Notice of Meeting:
I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee will be held on:
Date: Tuesday 16 February 2021
Time: 1:30pm (or at the conclusion of the Community and Culture Committee)
Venue: Edinburgh Room, Municipal Chambers, The Octagon, Dunedin
Sandy Graham
Chief Executive Officer
Planning and Environment Committee
PUBLIC AGENDA
MEMBERSHIP
Chairperson |
CrDavid Benson-Pope |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Cr Sophie Barker |
Cr Steve Walker
|
Members |
Cr Rachel Elder |
Cr Christine Garey |
|
Cr Doug Hall |
Mayor Aaron Hawkins |
|
Cr Carmen Houlahan |
Cr Marie Laufiso |
|
Cr Mike Lord |
Cr Jim O'Malley |
|
Cr Jules Radich |
Cr Chris Staynes |
|
Cr Lee Vandervis |
Cr Andrew Whiley |
Senior Officer Robert West, Acting General Manager City Services
Governance Support Officer Lauren McDonald
Lauren McDonald
Governance Support Officer
Telephone: 03 477 4000
Lauren.mcdonald@dcc.govt.nz
Note: Reports and recommendations contained in this agenda are not to be considered as Council policy until adopted.
Planning and Environment Committee 16 February 2021 |
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Public Forum 4
2 Apologies 4
3 Confirmation of Agenda 4
4 Declaration of Interest 5
5 Confirmation of Minutes 17
5.1 Planning and Environment Committee meeting - 17 November 2020 17
Part A Reports (Committee has power to decide these matters)
6 Planning and Environment Committee Forward Work Programme 24
7 Actions from resolutions of Planning and Environment Committee meetings 31
8 Planning and Environment Activity Report for the Quarter Ending 31 December 2020 35
9 Items for Consideration by the Chair 48
Planning and Environment Committee 16 February 2021 |
At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
Note: Any additions must be approved by resolution with an explanation as to why they cannot be delayed until a future meeting.
|
Planning and Environment Committee 16 February 2021 |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. Members are reminded of the need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.
2. Elected members are reminded to update their register of interests as soon as practicable, including amending the register at this meeting if necessary.
That the Committee: a) Notes/Amends if necessary the Elected Members' Interest Register attached as Attachment A; and b) Confirms/Amends the proposed management plan for Elected Members' Interests. |
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Register of Interests as at 11 February 2021 |
7 |
|
Planning and Environment Committee 16 February 2021 |
Planning and Environment Committee meeting - 17 November 2020
That the Committee: Confirms the public part of the minutes of the Planning and Environment Committee meeting held on 17 November 2020 as a correct record.
|
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
A⇩ |
Minutes of Planning and Environment Committee meeting held on 17 November 2020 |
18 |
|
Planning and Environment Committee 16 February 2021 |
Planning and Environment Committee
MINUTES
Minutes of an ordinary meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee held in the Edinburgh Room, Municipal Chambers, The Octagon, Dunedin on Tuesday 17 November 2020, commencing at 1:45pm.
PRESENT
Acting Chairperson |
Cr Steve Walker |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Cr Sophie Barker |
|
Members |
Cr Rachel Elder |
Cr Christine Garey |
|
Mayor Aaron Hawkins |
Cr Carmen Houlahan |
|
Cr Marie Laufiso |
Cr Mike Lord |
|
Cr Jim O'Malley |
Cr Jules Radich |
|
Cr Chris Staynes |
Cr Lee Vandervis |
|
Cr Andrew Whiley |
|
IN ATTENDANCE |
Robert West (General Manager City Services); Simon Drew (General Manager Infrastructure Services); Nicola Pinfold (Group Manager Community and Planning); Paul Henderson (Acting Group Manager Customer and Regulatory Services); Ros MacGill (Manager Compliance Solutions); Scott MacLean (Acting Group Manager Parks and Recreation); Ashley Reid (Parks and Recreation Planner); Tom Simons-Smith (Coastal Specialist); Jeanine Benson (Group Manager Transport); Anna Johnson (City Development Manager) |
Governance Support Officer Lauren McDonald
1 Public Forum
1.1 Public Forum
|
Mary O’Brien from CCS Disability Action and Chris Ford from the Disabled Persons Assembly advised their support for the one-way shared street option, which they considered provided the maximum flexibility, increased safety for those with disabilities, fitted with the central government transport policy statement and the Waka Kotahi Pedestrian Planning Guide currently under development. Their preference was for an electric bus loop to operate in one direction and they saw George Street as a destination for the public and not as a transport thoroughfare. Moved (Mayor Hawkins/Cr Garey) That the Committee: Extends the Public Forum beyond 30 minutes. Motion carried. Finn Campbell from Generation Zero spoke in support of the one-way design option, as it increased the scope of the project along to the Octagon, supported vulnerable users and provided people friendly useable spaces. He considered the street design focus should be “people first” and for elected members to the ensure designs supported carbon reduction. Cr Carmen Houlahan left the meeting at 2:38 p.m. and returned at 2:41 p.m. Michaela Waite-Harvey, University of Otago Students Association (OUSA) President advised that the OUSA focus was on student safety and supported a one-way design which was future proofed and provided environmentally friendly modernising of the streets. She advised that the OUSA considered wider community consultation was required on the interest and necessity of an electric bus loop service Cr Rachel Elder left the meeting at 2:55 p.m. and returned to the meeting at 2:58 p.m. |
Moved (Cr Steve Walker/Mayor Aaron Hawkins): That the Committee:
Adjourn the meeting for five minutes
Motion carried
|
The meeting adjourned at 2:58 p.m. and recommenced at 3:05 p.m. Cr Houlahan was absent from the room. |
2 Apologies |
Apologies were received from Cr Hall for absence and Cr Benson-Pope for lateness.
|
Moved (Cr Steve Walker/Cr Chris Staynes): That the Committee:
Accepts the apologies from Cr David Benson-Pope for lateness and Cr Doug Hall for absence.
Motion carried (PLA/2020/028) |
3 Confirmation of agenda |
|
|
Moved (Cr Steve Walker/Cr Chris Staynes): That the Committee:
Confirms the agenda with the following alteration to page 69, paragraph 21 revised criteria list of Item 11 – Review of George Street Upgrade Project as circulated to members.
Motion carried (PLA/2020/029) |
4 Declarations of interest
Members were reminded of the need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arose between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.
The Committee noted the update to Mayor Hawkins Register of Interest provided at the Infrastructure Services Committee meeting held 16 November 2020.
|
Moved (Cr Steve Walker/Cr Marie Laufiso): That the Committee:
a) Notes the Elected Members' Interest Register and b) Confirms the proposed management plan for Elected Members' Interests. Motion carried (PLA/2020/030) |
5 Confirmation of Minutes
5.1 Planning and Environment Committee meeting - 22 September 2020 |
|
|
Moved (Cr Steve Walker/Mayor Aaron Hawkins): That the Committee:
Confirms the public part of the minutes of the Planning and Environment Committee meeting held on 22 September 2020 as a correct record. Motion carried (PLA/2020/031) |
Part A Reports
6 Actions from resolutions of Planning and Environment Committee meetings |
|
|
The actions report outlined progress on the implementing of resolutions of the Planning and Environment Committee meetings from the start of the 2019 – 2022 triennium. |
|
Moved (Cr Steve Walker/Cr Marie Laufiso): That the Committee:
Notes the Open and Completed Actions from resolutions of Planning and Environment Committee meetings as at 17 November 2020. Motion carried (PLA/2020/032) |
7 Planning and Environment Committee Forward Work Programme |
|
|
The report from Civic provided a regular update of the Planning and Environment Committee forward work programme for the 2020-2021 to show areas of activity, progress and expected timeframes for decision making across a range of areas of work. |
|
Cr Houlahan returned to the meeting at 3:07pm.
|
|
Moved (Cr Rachel Elder/Cr Marie Laufiso): That the Committee:
a) Notes the Planning and Environment Committee forward work programme as at November 2020. Motion carried (PLA/2020/033) |
8 Planning and Environment Activity Report for the Quarter Ending 30 September 2020 |
|
|
The Community and Planning and Customer and Regulatory Services report provided an update on activities including city development, resource consents, building services, alcohol licensing, environmental health, animal control and parking enforcement for the three months ending 30 September 2020. |
|
The Group Manager Community and Planning, Nicola Pinfold; Acting Group Manager Customer and Regulatory Services, Paul Henderson and Manager Compliance Solutions, Ros MacGill spoke to the report and responded to questions from elected members.
|
|
Moved (Cr Steve Walker/Cr Christine Garey): That the Committee:
Notes the Planning and Environment Activity Report for the three months ending 30 September 2020. Motion carried (PLA/2020/034) |
9 Workplan for Reserve Management Plan reviews 2019-2027 |
|
|
The Parks and Recreation report outlined the forward work programme for the review of all reserve management plans administrated by the Parks and Recreation Services. |
|
The Acting Group Manager Parks and Recreation, Scott MacLean and the Parks and Recreation Planner, Ashley Reid spoke to the report and responded to questions from elected members.
|
|
Moved (Cr Steve Walker/Cr Marie Laufiso): That the Committee: Notes the reserve management plan review forward workplan. Motion carried (PLA/2020/035) |
10 St Clair - St Kilda Coastal Plan mid-engagement update |
|
|
The 3 Waters report provided an update on the St Clair – St Kilda Coastal Plan project and highlighted emerging themes from community feedback and coastal management plan implications ahead of the draft St Clair – St Kilda Coastal Plan being delivered to Council in the first quarter of 2021.
|
|
The General Manager Infrastructure Services, Simon Drew and Coastal Specialist, Tom Simons-Smith spoke to the report and responded to questions from elected members.
Cr Carmen Houlahan left the meeting at 3:41 p.m. and returned to the meeting at 3:43 p.m.
Cr Benson-Pope entered the meeting at 3:50 p.m.
|
|
Moved (Cr Lee Vandervis/Cr Marie Laufiso): That the Committee:
Notes the St Clair – St Kilda Coastal Plan mid-engagement update. Motion carried (PLA/2020/036) |
|
|
|
Moved (Cr Walker/Mayor Aaron Hawkins): That the Committee:
Adjourn the meeting for 10 minutes.
Motion carried
|
|
The meeting adjourned at 3:55pm and recommenced at 4:03pm. Cr Lee Vandervis was absent from the room. |
11 Review of George Street Upgrade Project |
|
|
The Community and Planning and Transport report outlined the independent review of the preliminary design and community engagement for the George Street upgrade project (completed by Kobus Mentz of Urbanismplus). The General Manager Infrastructure Services, Simon Drew; Group Manager Community and Planning, Nicola Pinfold and the City Development Manager, Anna Johnson spoke to the report and responded to questions from elected members. |
|
Cr Lee Vandervis returned to the meeting at 4:08 p.m.
|
|
Moved (Mayor Aaron Hawkins/Cr Steve Walker): That the Committee:
a) Notes the the findings of the independent review by Kobus Mentz of the Dunedin Retail Precinct (George Street upgrade) project. c) Revokes the Planning and Environment Committee resolution (PLA/2019/025) from 11 June 2019 which endorsed the preliminary design for the George Street – Central City Plan project. Motion carried (PLA/2020/037) |
|
|
|
Moved (Mayor Aaron Hawkins/Cr Steve Walker): That the Committee: b) Approves proceeding to detailed business case and developed design with a one–way design with flexibility to go to two-way shared street design for the Dunedin Retail Precinct George Street upgrade. The Committee voted by division:
For: Crs Sophie Barker, Christine Garey, Marie Laufiso, Mike Lord, Jim O'Malley, Chris Staynes, Steve Walker, David Benson-Pope and Mayor Aaron Hawkins (9). Against: Crs Rachel Elder, Carmen Houlahan, Lee Vandervis, Jules Radich and Andrew Whiley (5). Abstained: Nil
Motion carried (PLA/2020/038) by 9 votes to 5 |
12 Items for Consideration by the Chair |
|
|
A request was made for City Services staff to review the compliance rules in regard to size of signage on shop frontages, canopies and verandas and to provide report back on the enforcement process and any enforcement action that has been taken, with particular focus on the George Street and Princes Street retail areas.
|
The meeting was declared closed at 6:10 p.m.
..............................................
C H A I R P E R S O N
|
Planning and Environment Committee 16 February 2021 |
Planning and Environment Committee Forward Work Programme
Department: Civic
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 The purpose of this report is to provide a regular update of the Planning and Environment Committee forward work programme for the 2020-2021 to show areas of activity, progress and expected timeframes for decision making across a range of areas of work. (Attachment A).
2 As this is an administrative report only, there are no options or Summary of Considerations.
That the Committee: a) Notes the Planning and Environment Committee forward work programme as at 10 February 2021. |
NEXT STEPS
3 An updated report will be provided for the next meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee.
Signatories
Author: |
Lauren McDonald - Governance Support Officer |
Authoriser: |
Clare Sullivan - Team Leader Civic |
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Forward Work Programme - February 2021 |
25 |
Planning and Environment Committee 16 February 2021 |
Actions from resolutions of Planning and Environment Committee meetings
Department: Civic
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 The purpose of this report is to detail the open and completed actions from resolutions of Planning and Environment Committee meetings from the start of the triennium in October 2019 (Attachment A and B).
2 As this report is an administrative report only, there are no options or Summary of Considerations.
That the Committee: a) Notes the Open and Completed Actions from resolutions of Planning and Environment Committee meetings to 1 February 2021. |
discussion
3 This report will be provided an update on resolutions that have been actions and completed since the last Planning and Environment Committee meeting.
NEXT STEPS
4 An updated actions report will be provided at all Planning and Environment Committee meetings.
Signatories
Author: |
Lauren McDonald - Governance Support Officer |
Authoriser: |
Clare Sullivan - Team Leader Civic |
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
P&E Open Public Actions |
32 |
⇩b |
P&E Public Actions completed - February 2021 |
34 |
Planning and Environment Committee 16 February 2021 |
Planning and Environment Activity Report for the Quarter Ending 31 December 2020
Department: Community and Planning and Customer and Regulatory Services
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report updates the Committee on activities including city development, resource consents, building services, alcohol licensing, environmental health, animal control and parking enforcement for the three months ending 31 December 2020.
2 Some highlights for the quarter covered by this report include:
· Continued high volume of building consent applications being received.
· Continued lift in resource consent numbers post lockdown.
· Completion of the Zero Carbon 2030 rapid review, and findings fed into the 10 Year Plan 2021/31 development.
· Environment Court mediation on Group two appeals representing almost half the appeal points on the Second Generation Dunedin City District Plan (2GP) have been resolved (agreement reached, or appeal withdrawn).
That the Committee: a) Notes the Planning and Environment Activity Report for the quarter ending 31 December 2020. |
BACKGROUND
Activities
3 The Community and Planning group of activities work with other agencies to set the direction for managing Dunedin’s built and natural environment and is responsible for promoting the sustainable management of the natural and physical resources through its administration of the functions of the Council under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA).
4 Regulatory Services contributes directly to the Safe and Healthy City outcome, which is part of the Social Wellbeing Strategy, and enhances personal safety in relation to building services, animal services, health licensing, the sale and supply of alcohol and parking enforcement.
Residents’ Opinion Survey
5 The Residents’ Opinion Survey (ROS) is the principal mechanism by which the Council measures residents’ satisfaction with a wide range of its activities.
6 The ROS is conducted on a continuous monthly basis, aiming to obtain around 100 responses each month, resulting in a sample size of around 1,200 for the year. This gives a quarterly sample size of around 300 residents. A sample size of 300 has an expected margin of error (at the 95% confidence interval) of ± 5.7%, whereas the annual result for 2018/19 had a margin of error of ± 2.2% (at the 90% confidence level).
7 The ROS asks respondents to rate their satisfaction levels on a scale from 1-10 from very dissatisfied to very satisfied. Results are now provided in the quarterly reports for three categories; satisfied/very satisfied, neutral and dissatisfied/very dissatisfied.
8 The lower results reported for the last two time periods are due at least in part to changes in the way these measures are reported.
9 The ROS was temporarily suspended during the July to September 2020 quarter due to an operational issue. The ROS resumed in October 2020, with data sampling increased for the October and December quarter to obtain appropriate sample numbers for the July to December 2020 period. These results are reported in this quarter, and data sampling resumed as normal from January 2021 onwards.
DISCUSSION
Value and Efficiency
10 Satisfaction with ‘Overall Look and Feel of the City has decreased by 12% from the same period last year. Dissatisfaction has also increased by 50% compared to the same period last year.
11 Satisfaction with ‘Regulatory Services’ (excluding Building Services) has decreased by 7% from the same period last year. Dissatisfaction with ‘Regulatory Services’ is consistent with the same period last year.
Resource Consents
12 Resource consent processing in the period ending 31 December 2020 reflects a continued upswing since the COVID-19 lockdown. At the start of July applications were 11% down on 2019 but ended 2020 1% up on the total for 2019. In the quarter ended 31 December 2020, 276 applications (five year quarterly average is 247) were processed and 99% met the statutory timeframe.
13 The following graph shows processing over the last five years. The red line shows the number of applications granted each month. The January and December low points reflect the summer holiday periods. This fluctuation is normal. The blue line shows the percentage meeting the statutory deadline. It ranges from 89% to 100%.
14 The quarter ending 31 December 2020 continued a busy period for RMA complaints. The total for 2020 ended 52% above the average for 2012 to 2019 period (224 complaints compared to 116 in 2019). RMA complaints typically cover a range of issues. The main reasons for lodging an RMA complaint were earthworks, election signage and damage to trees and vegetation.
15 More detailed information on resource consents and other work undertaken by the Resource Consents team can be accessed via at: http://www.dunedin.govt.nz/services/planning.
Building Services
16 Volumes of building consents remain high with 808 for the quarter ending 31 December 2020 (compared to 644 received in same period last year). Similarly, high numbers of site inspections have been undertaken at 3,043 (compared to 2,893 undertaken in the same period last year).
17 The value of consents for the quarter was $92.5 million. Building consent application numbers for new dwellings for the quarter was 91.
18 Despite the high volumes, 99.7% of consents were processed within the 20 working day statutory timeframe. Building inspection bookings were a week out. The average time to process a consent during this time period was 13 working days.
19 For Code Compliance Certificate requests, 99.5% were processed within 20 working day statutory timeframe for the quarter.
Alcohol Licensing
20 The District Licensing Committee’s new members have undertaken training for their new roles and commenced opposition hearings.
21 Along with the usual changing of ownership of premises there has been a new on-licence open in the central city and four off-licenced premises, three of which are internet-based sellers.
Environmental Health
22 Overall food safety in Dunedin food premises remains at a high standard with the percentage of ‘A’ Grade food premises reaching 91% for the quarter ending 31 December 2020.
23 The number of noise complaints has reduced this quarter, consistent with previous years.
Animal Services
24 There has been a reduction in customer service requests over the last quarter compared to the same period in 2019.
Parking Services Enforcement
25 There has been reduction in customer service requests during this quarter compared to the same period in 2019. A new system of following up with customers on parking related customer service requests to ‘close the loop’ was introduced in October 2020, with the objective of reducing customer call backs.
26 There has been a decrease in parking infringement numbers compared to the same period in 2019.
Eco-Design Advisor
27 All outstanding consult visits are now up to date.
28 A project is now underway to review the Dunedin Public Libraries green building standards through ‘GreenStar’ voluntary building certification. The Eco Design Advisor will be involved in putting monitoring (environmental, energy and water use) in place in the libraries over the coming months.
Major Initiatives
29 The following section provides updates on the current status of the initiatives and is not confined to the quarter ending December 2020.
Second Generation Dunedin City District Plan (2GP) - Appeals
30 Mediation for the second group of the 2GP appeals began on 30 July 2020 and will be completed in February 2021. Topics in this round of mediation have included hazard facilities, service stations, reverse sensitivity, mana whenua, commercial, campus, residential strategic, network utilities, and biodiversity and coastal character. Most appeals in Groups one and two (which include the most significant strategic appeals) have been resolved or are close to agreement.
31 Staff lodged several consent memorandums with the Environment Court in December 2020, which resulted in two consent orders being issued. A number of appeals have also been withdrawn.
32 Staff are working on preparing consent memorandums on the other mediation topics, but some will be held until appeals on related topics or provisions have been resolved. One topic (rural landscape) has been set for a second round of mediation. When consent memorandums are signed by the Environment Court, they are issued to the DCC as a consent order and this change is then incorporated into the 2GP.
2GP - Growth Planning and Variation 2
33 The DCC has been working on changes to the 2GP to provide for more housing. Dunedin residents have previously been asked for their ideas on how and where the city should grow. That feedback, site assessments and input from DCC infrastructure teams have helped develop the proposed changes. All options were assessed in terms of impacts on the 3 Waters infrastructure network and identification of any necessary priority infrastructure upgrade projects in the 10 Year Plan. Options were also being evaluated in terms of potential impacts on the transportation network.
34 The proposed changes include:
· Zoning changes for some sites which will result in:
o new greenfield sites for development in areas that were zoned rural or rural residential
o more areas of medium-density zoning (where the density of housing can be increased).
· Rule changes for most of suburban Dunedin that will:
o make better provision for social housing
o remove the restrictions on who can live in family flats
o allow smaller site sizes and provide for duplexes
o create more flexibility for development through changes such as making it easier to average out site sizes in subdivisions.
· Changes which will improve how the plan manages the development of areas rezoned for new houses (greenfield sites) to encourage good urban design and well-managed infrastructure.
35 Most Dunedin residents live in areas which would be affected by one or more of these proposed changes. A paper seeking to notify Variation 2 to the 2GP was presented to Council on 29 January 2021. Variation 2 was publicly notified on the 3 February 2021 with the period for a formal submission extending until 4 March 2021.
Dunedin Heritage Trust Fund
36 The Dunedin Heritage Fund Committee met in November 2020 for the second funding round of the 2020/21 year, allocating $80,000 in heritage grants. The heritage developments supported across the city in Round 2 leveraged an estimated $416,505 of heritage work, and included the following projects:
Address |
Name |
Grant Amount |
Support for |
18 London Street |
‘Skid Row’ villa |
$10,000 |
Heritage window replacements and re‑glazing. |
721A Portobello Road |
Mary Queen of Peace Church |
$10,000 |
Interior repainting and repairs. |
1055 Highcliff Road |
Pukehiki Community Church |
$20,000 |
Support for Stage Two external repairs and restoration work. |
342 High Street |
Deacons Court |
$20,000 |
Restoration (repairs and repainting) of exterior. |
7 Montpellier Street |
Former High Street School site |
TBC |
Restoration element of historic fencing (former High Street School). |
38 Magnetic Street |
St Mary Star of the Sea Church |
$10,000 |
Roof replacement and capping repairs. |
31 Smith Street |
St Dominic’s Priory |
$20,000 |
Emergency work to south elevation window and masonry surround (stabilisation and bracing support). |
62 and 64 Dundas Street |
Terraces |
$TBC |
Replacement of original slate roof cladding with traditional slate roofing and associated roof level repairs. |
Heritage
37 Staff are looking at options for a public heritage offering in 2021 to bridge the gap until the next Heritage Awards in 2022. Suggestions so far include a half to one day research symposium; a half-day workshop for developers/owners; or a public heritage tour and talk. Suggestions are welcome from everyone with an interest in heritage.
Biodiversity
38 The September 2020 round of the Dunedin Biodiversity Fund had 21 applicants seeking $73,416, nearly twice the available funding of $40,000. The round was fully allocated with 15 applicants receiving full or partial funding for their projects. The Fund continues to receive increasing numbers of applicants overall with a record 37 applicants over the two rounds in 2020, and higher proportions of private landowners and first-time applicants. Funded projects included native forest revegetation, fencing, wetland restoration, and plant and animal pest control.
Te Ao Tūroa
39 The Te Ao Tūroa Partnership discussed the delivery timeframe of community projects funded by Te Ao Tūroa Grants in June 2020, in light of COVID-19. The Partnership resolved that if a project is delayed by no more than three months from 30 June 2021, funding will be retained. If a project cannot be undertaken within three months, funding would be returned.
40 The second year of a Te Ao Tūroa Summer Studentship is underway in partnership with University of Otago and Otago Polytechnic. The Studentship is focused on projects related to local activities and opportunities in Otago that are in line with the United Nations’ Sustainability Development Goals. The project outcomes will feed into RCE Otago, “Whaiao – Education for Sustainability Otago” of which the DCC is part.
South Dunedin Future (SDF) Project
41 Work is progressing with ORC regarding governance and leadership of the project.
Mana Whakahono ā Rohe/Iwi Partnership Agreement
42 In December 2020, a new Kaiwhakamāherehere, Jeanette Wikaira, commenced work at the DCC. Ms Wikaira reports to the CEO and is a member of the Executive Leadership Team. Further discussions between mana whenua and Councillors will take place in preparation for the 10 Year Plan 2021/31, primarily on partnership elements of the strategic framework and developing Te Tiriti o Waitangi principle priority indicators in the current 10 Year Plan. This will build on the feedback already provided by senior mana whenua representatives in October 2020 (and reported to Council in December 2020) on suggested framework improvements, considerations for governance arrangements (ie the Māori Participation Working Party) and other opportunities around capturing and using Māori data to inform decision making.
Carbon Zero 2030
43 An update on the DCC’s Zero Carbon 2030 work programme was provided to Council on 14 December 2020, as part of the 10 Year Plan work programme. As highlighted in that report, focus areas for the work programme have been:
· A further update to the Dunedin emissions profile 2018/19 employing a new methodology
· Working with teams across the DCC to consider alignment of current and proposed activities with the Zero Carbon target, including feeding into the Climate 2030 Rapid Review, the DCC Emissions Reduction Plan refresh, and draft 10 Year Plan development
· Providing input and support from a Zero Carbon perspective on other aspects of draft 10 Year Plan development, including draft Levels of Service, and the draft Infrastructure and Financial Strategies
· Refinement of a Zero Carbon 2030 work programme and delivery structure for 2021/22‑23/24.
44 In addition, formal discussions regarding a framework for the Zero Carbon 2030 Alliance have commenced with potential founding members, and 2019/20 DCC inventory development, reporting and audit (under the Toitū carbon reduce programme) has been progressed, along with procurement of a new emissions data management system for the DCC.
Capital Projects
City to Waterfront Bridge
45 In December 2020, as part of the 10 Year Plan process, the Council received an update report on the City to Waterfront Connection project following the business case process and the Council decision in May 2020 to defer the Dunedin Waterfront Revitalisation project due to economic uncertainties.
46 The scope of the project is to be reviewed with mana whenua and other stakeholders, in light of recent changes, to ensure that the bridge meets broader aspirations for the city including mana whenua cultural values. Staff will report back to Council in May 2021 with recommendations as to the scope and timing of the bridge connection.
Urban Design
47 The work programme for this period has included designing/construction for the staged development at Te Rauone Reserve and co-ordinating with Port Otago Limited during construction of breakwater facilities. Urban design support and advice was provided during the business case stages for the Central City Plan: Retail Precinct and Tertiary Streets projects. Other work includes developing a city-wide residential character assessment to help decision making during Variation 2 to the 2GP and providing conceptual design support and graphics for the Coastal Plan (3 Waters).
48 The team has also contributed to the following projects: North East Valley Cycleway Project, South Dunedin Library and Community Complex, and the Peninsula Connection.
OPTIONS
49 As this is an update report, there are no options.
NEXT STEPS
50 Key areas of focus for the next quarter include:
· Working with mana whenua on partnership elements of the strategic framework and aspirations for the city
· Mediation and resolutions of the remaining 2GP appeals
· Variation 2 to the 2GP – submissions and hearings stage
· Completion of the housing capacity monitoring report and starting the review of the Spatial Plan/development of next Future Development Strategy jointly with the ORC to guide growth in the city for the next 30 years
· Working with ORC on the governance and leadership of the South Dunedin Future Programme
· Scoping the revision of the Carbon Management Policy and progressing the introduction of a new emissions data management system.
Signatories
Author: |
Nicola Pinfold - Group Manager Community and Planning Paul Henderson - Acting Group Manager Customer and Regulatory Services |
Authoriser: |
Robert West - Acting General Manager City Services Simon Pickford - General Manager Community Services |
There are no attachments for
this report.
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This report relates to providing a public service and it is considered good-quality and cost-effective. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The Planning and Environment portfolio of activities support the outcomes of a number of strategies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement No specific implications for Māori. Work with Aukaha to ensure a partnership approach with mana whenua is ongoing following the appointment of the new DCC Kaiwhakamāherehere. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability This is an update report, there are no specific implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10YP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy This is an update report, there are no implications for the 10YP, although some measures are level of service performance measures that are annually reported as part of the 10YP. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The updates reported are within existing operating and capital budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance This report is assessed as being of low significance under the Significance and Engagement Policy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external This is an update report, no external engagement has been undertaken. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal This is an update report, no internal engagement has been undertaken. Input to the major initiatives and project updates has been provided by teams within Regulatory Services and Community and Planning Groups. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no identified risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflicts of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards There are no specific implications for Community Boards, although aspects of the report may be of interest to them. |