Agenda of Planning and Environment Committee

Planning and Environment Committee

12 June 2018

Part A Reports

Submission on the Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Renewal of Licences) Amendment Bill (No 2)

Department: Corporate Policy and Customer and Regulatory Services

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1 This is a covering report for the attached submission from the Dunedin City Council to the Government Administration Select Committee on the Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Renewal of Licences) Amendment Bill (No 2) and Supplementary Order Paper (SOP) No 14.

RECOMMENDATIONS

That the Committee:

a) Notes the submission from Dunedin City Council on the Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Renewal of Licences) Amendment Bill and Supplementary Order Paper No 14.

BACKGROUND

2 The Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Renewal of Licences) Amendment Bill (No 2) provides that where a local alcohol policy is in place under the provisions of the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 any renewal of a licence under the Act must not be inconsistent with the provisions of that local alcohol policy.

3 The supplementary paper clarifies that the discretion to refuse the renewal of a licence for sale and supply of alcohol that is inconsistent with a relevant local alcohol policy applies only to existing off-licences.

4 The submission has come to the Committee for retrospective consideration as the meeting time falls after the consultation deadline of Wednesday 25 April 2018. The draft submission was circulated to Councillors for feedback on 18 April 2018. No changes were suggested and the Chair of the Planning and Environment Committee signed the submission letter which was submitted on Monday 23 April.

DISCUSSION

5 The attached submission provides the Dunedin City Council’s response to the Amendment Bill and SOP, noting that the Amendment Bill provides greater clarity about the renewal of licences where local alcohol policies exist but that the SOP appears to undermine local alcohol policies in respect to on-licences and club licences.

OPTIONS

6 As this report is for noting only, there are no options.

NEXT STEPS

7 Pending the Committee’s decision, any changes put forth will be forwarded to the Government Administration Select Committee for incorporating into the DCC’s submission.

Signatories

Author:

Anne Gray - Policy Analyst

Kevin Mechen - Secretary, District Licensing Committee

Authoriser:

Adrian Blair - Group Manager Customer and Regulatory Services

Simon Pickford - General Manager Community Services

Attachments

	Title	Page
a	Submission on Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Renewal of Licences) Amendment Bill and SOP	18

SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS

Fit with purpose of Local Government

This report relates to providing a regulatory function and it is considered good-quality and cost-effective.

Fit with strategic framework

	Contributes	Detracts	Not applicable
Social Wellbeing Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Economic Development Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Environment Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Arts and Culture Strategy	☐	☐	☒
3 Waters Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Spatial Plan	☐	☐	☒
Integrated Transport Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Parks and Recreation Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Other strategic projects/policies/plans	☒	☐	☐

The submission aligns with priorities of the Social Wellbeing strategy and with the intent of local alcohol policies.

Māori Impact Statement

There are no known impacts for tangata whenua.

Sustainability

There are no implications for sustainability.

LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy

There are no implications for these documents.

Financial considerations

There are no financial implications.

Significance

This decision is considered low in terms of the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

Engagement – external

There has been no external engagement.

Engagement - internal

Regulatory Services and Corporate Policy staff have developed the draft submission and circulated it to Councillor for feedback.

Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc.

There are no identified risks.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Community Boards

There are no implications for Community Boards.

Planning and Environment Committee

12 June 2018

Submission from Dunedin City Council to the ORC draft Biodiversity Strategy

Department: Corporate Policy

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1 This report attaches the Dunedin City Council (DCC) submission to the Otago Regional Council (ORC) on the draft Biodiversity Strategy.

2 The ORC has developed the draft Biodiversity Strategy to: set out the biodiversity outcomes ORC collectively wants to achieve for Otago and roles and activities that ORC will be involved in; and establish a framework for working in partnership with other organisations.

3 The DCC submission was submitted to ORC by the deadline of the 11 May 2018 following informal engagement with elected members.

4 Retrospective approval is now sought, as the timeframe for the consultation fell outside the Committee cycle.

5 The draft Biodiversity Strategy was notified to DCC separately from the ORC draft 10 Year Plan with no mention of implementation plans for the draft Biodiversity Strategy being detailed in the draft 10 Year Plan. This resulted in inclusion of item 17 in the DCC submission:

“The DCC appreciates that this is a high-level strategy and suggests a separate implementation plan be developed for the Biodiversity Strategy to be successfully realised.”

RECOMMENDATIONS

That the Committee:

a) Approves, retrospectively the DCC submission to the Otago Regional Council on the draft Biodiversity Strategy at Attachment A.

Signatories

Author:	Junichi Sugishita - Policy Anlayst
Authoriser:	Nicola Pinfold - Group Manager Community and Planning

Attachments

Title

Page

SUBMISSION ON THE OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL’S BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY 2018

SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS

Fit with purpose of Local Government

This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities.

This report relates to providing a regulatory function and it is considered good-quality and cost-effective.

Fit with strategic framework

	Contributes	Detracts	Not applicable
Social Wellbeing Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Economic Development Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Environment Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Arts and Culture Strategy	☐	☐	☒
3 Waters Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Spatial Plan	☒	☐	☐
Integrated Transport Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Parks and Recreation Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Other strategic projects/policies/plans	☒	☐	☐

This submission has been made in line with the goals and objectives within the strategic framework above.

Māori Impact Statement

There are no known impacts for tangata whenua from the DCC making this submission.

Sustainability

The submission supports a sustainable approach to managing the natural environment.

LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy

There are no implications.

Financial considerations

There are no financial implications.

Significance

This decision has been assessed under the Council's Significance and Engagement Policy as being of low significance.

Engagement – external

There has been no external engagement on this submission although staff attended an ORC workshop on the draft Biodiversity Strategy and provided feedback on the early draft.

Engagement - internal

Parks and Recreation and City Development staff were consulted in the drafting of this submission.

Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc.

There are no known risks.

Conflict of Interest

There are no known conflicts of interest.

Community Boards

There are no implications for Community Boards.

Planning and Environment Committee

12 June 2018

Urban development capacity monitoring report

Department: Planning

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1 This report introduces the first Dunedin monitoring report prepared under the National Policy Statement for Urban Development Capacity (NPS-UDC) for noting by committee.

2 Under the NPS-UDC, DCC is required to monitor a range of indicators and use these to understand how well housing and business land markets are functioning, how planning may affect this, and when additional development capacity might be needed.

3 The attached report includes information on house sale prices, rental costs, affordability measures, consented homes, commercial rents and vacancy rates. Key points raised by the report are outlined in the discussion below.

RECOMMENDATIONS

That the Committee:

a) Notes the first quarterly urban development capacity monitoring report.

BACKGROUND

4 Dunedin has historically had modest population growth, however the rate of growth has recently risen significantly due to high levels of net migration. As a result, Dunedin was re-categorised as a medium-growth urban area in September 2017 under the NPS-UDC.

5 The NPS-UDC aims to ensure councils adequately consider the impact of their planning frameworks on the ability and efficiency of the market to provide sufficient housing and business land. One requirement under the NPS-UDC is to monitor and report quarterly on a range of market indicators. The attached report fulfils this requirement.

DISCUSSION

6 Attached is the first quarterly monitoring report. Key points raised in the report include the following:

a) House sale prices have risen significantly in the last two years. Rental costs have also increased, although to a lesser degree.

b) Based on the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s (MBIE) housing affordability measures, affordability for first home buyers has been improving over the last ten years. Affordability for renting households has been relatively flat over the same period. These results are due to house price increases being offset by other housing costs (e.g. interest rates) decreasing and household incomes rising.

c) Dunedin’s housing demand has historically been well accommodated by the construction of new homes, however construction has not kept pace with household growth over the last 3-4 years.

d) Changing household demographics and housing preferences suggest that an increasing number of smaller attached units (such as townhouses and apartments) are required. However, consents for new homes are still dominated by large standalone houses. This creates a risk that Dunedin’s housing stock may not provide sufficient choice for residents.

e) The report indicators suggest that the overall amount of zoned land is not a significant constraint on the housing market, with house prices being more influenced by construction costs and population increases.

f) Council has less data on how the business land market is functioning, which is an issue that councils across New Zealand are facing. The information that Council does have indicates relatively strong demand, which is generally being fulfilled by conversions, upgrades, and existing vacancies.

7 Staff are currently working on a housing and business assessment under the NPS-UDC. This will assess demand over the next 3, 10, and 30 years for housing and business land by type, location, and price point. It will also assess the capacity available to meet this demand, including the effect of Second Generation Plan provisions and the economic feasibility of developments. This assessment is due to be completed by 31 December 2018.

OPTIONS

8 Not applicable. Report for noting only.

NEXT STEPS

9 The attached monitoring report will be distributed within DCC, sent to MBIE for comment, and made available to the public via the DCC website.

10 The report will be updated on a quarterly basis, as required by the NPS-UDC. The report template will evolve and, where useful, incorporate new sources of data as they become available.

Signatories

Author:

Nathan Stocker - Policy Planner (Urban Development Capacity)

Authoriser:

Anna Johnson - City Development Manager

Nicola Pinfold - Group Manager Community and Planning

Sandy Graham - General Manager Strategy and Governance

Attachments

	Title	Page
a	NPS-UDC quarterly monitoring report	28

SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS

Fit with purpose of Local Government

This report relates to providing a regulatory function and it is considered good-quality and cost-effective.

Fit with strategic framework

	Contributes	Detracts	Not applicable
Social Wellbeing Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Economic Development Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Environment Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Arts and Culture Strategy	☐	☐	☒
3 Waters Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Spatial Plan	☒	☐	☐
Integrated Transport Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Parks and Recreation Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Other strategic projects/policies/plans	☐	☐	☒

Aligns with Spatial Plan goals.

Māori Impact Statement

No known impacts for tangata whenua.

Sustainability

No implications for sustainability. Data provided through monitoring will assist Council to ensure sustainability of housing stock.

LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy

No implications.

Financial considerations

No implications.

Significance

This decision is considered low in terms of the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

Engagement – external

No external engagement.

Engagement - internal

No internal engagement.

Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc.

No identified risks.

Conflict of Interest

No known conflict of interest.

Community Boards

No specific implications for Community Boards.

Planning and Environment Committee

12 June 2018

Results of the Heritage Monitoring Programme 17/18

Department: Planning

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1 This report introduces the first monitoring report prepared as part of the Dunedin Heritage Monitoring Programme approved by this Committee in June 2017. It is based on fieldwork undertaken over the summer of 2017/2018.

2 The attached report indicates that Dunedin’s scheduled heritage buildings are generally well cared for, regardless of their type. However, there are 24 buildings considered to be ‘at risk’ of loss due to their poor condition and/or lack of use. These buildings have their own unique issues which need to be addressed individually.

3 The results also show that the restoration projects partly funded by Dunedin City Council have been broadly successful.

4 The report suggests locations, building types and condition issues to prioritise.

RECOMMENDATIONS

That the Committee:

a) Notes the first Heritage Monitoring Report.

BACKGROUND

5 On 3 June 2014, City Development presented a report to the Planning and Regulatory Committee on 'Options to Address Demolition by Neglect and the Degradation of the Dunedin Streetscape'. One of the proposed measures in the report on which the Committee requested more information was the development of a ‘buildings at risk’ register.

6 On 13 June 2017, a report was presented to the Planning and Environment Committee recommending the development of a new Dunedin Heritage Monitoring Programme. The key purpose of the monitoring programme is to monitor progress in preserving and enhancing the city's heritage, by recording investment in and use of heritage buildings, and conversely highlighting any buildings and areas at risk that may need targeting of resources or other actions.

DISCUSSION

7 Fieldwork carried over the summer of 2017-18 visually assessed the exterior of 98% of the heritage buildings and structures scheduled in the second generation District Plan (2GP). It is intended that the omitted 2% are visited over the course of the year to complete the survey.

8 Each heritage item was assessed on the condition of different elements and then an overall condition (good; fair; poor; or very bad) was assigned to the item. Building elements assessed were roofs, gutters and downpipes, walls, doors and windows, and architectural details. Occupancy was also identified at the time. Photographs were taken from public places as a future point of comparison. The results of the survey were recorded as a spatial database.

9 The level of risk was calculated by a combination of condition and occupancy/use. Structures which cannot be occupied/used were assessed on condition alone. The risk matrix methodology was based on that used by Historic England in its annual Heritage At Risk survey of the most significant heritage sites in England.

10 ‘Direction of travel’ was assessed on the degree of restoration work planned or underway for ‘at risk’ buildings. This was based on both site reports and data taken from building consent records.

11 Key findings from the monitoring report include:

· Of the 774 buildings and structures assessed, only 24 were identified as ‘at risk’. This equates to 3.1% of scheduled items.

· A further 64 items (less than 8.3%) were considered ‘vulnerable’, with the remainder (88.6%) considered to be ‘not at risk’.

· Lower level maintenance issues, such as damaged render, deteriorating walls, flaking paintwork, were comparatively common but are not significant as these can be easily repaired.

· Vandalism was recorded for 9.4% scheduled buildings.

12 The 24 scheduled heritage buildings identified as ‘at risk’ and their recorded ‘direction of travel’ were:

2GP#	Name	Address	HNZ	Direction of travel
B035	Cargill’s Castle (ruins)	111D Cliffs Road, St Clair	Category 1 Historic Place	Positive – work planned
B106	NZ Loans & Mercantile Building (former)	cnr Thomas Burns & Fryatt Streets	Category 2 Historic Place	Positive- work planned
B153	Williden's Buildings (former)	420-422 George Street		Neutral
B387 (iii)	Manor Terraces	46 Manor Place		Negative
B355	Commercial building	148 King Edward Street		Negative
B381	Donaghy’s Rope Walk	64 Bradshaw Street	Category 1 Historic Place	Negative
B420	Chingford Stables	411 North Road	Category 1 Historic Place	Positive- work planned
B444	House	10 Prendergast Street		Positive- work underway
B465	Farley's Buildings (former)	118-122 Princes Street		Negative
B466	Farley's Buildings (former)	126 Princes Street		Negative
B486	Brown's Drapers (former)	378 Princes Street		Negative
B488	Griffin's Store (former)	380 Princes Street		Negative
B489	Dunedin Public Warehouse (former)	386 Princes Street		Negative
B495	S.F. Aburn Ltd (former)	389 Princes Street		Positive- work planned
B511	Scoullar & Chisholm Furniture Factory (former)	232 Rattray Street		Negative
B580	Taiaroa Head Fog Station	Taiaroa Head	Category 2 Historic Place	Negative
B586	St Dominic’s Priory	31 Smith Street	Category 1 Historic Place	Positive- work underway
B595	House	29 Tweed Street	Category 2 Historic Place	Positive- work underway
B628	Catholic Church of the Sacred Heart of Jesus	Corner 9137 Eton Street (SH87) and Woburn Street, Hyde	Category 2 Historic Place	Neutral
B645	Abbotsford Farm Steading	404 Allanton Road, Outram	Category 1 Historic Place	Neutral
B731	Harcus Road (bridge)	Taieri River		Neutral
B739	Pukehiki Community Church	cnr Highcliff and Camp Roads, Pukehiki	Category 2 Historic Place	Positive- work planned
B754	Greg & Co Building (former)	21 Fryatt Street	Historic Area	Positive- work underway
B780	Otago Education Board Offices (former)	33 Jetty Street		Negative

OPTIONS

13 No options as this report is for noting purposes only.

NEXT STEPS

14 The attached heritage monitoring report will be formatted as part of City Development’s monitoring report series and made available electronically and physically.

15 Actions to address risks identified in the monitoring report will be followed up including:

i. Supporting simple interventions such as appropriately repainting peeling timberwork or render to help protect historic fabric and improve their appearance through small grants from the Dunedin Heritage Fund.

ii. Encouraging and supporting more fundamental repairs to damaged walls and roofs to avoid water ingress, through small grants from the Dunedin Heritage Fund.

iii. Providing targeted advice and support on maintenance and restoration to owners of scheduled houses.

iv. Providing support and advice to community and religious groups with halls and churches, on priority maintenance and restoration work, as well as around the future of these buildings.

16 Public realm improvements led by the Central City Plan in and around Princes Street and George Street may act as a trigger to support improvements to heritage buildings in these areas in order to take advantage of the increased attractiveness of these streets.

Signatories

Author:

Dan Windwood - Heritage Planner

Authoriser:

Anna Johnson - City Development Manager

Nicola Pinfold - Group Manager Community and Planning

Attachments

	Title	Page
a	Heritage Monitoring Programme 2017-18	43

SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS

Fit with purpose of Local Government

This report relates to providing a public service and it is considered good-quality and cost-effective.

Fit with strategic framework

	Contributes	Detracts	Not applicable
Social Wellbeing Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Economic Development Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Environment Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Arts and Culture Strategy	☒	☐	☐
3 Waters Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Spatial Plan	☒	☐	☐
Integrated Transport Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Parks and Recreation Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Other strategic projects/policies/plans	☒	☐	☐

The Heritage Monitoring Programme also contributes to the Heritage Strategy.

Māori Impact Statement

There are no known impacts for tangata whenua.

Sustainability

Supporting the restoration and reuse of heritage buildings has a positive impact on the economic, social and environment sustainability of Dunedin.

LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy

Council funding for the Dunedin Heritage Fund is included in the 10 Year Plan and Annual Plan.

Financial considerations

There are no financial implications.

Significance

This report is considered low in terms of the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

Engagement – external

There has been informal discussion with Heritage New Zealand at a regional office level.

Engagement - internal

There has been no internal engagement.

Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc.

Council owns two buildings ‘at risk’ (Chingford Stables and Harcus Road Bridge). A replacement roof is currently being sourced for Chingford Stables as part of a wider programme to manage Parks and Recreation Services properties and the ‘direction of travel’ for this building is considered positive. The future of Harcus Road Bridge is currently being considered by Council after it was heavily damaged and removed following storm damage in 2017.

Conflict of Interest

There are no known conflicts of interest.

Community Boards

There are no specific implications for Community Boards, although several ‘at risk’ buildings are located within areas of the city with Community Boards.

Planning and Environment Committee

12 June 2018

The Octagon Experience - Final Feedback

Department: Planning

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1 This report presents the final public feedback received (from 400 on-site and 200 online survey responses), as well as the final business feedback received (from 20 targeted survey responses) on ‘The Octagon Experience’.

RECOMMENDATIONS

That the Committee:

a) Notes the report ‘The Octagon Experience – Final Feedback’.

BACKGROUND

2 Dunedin Venues Management Limited secured the Ed Sheeran concerts for Easter weekend 2018 and a trial closure of the Octagon and Lower Stuart Street was planned to coincide with that event.

3 The lower Octagon and Lower Stuart Street were closed to traffic for six days from Wednesday 28 March. The purpose of the closure was to create a central pedestrianised hub to help showcase Dunedin to more than 70,000 visitors and to local residents during Ed Sheeran’s concerts over Easter weekend.

4 The partially closed Octagon was transformed with temporary street furniture, surface treatments, plants, lanterns, accent lighting and a large-scale snakes and ladders board installed on the pavers.

5 The aim was to provide a space for visitors and locals to relax and enjoy the unique occasion with friends and family. The space and activities in it were called ‘The Octagon Experience’.

6 Following the report “The Octagon Experience Feedback” provided to the Committee on 17 April 2018, City Development staff were asked to provide further detail on the following:

· Complete survey findings from the public survey, after the online feedback period had closed on 30 April 2018; and

· Complete survey findings from the business survey, undertaken separately from the public survey, 11-25 May 2018.

7 To gauge the effectiveness of The Octagon Experience, staff set up a short survey consisting of five questions to gather feedback. Community survey feedback results were collected on-site by TouchScreen Marketing and Research during the event and through an online survey on the DCC website that was open during and after the event.

8 Feedback was received from 400 respondents via the on-site survey and 200 respondents online.

9 DCC staff emailed or hand-delivered a short survey consisting of four questions to 77 businesses in the Octagon and Lower Stuart Street area. The feedback period closed on Friday 25 May 2018 and 20 completed surveys were returned.

DISCUSSION

10 A total of 600 public participants responded to the community survey. The overall response from survey participants was positive with 91% saying they either “really liked” or “liked” the Octagon experience. In contrast only 6% gave a negative response. A little over half (58%) of the survey respondents were residents of Dunedin.

11 Out of the 77 businesses, 19 provided feedback on the business survey, with one business providing two sets of feedback (manager and employee). A little over half (55%) of the businesses thought that The Octagon Experience had a “somewhat positive” or “positive” effect on their business. A further 20% were “neutral” and the remaining 25% responded that it had either a “negative” or “somewhat negative” impact on their business.

12 Feedback results to both surveys are summarised and illustrated in Attachment 1: Feedback results from The Octagon Experience community and business surveys.

13 Questions 2 – 4 of the community and businesses surveys required a written response, which resulted in varied feedback over a range of topics. As a result, a set of themes were identified. NB: A respondent’s answer may have been categorised against more than one theme.

OPTIONS

14 As this is a noting report, no options are presented.

NEXT STEPS

15 The results from this survey will be considered by staff as part of future planning for the Octagon and Lower Stuart Street, in terms of temporary events and longer term amenity improvements.

Signatories

Author:

Crystal Filep - Team Leader Urban Design

Jess White - Project Support Officer

Authoriser:

Anna Johnson - City Development Manager

Nicola Pinfold - Group Manager Community and Planning

Attachments

	Title	Page
a	The Octagon Experience Final Feedback - Attachment 1 - 07-06-18	64

SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS

Fit with purpose of Local Government

This report enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities.

Fit with strategic framework

	Contributes	Detracts	Not applicable
Social Wellbeing Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Economic Development Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Environment Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Arts and Culture Strategy	☒	☐	☐
3 Waters Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Spatial Plan	☒	☐	☐
Integrated Transport Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Parks and Recreation Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Other strategic projects/policies/plans	☐	☐	☐

The Octagon Experience (5-day temporary pedestrianisation over Easter/Ed Sheeran weekend) was consistent with other strategies and plans.

Māori Impact Statement

There are no known impacts for tangata whenua.

Sustainability

Materials purchased for the Octagon Experience will be re-used where possible.

LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy

No known impacts for the LTP or Annual Plan have been identified.

Financial considerations

No financial impacts are noted.

Significance

This report is assessed as low in terms of the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

Engagement – external

External engagement was undertaken with members of the public and local businesses, as described in the report.

Engagement - internal

City Development consulted with Enterprise Dunedin, Council Communications and Marketing and Corporate Policy on designing this survey.

Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc.

There are no known risks.

Conflict of Interest

There are no known conflicts of interest.

Community Boards

There are no implications for community boards.

Chairperson	Cr David Benson-Pope
Deputy Chairperson	Cr Damian Newell	Cr Conrad Stedman
Members	Mayor Dave Cull	Cr Rachel Elder
	Cr Christine Garey	Cr Doug Hall
	Cr Aaron Hawkins	Cr Marie Laufiso
	Cr Mike Lord	Cr Jim O'Malley
	Cr Chris Staynes	Cr Lee Vandervis
	Cr Andrew Whiley	Cr Kate Wilson

	Title	Page
a	Register of Interest	7