Notice of Meeting:

I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee will be held on:

 

Date:                                                    Tuesday 4 August 2020

Time:                                                   1:30pm (or at the conclusion of the previous meeting, whichever is later)

Venue:                                                Edinburgh Room, Municipal Chambers, The Octagon, Dunedin

 

Sandy Graham

Acting Chief Executive Officer

 

Planning and Environment Committee

PUBLIC AGENDA

 

MEMBERSHIP

 

Chairperson

Cr David Benson-Pope

 

Deputy Chairperson

Cr Sophie Barker

Cr Steve Walker

Members

Cr Rachel Elder

Cr Christine Garey

 

Cr Doug Hall

Mayor Aaron Hawkins

 

Cr Carmen Houlahan

Cr Marie Laufiso

 

Cr Mike Lord

Cr Jim O'Malley

 

Cr Jules Radich

Cr Chris Staynes

 

Cr Lee Vandervis

Cr Andrew Whiley

 

Senior Officer                                               Robert West, Acting General Manager City Services

 

Governance Support Officer                  Lauren McDonald

 

 

 

Lauren McDonald

Governance Support Officer

 

 

Telephone: 03 477 4000

lauren.mcdonald@dcc.govt.nz

www.dunedin.govt.nz

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: Reports and recommendations contained in this agenda are not to be considered as Council policy until adopted.

 


Planning and Environment Committee

4 August 2020

 

 

ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS                                                                                                                                         PAGE

 

1             Public Forum                                                                                                                                                              4

2             Apologies                                                                                                                                                                    4

3             Confirmation of Agenda                                                                                                                                        4

4             Declaration of Interest                                                                                                                                           5      

Part A Reports (Committee  has power to decide these matters)

5             Dunedin Heritage Trust Fund Activity Report 2019-2020                                                                       17

6             Planning and Environment Activity Report for the two Quarters Ending 30 June 2020              23

7             National Policy Statement on Urban Development                                                                                  41

8             Items for Consideration by the Chair

Any items for consideration by the Chair.             

 

 


Planning and Environment Committee

4 August 2020

 

 

1          Public Forum

At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.

2          Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

3          Confirmation of agenda

Note: Any additions must be approved by resolution with an explanation as to why they cannot be delayed until a future meeting.


Planning and Environment Committee

4 August 2020

 

Declaration of Interest

 

  

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.         Members are reminded of the need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

 

2.         Elected members are reminded to update their register of interests as soon as practicable, including amending the register at this meeting if necessary.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

That the Committee:

a)     Notes/Amends if necessary the Elected Members' Interest Register attached as Attachment A; and

b)     Confirms/Amends the proposed management plan for Elected Members' Interests.

 

 

Attachments

 

Title

Page

a

Register of Interest

7

  



Planning and Environment Committee

4 August 2020

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 

    



Planning and Environment Committee

4 August 2020

 

Part A Reports

 

Dunedin Heritage Trust Fund Activity Report 2019-2020

Department: Planning

 

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1          The report provides an update on the current progress of the Dunedin Heritage Fund (DHF), the results and actions from the recent fund review programme and a summary of the grants allocated in the 2019-2020 financial year. 

2          It notes that a total of approximately $935,000 was offered in heritage grants for the year, which helped leverage over $8.4 million in construction, adaptive re-use, heritage repair and restoration projects across the city.

RECOMMENDATIONS

That the Committee:

a)     Notes the Dunedin Heritage Fund Activity Report 2019-2020.

 

 

BACKGROUND

3          The Dunedin Heritage Fund is a partnership jointly administered by the DCC and Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga (HNZPT). Its purpose is to ‘encourage the retention, preservation and maintenance of certain historic places, buildings, trees, bush and other vegetation situated in Dunedin’.  From its establishment in 1993, the Fund has primarily focused on providing partial or incentive funding for repair, restoration and conservation (including earthquake strengthening) projects for historic buildings and other heritage places. 

4          Since 2011, the Fund operated alongside a number of heritage re-use incentive schemes managed solely by Council.  These have provided additional support and incentives for private and commercial owners, and other groups requiring assistance.  The DCC heritage grants scheme funding was amalgamated into the Heritage Fund in July 2018.  The Heritage Fund is fully funded by the DCC and supported with heritage advice from the DCC Heritage Adviser and advisors from HNZPT, with administrative support by DCC staff.

5          At present, Council provides an annual grant to the Fund of $670,000 and the Fund is fully or oversubscribed on an annual basis.  This positive subscription rate has been achieved largely through active DCC promotion and networking, information provided on the Council website and some local spread of knowledge between developers and building owners. 

6          An internal review of the Fund was completed in 2019, which identified two key areas to update:

·        The Fund Deed is being reviewed and will be updated to clarify aspects related to its constitution, charitable status and liabilities.  A recommended option is due for discussion by the Fund Committee mid-August 2020.

·        The strategic direction and goals are being updated to give greater clarity for applicants about the types of projects that will likely be funded and why, and to assist the Heritage Fund Committee to manage the Fund long-term. The types of grants offered by the Fund are being reviewed with the goal of aligning the range of grant types, including small, medium and larger grants, with the Fund’s new strategic plan.

DISCUSSION

7          The Heritage Fund allocated $934,375.50 to a diverse range of heritage projects across the 2019-2020 financial year. This represents an average grant funding level of 11% for heritage projects, leveraging a total of just over $8,482,034 (ex GST) in project value.  Grants were offered to the following heritage projects:

Address of Building/ Item

Name of Building

Fund amount

Project/Purpose of Grant

Round 4 June 2020

 

$

 

318 Moray Place

Commercial building

40,000

Replacement of existing windows and doors

34 George Street Port Chalmers

Milnes Building (former)

20,000

EQ strengthening and fire proofing

76 and 78 Bond Street

John Edmond Building

20,000

Repainting façade

91 St Andrew Street

Commercial building

35,000

Reinstatement of steel windows, repair and repaint exterior, EQ strengthening and upgrading fire systems

57-65 Moray Place

Shand House (Moray Terrace)

29,500

EQ strengthening and restoration of finials

619 George Street

Residential building

16,000

Building restoration and EQ strengthening

100-108 Princes Street

Hotel Central (former)

25,000

Fire, access and stair upgrade, replace roof and EQ strengthening

126 Stafford Street

Residential building

15,000

Repair roof

412-412A George Street

Former ‘Capers’

40,000

Masonry repairs and preservation of existing heritage features on the façade

23 The Octagon

The Athenaeum

70,000

Preparation of feasibility study

403-411 Princes Street

403-411 Princes Street

60,000

EQ strengthening

33 Thomas Burns Street

Loan & Mercantile building

80,000

Conservation & restoration of the south elevation

 

Round 3 Feb 2020

16 Haywood Street

3,500

Repair broken and rotting windows

349 George Street

Commercial building

50,000

Internal alterations, EQ strengthening, upgrade fire-rated walls and façade restoration

52 Tennyson Street

Hulme Court

5,000

Restoration of features

291 Stuart Street

King Edward Court

100,000

External restoration of south elevation windows

7 Aurora Terrace, Port Chalmers

Port Chalmers Time-Ball

25,000

Reinstatement of time-ball, commemorative plaque at base of flagstaff, historic information board

145 Camp Road, Pukehiki

Larnach Castle

8,250

Fire safety review

413 High Street

Residential building

3,500

Retrofit double glazing and repairs to front bay window

Round 2 Dec 2019

79 Every Street

Truby King Harris Hospital (former)

10,880

Repair and replace protected areas of apartments 4 and 5 and entrance hall

2 Castle Street

Dunedin Prison

100,000

Stage 2 restoration (roof)

31 Smith Street

St Dominic's Priory

69,850

Feasibility study stage 2

252 Cumberland Street

Commercial building

25,000

EQ strengthening and façade restoration

367 High Street

Threave

4,559.5

Inspection survey and repair and maintenance plan

Round 1 Aug 2019

71 Drivers Road

Church

8,000

Detailed seismic assessment report

36 Russell Road, Seacliff

Seacliff Lunatic Asylum site

6,000

Preliminary reports - full Conservation Plan, Condition Report, Priority Report and Archaeological Report

310 Princes Street

Wain's Hotel

14,336

Reinstatement of three (3) finials on the top of Princes Street façade

607 Highgate

Maori Hill Community Centre

6,000

Repairs to stained glass window

228 Stuart Street

The Cathedral Church of Saint Paul the Apostle

38,000

Replacement of skylights

613 George Street

Residential building

6,000

Repairs and renovation

 

8          The $934,375.50, which is greater than the annual Council grant to the Fund ($670,000), is due to $270,000 of legacy payments held from the heritage rates relief and rates freeze grant schemes. 

OPTIONS

9          Not applicable.

NEXT STEPS

10        The Heritage Fund’s first meeting of its four annual rounds for the 2020-2021 year will be held on 20 August 2020.  There will be three further application rounds, which close at the end of October 2020, January 2021 and April 2021 respectively.

 

Signatories

Author:

Andrea Farminer - Heritage Advisor

Authoriser:

Anna Johnson - City Development Manager

Nicola Pinfold - Group Manager Community and Planning

Robert West - Acting General Manager City Services

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

 


 

SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS

 

Fit with purpose of Local Government

This decision promotes the social well-being of communities in the present and for the future.

This decision promotes the economic well-being of communities in the present and for the future.

This decision promotes the cultural well-being of communities in the present and for the future.

Fit with strategic framework

 

Contributes

Detracts

Not applicable

Social Wellbeing Strategy

Economic Development Strategy

Environment Strategy

Arts and Culture Strategy

3 Waters Strategy

Spatial Plan

Integrated Transport Strategy

Parks and Recreation Strategy

Other strategic projects/policies/plans

 

This update report contributes to the Strategic Framework through supporting the Spatial Plan by helping to deliver Dunedin as a memorable city with a distinctive built and natural character.  Likewise, the work of the Fund helps Council to deliver elements of its social wellbeing, economic development and Arts & Culture strategies through encouraging, incentivising and providing support to heritage building and place owners to care for, sensitively adapt and understand their heritage places of all kinds.

Māori Impact Statement

There are no known impacts for tangata whenua.  Opportunities to support tangata whenua heritage projects are ongoing and welcome.

Sustainability

The re-use and restoration of heritage buildings contributes to the long-term sustainability of the Dunedin region in a positive and effective way.

LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy

There are no implications from this report.

Financial considerations

The grant allocations are within budget.

Significance

There are no decisions to be made from this update report.  The report is assessed as low significance in terms of Councils Significance Engagement Policy. 

Engagement – external

No external engagement is required for this update report. The fund is widely advertised however.

Engagement - internal

No internal engagement is required for this update report.

Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc.

There are no identified risks from this report.

Conflict of Interest

There is no known conflict of interest from this report.

Community Boards

There are no implications for Community Boards other than raising their awareness and availability of the Heritage Fund to their communities.

 

 


Planning and Environment Committee

4 August 2020

 

 

Planning and Environment Activity Report for the two Quarters Ending 30 June 2020

Department: Community and Planning and Customer and Regulatory Services

 

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1          This report updates the Committee on activities including city development, resource consents, building services, alcohol licensing, environmental health, animal control and parking enforcement for the six months ending 30 June 2020.

2          Satisfaction statistics and data reported in this report are for two quarters, being January to March 2020 and April to June 2020.

3          As requested following the last quarterly report, negative and neutral responses from the Residents’ Opinion Survey are reported along with positive responses.

4          Some highlights for the two quarters covered by this report include:

·        The hearings on Variation 1 of the Second Generation District Plan (2GP) (which deals with minor amendments) were held in June.

·        Variation 2 to the 2GP which deals with Housing Capacity, was initiated by Council on 12 February 2019.  Its focus is on changes required to address the shortfall in medium-term housing capacity that has been identified as a result of significant changes to Dunedin’s growth rate.

·        $645,500 allocated from Dunedin Heritage fund to support heritage related projects across the city.

·        A new phase of community engagement on South Dunedin Futures commenced in February and gained positive momentum with seven community meetings held before COVID-19 lockdown

·        Numbers of building and resource consents received and processed were impacted by COVID-19 lockdown. Processing continued throughout the lockdown at reduced levels. Building consent numbers have returned to pre-lockdown levels and are on track for a six-year high. Resource consent numbers have reduced noticeably and are hovering around the average for the last nine years.

 

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

That the Committee:

a)     Notes the Planning and Environment Activity Report for the six months ending 30 June 2020.

 

BACKGROUND

5          The Community and Planning group of activities work with other agencies to set the direction for managing Dunedin’s built and natural environment and is responsible for promoting the sustainable management of the natural and physical resources through its administration of the functions of the Council under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA).

6          Regulatory Services contributes directly to the Safe and Health City outcome which is a part of the Social Wellbeing Strategy and enhances personal safety in relation to building services, animal services, health licensing, the sale and supply of alcohol and parking enforcement.

DISCUSSION

7          The Residents’ Opinion Survey (ROS) is the principal mechanism by which the Council measures residents’ satisfaction with a wide range of its activities.

8          The ROS is conducted on a continuous monthly basis, aiming to obtain around 100 responses each month, resulting in a sample size of around 1,200 for the year. This gives a quarterly sample size of around 300 residents. A sample size of 300 has an expected margin of error (at the 95% confidence interval) of +/- 5.7%, whereas the annual result for 2018/19 had a margin of error of +/- 2.2% (at the 90% confidence level). Annual results for 2019/20 will be published later in the year.

9          The Residents’ Opinion Survey asks respondents to rate their satisfaction levels on a scale from 1-10 from very dissatisfied to very satisfied. Results are now provided in the quarterly reports for three categories; satisfied/very satisfied, neutral and dissatisfied/very dissatisfied.

10        The lower results reported for the last two time periods are due at least in part to changes in the way these measures are reported.

11        At the meeting in February the committee requested the percentages of respondents who were “dissatisfied” and “very dissatisfied” were reported, along with the neutral results, rather than just the “satisfied” and “very satisfied”. This report presents the three data sets for the past six quarters.

Satisfaction with Look and Feel of the City

12        A decrease of 4% in satisfaction with ‘Overall Look and Feel of the City’ was reported at 31 March 2020, followed by an increase of 7% reported at 30 June 2020. Overall a decrease in satisfaction of 4% was reported between the last two quarterly results for 2018/2019 and 2019/2020.

Satisfaction with Regulatory Services

13        An increase of 1% in satisfaction with ‘Regulatory Services’ was reported as at 31 March 2020, followed by an increase of 2% reported at 30 June 2020. Overall a decrease in satisfaction of 8% was reported between the last two quarterly results for 2018/19 and 2019/2020.


 

Value and Efficiency

Resource Consents

14        Resource consent processing in the periods ending 31 March and 30 June 2020 reflect the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown. The period ending 31 March was very busy with 233 applications being granted, while the period ending 30 April was quieter with 205 applications granted. The number of applications received between January and March was high at 265 compared to an average of 216 for the previous five years; it was also the second largest number for this period since 1998 when records started.

15        The graph below shows processing over the last five years.  The red line shows the number of applications granted each month. The lower number in April and May 2020 reflects the impact of COVID-19 lockdown. The January and December low points reflect the summer holiday periods; this fluctuation is normal. The blue line shows the percentage meeting the statutory deadline; it ranges from 89 to 100.

16        The periods ending 31 March and 30 June 2020 continued a busy trend for RMA complaints. The two quarters were 30% busier than the average for the equivalent time in 2012 to 2019. The monthly fluctuation was large, ranging from 8 to 36.

17        Other work undertaken by the Resource Consent team is LIMs, administration, subdivision certification, building consent planning checks, HAIL work and planning enquiries. More detailed information is provided each month as the City Planning Activity report on the Council’s website. This can be accessed via this link: http://www.dunedin.govt.nz/services/planning.


 

Building Services

18        For the first two months of 2020 the number of building consent applications received was at a six-year high. During the COVID-19 lockdown, numbers did drop although numbers have bounced back with several six-year highs for the month of June including the number of:

a)         Building consent applications received

b)        Building Inspections undertaken

c)         Building Incident/Compliance requests

19        As a result, the number of building consent applications for the first half of 2020 (1191) is down on the comparable period in 2019 (1349). The value of consents for the half year was comparable at $132.1M (2019 = $135.3M). The number of new dwelling applications for the six months was 142 (2019 = 154).

 

20        Processing times for Building Consent applications was impacted in May (90.7%) and this was due to staff inability to process paper-based consents in lockdown. For the half year 96.7% of the building consents have been processed within 20 working days. The average time to process the applications over the six-month period was 12 working days.

 

 

21        Paper-based Code Compliance Certificate requests were also unable to be processed during lockdown and this is reflected in May’s figures of 61%. Overall for the six months, the average was 91.8% processed within 20 working days. 

22        The four remaining general non-conformities identified by the external auditors (IANZ) in their September 2019 audit were cleared by the February 2020 deadline.

23        As with most areas the future short/medium term impact of COVID-19 is still unclear. During the lockdown, no paper building consent applications could be accepted which accounts for approximately 40% of the total applications received. 

24        Given the inability to process paper during lockdown, post lockdown all paper-based applications are now being manually scanned and turned into electronic applications which means they can be processed if lockdown levels change in the future.              

25        The messaging that staff have been receiving around the short-term implications for the Dunedin building industry is that builders remain busy and designers are indicating they still have months of work on their books. That said, a couple of jobs have been cancelled or put on hold. There is a watch in place for three to six months as there may be pressure on obtaining building supplies/materials.


 

Alcohol Licensing

26        In the reporting period there were 54 applications received for new and renewed licences. Of these seven were new licences (two of which were for premises that were previously unlicensed and the remainder for premises that have changed ownership).  Licence renewal applications continued to be processed during the COVID-19 lockdown period.

27        The full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on alcohol licensing will not be known for some time.  While there is still uncertainty in the hospitality sector because of the loss of the tourist market, a lot of the businesses are changing their business models to deal with their current markets. 

Environmental Health

‘A’ Graded Food Premises

28        The percentage of food premises with an ‘A’ Grade remains constant at 87% to 90% over the last 12 months and is very similar to last year. Overall food safety in Dunedin food premises is at a very high standard.

Noise

29        There was a small increase in the total number of noise complaints in February compared to the same period last year. However, complaint numbers dropped during the months of March to May compared to the same period in the two previous years, which can be attributed to the COVID-19 lockdown period and students leaving the city.

Animal Services

30        At the start of 2020 there was an increase in barking complaints, which could be attributed to the warmer weather with people being outside. However, there was a reduction in behavioural issues (attacks and aggressive complaints) which may be due to dog owners returning to work after the summer holidays, and dogs not being out as much. April saw a marked reduction in requests for services due to lockdown; however, the requests are now starting to return to pre-lockdown levels. 

Parking Services

31        Parking infringement numbers were similar in January/February and then reduced in March/April due to the COVID-19 lockdown. Infringement numbers over the last two months were also less than the previous year due to the free parking initiative. 

32        The increase in customer requests for parking enforcement, blocked vehicle entrances and leased carparks during February can be attributed to the return of students to the city. During May to June the number of requests for service have gradually increased as the city returns to normal activity.

Eco Design Advisor

33        The Eco Design Advisor (EDA) has been involved in several initiatives with Cosy Homes, which included:

a)         Education with Kainga Ora property managers. 

b)        Work on the Kia Haumaru programme aiming to help upgrade the homes of people with repeat hospitalisations that were likely caused by their homes.

34        The University Orientation week (Tent City) was attended by the EDA, and feedback indicated an increase in the number of student flats that now have double glazing, insulation and good heating installed.

35        HEAT kits (Home Energy Audit Kits) are a new initiative being launched in conjunction with Cosy Homes, EnviroSchools, Community Advisors and the library. Kits are available for the public to borrow to help them understand the performance of their house.

36        The increase in new customer service requests for the month of June (as indicated in the graph below) is attributed to the cold winter weather, with people noticing more condensation, as well as catching up on requests from the COVID-19 lockdown.

 


 

Major Initiatives

37        The following section is not confined to the quarter ending June 2020 and provides updates on the current status of the initiatives.

Second Generation Dunedin City District Plan (2GP)

Appeals

38        Mediation for the first group (priority group 1) of the 2GP appeals took place in August 2019. Many have been resolved and several consent memoranda have been lodged with the Environment Court. Some of these consent orders have been signed and some are waiting for other appeals to be resolved first.  When consent orders are signed by the Environment Court the change is then implemented into the 2GP.

39        Mediation of the next priority group will begin at the end of July.  The topics in the next mediation group include Industrial, Commercial, Reverse Sensitivity Definition (Strategic), Rural, Heritage, Residential, Campus, Network Utilities, Mining, Landscape and Coastal, Manawhenua Strategic and Biodiversity. This group is scheduled to be completed by mid-October 2020.

Variation 1

40        Variation 1 of the 2GP covers minor clarifications to the wording of provisions to ensure that they function as intended, substantive amendments to fix identified problems or gaps within a small number of provisions, and mapping amendments to make minor adjustments to zone or mapped area boundaries where boundaries are in the wrong place.

41        There were eight submissions in total, with 27 points in support and 14 points seeking amendment. The Variation 1 hearing took place on 5 June 2020.  The decisions on Variation 1 were notified on Saturday 18 July 2020. The appeal period closes on 28 August 2020.

Growth Planning and Variation 2

42        Variation 2 (housing capacity) was initiated by Council on 12 February 2019. Its focus is on adding medium-term housing capacity to address a shortfall that was identified as a result of significant changes to Dunedin’s growth rate. Initial work on a revised Future Development Strategy (update to the Spatial Plan) has also started. This project will re-look at housing needs for the long term (30 years), and will be formally initiated in 2021.

43        The National Policy Statement - Urban Growth Capacity (NPS-UDC) requires that the DCC considers all practicable options to enable necessary housing capacity. This could include applying residential zoning to new areas (greenfield development), amending rules or other provisions to increase the density of housing enabled in residential zones, or using statutory tools and methods available under other legislation.

44        The project is being led by City Development, but involves close collaboration with infrastructure teams, particularly 3 Waters, to ensure all options are assessed in terms of impacts on the 3 Waters infrastructure network and identification of any necessary priority infrastructure upgrade projects in the 10-year plan. All options are also being evaluated in terms of potential impacts on the transportation network.

45        The project also involves:

•          An update to population projections, which will inform assessments of housing demand as well as being incorporated into the key assumptions for the next 10-year plan. These are currently being reviewed in light of the potential impact of COVID-19.

•          Research on housing preferences. This has been completed and shows a stronger demand for attached housing types (such as duplexes, townhouses, and apartments) than previous surveys. This will inform work on Variation 2.

•          A community questionnaire about future housing, which has been completed.

•          On-going discussions with key stakeholders including developers, surveyors, Housing New Zealand, ORC, Aukaha, Ministry of Education and Utility companies.

•          Ongoing monitoring as required by the NPS-UDC (see below).

Urban Development Monitoring

46        City Development has developed two new webpages to provide information on what’s happening with the housing market in Dunedin. These contain interactive graphs on consented homes (by type and location), constructed homes, population estimates/projections, housing purchase/rental costs, and other related indicators.

47        These webpages will be updated as regularly as the underlying data permits, from monthly for total consent/construction numbers to annually for population estimates. The underlying data is also available to download on the webpages.

48        The webpages were developed to meet DCC’s requirements under the National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity, which include monitoring a range of indicators and using these to understand how well housing markets are functioning, how planning may affect this, and when additional development capacity might be needed. The DCC was previously giving effect to these requirements through the release of quarterly monitoring reports in a PDF format.

49        The new webpages are available at https://www.dunedin.govt.nz/council/district-plan/monitoring-and-research.

Dunedin Heritage Trust Fund

50        The Dunedin Heritage Trust Fund committee has met for two funding rounds in the six months to 30 June allocating $645,750 in heritage grants across the city. $195,250 was allocated in Round 3 and $450,500 in Round 4. The range of heritage related projects supported across the city is outlined in the concurrent report on the Dunedin Heritage Trust Fund.

Heritage

51        Work on the Annual Dunedin Heritage Awards was completed in mid-March, but the Awards ceremony was postponed until further notice due to the COVID-19 response.  The Awards have now been rescheduled for Tuesday 25 August at Toitū Otago Settlers Museum.

52        Work on the District Plan Heritage Schedule data collation project is now 75% complete. Staff anticipate its completion at the end of 2020. The Heritage Schedule information will be available for staff and public access when complete. It is designed to widen the present heritage information available to owners, developers and researchers to enhance understanding and knowledge of Dunedin’s key heritage places.

Biodiversity

53        A high-resolution Vegetation Map for Dunedin City project has been completed. This map provides detailed baseline information on the city’s indigenous biodiversity extent and range of ecosystems. It will be used for a variety of cross-department biodiversity and environmental programmes, including climate change mitigation and likely implementation of the proposed National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity. A version of the map will be made available to the public later in 2020.

54        The DCC made a submission for Council on the Draft National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity and has been involved in ‘road testing’ the policies to assess the potential impact for Council and the community and provided a ‘road testing’ report to Ministry of Environment (MfE).

55        The April 2020 round of the Biodiversity Fund was completed during the COVID-19 lockdown. The fund continues to receive increasing numbers of applicants, including first-time applicants. The April 2020 round has 16 applicants and supported a range of projects totalling $54,850. Projects included native forest, sand dune and wetland restoration, and plant and animal pest control.

Te Ao Tūroa

56        The third year of Te Ao Tūroa Grants saw a total of $53,100 awarded to five community groups achieving support for their projects around climate change adaptation, the creation of backyard ecosanctuaries, practice of Mātauraka Māori in habitat restoration, community composting and marine education. The grant total includes reallocated underspend due to the COVID-19 disruptions and a grant repayment from a previous recipient.

57        A native planting guide and webmap to help plan small scale native planting projects were launched over lockdown. The planting guide booklet has overall information about native planting while the webmap can be used to find out more specific information about plant species suitable for a certain location/area.

58        The first trial of a Te Ao Tūroa summer studentship is underway, developing a guide for sustainable flatting and establishing a sustainability hub for students at the University of Otago and Otago Polytechnic, respectively.

59        The Environment Envoy project, in partnership with Dunedin Dream Brokerage, has been taken forward for a third year, with a call out for creative projects that encourage the Dunedin community to see their local environment reimagined through innovative and participatory use of vacant space. The announcement of a successful project has been on hold due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

60        The first community hui for Te Ao Tūroa scheduled on 28 March has been postponed to a later date. The hui is to showcase what has happened in the city since Te Ao Tūroa has been in place, to engage with the community and to identify and develop partnerships and collaboration.


 

South Dunedin Future (SDF) Project

61        A new phase of SDF community engagement began in February and gained positive momentum before COVID-19 lockdown. Seven community meetings were held before the lockdown restrictions, and initial feedback was positive. Another 31 groups were also lined up or keen to meet prior to COVID-19 lockdown.

62        Since the COVID-19 lockdown, groups have been contacted to reinstate meetings as soon as they are ready. Engagement for the St Clair-St Kilda Coastal Plan has also re-started, with the introduction of an online interactive ideas wall where suggestions can be shared with other people in the community within a safe environment. The online survey is still available to give feedback with paper versions being sent to residential homes located near the coast.

63        The first in a series of monthly SDF ‘drop in’ sessions began at the South Dunedin Community Hub on 20 February. The drop-in session focused on the geology of South Dunedin and was led by ORC Natural Hazards Analyst Dr Sharon Hornblow, with support from DCC staff. The session attracted about 20 people and provided a good opportunity for those people to engage directly with staff. Monthly sessions at the Hub will restart in August.

64        Progress has been made on creating a database of technical reports and data, as well as protocols around what goes into the database and how it will be used. The establishment of a Technical Advisory Group is also underway.

Covenant of Mayors

65        An update report on DCC’s Climate Change Work Programme was provided to Council on 25 May 2020. The report noted next steps around the work programme, which include commissioning an update to the emissions inventory of the city, which is a key commitment of the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy. Further details are noted in the update report.

66        The Climate 2030 Rapid Review is underway. It involves assessing current and future DCC activity to identify activities that could add to or reduce emissions, as well as build climate resilience.

Tertiary Precinct Planning and Co-ordination

67        As reported in February, the Council’s partnership with the tertiary stakeholders University of Otago and Otago Polytechnic is being refreshed.

68        Due to the COVID-19 lockdown the proposed refresh of the Tertiary Precinct Planning Group (the operational group established some twelve years ago to ensure co-ordination of planning activities across the tertiary quarter) did not take place. It is proposed that the group shift its focus away from formal workstreams, towards providing an integrated forum to collaboratively address issues within the tertiary quarter and respond to emerging priorities.

69        The Steering Group (the overarching governance group) met in June to discuss how the tertiary organisations fared during lockdown and the anticipated impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the tertiary sector and the city.  They discussed measures to support recovery including a hardship fund for students and scheduling in extra graduations to bring visitors to the city. 


 

Capital Projects

Waterfront Revitalisation

70        As reported in February, work in the early part of the year focussed on negotiating with the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) and the Waterfront partners, the terms and conditions associated with the Provisional Growth Fund (PGF) funding and confirming the approach for the procurement of the design, construction and project management of Stage 1a.

71        Council reviewed its position on the Waterfront Revitalisation project on 25 May in light of the economic impacts of the COVID-19 lockdown. Council resolved to withdraw from the PGF process and to put the project on hold until economic conditions improved. The offered $20M funding towards Stage 1a would not be taken up.  In order to ensure that the City was well positioned to undertake the project at the point when the economy improved. Council also resolved that staff continue, as far as practicable and subject to not incurring unnecessary cost, with some of the underpinning work on consenting and design processes.

72        A strategic level hui was convened with senior representatives of mana whenua, Ngāi Tahu Property and Aukaha (the consultancy arm of Otago papatipu rūnaka) to discuss working in partnership on the Waterfront and other strategic projects, as well as partnering to undertake masterplanning across the wider area and linking back to the central city.  This masterplanning work and work on ensuring the cultural values of mana whenua are integral to our major projects and will continue despite the Waterfront revitalisation project being on hold.

Urban Design

73        The work programme for this period has included designing schemes for Tunnel Beach, Te Raoune Reserve, Schools Speed projects, the Octagon Experience, playground strategy development, and the Sutton Bridge.  The DCC has been working alongside Aukaha and mana whenua in the development of guidance documents to inform future development in the city.

74        Major projects still ongoing are the Central City Plan: George Street Project, Tertiary Streets, North East Valley Cycleway project, South Dunedin Community Library, Peninsula Connection, and Dunedin Waterfront projects. This work has included stakeholder and community engagement, preliminary design and urban design advice.

OPTIONS

75        As this is an update report, there are no options.

NEXT STEPS

52        Key areas of focus for the next quarter include:

·    Progressing the appeals on the 2GP and progressing Variation 2 on growth for housing.

·    Renewed stakeholder engagement on George Street with a refreshed Central City Advisory Group.

·    Holding the annual heritage awards, rescheduled for August.

·    A community hui on Te Ao Tūroa (rescheduled due to COVID-19 lockdown).

·    Progressing the carbon 2030 Rapid Review of DCC activities.

·    Reactivating community engagement on South Dunedin Future post COVID-19 lockdown.

 

Signatories

Author:

Nicola Pinfold - Group Manager Community and Planning

Adrian Blair - Group Manager Customer and Regulatory Services

Authoriser:

Robert West - Acting General Manager City Services

Simon Pickford - General Manager Community Services

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS

 

Fit with purpose of Local Government

This report relates to providing a public service and it is considered good-quality and cost-effective.

Fit with strategic framework

 

Contributes

Detracts

Not applicable

Social Wellbeing Strategy

Economic Development Strategy

Environment Strategy

Arts and Culture Strategy

3 Waters Strategy

Spatial Plan

Integrated Transport Strategy

Parks and Recreation Strategy

Other strategic projects/policies/plans

 

The Planning and Environment portfolio of activities support the outcomes of a number of strategies.

Māori Impact Statement

As noted in the report the DCC Kaiwhakamāherehere was appointed in February 2020 and assumed the strategic lead on the development of the Mana Whakahono ā Rohe/Iwi Partnership Agreement, previously initiated by Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu on 11 July 2019.

Sustainability

This is an update report, there are no specific implications for sustainability.

LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy

This is an update report, there are no implications for the LTP, although some measures are level of service performance measures that are annually reported as part of the LTP.

Financial considerations

The updates reported are within existing operating and capital budgets.

Significance

This report is assessed as being of low significance under the Significance and Engagement Policy.

Engagement – external

This is an update report, no external engagement has been undertaken.

Engagement - internal

This is an update report, no internal engagement has been undertaken. Input to the major initiatives and project updates has been provided by teams within Regulatory Services and Community and Planning Groups.

Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc.

There are no identified risks.

Conflict of Interest

There are no known conflicts of interest.

Community Boards

There are no specific implications for Community Boards, although aspects of the report may be of interest to them.

 

 


Planning and Environment Committee

4 August 2020

 

 

National Policy Statement on Urban Development

Department: City Development

 

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1          This report is to update councillors on the recently gazetted National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 (NPS-UD).

2          National Policy Statements are developed by central government to provide direction on resource management issues of national significance. Local authorities are required to amend their Resource Management Act plans (e.g. the Second Generation District Plan) to give effect to the objectives and policies in an NPS. The NPS-UD is part of the government’s ‘urban growth agenda’ programme and aims to reduce regulatory barriers to land and development markets.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

That the Committee:

a)     Notes the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 dated July 2020.

b)     Notes the next steps and timeframes for meeting requirements under the National Policy Statement on Urban Development (NPS-UD).

 

 

 

Background

3          The NPD-UD was gazetted on 23 July 2020. It will take effect on 20 August 2020 and replaces the National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity 2016 (NPS-UDC).

4          The NPS-UD contains objectives and policies in eight key areas:

Section

Note

Providing development capacity

Similar to existing requirements under the NPS-UDC.

Responsive planning

Local authorities must ‘have particular regard to’ the additional development capacity in proposed plan changes that meet certain conditions.

Evidence-based decision-making

Similar to existing requirements under the NPS-UDC.

Future Development Strategies

New requirement for DCC, discussed further below.

Housing and Business Development Capacity Assessments

Similar to existing requirements under the NPS-UDC.

Intensification in tier 1 urban environments

Not applicable to Dunedin.

Development outcomes for zones

The objectives for each zone must include a description of the development outcomes intended for the zone. Zone policies and rules need to be consistent with these descriptions.

Car parking

New requirement for DCC, discussed further below.

5          The NPS-UD has a wider scope than the NPS-UDC and includes provisions on providing for good urban form and function. There is also a greater requirement to recognise that the planned urban built environment may involve significant changes to an area and that this may detract from amenity values appreciated by some people (while improving the amenity values appreciated by others).

6          The NPS-UD also includes provisions relating to considering effects of climate change, supporting reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, and engaging with hapū and iwi.

Discussion

7          The NPS-UD categorises urban environments as Tier 1, 2, or 3 based on their size and growth rate. This addresses the DCC submission about the previously proposed categories of ‘major urban centres’ (which did not include Dunedin) and all other urban centres, which were problematic.

8          Dunedin is defined by the NPS-UD as a Tier 2 urban environment. As a Tier 2 urban environment, not all requirements apply to Dunedin. For example, Tier 1 areas have requirements to adopt specific building height and density standards in certain locations, which do not apply to Tier 2 areas.

9          All territorial authorities, including DCC, are required to remove minimum carparking requirements from their District Plans without going through a plan change process. Councils are strongly encouraged to manage effects associated with the supply and demand of car parking through comprehensive parking management plans.

10        Under the NPS-UD, Dunedin is required to develop a Future Development Strategy (FDS). The purpose of an FDS is to promote long-term strategic planning by setting out how Council intends to achieve well-functioning urban environments and provide sufficient development capacity over the next 30 years.

11        The FDS must spatially identify the broad locations in which development capacity will be provided over the long term and the infrastructure required to service that capacity. The NPS-UD requires councils to develop an implementation plan for their FDS and to update the implementation plan annually. The FDS will update or replace the current Dunedin City Spatial Plan.

12        The City Development team has already started this process by recently updating the housing capacity assessment, growth projections, undertaking a housing preferences study, running a housing choices community engagement process and undertaking background work to evaluate options to increase housing capacity. However, for this year the focus of the growth programme has been to use this background work to identify ‘quick wins’ to address the shortfall in medium growth capacity. These ‘quick wins’ will be included in a variation to the District Plan (2GP). Additional housing capacity may also be added through mediated agreements on 2GP appeals. This programme of work was discussed in a report to Council on 24 February 2020.

Options

13        As this is an update report, there are no options.

Next steps

14        The following deadlines apply to implementing the NPS-UD:

·    Housing capacity assessment                     July 2021

·    Removal of carparking standards              February 2022

·    Intensification policies                                   August 2022

·    Future Development Strategy                    In time to inform the 2024 long-term plan

·    Business land capacity assessment           In time to inform the 2024 long-term plan

15        The implementation of the NPS-UD is a joint responsibility between DCC and Otago Regional Council. Initial discussions with Otago Regional Council have started on how to coordinate an approach, but further consideration will be needed around developing the Future Development Strategy.

16        Work will continue with all relevant DCC departments to assess how to collectively give effect to the NPS-UD requirements.

 

 

Signatories

Author:

Nathan Stocker - Policy Planner (Urban Development Capacity)

Anna Johnson - City Development Manager

Authoriser:

Nicola Pinfold - Group Manager Community and Planning

Robert West - Acting General Manager City Services

Attachments

 

Title

Page

a

National Policy Statement on Urban Development

46

 

SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS

 

Fit with purpose of Local Government

To meet the current and future needs of communities for good quality local infrastructure.

Fit with strategic framework

 

Contributes

Detracts

Not applicable

Social Wellbeing Strategy

Economic Development Strategy

Environment Strategy

Arts and Culture Strategy

3 Waters Strategy

Spatial Plan

Integrated Transport Strategy

Parks and Recreation Strategy

Other strategic projects/policies/plans

The removal of minimum carparking standards may impact on the outcomes identified by the Spatial Plan and Integrated Transport Strategy. The development of a Future Development Strategy will contribute to integrated decision-making, particularly between land-use and infrastructure planning.

Māori Impact Statement

The NPS-UD will involve additional opportunity for iwi to be involved in strategic planning processes.

Sustainability

Sustainable development is a key objective of Council’s Spatial Plan. The long-term implications of the NPS-UD for sustainability are unknown.

LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy

The removal of minimum carpark requirements may impact on the levels of service for on-street carparking if it results in increased pressure.

Financial considerations

There are no specific financial implications.

Significance

As this report is for noting, the significance in terms of Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy is assessed as low.

Engagement – external

Dunedin City Council was involved with earlier engagement with the Ministry for the Environment and the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development.

Engagement - internal

There has been no internal engagement on this report. Staff from 3 Waters, Transport, and Policy are involved in growth-related work.

Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc.

There are no identified risks.

Conflict of Interest

There are no known conflicts of interest.

Community Boards

There are no specific implications for Community Boards.

 

 


Planning and Environment Committee

4 August 2020

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator