Agenda of Otago Peninsula Community Board

Notice of Meeting:

I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Otago Peninsula Community Board will be held on:

Date: Thursday 31 January 2019

Time: 10.00 am

Venue: Portobello Bowling Club, Sherwood Street, Portobello

Sue Bidrose

Chief Executive Officer

Otago Peninsula Community Board

PUBLIC AGENDA

MEMBERSHIP

Chairperson	Paul Pope
Deputy Chairperson	Hoani Langsbury
Members	Lox Kellas	Graham McArthur
	Christine Neill	Edna Stevenson
	Cr Andrew Whiley

Senior Officer Chris Henderson, Group Manager Waste and Environmental Solutions

Governance Support Officer Lauren McDonald

Lauren McDonald

Governance Support Officer

Telephone: 03 477 4000

Lauren.McDonald@dcc.govt.nz

www.dunedin.govt.nz

Note: Reports and recommendations contained in this agenda are not to be considered as Council policy until adopted.

Otago Peninsula Community Board

MINUTES

Minutes of an ordinary meeting of the Otago Peninsula Community Board held in the Portobello Bowling Club, Sherwood Street, Portobello on Thursday 15 November 2018, commencing at 10.00 am

PRESENT

Chairperson	Paul Pope
Members	Lox Kellas	Graham McArthur
	Christine Neill	Edna Stevenson
	Cr Andrew Whiley

IN ATTENDANCE

Chris Henderson (Group Manager Waste and Environmental Solutions)

Governance Support Officer Rebecca Murray

1 Opening

OPENING REFLECTION

Lox Kellas opened the meeting with a reflection.

TRIBUTE TO SENIOR GOVERNANCE SUPPORT OFFICER, PAM JORDAN

The Board paid tribute to Governance Support Officer, Pam Jordan who sadly passed away and acknowledged her hard work and dedication.

2 Public Forum

There was no Public Forum.

3 Apologies

Moved (Paul Pope/Cr Andrew Whiley):

That the Board:

Accepts the apology from Hoani Langsbury.

Motion carried (OPCB/2018/055)

4 Confirmation of agenda

Moved (Christine Neill/Lox Kellas):

That the Board:

Confirms the agenda with the following addition to the Chairpersons Report regarding Scott Hall and a skateboard park.

Motion carried (OPCB/2018/056)

5 Declarations of interest

Members were reminded of the need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arose between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

Lox Kellas advised that he owns a Residential Property which is to be added to the Register.

Edna Stevenson advised that she owns a Residential Property which is to be added to the Register.

Moved (Paul Pope/Cr Andrew Whiley):

That the Board:

a) Amends the Elected Members' Interest Register

b) Confirms the proposed management plan for Elected Members' Interests.

Motion carried (OPCB/2018/057)

6 Confirmation of Minutes

6.1 Otago Peninsula Community Board meeting - 27 September 2018

Moved (Graham McArthur/Cr Andrew Whiley):

That the Board:

Confirms the public part of the minutes of the Otago Peninsula Community Board meeting held on 27 September 2018 as a correct record.

Motion carried (OPCB/2018/058)

Part A Reports

7 Governance Support Officer's Report

The report informed the Otago Peninsula Community Board of activities relevant to the Board area including:

a) Project Fund

b) Action Lists.

Moved (Paul Pope/Graham McArthur):

That the Board:

a) Notes the Governance Support Officer's Report.

b) Amends the Action Lists as appropriate.

Motion carried (OPCB/2018/059)

8 Funding Application - Broad Bay Community Centre

Consideration was given to a funding application from the Broad Bay Community Centre towards the next four editions of the community newsletter.

Moved (Graham McArthur/Cr Andrew Whiley):

That the Board:

a) Grants the funding application from Broad Bay Community Centre for $320.00 towards the next four editions of the community newsletter.

Motion carried (OPCB/2018/060)

9 Funding Application - Portobello School

Consideration was given to a funding application from Portobello School to replace an existing faulty/broken chemical dosing system in the Portobello School pool.

Moved (Member Lox Kellas/Member Edna Stevenson):

That the Board:

a) Grants the funding application from Portobello School for $1,776.00 to replace an existing faulty/broken chemical dosing system in the Portobello School pool.

Motion carried (OPCB/2018/061)

10 Meeting Schedule 2019

A report from Civic provided a copy of the schedule of meetings for 2019 for the Board's consideration.

Moved (Paul Pope/Lox Kellas):

That the Board:

a) Adopts the schedule of meetings for 2019 with the 2 May 2019 meeting being held in the Civic Centre.

Motion carried (OPCB/2018/062)

11 Working Parties/Board Area Liaison Updates

Keep Dunedin Beautiful

Graham attended the last Keep Dunedin Beautiful meeting, and the focus was around Dunedin being announced the winner of the most beautiful city. Keep Dunedin Beautiful has produced a community clean up guide which will assist people on what could be done, and information sharing. A possible date for a clean-up day at the heads was discussed and it was advised that February would be a good time.

Rural Roads

Lox advised the gravel roads seemed to be holding up. Lox is to email the Group Manager Transport to discuss security around gates, and Fulton Hogan and the Transport Contract Supervisor about the expectation that the Back Bay roads are in good order while the works were closed down over the Christmas period.

Emergency Response Plan

Lox advised that he had spoken to the Police SAR about the community plan. Community emergency meetings would be held in a few months’ time. It was noted that Civil Defence staff member Paul Allen was doing a great job getting the community together. Paul Pope advised that he had sent a letter to Minister Kris Faafoi regarding cell coverage issues, especially in Tomahawk.

Members' Area Updates

Graham McArthur advised that the Broadbay community were raising money for the boat club.

Lox Kellas advised roadworks were going well and the staff working on the roadworks are great. Hoopers Inlet working well. There were still a few people walking their dogs along the beach with no leads.

Christine Neill advised that potholes had appeared due to a combination of trucks and rain on Allens Beach Road, and this would need graded before Christmas. Christine is to keep in contact with Fulton Hogan and the Transport Contract Manager on the roading issues. It was noted that the Papanui Inlet wall was crumbling. Road cones had been put in place but repairs needed to be carried out.

Edna Stevenson advised she had visited the completed Conway Street repairs. Edna is to follow up on the Greenacres Street drainage. She had also been made aware of greenery growing over the mural at the bottom of Marion Street.

12 Chairperson's Report

The Chairperson provided updates to the Board on the following matters:

a) Outcome of Tomahawk Beach Meeting – new signage at entrance points of the beach explaining the rules
b) Outcome of the meeting with Parks over the Lagoon Reserve – Gate to be locked at night and unlocked in the morning, monitoring will be carried out
c) Tomahawk Community Meeting – 60 plus attended the consultation sessions.
d) Road Widening - Alternative work programme
e) Te Rauone Reserve Plans
f) Tomahawk School and Facilities Process
g) Community Plan and preparation for 2019 Annual Plan
h) 2019 Biodiversity Forum
i) 2019 Tourist Operators
j) Emergency Plan
k) ORC Pest Management Submission
l) End of year lunch

m) Request received regarding a skatepark at Macandrew Bay (Paul to raise in action plan for January meeting)

n) Update of the upgrade on Scott Hall external maintenance

Moved (Paul Pope/Cr Andrew Whiley):

That the Board:

a) Notes the Chairperson's Report.

b) Approves the Boards letters of support for the Restoration of the Larnach Byre, Hereweka Archaeological Conservation Plan and the Peninsula Playcentre.

Motion carried (OPCB/2018/063)

13 Councillor's Update

Councillor Andrew Whiley provided an update on matters of interest to the Board which included:

· Attended the Civil Defence emergency meeting

· The modified LAP was signed off

· 2GP had been released

· The draft Waste Minimisation Plan

· GigCity campaign was complete

Moved (Lox Kellas/Christine Neill):

That the Board:

a) Notes the report.

Motion carried (OPCB/2018/064)

14 Items for Consideration by the Chair
	There were no items for consideration

The meeting concluded at 11.55 am.

..............................................

CHAIRPERSON

Otago Peninsula Community Board

31 January 2019

Part A Reports

Ocean Grove Recreation Hall
Invitation to assist with formation of steering committee

Department: Property

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1 This report is to seek support from the Otago Peninsula Community Board to help with the establishment of a steering committee for the Ocean Grove Recreation Hall.

RECOMMENDATIONS

That the Board:

a) Notes the report

b) Decides to assist with the initial set-up of a steering committee for the Ocean Grove Recreation Hall.

BACKGROUND

2 The Ocean Grove area is home to three Dunedin City Council owned facilities;

1) Tomahawk School

2) Ocean Grove Domain Hall

3) Ocean Grove Recreation Hall

3 Dunedin City Council staff engaged with the Ocean Grove community in October 2018 to inform the community of what was proposed around the three sites.

4 The Tomahawk School building is to be demolished in early 2019, with further engagement with the community planned later in 2019 regarding the future development of the site.

5 The Ocean Grove Domain Hall would no longer receive investment from Dunedin City Council, due to numerous structural issues with the building, and flooding issues with the site. Further engagement with the community is planned for later in 2019 regarding the future development of the site.

6 The Ocean Grove Recreation Hall would become the single multi-purpose community facility. A steering committee would be formed to work with Dunedin City Council staff to develop the scope of building improvements required to upgrade the building into a modern, multi-purpose community facility.

7 Feedback from the engagement events carried out in October 2018 with the Ocean Grove community identified the need for support in forming a steering committee, as attempts in the past to form a steering committee were not successful.

8 A list of thirty-six residents from the Ocean Grove community had indicated they were willing to be involved in forming such a committee.

DISCUSSION

9 The Ocean Grove community accepted that the Ocean Grove Recreation Hall was the practical choice for a single multi-purpose community facility, and had identified that they needed support around the process of forming a steering committee.

10 If the Otago Peninsula Community Board deems it appropriate, it would help facilitate initial Ocean Grove Recreation Hall Committee meetings alongside Dunedin City Council staff, to support the Ocean Grove community through the process of forming a steering committee.

11 The steering committee would be asked for their input on behalf of the Ocean Grove community with identifying the range of work required to turn the Ocean Grove Recreation Hall in to a multi-purpose community facility.

12 The steering committee would also look at the possible future development of an Incorporated Society or Hall Committee, who would manage the day to day running of the Ocean Grove Recreation Hall in the future.

OPTIONS Option One – Assist with the initial set-up of a steering committee for the Ocean Grove Recreation Hall.

The Otago Peninsula Community Board supports the process of forming an initial steering committee, and continues to give support if requested by the steering committee in the future. Advantages

· Creates a strong link with the Otago Peninsula Community Board and the Ocean Grove community.

· The Ocean Grove community falls within the Otago Peninsula Community
Board’s boundary and they have responsibility to advocate for the communities that lie within that boundary.

· The Ocean Grove community can utilize the Otago Peninsula Community Board’s expertise.

Disadvantages

· Additional stakeholder involvement could lead to progress being delayed.

Option Two – Do not assist with the initial set-up of a steering committee for the Ocean Grove Recreation Hall.

Advantages

· The Ocean Grove community may feel they can make faster progress without additional stakeholder involvement.

Disadvantages

· No strong link is established between the Otago Peninsula Community Board and the Ocean Grove community.

· The Otago Peninsula Community Board is unable to advocate fully for the communities that lie within their boundary.

· The Ocean Grove community is unable to fully utilize the Otago Peninsula Community Board’s expertise.

NEXT STEPS

13 If the Otago Peninsula Community Board agrees to assist with the formation of a steering committee, a date would be set for a meeting with the Ocean Grove community, and Dunedin City Council staff.

Signatories

Author:	Andrea Barker - Community Engagement Coordinator
Authoriser:	David Bainbridge - Group Manager Property Services

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS

Fit with purpose of Local Government

This decision enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities and relates to providing local infrastructure and it is considered good-quality and cost-effective.

Fit with strategic framework

	Contributes	Detracts	Not applicable
Social Wellbeing Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Economic Development Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Environment Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Arts and Culture Strategy	☒	☐	☐
3 Waters Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Spatial Plan	☒	☐	☐
Integrated Transport Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Parks and Recreation Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Other strategic projects/policies/plans	☒	☐	☐

Formation of a single multi-purpose community facility contributes to the social wellbeing strategy be enabling healthy and safe people, the spatial plan by contributing to a liveable city and the Parks and Recreational strategy by enabling a facility for group participation in recreation activities

Māori Impact Statement

There are no known impacts for tangata whenua, they can contribute as part of the community in this project.

Sustainability

Formation of a single multi-purpose fit for use community facility allows for sustainable use for the Community for the future.

LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy

There are no implications, however money could be allocated through the annual plan process for this project.

Financial considerations

No budget allocated for project.

Significance

The decision is deemed to have low level of significance.

Engagement – external

Ocean Grove and Tomahawk community engagement events held in October 2018.

Engagement - internal

Collaboration with Parks and Recreation Services, Community Development, and Property Services team.

Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc.

Work needs to be undertaken on the level of earthquake strengthening for the multi-purpose community facility. Initial Seismic Assessment (ISA) gave a seismic strength rating of this building as 60% in the longitudinal direction but 30% in the transverse direction as compared to a New Building Standard for seismic strength. The building was given a D grade and on this basis, was stated as potentially earthquake prone. This will be part of the scope of the project.

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of Interest

Community Boards

The area falls within the boundary of the Otago Peninsular Community Board

Otago Peninsula Community Board

31 January 2019

Proposal to Rename Desert Road

Department: Transport

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1 The purpose of this report is to present a proposal for the renaming of Desert Road, which joins Harington Point Road on the Otago Peninsula.

2 The proposed road name Moepuku Road is to replace the current road name.

3 The proposed road name complies with the Dunedin City Council Road Naming Policy (the Policy) and is recommended for support by the Otago Peninsula Community Board.

RECOMMENDATIONS

That the Board:

a) Supports renaming “Desert Road” to “Moepuku Road”

b) Notes that this recommendation will be included in the final road naming report to be presented to the Infrastructure Services and Networks Committee

BACKGROUND

4 Mr Edward Ellison, a landowner whose property is accessed directly from “Desert Road”, has submitted a letter to Council (Attachment A) establishing that the road has been named incorrectly.

5 Mr Ellison proposes that the name be changed to “Moepuku Road” in reference to a local geographical feature, and to better reflect the history of the area.

DISCUSSION

6 A land slip in 1968, and subsequent land movement, made the original Harington Point Road alignment unpassable. As a result, Harington Point Road was relocated to its current position north-west of the original road alignment.

7 A section of the original road alignment, to the south of the land slip, is named “Desert Road”. It provides physical access to several properties. The attached Dunedin City Council aerial photograph/map depicts this alignment (Attachment B).

8 Sections of the original formation to the north of the land slip site do not carry the name “Desert Road” on Council maps, and are therefore not a subject of this report.

9 When the present Harington Point Road formation was first constructed, it was left unsealed to enable it to be compacted by the passing of traffic over the carriageway. Because of its barren and sandy appearance at the time, it was given the local nickname “Desert Road”.

10 The section of the original alignment to the south of the land slip site has become known as “Desert Road”. It appears on Council and Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) maps with this name (Attachments B and C).

11 Application of the name “Desert Road” to the section of the original Harington Point Road alignment south of the land slip site is an error, as this name was first used in reference to the original construction of the present Harington Point Road alignment.

12 Mr Ellison proposes “Desert Road” be renamed “Moepuku Road”.

13 “Moepuku” is the name of an old wetland, the remains of which can still be seen to the west of the Harington Point Road/”Desert Road” intersection. This wetland appears in name on the early of maps and documents relating to the area, and is included in the text of the 1844 Deed of Sale for Ōtākou to the NZ Land Company. Documentation supplied by Mr Ellison in support of this name is attached to this report (Attachments D and E).

14 The Policy allows for altering the name of an existing road. The proposed renaming of “Desert Road” to “Moepuku Road” is considered to comply with the Policy insofar as it will result in a benefit to the community by replacing an incorrect road name with a name of a local geographical feature.

15 The name “Moepuku” is considered to comply with the selection criteria of the Policy.

OPTIONS Option One – The Board supports renaming Desert Road as Moepuku Road (Recommended Option) Advantages

· The proposed name corrects a mistake and replaces an incorrect road name with a name of a local geographical feature.

· The proposed name is considered to be compliant with the Road Naming Policy.

Disadvantages

· There are no significant disadvantages with this option.

Option Two – The Board does not support renaming Desert Road as Moepuku Road (Alternative Option)

Advantages

· There are no significant advantages with this option.

Disadvantages

· The existing incorrect road name remains.

NEXT STEPS

16 If the recommend name is supported, staff will request that it be formally approved by the Infrastructure Services and Networks Committee.

Signatories

Author:

Grant Fisher - Transport Planner/Engineer

Authoriser:

Susan Lilley - Senior Transportation Planner

Richard Saunders - Group Manager Transport

Simon Drew - General Manager Infrastructure Services

Attachments

	Title	Page
⇩a	Letter from Mr Ellison - Proposal to Rename Desert Road	25
⇩b	DCC Map - Desert Road alignment	32
⇩c	LINZ Topo/Locality Map	33
⇩d	Ngai Tahu Atlas name reference for "Moepuku"	34
⇩e	Sale Deed - 1844	35

SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS

Fit with purpose of Local Government

This proposal relates to providing local infrastructure and it is considered good-quality and cost-effective.

Fit with strategic framework

	Contributes	Detracts	Not applicable
Social Wellbeing Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Economic Development Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Environment Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Arts and Culture Strategy	☐	☐	☒
3 Waters Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Spatial Plan	☐	☐	☒
Integrated Transport Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Parks and Recreation Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Other strategic projects/policies/plans	☒	☐	☐

This is an administrative function.

Māori Impact Statement

Mr Ellison has supplied a copy of his letter to Council, proposing the change of road name, to Te Runanga o Otakou.

Sustainability

There are no implications for sustainability.

LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy

There are no implications for the LTP.

Financial considerations

There are no financial implications.

Significance

The significance of the decision deemed to be low in terms of Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

Engagement – external

Mr Ellison has supplied a copy of his letter to Council, which proposes the change of road name, to Te Runanga o Otakou, and landowner’s adjoining the subject section of road being R & M Montgomery, Miles Notman, and Mandy Burns.

It should be noted that the Policy requires full public consultation later in the process, after Community Board, and Council, approval.

Engagement - internal

There has been no internal engagement.

Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc.

There are no known risks.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Community Boards

The site is located within the Otago Peninsula Community Board area.

Otago Peninsula Community Board

31 January 2019

Community Board Remuneration

Department: Civic

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1 The Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) gives the Remuneration Authority (the Authority) the responsibility for setting remuneration for local government elected members.

2 The Authority is seeking feedback on how Community Boards should be remunerated for the determination it will issue on 1 July 2019. Currently, the Authority sets the amount of remuneration for each chair and member of every Community Board.

3 The Authority is now seeking feedback on whether or not Community Boards should be funded from a “governance pool”. Regardless of how they are funded, the Authority is also asking if remuneration should reflect the number of residents represented by the whole board, or the number of residents represented by each member.

4 As this is an administrative report, the summary of considerations is not required.

RECOMMENDATIONS

That the Board:

a) Notes the Community Board Remuneration report.

b) Considers the Remuneration Authority request and provides feedback as appropriate.

BACKGROUND

5 Over the past two years, the Authority has been undertaking a review of how it sets remuneration for councillors of local authorities. It has decided to change the current system of allocating a base pay for each councillor, along with a pool for remunerating additional responsibilities, to a system of allocating a governance pool to each council, with each council then determining how the governance pool is to be allocated to councillors. The Authority will continue to determine the remuneration paid to each Mayor.

DISCUSSION

6 The Authority is now asking for feedback on whether the governance pool being introduced should include remuneration for Community Boards, and if so, how should it account for the impact of the relativities between Councils with Community Boards and those that do not have Community Boards.

7 The Authority also notes that there appears to be big variations in member numbers of Community Boards, even between Boards with similar populations. Regardless of how Community Boards are remunerated, the Authority would also like feedback on whether Community Board remuneration should reflect the number of residents represented by the whole board or the number of residents represented by each member

8 Key statistics are provided by the Authority in Attachment A to C for information purposes, along with the request for feedback from the Authority at Attachment D.

OPTIONS

9 There are no options for this report.

NEXT STEPS

10 Feedback received from the Community Board will be provided to the Council for information at the 19 February Council meeting, and then forwarded with the Council’s comments to the Remuneration Authority on 20 February 2019.

Signatories

Author:	Sharon Bodeker - Team Leader Civic
Authoriser:	Sue Bidrose - Chief Executive Officer

Attachments

	Title	Page
⇩a	CB Key Statistics	39
⇩b	CB Remuneration 2019 - Sorted by Governance Cost Per Capita	41
⇩c	CB Remuneraiton 2019 - Sorted by Population	43
⇩d	Email from the Remuneration Authority	45

Otago Peninsula Community Board

31 January 2019

Governance Support Officer's Report

Department: Civic

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1 This report is to inform the Otago Peninsula Community Board of activities relevant to the Board area including:

a) Project Fund

b) New Zealand Community Boards’ 2019 Conference

c) Action Lists.

RECOMMENDATIONS

That the Board:

a) Notes the Governance Support Officer's Report.

b) Considers nominating a Board Member as the community representative to attend the 2019 New Zealand Community Boards’ Conference

c) Amends the Action Lists as appropriate.

Project Fund

2 $4,980.60 remains in the Project Fund taking into account expenditure already made on grants.

3 The following expenditure has been made so far in this financial year:

Meeting Date	Amount	Recipient/Purpose
23 August 2018	$848.40	Otago Peninsula Trust – Glenfalloch Night Garden project
	$1,500.00	Scott Hall Committee – new oven
	$75.00	Flowers
27 September 2018	$500.00	The Caselberg Trust – towards materials to complete the landscaping
15 November 2018	$320.00	Broad Bay Community Centre – towards newsletter
	$1,776.00	Portobello School – replacement of faulty chemical dosing system at pool.
Total	$5,019.40

New Zealand Community Boards’ Conference Attendance

4 The 2019 New Zealand Community Boards’ Conference is being held at the Devon Hotel, New Plymouth from 11 – 13 April 2019. Early bird registrations ($755.00 including GST) close on 1 March 2019 and standard registrations ($855.00 including GST) are available following that. The Council’s policy on attendance at this conference is as follows:

a) Council will cover the accommodation, travel and registration costs for one Community Board member (per Community Board) to attend the biennial Community Boards Conference when it is held in the South Island, and two Community Board members IN TOTAL to attend the conference when it is held in the North Island.

b) Individual Community Boards are responsible for covering the costs of any additional delegates they wish to send to the Conference over and above the representatives for whom costs will be met by the Council.

5 If the Board wishes to nominate a member to go into the draw for one of the two Council-funded places, please advise Sharon Bodeker of the name by 15 February 2019. Any additional members the Board wishes to attend (or those unsuccessful in the draw) can be paid for from the Board's project fund

Correspondence

6 Letter of Thanks from Portobello School for funding assistance received. (Attachment A)

Action Lists

7 An update on outstanding matters is provided in Attachments B and C.

Signatories

Author:	Lauren McDonald - Governance Support Officer
Authoriser:	Sharon Bodeker - Team Leader Civic

Attachments

	Title	Page
⇩a	Correspondence - Letter of Thanks	51
⇩b	OPCB Transport Action List	54
⇩c	OPCB Parks and Recreation Action List	57

SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS

Fit with purpose of Local Government

This decision enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities.

Fit with strategic framework

	Contributes	Detracts	Not applicable
Social Wellbeing Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Economic Development Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Environment Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Arts and Culture Strategy	☐	☐	☒
3 Waters Strategy	☐	☐	☒
Spatial Plan	☐	☐	☒
Integrated Transport Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Parks and Recreation Strategy	☒	☐	☐
Other strategic projects/policies/plans	☐	☐	☒

Māori Impact Statement

There are no known impacts for tangata whenua

Sustainability

There are no implications for sustainability.

LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy

There are no implications.

Financial considerations

There are no financial implications.

Significance

This decision is considered low significance in terms of the Council's Significance and Engagement Policy.

Engagement – external

There has been no external engagement.

Engagement - internal

Internal engagement has occurred with appropriate staff members.

Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc.

There are no risks.

Conflict of Interest

There are no known conflicts of interest.

Community Boards

There are no implications for Community Boards except to provide information on activities in or relevant to the Board area.

Common Name
Ikoa Māori Status	Rūnaka
Common Name Status	No common name
Catchment	Ōtakou
Geographic Description	The wetland east of Te Aka Pātiki
Accuracy	General
Tradition	Unknown
Feature Type	Wetland
Web Text
Korero Summary	Moepuku is the wetland located immediately east of Te Aka Pātiki on Muaupoko (Otago Peninsula).
Reference Summary	ML137 Ōtākou NR Blk B Subdivision 1868; Beattie Notebook 1915:4; Beattie Southern Stray Papers: 1931_Peninsula and Taieri.
Latitude (WGS84)	-45.81
Longitude (WGS84)	170.69

	Title	Page
A ⇩	Minutes of Otago Peninsula Community Board meeting held on 15 November 2018	10