on 1 July 2017.
7 Due to the resource consents for Green Island Landfill expiring in October 2023 there is a need to confirm the preferred future waste operating model, including preferred option for landfill operation, as soon as possible.
DISCUSSION
8 Solid waste management and landfill operations are a key strategic priority for the Council and have high community and stakeholder interest.
9 There is no mandatory or legal requirement for local authorities to be directly involved in the provision of landfill services or the collection of waste. However a territorial authority must promote effective and efficient waste management and minimisation within its district in accordance with section 42 of the Waste Minimisation Act 2008.
10 How waste is managed should reflect the direction of the Council’s Waste Management and Minimisation Plan (WMMP). Council’s WMMP is due for review by September 2019 and will need to be developed alongside the Waste Futures Project to cover collection, waste minimisation, resource recovery, recycling, treatment and disposal, services and facilities in the Dunedin region.
11 Council must also comply with the New Zealand Waste Strategy 2010 and the following legislation:
· Waste Minimisation Act (2008)
· Local Government Act (2002)
· Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act (1996)
· Climate Change Response Act (2002)
· Resource Management Act (1991)
· Litter Act (1979).
12 The Council has set an aspirational zero-waste target through the WMMP 2013 and recent Council resolutions have directed investigation of enhanced waste management practice including organics collection. Decisions on these will need to be considered as part of the WMMP review and the wider future waste operating model.
13 The operating context for waste, including waste levies and legislative requirements, is shifting with the new Government towards higher standards, meaning that Council needs to be planning for this new operating environment and ensuring that this is sustainable long term.
14 Waste recovery is challenging due to limited markets for recovered waste (e.g., glass/plastics) and competing financial incentives to dispose of waste (e.g., green waste), meaning it will be challenging to achieve the Council’s waste management aspirations of zero-waste.
15 The Green Island Landfill plays an important role in waste management. The landfill forms part of a wider interdependent system managed by both the Council and private sector that also includes collection contracts, transfer stations, landfill operations, public engagement, and waste recovery activities.
16 Resource consents for the operation of the Green Island Landfill expire in 2023. Current advice is that it may be challenging to extend the consents or the physical scale of the landfill significantly beyond 2023, meaning alternative sites and delivery models need to be investigated along with the feasibility of extending the Green Island consents (both scale of the site and time-frame) and the enhancement of current waste minimisation practices.
17 Any extension of the Green Island Landfill consent would only be for a short period.
18 Examples from other Councils indicate that it is likely that development of an alternative landfill disposal site to replace Green Island Landfill would take around seven years to plan, consent, and implement. This includes significant RMA consenting process and stakeholder engagement. Therefore it is unlikely a new disposal site would be delivered before the expiry of current landfill consents in 2023. Examples of Councils or regions that have recently worked through a similar process include:
· Napier/Hastings;
· Taranaki;
· Ruapehu;
· Queenstown; and
· Christchurch.
19 Council’s waste collection contracts also require review by 2019 and these will need to be linked to future landfill options. Extensions to the existing contracts or interim contracts will need to be put in place until a preferred future solid waste operating model has been identified and approved for detailed investigation in 2019/20.
20 The combination of these factors presents a unique opportunity for Council to develop its preferred future strategic waste management model for the Dunedin region over the medium to long term.
OPTIONS
21 Not applicable.
waste futures 2023 project
22 The Project Execution Plan for the first part of the project has been developed, and a Project Steering Group has been established consisting of the acting General Manager Infrastructure and Networks, General Manager Strategy and Governance, and General Manager Finance and Commercial. The Project Control Group has also been established, and meeting and reporting structures have been implemented.
23 Overall project governance sits with the Council’s Infrastructure and Network Services Committee and there will be regular reports to the Committee on progress.
24 Phase one of the project will consist of six concurrent and closely interrelated workstreams:
· Workstream 1: Project Management – Ongoing project management and governance of the programme, including procurement of professional services.
· Workstream 2: Feasibility Analysis – Technical feasibility analysis of Green Island and alternative landfill site at Smooth Hill (see map attachment A), including service continuity and planning.
· Workstream 3: Options Analysis and Business Case Process – Development and analysis of waste futures options, including recommendation of preferred option and associated business case development.
· Workstream 4: Review of Waste Management and Minimisation Plan – Review of the Waste Management and Minimisation Plan to ensure it is aligned with, and supports, Waste Futures 2023.
· Workstream 5: Review Kerbside Collection – Review collection contracts to ensure they support service continuity and are aligned with, and support, Waste Futures 2023.
· Workstream 6: Communications and Engagement – Development and implementation of a communications and engagement strategy and plan that supports Waste Futures 2023, including the review of the Waste Management and Minimisation Plan and review of kerbside collection services.
25 Phase one of the project is intended to be an integrated assessment of all aspects of the waste management system that are relevant to Dunedin. The project will review the strategic options available to manage solid waste and will employ the Better Business Case framework in accordance with the New Zealand Government’s Better Business Case guidelines.
26 This process provides a best practice approach to manage risk and ensure a robust assessment of options and the financial, delivery, management and environmental issues associated with this type of project. It also ensures that the Council is well placed to seek Government investment for the project through the Provincial Growth Fund, if this is considered a viable funding source to support delivery.
27 The business case will be developed in stages, with the first stage leading to an indicative business case aimed at advising the Council of a preferred option, followed by a detailed business case aimed at a final decision on what components should comprise the entire solid waste management system operated by Council.
28 Council will require the assistance of suitably qualified professionals to assist with the development of this business case, either in whole or in part. The deliverables for the project reflect the Better Business Case framework and will be developed over the life of the project.
29 Early engagement with key stakeholders is being undertaken via targeted consultation meetings as part of the early project establishment phase. Stakeholders with a high level of interest in the project include the community, Councillors, Otago Regional Council, waste collectors, waste processors, and various council departments. Other important stakeholders include iwi, government departments, waste generators, neighbouring councils, and users of recycled products.
30 Consultation and engagement with the public is expected to take the following forms:
· Direct engagement with key/affected stakeholders;
· Website information, leaflets, e-mails, drop-in sessions; and
· A public consultation process in 2018.
NEXT STEPS
31 Early engagement with project stakeholders is currently underway, and contact with potentially affected parties has been initiated. The Communication and Engagement Plan, Procurement Plan, Project Schedule, and Risk Register have been developed and will be updated during the life of the project.
32 Procurement for suitably qualified and experienced resources to complete both the feasibility studies and Better Business Case assessment is currently underway. The target date for contract award is 9 July 2018.
33 Regular reporting on the project will be through INSCOM.
Signatories
Author: |
Chris Henderson - Group Manager Waste and Environmental Solutions |
Authoriser: |
Leanne Mash - General Manager Infrastructure and Networks (Acting) |
|
Title |
Page |
Smooth Hill Photographic Map |
95 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report relates to providing local infrastructure and it is considered good-quality and cost-effective. This report relates to providing a public service and it is considered good-quality and cost-effective. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The Waste Futures 2023 Project contributes to the Environment Strategy by enabling a robust evaluation of potential options for Dunedin City Council to continue to ensure effective reduction and management of solid waste to achieve the goals set out in its Waste Management and Minimisation Plan, with appropriate regard given to the goals of the Emissions Management and Reduction Plan.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement Iwi have been identified as a significant stakeholder and will be engaged during the Better Business Case options development.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability The Waste Futures 2023 Project may have significant economic and environmental implications depending on the preferred option identified.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan/Financial Strategy/Infrastructure Strategy The Waste Futures 2023 Project will be publicly consulted on during 2019.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations Will be reported on once further details are known.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance Once options are determined then the significance will be assessed in terms of the Council's Significance and Engagement Policy.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external Significant external engagement will be undertaken during the development of potential future operating models.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal Significant internal engagement will be undertaken during the development of potential future operating models.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal/Health and Safety, etc. A risk register has been developed which will allow the Project Control Group and Project Steering Group to actively manage risk associated with the Waste Futures 2023 project.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflicts of interest.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards The future management of waste services will be discussed with Community Boards as part of the process.
|
26 June 2018 |
|
Statements of Intent for Dunedin City Holdings Limited, Subsidiaries and Associate Companies
Department: Civic
The full report will be circulated as a supplementary agenda item on Thursday, 21 June 2018.
|
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
Revocation of Bylaws
Department: Corporate Policy
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report recommends revoking two Council Bylaws, the Introduction to the Consolidated Bylaw and the Amusement Devices Bylaw, as they have both become redundant.
2 A review of Council bylaws shows that two current Bylaws are redundant due to changes in process and the introduction of national legislation. Revoking these bylaws is intended to prevent confusion from staff and the public about the status of the bylaws.
That the Council: a) Revokes the Introduction to the Consolidated Bylaw b) Revokes the Amusement Devices Bylaw
|
BACKGROUND
3 A review of Council bylaws in 2017 identified two current bylaws that have become redundant:
· Introduction to the Consolidated Bylaw (see Attachment A)
· Amusement Devices Bylaw (see Attachment B)
Introduction to the Consolidated Bylaw
4 The Introduction to the Consolidated Bylaw was initially approved in 1991. At that time, before many records were digitised, all Council bylaws were kept in a book called the Consolidated Bylaw. They were numbered and were prefaced by the Introduction to the Consolidated Bylaw. This introduction includes delegations, service of notices, right of entry, offences and breaches, fees and deposits, notices to be obeyed, penalties, dispensing power, commencement, appeals and access to Council property.
5 As bylaws became digitised, relevant aspects covered in the introduction became incorporated into each individual bylaw, thus duplicating the introduction. The Introduction to the Consolidated Bylaw was last reviewed in 2008, and because of the duplication, should now be revoked.
Amusement Devices Bylaw
6 The Amusement Devices Bylaw applies to ‘amusement devices’ (as defined at section 21A of the Machinery Act 1950) which includes, for example, Ferris wheels, bouncy castles and scale model locomotives. The bylaw was initially approved on 5 December 2005 and was last reviewed in 2015. Although the Machinery Act 1950 was repealed in 2016 by the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, the definition of ‘amusement devices’ continues through the Amusement Devices Regulations 1978.
7 These regulations make provision for a local authority to take applications and issue permits to operate these amusement devices. The regulations also provide for inspection requirements and set fees for the investigation and prosecution of offences. As the local authority has powers to administer these regulations, the requirement for a bylaw is not necessary.
DISCUSSION
8 Duplication of information through digitisation and the introduction of national legislation have made the Introduction to the Consolidated Bylaw and the Amusement Devices bylaws redundant.
9 To meet mandatory requirements of the Local Government Act (LGA), bylaws must be reviewed. Following review, they may continue without amendment, be amended, be revoked, or be revoked and replaced. The Amusement Devices bylaw and Introduction to the Consolidated Bylaw have been reviewed and it is recommended they are revoked as they are no longer required.
10 Revoking these bylaws will prevent confusion amongst staff and the public about the status of the bylaws.
11 This is an administrative process, and does not require consultation.
OPTIONS
Option One – Revoke Introduction to the Consolidated bylaw and Amusement Devices bylaw (Recommended)
1 This option involves revoking two bylaws which are no longer required.
Advantages
· Removes potential for confusion amongst staff and the public about the status of these bylaws
Disadvantages
· There are no disadvantages to this option.
Option Two – Do not revoke Introduction to the Consolidated bylaw and Amusement Devices bylaw (Status Quo)
2 This option retains the status quo of keeping two bylaws which are no longer required.
Advantages
· There are no advantages to this option.
Disadvantages
· Potential for confusion amongst staff and the public about the status of these bylaws.
NEXT STEPS
12 If revoked, these bylaws will be removed from the Dunedin City Council (DCC) website and from the DCC Key Documents Register.
Signatories
Author: |
Anne Gray - Policy Analyst |
Authoriser: |
Nicola Pinfold - Group Manager Community and Planning |
|
Title |
Page |
Introduction to Consolidated Bylaw |
102 |
|
Amusement Devices Bylaw |
107 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This decision relates to providing a regulatory function and it is considered good-quality and cost-effective. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
This decision to correct records has no relevance to the strategic framework. The bylaws are included on the DCC website and are included in the DCC Key Documents Register. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy There are no implications for these documents. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations There are no financial implications. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance This decision is considered low in terms of the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been no external engagement. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal Discussions to inform this report were held with in-house legal counsel, Governance and Regulatory staff in late 2017 and again in May 2018. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. Risks of not revoking these bylaws are confusion amongst staff and the public. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There is no known conflict of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards There are no implications for Community Boards. |
26 June 2018 |
|
Naming of Two New Roads off Hagart-Alexander Drive, Mosgiel
Department: Transport
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 The purpose of this report is to present the options for the naming of two new roads off Hagart-Alexander Drive, Mosgiel, within the Ōwhiro Park residential development.
2 The new road names proposed by the developer comply with the Dunedin City Council Road Naming Policy and are therefore recommended for approval.
3 Mana whenua have been consulted as one of the proposed names, “Ōwhiro Avenue”, contains a Māori name. They have confirmed there is no objection to the proposal.
That the Council: a) Approves naming of a new road off Hagart-Alexander Drive as “Ōwhiro Avenue”. b) Approves naming of a new road off the proposed “Ōwhiro Avenue” as “Glenimrie Close”. |
BACKGROUND
4 The Ōwhiro Park residential development is currently being constructed off Hagart-Alexander Drive, Mosgiel.
5 The development will create 81 residential sections and two roads to vest in the Council. The development has now progressed to a stage where the Council's approval is sought to name the new roads within the development.
DISCUSSION
6 The developer, Minaret Resources Limited, has proposed “Ōwhiro Avenue" as their preferred name for the new main “loop” road within the development. No alternative road name has been proposed.
7 The developer has proposed “Glenimrie Close" as their preferred name for the cul-de-sac within the development. No alternative road name has been proposed.
8 The developer has proposed "Ōwhiro Avenue" after the Ōwhiro Stream which adjoins the site. The Ōwhiro Stream drains the catchment of land from the south-eastern end of the Taieri Plain to where it meets the Taieri River near Allanton.
9 Aukaha were engaged by Transport to consult with mana whenua regarding the name “Ōwhiro” being used for the new road. No objection to the proposed name has been raised through this consultation.
10 Aukaha advise that the Ngai Tahu Atlas confirms the spelling of “Ōwhiro” is correct, even though “Owhiro” (without the macron) is noted on publications such as Land Information New Zealand maps.
11 The name “Ōwhiro” is not a duplicate of, or similar to, any existing road name in Dunedin. The name fits the appropriateness criteria of the Policy as it references a significant geographical feature in the area.
12 The developer has proposed "Glenimrie Close" after the house and farm that used to occupy the site. The house and farm are referred to in an archeological assessment report provided in support of the proposed name. The letterbox to 69 Gladstone Road North (adjoining the Ōwhiro development) names the land as ‘Glenimrie’, and the developer confirms that the owners of 69 Gladstone Road North consent to the ‘Glenimrie’ name being used within the development.
13 The name “Glenimrie” is not a duplicate of, or similar to, any existing road name in Dunedin. The name fits the appropriateness criteria of the Policy.
14 Please note that this report would normally be presented to the Infrastructure Services and Networks Committee; however due to the timing of its next meeting approval is being sought by Council, for rating purposes.
OPTIONS
15 The developer has not submitted any alternative names for these roads.
Option One (A) – The Council approves naming of the roads off Hagart-Alexander Drive as “Ōwhiro Avenue” (Recommended)
Advantages
· The names are considered to comply with the Road Naming Policy.
Disadvantages
· There are no known disadvantages with this option.
Option One (B) – The Council approves naming of the roads off Hagart-Alexander Drive as “Glenimrie Close” (Recommended)
Advantages
· The names are considered to comply with the Road Naming Policy.
Disadvantages
· There are no known disadvantages with this option.
Option Two – The Council rejects the proposed road names
Advantages
· Staff can be directed to request alternative road names from the developer that may better suit the Council’s preferences.
Disadvantages
· The new roads will not have names which will inconvenience property owners and delay the release of new rating information to landowners.
NEXT STEPS
16 If the recommended names are approved, staff will process the required documentation and advise the developer and Land Information New Zealand of the new road names.
Signatories
Author: |
Grant Fisher - Transport Planner/Engineer |
Authoriser: |
Richard Saunders - Group Manager Transport |
|
Title |
Page |
Location Plan |
112 |
|
Subdivision Plan |
113 |
|
Confirmation of no objection to road name from Aukaha |
114 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This decision/report/proposal relates to providing local infrastructure and it is considered good-quality and cost-effective.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
This is an administrative function. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement Mana whenua have been consulted and do not object to the proposed road names. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy There are no implications for the LTP. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations There are no financial implications. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance The significance of the decision is deemed to be low in terms of Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been engagement with the developer and their agent. There has also been engagement with mana whenua. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal There has been engagement with BIS. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no conflicts of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards The Mosgiel–Taieri Community Board have been consulted on the changes. At the time of writing no feedback had been received. |
26 June 2018 |
|
Parking Survey Feedback
Department: Transport
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides a summary of public feedback received by the Council during a recent on-line parking survey, and discusses the next steps for developing a Parking Management Plan.
That the Council: a) Notes the report and summary of feedback from the parking survey. |
BACKGROUND
2 Results from DCC’s Residents Opinion Surveys in 2016 and 2017 showed a decline in satisfaction of on-street metered parking and dissatisfaction with the availability of parking in the central city. This is despite high parking inventory across the central city, a consistent pricing structure and underutilisation of parking buildings outside peak times.
3 Recent parking surveys record that there are almost 22,000 car parking spaces in central Dunedin. Dunedin’s on-street parking prices have not changed since they were set in 2009. Changes are still being made to improve travel choice and make alternative modes such as public transport or travel by bicycle more attractive.
DISCUSSION
4 Dunedin’s current Parking Strategy was adopted in 2008, for the 2008-2018 period. It is nearing the end of its ‘life’ and aspects of it are out of date. The strategy has not been reviewed or updated during the strategy period.
5 It is intended to replace Dunedin’s current Parking Strategy with a Parking Management Plan.
6 There are a number of projects that are likely to impact the transport network and parking in Dunedin’s CBD area. The DCC’s 2018-28 10 Year Plan funds a Central City Upgrade, Tertiary Precinct Upgrade and Dunedin Urban Cycleways programme. The Otago Regional Council continues to implement changes to Dunedin’s public transport network, the NZ Transport Agency is constructing its SH1/one-way pair cycle lane project and central Government has recently announced the Dunedin Hospital is being redeveloped on a new central city site.
7 Based on the feedback received by transport staff, several other areas of Dunedin are also experiencing parking pressures.
8 These factors taken together, along with the age of the current parking strategy, means it was an appropriate time for a review.
9 To understand the range of issues that people currently face, DCC carried out an online public parking survey for three weeks from 30 April to 21 May 2018. This was the first step towards developing a new Parking Management Plan.
10 The survey asked people to share their thoughts on parking in the city, and to provide feedback on what people found worked well and what they thought could be improved.
11 The Council received 801 feedback forms. The main points people raised related to
a) availability and turnover,
b) pricing,
c) time restrictions,
d) regulation and enforcement,
e) buildings,
f) all day parking,
g) design and safety, and
h) technology.
12 The feedback has been summarised in the attached report.
OPTIONS
13 There are no options, as this is a report for noting only.
NEXT STEPS
14 Staff will consider the issues raised by respondents through the survey feedback and look at options for further consultation on how best to meet parking needs across the city.
Signatories
Author: |
Susan Lilley - Senior Transportation Planner |
Authoriser: |
Nick Sargent - Transport Strategy Manager Richard Saunders - Group Manager Transport Leanne Mash - General Manager Infrastructure and Networks (Acting) |
|
Title |
Page |
Parking Survey Summary Report |
118 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
Parking management will contribute to the vision of the Central City Plan and the Integrated Transport Strategy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no impacts for tangata whenua |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability Parking management changes may create the opportunity for streetscape amenity improvements, providing for active modes and improving public transport |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy There are no implications |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations There are no financial implications. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance This decision is considered to be of low significance in terms of the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external Feedback was sought from the wider general public. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The survey was developed in consultation with DCC’s Communications Department. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no identified risks |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflicts of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards Some survey feedback received related to Community Board areas. |
26 June 2018 |
|
Traffic and Parking Bylaw Review
Department: Transport
1 The purpose of this report is to inform Council that a review of the Traffic and Parking Bylaw will be undertaken.
2 A review of the Traffic and Parking Bylaw has been prompted by the age of the existing Bylaw, and the need to clarify certain provisions.
That the Council: a) Notes the review of the Parking and Traffic Bylaw. |
BACKGROUND
4 The Bylaw makes general restrictions, such as the prohibition of parking on the grass verge, as well as setting up the process for making specific restrictions which will be made as needed. Specific restrictions include changing the time limit on an individual park, altering the paid parking area, or deeming a road one-way only. Previous changes to parking restrictions have been made either by staff or Council, depending on the significance of the change.
5 A review of the Bylaw is needed to clarify the decision-making processes for making restrictions.
6 Unlike bylaws made under the Local Government Act, mandatory review of the Bylaw is not required under the LTA.
DISCUSSION
7 The Bylaw covers all roads under Council control in Dunedin City, and therefore affects a significant number of people and addresses a range of issues. It enables parking turnover in high demand areas such as the city centre, through the use of time restricted parking and paid parking. It promotes accessibility through mobility parks as well as supporting public transport through the provision of bus stops. The Bylaw also supports traffic flow (one-way streets), safeguards infrastructure (weight limits on bridges), and provides for vulnerable road users through the provision of cycle lanes. For these matters to be enforced, they must be provided for in a bylaw.
8 The Bylaw was reviewed in 2008, and amended in 2010. A number of issues with the existing Bylaw have been identified through a staff workshop and feedback from the recent public survey on parking (see Council report on the current agenda – Parking Survey Feedback).
9 A full Bylaw review will be undertaken and the review will include:
· Clarify the process for making restrictions.
· Update the language and structure.
· Clarify the governing legislation.
· Update provisions to provide for changes in the technological, social and legal context since the Bylaw was made.
· Update provisions to better reflect the Council’s strategic direction and requirements.
· Investigate whether amendment to the Bylaw is needed to support enforcement.
· Investigate whether Council’s other transport bylaws should be consolidated in to the Traffic and Parking Bylaw.
10 Amending the current Bylaw is considered the most appropriate way of regulating and controlling traffic and parking on roads in Dunedin City noting that the Bylaw is required to enable enforcement of restrictions. Due to the age of the Bylaw it needs to be brought up to date to provide for and adapt to future changes in technology, and to support Council’s strategic direction.
11 There are no options as this is a report for noting only.
NEXT STEPS
12 Staff will undertake a review of the existing Bylaw and report back to Council with its findings and draft Bylaw amendments.
Signatories
Author: |
Anja McAlevey - Senior Transportation Planner |
Authoriser: |
Richard Saunders - Group Manager Transport Leanne Mash - General Manager Infrastructure and Networks (Acting) |
|
Title |
Page |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Traffic and Parking Bylaw |
136 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
Reviewing the Traffic and Parking Bylaw will allow decision making that contributes to a number of strategic objectives. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for tangata whenua. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability Review of the Traffic and Parking Bylaw will assist decision making that may improve provision for active modes, public transport and electric vehicles. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy There are no implications. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations There are no financial implications. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance Commencing a Bylaw review is a decision of low significance in terms of the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The significance of the proposed amendment to the Bylaw will be assessed later in the process. It is likely that the special consultative procedure will be required. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external Feedback on existing parking provision was sought from the wider general public (see Council report on the current agenda – Parking Survey Feedback). |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal This report has been developed with input from Transport, Legal, Compliance, Animal and Parking Services, Civic, and Corporate Policy. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no identified risks. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflicts of interest. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards Some Community boards have parking restrictions within their board areas. They will be given an opportunity to provide input into any new bylaw during the Bylaw review process. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Council 26 June 2018 |
|
Resolution to Exclude the Public
That the Council excludes the public from the following part of the proceedings of this meeting (pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987) namely:
This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, and the particular interest or interests protected by Section 6 or Section 7 of that Act, or Section 6 or Section 7 or Section 9 of the Official Information Act 1982, as the case may require, which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as shown above after each item.