|
|
Council
30 June 2020
|
Octagon Experience Evaluation Report
Department: Community and Planning and Corporate
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This
report provides feedback on the pedestrianisation trials for the Octagon
conducted in January – March this year. These trials were commissioned in
response to the Council decision to allocate funding in the 2018/ 19 and
2019/20 Annual Plans for further trials in the Octagon and lower Stuart Street.
This decision followed the successful pedestrianisation trial conducted at
Easter in 2018, timed around the Ed Sheeran concert.
2 The
pedestrianisation trials were scheduled to coincide with other planned events
in the city including the Masters Games 2020 and the city activations for the
Queen and Elton John concerts in an attempt to enhance the vitality of the
Octagon and support commercial activity. (A separate evaluation report is
presented to this meeting on the Masters Games).
3 This
report presents the outcome of the trial and includes the analysis of the
specialist reports commissioned to evaluate the trials from economic and social
dimensions, along with community feedback. It also outlines the challenges
encountered due to unforeseen events including the impacts of the COVID-19
pandemic and the closure of the country’s borders to international
visitors.
4 Some
conclusions regarding the trials and lessons to be applied in future planning
are presented for council consideration.
|
RECOMMENDATIONS
That the Council:
a) Notes the feedback (including feedback from the
community and affected parties) and quantitative data relating to the Octagon Experience 2020, and the
specialist reports
commissioned to evaluate the trials.
b) Notes that the findings of this
evaluation report will be used to inform planning on George Street and other
major projects.
|
BACKGROUND
5 In
April 2018 Planning and Environment Committee received a report outlining the
feedback received regarding the Octagon Experience, a five-day trial
pedestrianisation of the Octagon over the Easter / Ed Sheeran concert weekend.
6 The
Committee noted the feedback report. The committee also passed the following
resolutions:
Moved (Cr Aaron Hawkins/Damian Newell):
That the Committee:
a) Notes the report.
Motion carried (PLA/2018/013)
Moved (Cr Aaron Hawkins/Cr Damian
Newell): That the Committee:
a) Reaffirms support for pedestrianisation trials to be undertaken in the Lower Octagon and Lower Stuart Street.
Division
The
Committee voted
by division.
For: Mayor Dave Cull, Crs Rachel Elder, Christine Garey, Doug Hall, Aaron Hawkins,
Marie Laufiso, Mike Lord, Jim O'Malley,
Damian Newell, Conrad
Stedman, Andrew Whiley, Kate Wilson and David Benson-
Pope (13).
Against: Cr Lee Vandervis (1).
The division
was declared CARRIED
by 13 votes to 1
Motion carried (PLA/2018/014)
Moved (Cr Aaron Hawkins/Cr Damian Newell):
That the Committee:
b) Recommends Council give consideration to the allocation of $75,000 a year in 2018/19 and 2019/20 at the ten year plan hearings to support pedestrianisation trials in the lower Octagon
and lower Stuart
Street.
Division
The Committee
voted by division.
For: Mayor Dave Cull, Crs Rachel Elder, Christine Garey, Doug Hall, Aaron Hawkins,
Marie Laufiso, Jim O'Malley, Damian
Newell, Conrad Stedman, Andrew Whiley, Kate Wilson and David Benson-Pope (12).
Against: Crs Mike Lord and Lee Vandervis
(2). The division was declared
CARRIED by
12 votes to 2.
7 In
May 2018 when Council considered the community feedback on the 10 Year Plan,
there was discussion on trialling of pedestrianisation treatments within the
Octagon and extents within Moray Place including the lower Octagon and Lower
Stuart Street over the next two years. The discussion included trialling
treatments that could inform permanent change identified within the Central
City Plan, informing the George Street project and conducting a trial of
pedestrianisation and assess its impacts. The discussion resolved to trial a
number of interventions’ in order to ascertain a future layout of the
Octagon. The Council passed the following resolution:
Moved (Cr Aaron Hawkins/Cr Damian Newell):
That the Council:
a) Allocates $75,000 a year to the operational Community and Planning budget in 2018/19 and 2019/20 to support pedestrianisation trials, and associated
activities in the lower Octagon
and Stuart Street.
Division
The Council voted by division.
For: Crs David Benson-Pope, Rachel Elder, Christine
Garey, Doug Hall, Aaron Hawkins, Marie Laufiso, Mike Lord, Damian Newell, Jim O'Malley, Chris Staynes, Conrad Stedman, Andrew Whiley, Kate Wilson and Mayor Dave Cull (14).
Against: Cr Lee Vandervis
(1).
The division was declared CARRIED by 14 votes to 1
Motion carried (TEN/2018/041)
8 A
Notice of Motion considered by Council in December 2019 is discussed under
engagement (paragraph 24).
Purpose of the Trials
9 Following
the success of the Ed Sheeran weekend trial in autumn 2018, the purpose of the
Octagon Experience was to trial a range of layouts and pedestrianisation
treatments within the Octagon, together with activation by events and family
friendly activities, and assess their impacts. The trials were to explore how
pedestrian friendly layouts activated with placemaking features and artistic
interventions, could be used to enhance the vibrancy and vitality of the
Octagon, increase footfall and support commercial activity. The intention was
that the findings could inform a future layout of the Octagon and potentially
inform other changes proposed.
10 The
summer timing was chosen because it enabled the collection of peak season data
(previously all data has been collected in autumn). In addition, the number of
scheduled events provided the opportunity to create a summer programme, and
harness the visitor economy to improve the experience of the CBD for all.
Planning for the trials
11 The
initial planning for the Octagon Experience was underway in May 2019 when the
potential to site the NZ Masters Games hub in the Octagon and coordinate the
Octagon Experience pedestrian trials with the city events programme was
identified. The Masters Games Trust was looking to reinvigorate the Games hub
and the Octagon Experience was seen as providing that opportunity.
12 As
outlined in the Masters Games report, when the Masters Games Village was
previously located at Logan Park many participants chose to head to the CBD in
the evenings. Siting the Masters Games within the CBD was seen by the Dunedin
Masters Games Trust as an opportunity to showcase the largest multi-sport event
in New Zealand.
13 Discussions
with the Masters Games and a cross-Council Working Group led to the Octagon
Experience being developed in September 2019. This proposal to trial partial
Octagon closures alongside the events programme was considered by ELT in
September 2019. This was the same decision making process followed with the
trials for Ed Sheeran weekend.
14 The
Masters Games Hub was designed to provide a nine-day “experience”
for entrants, residents and visitors. The hub consisted of an entertainment
stage, large screen for viewing Games events and a tent. Built over the lower
Octagon the tent was open at the front and sides, allowing bar and café
patrons to watch the activities. The Masters Games hub also included a medal
podium, merchandise pop up and small marquees.
15 The
proposal included trialling three layouts of the Octagon, guided by the Global
Street Design Guide’s recommendations. The original plan was to increase
the degree of closure incrementally from 30% closure moving to 60% closure and
then 100% from December 2019 to February 2020, finishing the Octagon Experience
with the events programme. However, once the complexity of accommodating the
Master Games and cruise ship shuttles within the Octagon was factored into the
planning, this phasing was not possible.
16 The
revised plan was to trial three options: starting with 80% closure, 60% closure
and 30% closure around a revised timeframe (1 Feb 2020 – 23 March 2020).
The first phase was designed to accommodate large scale events (i.e.
Masters Games and activations for Elton John and Queen concerts) and increased
pedestrian space. The second phase layout was the design proposed in the
Central City Plan (2014). It involved creation of a “shared space”
treatment with space for all vehicles and some areas for pedestrians only. The
third phase was focused on the Lower Octagon and Lower Stuart Street.
17 The
layouts proposed increasing public space for recreation to varying degrees;
addressing transport objectives of slowing traffic and through movement of the
Octagon; and placemaking to provide family friendly activation. The aim of
proposing the layouts concurrently was so each layout could be compared by the
community and stakeholders, while measuring impacts of various scales across
the project objectives. The duration of each layout was as per the design guide
with two/three week duration per layout allowed in order to assess impacts of
change following adaptation to a new traffic management layout.
Consultation /
engagement
18 Consultation
on the proposal commenced in November 2019 and continued throughout the Octagon
Experience. The plan was set out in the communications and engagement strategy
for the Experience.
19 The Octagon
Experience trials were promoted through a range of means, including:
· Media release
· Advertising in the
ODT and on radio
· Social media,
including DCC Facebook page and My Little Local
· Posters within the
Octagon and flyers in businesses
· NZ Masters Games
information for participants.
20 Staff
visited businesses in the Octagon and surrounding streets to talk through the
proposals. Letters were sent to tourism companies. Meetings were held
with tourism providers, Chamber of Commerce, local business owners, access
forum representatives and property owners. Discussions were also held with the
two Octagon Market providers who utilise the Octagon on cruise ship visitor
days.
21 The
affected persons process, which is the Council’s standard method of
consulting stakeholders about events and road closures was used. More than 75
businesses were consulted as affected parties. However, the affected persons
process was late in starting due to the number of events involved and the range
of stakeholders involved.
22 As
is common practice for road closures, the decision was taken to limit the
affected parties consultation to properties bordering the closed roads. For
example, it did not extend to Moray Place. However the team responded to
requests across the CBD and across the city and made changes where appropriate such
as changing plans for Princes Street to accommodate cruise ship shuttles and
large scale deliveries for businesses.
24 With
the benefit of hindsight, the affected persons process for the trial closures
should have been better managed and more comprehensive. This process
should have commenced earlier. Future affected persons processes (for one-off
events coordinated by Council or other activities led by Council) will be
implemented differently as more notice and engagement with stakeholders would
have resolved some issues earlier.
25
The engagement generated much community interest and at the Council meeting on
10 December 2019 Council:
Moved (Cr Carmen Houlahan/Cr
Sophie Barker):
That the Council:
a) Urgently reviews the plans for
Octagon closures
Division
The Council voted
by
division
For: Crs Sophie Barker,
Rachel Elder, Doug Hall, Carmen Houlahan,
Jim
O'Malley, Jules Radich, Chris
Staynes and Lee Vandervis (8).
Against: Crs David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Marie Laufiso, Mike Lord, Steve Walker
and Aaron
Hawkins (6).
Abstained: Nil
The
division was declared CARRIED by
8 votes to 6
Motion carried (CNL/2019/072)
b) Discuss the plans thoroughly
with all affected parties weekly.
Division
The Council voted
by
division
For: Crs Doug Hall, Jules Radich
and Lee Vandervis (3).
Against: Crs Sophie Barker,
David Benson-Pope, Rachel
Elder, Christine Garey,
Carmen Houlahan,
Marie Laufiso, Mike Lord, Jim O'Malley, Chris
Staynes, Steve Walker and Aaron Hawkins (11).
Abstained: Nil
The division was declared
LOST by 11 votes
to 3
26 Following this resolution urgent meetings were
held with the Chamber
of Commerce, Dunedin
Host, tourism operators
and Ritchies bus company (cruise ship shuttle operators), and a
solution agreed that met the needs of most parties. The resultant changes are described later
in the report. The key change
was agreement that Princes
Street would be the drop-off
and pick up
point for all cruise passengers to allow easy access to retail,
hospitality and the CBD and that tour operators would use the
space in Moray Place in front of the Public Library.
Set up and transition
27 Setup
of the Octagon Experience commenced on 27 January 2020. Temporary traffic
management was put in place including orange road cones, to close the road to
traffic in order to allow setup of the stage and elements of the Masters Games.
This setup took 5 days to complete. Traffic cones were replaced with planter
boxes and placemaking items to make the public space more attractive. The
timeframe meant that the Octagon Experience looked messy and confusing for an
extended period of time. The setup was not well executed and this was remedied
with transitions into later phases undertaken at night to minimise disruption
to businesses and the public.
Phases and timing
28 The
layouts for the three phases are described below and are illustrated in
Attachment A. Photographs showing each of the phases in operation are included
in Attachment B.
Phase
1 - Pedestrianisation of the Octagon with access for cruise ship shuttles
(80% closure)
29 The
first phase layout was trialled from 27 January to 16 February and
was developed to accommodate the city events proposed including the New Zealand
Masters Games hub. The Masters Games opened on 1 February and included
entertainment each evening which was open to the public. The tent area was an
alcohol-free zone, and the public were able to watch some Masters Games events
in the Octagon. City activations for the Elton John and Queen concerts were
also held. Two annual events (Thieves Alley Market and the Otago
Southland Pipe Band Contest) also occurred within the period and required full
closure. The need to activate these two events added cost count and complexity
to the Octagon Experience detailed more fully later in the report.
30 The
original plan for Phase 1 was intended to involve 100% closure to traffic with
the exception of route and delivery windows for businesses. Following the
Council resolution in December 2020, and consultation with businesses and
cruise ship shuttle operators, this was reduced to 80% closure (as shown in
Attachment A) to maintain shuttle drop-off locations near the Octagon in
Princes Street. (This is discussed in some detail below under Traffic
management.
31 This
layout included removing car parking, relocating one mobility space with an
additional two space located in the first block of George Street, and taxi rank
relocated to Upper Stuart Street entrance to the Octagon. Businesses utilised
delivery drop offs from 9pm – 5pm inclusive (20 hours) using the
identified delivery route. The speed limit for shuttles and operational
vehicles was restricted to 10km/h.
Phase
2
32 The
second phase layout commenced on 17 February to 9 March and trialled the design
of the Octagon identified within the Central City Plan. It balanced an increase
in public space with some general traffic. This layout included creating two
‘shared spaces’ open to all traffic in the lower and upper Octagon
for general traffic and using the remaining roads and central carriageway for
public space. The speed limit for this layout was 10-15km/h for all traffic.
Mobility spaces and taxi rank remained in the same locations as phase 1, and
car parking was reintroduced to the Octagon outside the Dunedin Public Art
Gallery. Cruise buses were accommodated in Princes Street and tour buses in
Moray Place.
Phase
3
33 The
third phase layout commenced on 9 March until 23 March. It included
partial closure of the lower Octagon and reopening of the central carriageway
and upper Octagon for general traffic, returning these parts of the space to
business as usual. The speed limit in the Lower Octagon and Lower Stuart Street
was 10-15km/h for all traffic, and the remaining Octagon speeds returned to
business as usual speeds of 30km/h. In this layout the Octagon Market returned
to the grassed area in the upper Octagon. The existing full car parking provision
returned to the Octagon and the taxi rank returned to its existing locations.
Mobility spaces returned to their existing locations. Cruise and tour buses
were accommodated back in the central carriageway and the Octagon.
Traffic management / Cruise ship and tour buses
34 Traffic management planning was underway in November,
with plans revised in response to feedback and the changes made after further
discussion with cruise and tour operators. The traffic management of the trials
was discussed at length with the traffic management supplier and New Zealand
Transport Agency (NZTA) to identify ways in which the trial might utilise more
attractive equipment, rather than traditional traffic cones and barriers, which
are in keeping with statutory regulations. It was agreed that the trials could
utilise planter boxes, troughs, and fencing to form the layout, however the
dimensions, robustness and particular items was dictated and restricted by the
regulations of current practice.
35 The
physical layout of each phase of the trial and its traffic management was test
driven by the emergency services and discussed with an accessibility
representative.
36 The
space needs of the Masters Games layout had implications for cruise ship buses
and other service traffic which have in recent years utilised the central
carriageway of the Octagon. Options were developed for the siting of drop offs
for cruise ship shuttles that allowed sufficient space, frequency of movements
(1 movement every two minutes) and the size and number of buses.
37 Staff considered six options for relocation of cruise ship
related transport operators during Phase 1 period. Outside Toitū Otago Settlers Museum was the recommended option for Phase 1 due
to the length of roadway; space for local tour providers; space for the Octagon
Markets; shelter from the weather within the museum and adjacent tourist
facilities for a high customer experience. This, and options were discussed
with stakeholders.
38 Following
stakeholder engagement, the walking distance to the Octagon was identified as
an issue for some cruise ship passengers, along with concern that shuttle drop
off being located away from Octagon businesses. However
following concerns raised by Ritchie’s buses and Octagon retailers, the
Cruise ship bus stops were temporarily relocated to State Highway 1 on
Cumberland Street. This was the preferred option of the provider.
39 Following
further feedback from tour providers and volunteers, concerns were raised that
the visitor experience was not good at this location and a new location sought.
Ongoing engagement with stakeholders, including the cruise ship shuttle
providers, meant that the final location of shuttles was in Princes Street on
single cruise ship days and the provider made their own decision to split to
Cumberland Street on double cruise ship days.
40 Other changes
made in response to feedback included:
· Providing public
maps and signage for visitors to navigate the CBD
· Activating the Municipal
Lane and the Civic Plaza to make them more attractive and encourage tourists to
access local tours on Moray Place.
41 Alternative locations were
also agreed with the two Octagon Market providers that utilise the space on
cruise ship visitor days. During PhaseS 1 and 2, the space occupied by the
markets was utilised for other activities, while in Phase 3 meant the Octagon
markets could utilise the grassed area within the Octagon.
42 Staff offered a number of
locations for consideration by the stall holders including the community
gallery, civic plaza, municipal chamber and other non-DCC owned locations.
During Phase 1, one market provider utilised the space within the community
gallery on cruise ship days. The second market provider did not accept alternative
locations. In Phase 3, the market providers returned to the grass area of the
Octagon.
COVID-19 Pandemic
43 While stakeholder
engagement was a known requirement, and could have been improved through better
planning and earlier engagement, there were other challenges which were
unforeseen, which had a material impact on the trials, namely the COVID-19
pandemic.
44 Central government
applied travel restrictions to Chinese visitors from 2 February. New Zealand
reported its first case of COVID-19 on 28 February, with further cases reported
in early March. New Zealand’s borders were closed at 12.59 pm on 19 March.
Cruise ship visits scheduled for 18, 21 and 22 March were cancelled, as was the
Fringe Street party scheduled for 21 March. New Zealand moved quickly through
the alert levels and the country went into lockdown at 11.59pm on 25
March.
45 StatsNZ
reported that industries related to international travel, such as accommodation
and transport, began to feel the effects of Covid-19 earlier in the quarter,
with activity dropping significantly once the borders closed on 19 March. The
economy fell 0.2% after growing at an annual pace of 1.8% in the December
quarter.
46 Service
industries, which make up two-thirds of the economy, fell 1.1% in the quarter.
Retail, accommodation and restaurants fell 2.2% while transport, postal and
warehousing experienced a 5.2% drop. Both were heavily affected by the fall in
international visitors.
47 StatsNZ
advise real gross national disposable income, which measures the real
purchasing power of the country’s disposable income, fell by 1.6% in the
quarter, “impacted by a fall in the terms of trade and an increase in the
net flow of income to overseas”.
48 Household
spending declined 0.3% in the March quarter. This was largely due to weaker
spending on services. Restaurant meals and ready-to-eat food, international
passenger services and accommodation services all contributed to the fall.
49 StatsNZ
predict that the “majority of the impact of COVID-19 response
restrictions will be shown in the June 2020 quarter GDP release.’’
The ANZ Chief Economist predicts a 19% decrease in GDP for the June quarter.
(Source: ODT 19 June 2020).
TIMELINE
50 A
timeline showing how these various events aligned with the timing of the
Octagon Experience phases is included in Attachment C. While most events were
scheduled during Phase 1, other events were planned in Phases 2 and 3,
including a 3x3 Basketball tournament (Phase 2) and the Fringe Street Party at
the end of Phase 3. This was ultimately cancelled due to COVID-19.
51 This attachment also
includes daily weather data for the trial period. There was a weather event on
4 February, with torrential rain forcing the cancellation of planned
activations for the Elton John concert. In contrast, fine
weather for the Queen concert resulted in audiences in the Octagon enjoying a
pre-concert performance on the Masters Games stage by Tahu and Takahes.
BUDGET
52 A
$150k budget was allocated in the Annual Plan for the trials. The budget was
overspent in part because of increased traffic management and the need for the
activation of Municipal Lane. The layout changes in Princes Street to
accommodate the changed cruise ship drop offs also required additional planter
boxes and increased costs. The total cost was $327,943. This includes elements
associated with Masters Games and other events. (e.g. Traffic
management). The costs of the trial were met from existing budgets.
53 Local
providers were used and many of the items can be reused. These are indicated by
an asterisk in the table below. Transport Group plan to reuse elements for
future trials; plants and furniture are being reused by Parks and Recreation;
and City Property have requested planters for community centres and schools.
All remaining furniture will be used by Events team for activations, in the
same way as furniture for Ed Sheeran was refurbished and reused for this event
54 The
high level breakdown of how the budget was applied is as follows:
Summary
of Expenditure on the Octagon Experience and Evaluation
|
|
Cost
|
|
Activation
|
|
|
Furniture including seats / tables and chairs / sandpit *
|
$44,937
|
|
Planter boxes *
|
$53,000
|
|
Family games (table tennis and games) *
|
$9,282
|
|
Plants and trees *
|
$14,699
|
|
Lighting
|
$15,451
|
|
Artist
|
$5,468
|
|
Advertising
|
$18,486
|
|
Municipal Lane activation
|
$34,000
|
|
Logistics - Container / Student Labour / Transporting
Furniture between phases
|
$10,487
|
|
Traffic Management for event
|
$35,272
|
|
Subtotal
|
$240,082
|
|
Events
|
|
|
Traffic management for Masters Games and events
|
$9,000
|
|
Subtotal
|
$9,000
|
|
Evaluation
|
|
|
Evaluation report (Aitken Taylor)
|
$27,500
|
|
Evaluation reports (First Retail)
|
$26,361
|
|
Evaluation report (Nathan Berg)
|
$25,000
|
|
Subtotal
|
$78,861
|
|
TOTAL
|
$327,943
excl GST
|
|
*being reused
|
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND FEEDBACK
55 One
of the tools for evaluating the trials was an Octagon Experience Feedback
Survey. The survey was available online via the Council website and in paper
form at two locations within the Octagon.
56 The
survey was a mechanism for residents, businesses and visitors to express their
views of the trial. The 7 questions which are set out in full in Attachment D,
along with the results, included:
· What is your reason for
visiting the Octagon today?
· Did you enjoy the
Octagon Experience? If not, why not?
· Do you have any other
comments about the Octagon Experience?
57 A
business and retailer specific survey was developed with the Chamber of
Commerce and Dunedin Host which was intended to be sent out to businesses
following the trial. However, due to COVID-19, it was agreed with the
stakeholders this survey should not be undertaken.
58 Of
the 1997 respondents to the Feedback survey, 14% (291) completed the paper form
within the Octagon and remaining 1706 via the online form. An overwhelming
majority of respondents (92%) lived in Dunedin and 8% lived outside of Dunedin.
59 Of
the submitters responding to where they heard about the Octagon Experience, the
highest scoring responses were from the ODT (528), 447 from social media, 213
from word of mouth and 141 from media amongst other locations.
Survey results
60 The survey
results are set out in Attachment D and summarised below.
Phase One
61 A
total of 795 submissions was received during Phase 1 of the Octagon Experience.
Of these submissions, 31% said they enjoyed the experience while 69% said they
did not.
62 Of
the people that did not enjoy the Octagon Experience, one of the main areas of
concern is around traffic and parking. 162 respondents commented on the effects
of the trial on the traffic flows around the Octagon (e.g. Moray Place) and
beyond, citing congestion problems and longer travel times. 113 respondents
also commented on the lack of parking and the effects of this. It caused some
people to not come to the Octagon, not go into retail stores, and missing
appointments.
63 Accessibility
was another major concern for people that did not enjoy the experience. 79
respondents commented on the difficulty for less abled (e.g. elderly, disabled)
people to access things on the Octagon, with many choosing to stay away or
unable to go due to lack of accessibility for close drop-off/parking. This is
also a reoccurring theme for respondents who commented on parking, citing the
lack of easy/close accessibility didn’t encourage them to go to the
Octagon. 12 respondents also specifically commented on the removal of the P5
parking outside the library as a negative, noting it took away the access for
quick library drop-off.
64 People
also commented on the general look of the Experience, with 112 respondents
disliking the look noting that it looked disorganised and/or tacky. 18
respondents said it resembled a construction zone or looked like there was
roadworks happening. 22 respondents who enjoyed the experience also noted it
could be better planned/better designed, with more things to do and more play
equipment.
65 People
who enjoyed the Experience were positive about the vibe/atmosphere it created,
with some saying its nice without the traffic/fumes/noise (35) and allowed them
to enjoy being in the area and socialise comfortably. 39 respondents
specifically commented that this should be permanent. 28 respondents enjoyed
the Experience as a pedestrian, and 10 respondents noted how it was family
friendly. 20 respondents suggested that it should only be partially closed with
just the lower Octagon being pedestrian only.
Phase Two
66 A
total of 559 submissions was received during Phase 2 of the Octagon Experience.
Of these submissions, 33% said they enjoyed the experience while 67% said they
did not. A summary of the comment themes is presented below.
67 One
of the main areas of concern for Phase 2 is again around traffic and parking.
113 respondents commented on the effects of the trial on the traffic flows
around the Octagon (e.g. Moray Place) and beyond, citing congestion problems
and longer travel times. 85 respondents also commented on the lack of parking
and the effects of this.
68 Accessibility
was another major concern, with 53 respondents commenting on the difficulty for
less abled (e.g. elderly, disabled) people to access things on the Octagon. Six
respondents specifically commented on the removal of the P5 parking outside the
library as a negative, noting it took away the access for quick library
drop-off.
69 Respondents
cited the experience as a waste of money/time, and 29 people were concerned
about it impacting businesses negatively. There were comments about Dunedin not
being a big enough city to cater an experience such as this, and it would be
more suitable as temporary closures for events.
70 There
was support for closing just the lower Octagon, with 20 respondents supporting
this. 19 respondents thought the main carriageway should be closed instead.
71 Respondents
commented that the Octagon seemed empty/deserted, however 25 respondents saw
people using the space and thought seemed busy.
72 People
also commented on the general look of the Experience, with 112 respondents
disliking the look noting that it looked disorganised and/or tacky. 18
respondents said it resembled a construction zone/roadworks area. 22
respondents who enjoyed the Experience also noted it could be better
planned/better designed, with more things to do and more play equipment.
73 People
who enjoyed the Experience were positive about the vibe/atmosphere it created,
with some saying it’s nice without the traffic/fumes/noise (36) and
allowed them to enjoy being in the area and socialise comfortably. 28
respondents specifically commented that this should be permanent. 15
respondents noted how it was family friendly, while four commented that it
should have more activities/play equipment and four more thought more food
trucks should be added.
Phase
Three
74 A
total of 539 submissions was received during Phase 3 of the Octagon Experience.
Of these submissions, 60% said they enjoyed the experience, while 40% said they
did not.
75 One
of the main areas of concern for Phase 3 is again around traffic and parking,
although to a much lesser extent than the other phases. Around 41 respondents
commented on the effects of the trial on the traffic flows around the Octagon
(e.g. Moray Place) and beyond, citing congestion problems and longer travel
times. Another 41 respondents also commented on the lack of parking and the
effects of this.
76 Respondents
didn’t like the look of the experience/thought it looked tacky, however
44 respondents enjoyed the vibe/atmosphere of the experience citing that they
enjoyed the provision of the activities, seating and play equipment (16) and
saw lots of people using the space (25).
77 Respondents
wanted the experience to be permanent, with eight preferring a full closure,
and 15 respondents citing a partial closure seemed more successful. There were
15 suggestions to close just the main carriageway, and 22 suggestions across
all comments to close just the lower Octagon.
Summary of Feedback survey results
78 The
feedback, concerns and issues raised by the respondents to the Octagon
Experience Feedback survey were relatively consistent across the phases. These
issues were notably around effects on traffic flow, lack of parking,
accessibility issues, and the general look of the Octagon Experience. For
people who did enjoy the Experience, the things that were noted were the
atmosphere and vibe of the Experience, the lack of traffic and noise, and the
extra amenities/equipment provided. There were more people who didn’t
like the trial at the start in Phase 1, and as the Experience changed to phase
3, more people enjoyed the Experience than those that did not. There appeared
to be more people generally in favour of a partial closure than full,
suggesting the lower Octagon and/ or the central carriageway for permanent
closure.
TRIAL EVALUATION
79 The
trial was assessed using the objectives for evaluating streets are
stated in the Global Streets Design Guide. Data relating to the following
dimensions was collected and assessed:
· User Counts
· Behaviour comfort
and safety
· Environment
· Commercial
Activity
User Counts
Number of people cycling
80 The
Aitken Taylor report captured bicycle activity data within the Octagon. Four
survey locations were used, with surveying taking place for Phases 2 and 3
only.
81 For
Phase 2, there were 426 total weekday bicycle movements, with peaks at commute
times at 8-9am and 5-6pm. On Saturday, there were 354 movements with the peak
time taking place between 11am-12pm.
82 For
Phase 3, there were 384 weekday bicycle movements, with peaks between 8-10am
and 5-7pm. On Saturdays, 222 movements were observed, with a noticeable peak
between 1-2pm and dip from 3-4pm.
Driving
83 For
vehicle movements, data was extracted from the traffic signal system (SCATS).
Analysis was conducted on the six intersections on or within Moray Place. The
intersections were:
· Stuart
Street (Lower) and Moray Place
· Princes
Street and Moray Place
· Princes
Street and Octagon
· George
Street and Octagon
· George
Street and Moray Place
· Stuart
Street (Upper) and Moray Place.
84 Vehicle
movements at the two Octagon intersections dropped dramatically during Phase 1
and then increased during Phase 2 and Phase 3, returning to normal levels. The
surrounding intersections stayed reasonably steady throughout, even though each
had one ‘leg’ closed completely or restricted.
85 The
other two legs showed a significant increase in volumes, as the vehicles had
been detoured around Moray Place rather than driving through the Octagon.
86 The most
congestion observed was at the corner of Princes Street and Moray Place.
Footfall figures in central city and local facilities
87 User
counts were taken at the City Library, the Dunedin Public Art Gallery (DPAG)
and at the i-SITE Dunedin Visitor Centre.
88 For
the City Library during Phases 1 and 2, loans and physical visits were used to determine
user counts. February 2020 usage was compared to February 2019. Overall, loans
(-2.4%) and physical visits (-0.7%) for 2020 are slightly down, however, there
is no large variance.
Table 1 – Comparison of loans and physical visits
to the City Library for February 2019 and 2020
|
|
Loans
|
Variance
|
% Change
|
Physical Visits
|
Variance
|
% Change
|
|
February 2019
|
55,085
|
|
|
55,707
|
|
|
|
February 2020
|
53,785
|
-1,300
|
-2.4%
|
55,321
|
-386
|
-0.7%
|
89 Phase
3 shows (below) a significant reduction in loans and physical visits to the
City Library. To note, however, the facility was closed for nine opening days
in March (29% of total opening days for the month). The cancellation of public
programmes in the two weeks prior to the COVID-19 lockdown would also have contributed
to the reduction in visitation.
Table 2 – Comparison of loans and physical visits
to the City Library March 2019 and March 2020
|
|
Loans
|
Variance
|
% Change
|
Physical Visits
|
Variance
|
% Change
|
|
March 2019
|
56,086
|
|
|
59,522
|
|
|
|
March 2020
|
47,333
|
-8,753
|
-15.6%
|
40,312
|
-19,210
|
-32.3%
|
90 For DPAG, visitor
statistics were recorded (below) from 27 January to 22 March 2020, and between
2017 to 2020. All show that 2020 visitor numbers had generally increased from
2019 visitations.
Table 3 – Yearly comparisons of visitations to
Dunedin Public Art Gallery
|
Phase 1
|
27 Jan – 2
Feb
|
3 Feb – 9
Feb
|
10 Feb – 16
Feb
|
|
2017
|
4,255
|
6,184
|
4,833
|
|
2018
|
3,944
|
3,843
|
4,229
|
|
2019
|
5,120
|
5,492
|
5,372
|
|
2020
|
5,347 (+227)
|
6,297 (+805)
|
5,899 (+527)
|
|
Phase 2
|
17 Feb – 23
Feb
|
24 Feb – 1
Mar
|
2 Mar – 8
Mar
|
|
2017
|
4,901
|
4,371
|
4,810
|
|
2018
|
4,371
|
4,103
|
3,642
|
|
2019
|
5,347
|
4,530
|
6,039
|
|
2020
|
5,362 (+15)
|
6,696 (+166)
|
5,160 (-879)
|
|
Phase 3
|
9 Mar – 15
Mar
|
16 Mar – 22
Mar
|
|
|
2017
|
5,137
|
4,868
|
|
|
2018
|
4,754
|
4,378
|
|
|
2019
|
5,031
|
5,782
|
|
|
2020
|
5,030 (-1)
|
No data
|
|
91 The i-SITE
Dunedin Visitor Centre recorded footfall data from 6 January to 31 March
2020.
Table 4 – Comparisons of Dunedin i-SITE visitations
for 2019 and 2020
|
Week ending
|
2019
|
2020
|
% Change
|
|
6 January
|
7518
|
5107
|
-32%
|
|
13 January
|
6555
|
6046
|
-8%
|
|
20 January
|
6993
|
4220
|
-40%
|
|
3 February
|
5706
|
4917
|
-14%
|
|
10 February
|
7405
|
5778
|
-21%
|
|
17 February
|
6566
|
4373
|
-27%
|
|
24 February
|
7345
|
4507
|
-33%
|
|
3 March
|
6008
|
4399
|
-39%
|
|
10 March
|
6974
|
4526
|
-27%
|
|
17 March
|
5000
|
1390
|
-72%
|
|
24 March
|
4752
|
0
|
N/A
|
|
31 March
|
5463
|
0
|
N/A
|
92 Visitor
numbers to the i-SITE were down on 2019 figures for January before the trials
began. There was a 23.5% decrease on 2019 figures for the first 4 weeks of
January compared with a 36.5% decrease over the weeks of the trial. (This
excludes the weeks when there no visitor figures collected due to the COVID-19
Lockdown).
Behaviour, Comfort and Safety
Number of pedestrians by type of activity and duration of stay
93 In
addition to bicycle activity, the Aitken Taylor report captured pedestrian,
staying (standing, sitting, playing) and sitting activity data. As noted above,
four survey locations were used, with surveying taking place for Phases 2 and 3
only.
94 For Phase 2:
· Weekday
pedestrian movements were recorded at a total of 23,484 peaking at 12 and 2pm,
with the highest foot traffic on George Street, Princes St, and Stuart St East
respectively.
· Saturday
pedestrian movements totalled 27,816 (18% increase compared to weekday), with
the highest foot traffic reflecting the above.
· 350
persons were observed as staying (with 301 seating and standing), and 39
children at play, with activity peaking at 12pm.
· 805
persons staying on Saturday (with 434 outdoor/commercial dining, 347 seating
and standing).
· 547
persons were observed at outdoor café seating on Saturday, with 30% of
outdoor seats on offer being occupied at any one time.
95 For Phase 3:
· Weekday
pedestrian movements were recorded at a total of 25,110, peaking at 1pm.
· Saturday
pedestrian movements totalled 24,084.
· 702
persons were observed as staying during the weekday (with 314 outdoor
commercial dining, 388 seating and standing – a 20% increase from Phase
2).
· A
total of 973 persons were observed as staying on a Saturday (with 518
attributed to outdoor café seating, and 451 seating and standing).
Crime rates
96 The
First Retail Report noted in the initial two Phases “a confident decline
in theft and related incidents, public order and acts to cause injury offences”. When thoroughfare traffic returned in Phase 3, levels of
crime and disorder escalated.
97 ‘All
victimisations’ NZ Police data was used to record these observations,
which includes ‘Acts intended to cause injury’; ‘Theft and
related offences.’; ‘Unlawful entry with intent/burglary’;
and ‘Sexual assault’. ‘Theft and related offences’ and
‘Acts intended to cause injury’ together made up 81% of ‘All
victimisations’ in Dunedin Central during the trial period.
98 The
Report noted that “increased activity, welcoming a more diverse and
family-orientated audience and greater space for movement around licenced
premises contributed to these positive outcomes”.
Environment
Levels of particulate matter
99 The Nathan Berg Report cited
the air quality sensor (listed as "Central Dunedin" in air quality
databases) located at the corner of Albany Street and Anzac Avenue near Forsyth
Barr Stadium. The report notes this shows Dunedin's air quality has been
significantly improving for at least a decade, as seen in the steady decline in
emissions, which have been cut by almost half over just the last decade.
100 The report however also notes that devices
measuring air quality located inside the CBD should be considered if urban
planning policies such as pedestrianisation and restriction of automobiles are
to be credibly linked to reliable evidence measuring gains in air quality
attributable to those policies. Once daily and hourly PM10 data become
available, further analysis will be required to investigate whether the Octagon
Experience had any measurable effects on air quality.
Commercial activity
Impacts on consumer spend
locally and across the city
101 The
retail spending data provided in the First Retail report was measured using the
MarketView[1]
(electronic transactions) data. This data was split by month, area, local and
total spend, and spending by industry. The MarketView data in the First Retail
report is based on 5 Octagon mesh blocks, see the shaded area in Attachment F.
102 The
retail spending for the Octagon area was variable over the months of the
Octagon Experience.
Total retail spending
103 The
report from First Retail shows total retail spending in the Octagon area was up
10.8% in January 2020, up 6.7% in February and down 42.6% in March (see Figure
1). Retail spending in March 2020 was down in the Octagon, George St and
the rest of Dunedin as the impacts of COVID-19 border restrictions, cruise ship
cancellations and lockdown became apparent.
Figure 1 –
Percentage change in total retail spending Jan 2020 to Mar 2020 (on same month
of the previous year) – sourced First Retail
Table 5 - Percentage change in total retail spending Jan
2020 to Mar 2020 (on same month of the previous year)
|
|
Percentage
change on same month of the previous year
|
|
|
Jan 2020
|
Feb 2020
|
Mar 2020
|
|
Octagon
|
10.8%
|
6.7%
|
-42.6%
|
|
George St
|
3.4%
|
7.2%
|
-35.9%
|
|
Rest of Dunedin
|
4.2%
|
10.3%
|
-3.4%
|
|
Dunedin city
|
4.3%
|
9.8%
|
-8.8%
|
Local retail spending
104 The
First Retail report shows local retail spending was up 13.9% in January 2020,
down 4.0% in February and down 43.2% in March. Retail spending in March 2020
was down in the Octagon, George St and the rest of Dunedin mostly likely due to
the impacts of COVID-19; border restrictions, cruise ship cancellations and
lockdown from 25 March.
Figure 2 –
Percentage change in local retail spending Jan 2020 to Mar 2020 (compared with
2019) – sourced First Retail
Table 6 - Percentage change in local retail spending Jan
2020 to Mar 2020 (on same month of the previous year) (First Retail)
|
|
Percentage
change on same month of the previous year
|
|
|
Jan 2020
|
Feb 2020
|
Mar 2020
|
|
Octagon
|
13.9%
|
-4.0%
|
-43.2%
|
|
George St
|
6.5%
|
1.1%
|
-33.8%
|
|
Rest of Dunedin
|
5.3%
|
8.1%
|
2.4%
|
105 Due
to the impacts of COVID-19, it is difficult to assess the outcome of the
Octagon Experience on retail spending, particularly during the March period.
The Octagon Experience started on 27 January and continued through February and
March. Due to the timing of the Octagon Experience and the impacts of COVID-19,
February data potentially provides the most useful indication of retail
spending during the trial.
Retail spending by key industry
106 The
key industries with the highest growth in the Octagon during February 2020 (on
the same month the previous year) was hospitality, up 19.8%, Apparel and
personal goods, up 17.9% and department stores and leisure down 14.5%.
Table 7 - Percentage change in retail spending by
industry for key Octagon industries – Feb 2020 (compared with the same
month in 2019) (First Retail)
|
|
Variable
|
Octagon
|
George St
|
Rest of Dunedin
|
Dunedin city
|
|
Apparel and personal
|
Percentage change
|
17.9%
|
4.7%
|
3.5%
|
4.8%
|
|
Hospitality
|
Percentage change
|
19.8%
|
17.7%
|
17.9%
|
18.1%
|
|
Department stores and leisure
|
Percentage change
|
-14.5%
|
10.0%
|
11.8%
|
10.8%
|
107 Professor
Nathan Berg (DCC Chair in Entrepreneurship, Otago Business School and the
Department of Economics and Tahu Andrell (a post-graduate student in the
Department of Economics at the University of Otago) undertook an analysis of a
sample of Octagon and CBD businesses during the Octagon Experience.
Professor Berg’s analysis was based on a sample of 7 Octagon businesses
and 8 CBD businesses. The analysis focuses on business revenue.
Analysis of the sample of Octagon businesses
108 Professor
Berg’s analysis of the sample of Octagon businesses found a 2.0% increase
in revenue during phase 1 (27 January – 16 February) on the same period
in 2019, a 24.3% drop during phase 2 (17 February – 9 March) when
compared to the same time the year before and a 6.3% drop during phase 3 (10
March to 23 March) on the comparable 2019 time period.
Table 8 - Percentage
change in business revenue for sample of Octagon businesses (compared with the
same time period in 2019) (Prof. Berg report)
|
|
Phase 1
|
Phase 2
|
Phase 3
|
|
Octagon sample
|
2.0%
|
-24.3%
|
-6.3%
|
109 There
are some differences in the MarketView and Professor Berg findings, with the
MarketView data providing more positive results for February but a more
significant drop in retail sales during March. The differences may be due
to the different sample of businesses (MarketView based on all businesses in
the five Octagon meshblocks as shown in Appendix 6) and Professor Berg’s
work focused on a sample of 7 Octagon businesses. Professor Berg suggests
that businesses located within the Octagon had a bigger fall in revenue during
the Octagon Experience than businesses located further from the Octagon,
although this may in part be due to the importance of international visitors to
this area, and the impacts of COVID-19 on international visitors as the trial progressed.
i-SITE
revenue
110 In
addition to the economic data in the First Retail and Nathan Berg reports,
revenue at the i-SITEs in the Octagon and at Port Chalmers is also presented.
Revenue collected at the Octagon i-SITE in January was higher than the same
period in 2019, while revenue was notably reduced in February and March. The
revenue at the Port Chalmers i-SITE showed a similar pattern, suggesting that
the reduced revenue at the i-SITE in February and March was not due to the
Octagon Experience.
Figure 3: Revenue at i-SITEs
January -March 2020 (compared with revenue for 2019)
|
|
City i-SITE
|
Port i-SITE
|
|
|
2019
|
2020
|
2019
|
2020
|
|
January
|
$266,655
|
$283,159
|
$214,155
|
$224,543
|
|
February
|
$309,296
|
$255,273
|
$213,905
|
$116,247
|
|
March
|
$250,824
|
$123,426
|
$137,446
|
$78,003
|
111 Professor
Nathan Berg and First Retail have been asked to comment on the differences in
the findings of their respective reports. Their further comments will be
reported at the meeting.
Commentary from Transport and NZTA
112 The
Berg report makes a number of statements about transport related issues and the
Octagon Experience. It includes commentary regarding New Zealand Transport
Agency (NZTA), transportation and urban planning. The report has been
referred to NZTA for feedback which will be reported at the meeting.
113 Transport
staff note that aspects of the report are not consistent with Council’s
Integrated Transport Strategy or the Government Policy Statement on transport
which are linked. Staff further note that the assertion that health will be
impacted by the congestion and traffic calming in the CBD (lack of carparks)
for gyms is not backed by any data.
114 Staff
will need to undertake further analysis of some of the other assertions in the
report, e.g. those relating to choice of modes; levels of service for transit
times by automobiles; and self-financing transit systems before they can
provide any further comment on the findings.
CONCLUSIONS
AND LESSONS LEARNED
Conclusions
115 The
Octagon comprises a complexity of interests and of functions. These
complexities were not well understood and as a consequence were not well
managed. Changes in one dimension have impacts on others. For example when
cruise ship drop-offs were relocated to Cumberland Street to accommodate
shuttle operators, Octagon retailers were unhappy with the changes. Some
businesses are vulnerable to small changes.
116 The
focus of the trials shifted because of the perceived opportunity presented by
linking with the Masters Games and other events. The inclusion of Masters Games
detracted from both the Octagon Experience and that of the Masters Games
participants. The focus on the Octagon Experience itself was lost. The layout
of Lower Stuart street was difficult to “read” for both pedestrians
and traffic.
117 Accommodating
the Masters Games and other events such as Thieves Alley and the Pipe Band
competition, with their own layouts, impacted the trial. The Masters Games
required a large stage and stretch tent which occupied most of the Lower
Octagon, and the health and safety requirements associated with the need to
accommodate up to 1500 people, necessitated the 80% closures.
118 The COVID-19 pandemic and the
restrictions on cruise ships and other international visitors impacted the
trial.
119 The
timing relative to the George Street project and the extent of community
comment on George Street may have negatively influenced community feedback.
Positives
120 There
were positives to emerge from the trials including reductions
in crime, as reflected in Police data. The Octagon Experience provided family
friendly activities and a ‘non-alcohol related’ culture to balance
out the night time economy in the Octagon.
121 Hospitality
and some retail businesses (i.e. personal and apparel sectors) benefitted with
total spending in Octagon businesses in these sectors in February higher (19.8%
and 17.9%) compared with the same month in 2019.
122 Community
feedback confirms there was a higher level of amenity and usage during the
period without traffic. Food trucks were popular and introduced an added aspect
of choice for Octagon users.
123 There
are changes Council could make now to enhance the user experience in the
Octagon, such as the provision of informal seating and an outdoor table tennis
table that do not require changes to traffic layouts.
124 Public
transport continued to function unimpeded. The ORC reported no delays to the
public transport network.
125 The
trial provided a chance to learn more about the Octagon, and pedestrianisation
in Dunedin, particularly during peak visitor season. Council now has the
benefit of significant data and improved understanding of how the Octagon
functions, which can inform future planning. It is now clear that the central
carriageway is a key element of the way the Octagon functions.
126 Council’s
Transport Group now have data from our ITS traffic detection system to describe
how traffic responded / diverted as a result of the closures and this
information will be used to inform future proposals.
Lessons Learned
127 The
lessons learned from the trials are set out in more detail below:
128 Engagement:
Communications and engagement with affected parties could have been better
timed and executed with the full range of stakeholders identified from the
beginning. Including stakeholders in more timely consultations about the
future of the Octagon and the Central City Plan will be vital, as will be
balancing the commercial and community interests. It should
have started sooner and provided stakeholders with a genuine opportunity to
provide input into what was being planned.
129 More thorough consultation with cruise ship providers and business
owners, but also individuals and other stakeholders, should be undertaken ahead
of any future trials. This engagement would cover strategies to keep the
proximity of Octagon retailers to cruise ship visitors or other tourist drop
off areas. It would also include outdoor dining coverage and other methods to
clarify business signage and boundaries for alfresco dining.
130 Decision
making process: The final design for the Octagon Experience was not signed
off by Council. Staff followed the same process as the Ed Sheeran trial. In
order to ensure certainty, in future, a clear decision process should be agreed
by Council.
131 Evaluation:
A clear evaluation framework, as requested by Council for the Octagon Experience,
should be in place before any trials commence. Baseline should be evaluated
before the trial beginning. Staff should also ensure more baseline data is
available with which to compare trial evaluation impacts to. Ideally staff
would model the impacts of road closures before trailing closures (i.e. refine
baselining of the impacts of certain traffic treatments or road closures).
132 Timings:
Multiple transitions (accommodating revised layouts for one-day events) in one
trial period are problematic. In future Council needs to ensure events and
layouts are compatible. Sequential trials of layouts were proposed in order to
enable comparisons, in the absence of baseline data. However, ideally no more
than one layout should be trialed at any one time. A shorter trial period than
eight weeks would also be more beneficial.
133 Communications:
There was heavy reliance on the Council’s website for communication.
Although control of positive media message is challenging, there needs to be
more focus on public communications for future projects to ensure that the
public are more aware of the purpose of trials, not just road closures.
134 Project
planning and resourcing: Significant lead in time is required for planning
trials. More senior personnel should be included in planning discussions,
which will refine trial parameters and treatments. Plans need to ensure
adequate staff resourcing to respond to issues in a timely way, e.g. getting
signage and wayfinding in place for relocated tourism operators.
135 Logistics:
The set-up phase was protracted over five days, and created confusion
and a negative impression of the trials at the outset. Further planning should
identify what transitions are required and ensure they are undertaken in a way
that minimises disruption and ensures adequate staff time and
rostering especially during weekend times is provided for in planning future
trials. This includes pack up/pack down times, as well as securing furniture
overnight.
136 Physical
activation: Activation of some areas (e.g. Upper Octagon and feeder starts
including Upper Stuart St) is challenging due to the sloping topography and
requires extra work. Activation of Municipal Lane worked well, but could
have occurred earlier. The permanency of some activation
furniture and street signage needs to be reconsidered to avoid the
‘tacky’ visage of some treatments.
137 Traffic: Pick-up and drop-off- locations
could be closer for taxis. Alternative locations for siting cruise ship
shuttles, buses and tourism operators should be negotiated and agreed with
transport and tourism operators now, rather than close to the period of any
proposed closures.
NEXT STEPS
138 The
information gathered will be used to inform future planning for the Octagon (as
part of the Central City Plan). The findings will also be used to inform the
“reset” of the consultation on the George Street (Central City
Plan) project.
Signatories
|
Author:
|
Nicola Pinfold - Group Manager Community and Planning
Sandy Graham - General Manager City Services
|
|
Authoriser:
|
Sue Bidrose - Chief Executive Officer
|
Attachments
|
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
⇩a
|
Octagon Experience
phases - scope and timing
|
42
|
|
⇩b
|
Octagon Experience
phases - photographs
|
44
|
|
⇩c
|
Timeline and weather
data
|
47
|
|
⇩d
|
Community Feedback
|
49
|
|
⇩e
|
Aitken Taylor: The
Octagon Experience Public Life Survey (June 2020)
|
67
|
|
⇩f
|
First Retail: The
Octagon Experience (May 2020)
|
127
|
|
⇩g
|
Map of the mesh blocks
covered by the MarketView data
|
171
|
|
⇩h
|
Nathan Berg and Tahu
Andrell (June 2020): An Event Study measuring Change in Sales Revenue and
Entry Counts associated with the Octagon Experience 2020
|
172
|
|
⇩i
|
Addendum (June 2020) to
Nathan Berg and Tahu Andrell: An Event Study
|
236
|
|
⇩j
|
Traffic and pedestrian
footfall data
|
238
|
|
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
|
Fit with purpose
of Local Government
This report relates to providing local infrastructure and
it is considered good-quality and cost- effective.
|
|
Fit with strategic
framework
|
|
Contributes
|
Detracts
|
Not applicable
|
|
Social Wellbeing Strategy
|
☒
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
Economic Development Strategy
|
☒
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
Environment Strategy
|
☒
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
Arts and Culture Strategy
|
☒
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
3 Waters Strategy
|
☒
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
Spatial Plan
|
☒
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
Integrated Transport Strategy
|
☒
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
Parks and Recreation Strategy
|
☒
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
Other strategic projects/policies/plans
|
☐
|
☐
|
☒
|
The Octagon Experience aligns with all key strategies.
|
|
Māori Impact
Statement
Mana whenua will be involved as a key partner in any
future project work.
|
|
Sustainability
Sustainability has been a key consideration during the
development of this project with the street furniture, plants and assets used
for the trial being reused across parks and reserves.
|
|
LAP/Annual Plan /
Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy
There was $150k allocated on the Annual Plan for
pedestrianisation trial. The costs are detailed in the report.
|
|
Financial
considerations
The budget and spend is outlined in the report.
|
|
Significance
This report is considered low – medium significance
in terms of the Council’s Significant and Engagement Policy. (Low in
terms of financial value but high degree of public interest).
|
|
Engagement –
external
As detailed in the report, external engagement has
occurred prior to and during the Octagon Experience.
|
|
Engagement -
internal
Internal engagement has occurred throughout this process
and the project development across many departments of Council.
|
|
Risks: Legal /
Health and Safety etc.
There are no known risks associated with this information
report.
|
|
Conflict of
Interest
No conflicts have been identified.
|
|
Community Boards
The Octagon is not located within a Community board area,
however, the report may be of interest to community boards.
|
