Notice of Meeting:
I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Dunedin City Council will be held on:
Date: Thursday 30 June 2022
Time: 10.00 am
Venue: Council Chamber, Municipal Chambers, The Octagon, Dunedin
The meeting will be live streamed on the Council’s YouTube page: https://youtu.be/v9gqQy7ZWkM
Sandy Graham
Chief Executive Officer
Council
SUPPLEMENTARY AGENDA
MEMBERSHIP
Mayor |
Mayor Aaron Hawkins |
|
Deputy Mayor |
Cr Christine Garey
|
|
Members |
Cr Sophie Barker |
Cr David Benson-Pope |
|
Cr Rachel Elder |
Cr Doug Hall |
|
Cr Carmen Houlahan |
Cr Marie Laufiso |
|
Cr Mike Lord |
Cr Jim O'Malley |
|
Cr Jules Radich |
Cr Chris Staynes |
|
Cr Lee Vandervis |
Cr Steve Walker |
|
Cr Andrew Whiley |
|
Senior Officer Sandy Graham, Chief Executive Officer
Governance Support Officer Lynne Adamson
Lynne Adamson
Governance Support Officer
Telephone: 03 477 4000
Lynne.Adamson@dcc.govt.nz
Note: Reports and recommendations contained in this agenda are not to be considered as Council policy until adopted.
Council 30 June 2022 |
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 24
Reports
13 Forward Work Programme for Council - June 2022 4
14 Adoption of the Annual Plan 2022/23 15
15 Setting of Rates for the 2022/23 Financial Year 100
16 Zero Carbon Policy 125
17 Submission on Emissions Reduction Plan 147
18 Submission on the Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Fees) Regulations 163
Notice of Motion
23 Notice of Motion - Learning Experiences Outside the Classroom 196
24 Notice of Motion - St Clair Groyne Reinstatement 198
|
Council 30 June 2022 |
Forward Work Programme for Council - June 2022
Department: Civic
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 The purpose of this report is to provide the updated forward work programme for the 2021-2022 year (Attachment A). This forward work programme includes the Council decisions made during the development of the 10 year plan 2021-31, and 2022/23 Annual Plan
2 As this is an administrative report only, there are no options or Summary of Considerations.
That the Council: a) Notes the updated Council forward work programme as shown in Attachment A. |
DISCUSSION
3 The forward work programme is a regular agenda item which shows areas of activity, progress and expected timeframes for Council decision making across a range of areas of work.
4 Decisions made by Council during the development of the 10 year plan and Annual Plan that require report back to Council have now been incorporated into this forward work programme. These were previously reported in a separate forward work programme to Council, on a two monthly basis. Decisions on the development of the 10 year plan and Annual Plan requiring report back to Committees have been included in the forward work programmes of the relevant Committees.
5 As an update report, the purple highlight shows changes to timeframes. New items added to the schedule are highlighted in yellow. Items that have been completed or updated are shown as bold.
NEXT STEPS
6 An updated report will be presented to the July 2022 Council meeting.
Signatories
Author: |
Sharon Bodeker - Acting Manager Governance |
Authoriser: |
Sandy Graham - Chief Executive Officer |
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Council Forward Work Programme - June 2022 |
7 |
Council 30 June 2022 |
Adoption of the Annual Plan 2022/23
Department: Civic and Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report recommends the adoption of the Annual Plan 2022/23 (Annual Plan) and approval of matters associated with the Annual Plan.
That the Council: a) Adopts the Annual Plan 2022/23. b) Authorises the Chief Executive to make any minor editorial changes resulting from quality checks prior to the final printing of the Annual Plan 2022/23 document. c) Authorises the Chief Executive to drawdown debt up to total debt of $445 million in the 2022/23 year. |
BACKGROUND
2 The Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) requires local authorities to prepare and adopt an annual plan for each financial year. The purpose of an annual plan is to provide the budget and funding impact statement for the year concerned and to identify any variation from the financial statements and funding impact statement included in the 10 year plan 2021-31 for that year.
3 The Annual Plan provides an update of year two of the 10 year plan 2021-31. The draft Annual Plan did not propose any significant changes to the 10 year plan, and while consultation was not required, Council agreed to a comprehensive engagement plan.
4 The engagement period ran from 31 March to 22 April 2022. The Council met in May 2022 to hear submissions, deliberate and make final decisions on the draft 2022/23 budget.
DISCUSSION
5 The Annual Plan reflects the resolutions made by the Council during its meetings in January and May 2022. Two further changes have been incorporated into the operating budgets since those meetings, as follows:
· The budget assumptions relating to the emissions trading scheme have been updated, resulting in an increase in operating costs of $1.135 million, funded by an increase in revenue from the Green Island landfill.
· Expenditure has been amended to take account of increased electricity costs reflecting updated all of government pricing and a cost-of-living adjustment to personnel costs.
6 The Rates increase remains unchanged at 6.5%.
7 The financial statements are extrapolated from the 2020/21 Annual Report and a forecast year end position as at 30 June 2022.
8 Debt is forecast to increase to $440.273 million in the 2022/23 year. Authority is sought to provide the Chief Executive with the appropriate delegation to drawdown debt up to a maximum of $445 million.
9 The adopted Annual Plan 2022/23 will require a full editorial quality check. This check will be completed within the statutory timeframes. Any required editorial changes can be achieved through delegating authority to approve editorial changes to the Chief Executive.
OPTIONS
10 The Council is legislatively required to adopt the Annual Plan 2022/23 before 1 July 2022, therefore there are no options applicable to this report.
NEXT STEPS
11 Once adopted the Annual Plan 2022/23 will be subject to final quality checks, graphic design and printed for public distribution in hard copy and on the Council’s website.
Signatories
Author: |
Sharon Bodeker - Acting Manager Governance Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Gavin Logie - Chief Financial Officer Sandy Graham - Chief Executive Officer |
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Annual Plan 2022/23 |
19 |
⇩b |
Income Statement for the year ended 30 June 2023 |
99 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government The development of the Annual Plan 2022/23 enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities; and promotes the social, economic, environmental and cultural well-being of communities in the present and for the future. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The Annual Plan contributes to the strategic framework because it provides the necessary funding to implement the services and activities outlined in the 10 year plan 2021-31. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement The Annual Plan 2022/23 provides a mechanism for Māori to contribute to local decision-making. DCC works with the Māori Participation Working Party, Aukaha and mana whenua to ensure there is process for Māori collaboration across the Annual Plan work programme. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability Sustainability is an underlying principle of the DCC’s strategic framework. Activity in the Annual Plan 2022/23 supports the DCC to embed the principles of sustainability across DCC work outlined in the 10 year plan 2021-31. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 year plan /Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy This report concludes the development of the Annual Plan 2022/23. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The financial considerations are detailed in the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance The Annual Plan does not propose any significant changes to the 10 year plan. Engagement on the draft plan was undertaken. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external The Council engaged on the draft Annual Plan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal Staff and managers from across the Council have been involved in the development of the Annual Plan 2022/23. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. The Council is legislatively required to adopt the Annual Plan before 1 July 2022. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflicts of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards Community Boards were involved in the Annual Plan engagement. Boards have submitted as part of the Annual Plan process. |
|
Council 30 June 2022 |
Setting of Rates for the 2022/23 Financial Year
Department: Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 Following adoption of the Annual Plan 2022-23, the Council now needs to set the rates as provided for in the Funding Impact Statement for the 2022-23 year.
That the Council: a) Sets the following rates under the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 on rating units in the district for the financial year commencing 1 July 2022 and ending on 30 June 2023. 1 General Rate A general rate set under section 13 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 made on every rating unit, assessed on a differential basis as described below: · A rate of 0.3284 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "residential" category. · A rate of 0.3120 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "lifestyle" category. · A rate of 0.8079 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "commercial" category. · A rate of 0.5747 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "residential heritage bed and breakfasts" category. · A rate of 0.2627 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "farmland" category. · A rate of 0.0630 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on the “stadium: 10,000+ seat capacity” category. 2 Community Services Rate A targeted rate for community services, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential basis as follows: · $103.50 (including GST) per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit for all rating units in the "residential, residential heritage bed and breakfasts, lifestyle and farmland" categories. · $103.50 (including GST) per rating unit for all rating units in the "commercial and stadium: 10,000+ seat capacity" categories. 3 Kerbside Recycling Rate A targeted rate for kerbside recycling, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential basis as follows: · $106.10 (including GST) per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit for rating units in the "residential, residential heritage bed and breakfasts, lifestyle and farmland" categories. · $106.10 (including GST) per rating unit for rating units in the "commercial" category. 4 Drainage Rates A targeted rate for drainage, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential basis as follows: · $654.00 (including GST) per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit for all rating units in the "residential, residential heritage bed and breakfasts, lifestyle and farmland" categories and which are "connected" to the public sewerage system. · $327.00 (including GST) per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit for all rating units in the "residential, residential heritage bed and breakfasts, lifestyle and farmland" categories and which are "serviceable" by the public sewerage system. · $654.00 (including GST) per rating unit for all rating units in the "commercial, residential institutions, schools and stadium: 10,000+ seat capacity" categories and which are "connected" to the public sewerage system. · $327.00 (including GST) per rating unit for all rating units in the "commercial, residential institutions and schools" categories and which are "serviceable" by the public sewerage system. · $102.25 (including GST) per rating unit for all rating units in the "church" category and which are "connected" to the public sewerage system. Rating units which are not "connected" to the scheme and which are not "serviceable" will not be liable for this rate. Drainage is a combined targeted rate for sewage disposal and stormwater. Sewage disposal makes up 78% of the drainage rate, and stormwater makes up 22%. Non-rateable land will not be liable for the stormwater component of the drainage targeted rate. Rates demands for the drainage targeted rate for non-rateable land will therefore be charged at 78%. 5 Commercial Drainage Rates – Capital Value A targeted rate for drainage, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential basis as follows: · A rate of 0.3055 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "commercial and residential institution" category and which are "connected" to the public sewerage system. · A rate of 0.1528 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "commercial" category and which are "serviceable" by the public sewerage system. · A rate of 0.2291 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "school" category and which are "connected" to the public sewerage system. · A rate of 0.1146 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "school" category and which are "serviceable" by the public sewerage system. · A rate of 0.0236 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on the “stadium: 10,000+ seat capacity” category. This rate shall not apply to properties in Karitane, Middlemarch, Seacliff, Waikouaiti and Warrington. This rate shall not apply to churches. Drainage is a combined targeted rate for sewage disposal and stormwater. Sewage disposal makes up 78% of the drainage rate, and stormwater makes up 22%. Non-rateable land will not be liable for the stormwater component of the drainage targeted rate. Rates demands for the drainage targeted rate for non-rateable land will therefore be charged at 78%. 6 Water Rates A targeted rate for water supply, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential basis as follows: · $496.00 (including GST) per separately used or inhabited part of any "connected" rating unit which receives an ordinary supply of water within the meaning of the Dunedin City Bylaws excepting properties in Karitane, Merton, Rocklands/Pukerangi, Seacliff, Waitati, Warrington, East Taieri, West Taieri and North Taieri. · $248.00 (including GST) per separately used or inhabited part of any "serviceable" rating unit to which connection is available to receive an ordinary supply of water within the meaning of the Dunedin City Bylaws excepting properties in Karitane, Merton, Rocklands/Pukerangi, Seacliff, Waitati, Warrington, East Taieri, West Taieri and North Taieri. · $496.00 (including GST) per unit of water being one cubic metre (viz. 1,000 litres) per day supplied at a constant rate of flow during a full 24 hour period to any "connected" rating unit situated in Karitane, Merton, Seacliff, Waitati, Warrington, West Taieri, East Taieri or North Taieri. · $248.00 (including GST) per separately used or inhabited part of any "serviceable" rating unit situated in Waitati, Warrington, West Taieri, East Taieri or North Taieri. This rate shall not apply to the availability of water in Merton, Karitane or Seacliff. 7 Fire Protection Rates A targeted rate for the provision of a fire protection service, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential basis as follows: · A rate of 0.0873 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on all rating units in the "commercial" category. This rate shall not apply to churches. · A rate of 0.0655 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on all rating units in the "residential institutions" category. · A rate of 0.0095 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on the “stadium: 10,000+ seat capacity” category. · $148.80 (including GST) for each separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit within the "residential, residential heritage bed and breakfasts, lifestyle and farmland" category that is not receiving an ordinary supply of water within the meaning of the Dunedin City Bylaws. 8 Water Rates – Quantity of Water A targeted rate for the quantity of water provided to any rating unit fitted with a water meter, being an extraordinary supply of water within the meaning of the Dunedin City Bylaws, set under section 19 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, according to the following scale of charges (GST inclusive):
Where the supply of a quantity of water is subject to this Quantity of Water Targeted Rate, the rating unit will not be liable for any other targeted rate for the supply of the same water. 9 Allanton Drainage Rate A targeted rate for the capital contribution towards the Allanton Wastewater Collection System, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, of $411.00 (including GST) per rating unit, to every rating unit paying their contribution towards the scheme as a targeted rate over 20 years. Liability for the rate is on the basis of the provision of the service to each rating unit. The Allanton area is shown in the map below: 10 Blanket Bay Drainage Rate A targeted rate for the capital contribution towards the Blanket Bay Drainage System, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, of $636.00 (including GST) per rating unit, to every rating unit paying their contribution towards the scheme as a targeted rate over 20 years. Liability for the rate is on the basis of the provision of the service to each rating unit. The Blanket Bay area is shown in the map below: 11 Curles Point Drainage Rate A targeted rate for the capital contribution towards the Curles Point Drainage System, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, of $749.00 (including GST) per rating unit, to every rating unit paying their contribution towards the scheme as a targeted rate over 20 years. Liability for the rate is on the basis of the provision of the service to each rating unit. The Curles Point area is shown in the map below:
12 Tourism/Economic Development Rate A targeted rate for Tourism/Economic Development, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential basis as follows: · 0.0116 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on every rating unit in the "commercial" category. · 0.0013 cents in the dollar (including GST) of capital value on the “stadium: 10,000+ seat capacity” category. 13 Warm Dunedin Targeted Rate Scheme A targeted rate for the Warm Dunedin Targeted Rate Scheme, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, per rating unit in the Warm Dunedin Targeted Rate Scheme. The targeted rate scheme provides a way for homeowners to install insulation and/or clean heating. The targeted rate covers the cost and an annual interest rate. The interest rates have been and will be: Rates commencing 1 July 2013 and 1 July 2014 8% Rates commencing 1 July 2015 and 1 July 2016 8.3% Rates commencing 1 July 2017 7.8% Rates commencing 1 July 2018 7.2% Rates commencing 1 July 2019 6.8% Rates commencing 1 July 2020 5.7% Rates commencing 1 July 2021 4.4% 14 Private Street Lighting Rate A targeted rate for the purpose of recovering the cost of private street lights, set under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential basis as follows: · $149.40 (including GST) per private street light divided by the number of separately used or inhabited parts of a rating unit for all rating units in the "residential and lifestyle" categories in the private streets as identified in the schedule below. · $149.40 (including GST) per private street light divided by the number of rating units for all rating units in the "commercial" category in the private streets as identified in the schedule below.
Differential Matters and Categories b) Adopts the following differential categories for the 2022/23 financial year. The differential categories are determined in accordance with the Council's land use codes. The Council's land use codes are based on the land use codes set under the Rating Valuation Rules 2008 and are set out in Attachment A. In addition, the Council has established categories for residential institutions, residential heritage bed and breakfasts, the stadium: 10,000+ seat capacity, churches, and schools. 1 Differentials Based on Land Use The Council uses this matter to: · Differentiate the General rate. · Differentiate the Community Services rate. · Differentiate the Kerbside Recycling rate. · Differentiate the Private Street Lighting rate. · Differentiate the Tourism/Economic Development rate. · Differentiate the Fire Protection rate. The differential categories based on land use are: · Residential – includes all rating units used for residential purposes including single residential, multi-unit residential, multi-use residential, residential special accommodation, residential communal residence dependant on other use, residential bach/cribs, residential carparking and residential vacant land. · Lifestyle – includes all rating units with Council's land use codes 2, 20, 21, 22 and 29. · Commercial – includes all rating units with land uses not otherwise categorised as Residential, Residential Heritage Bed and Breakfasts, Lifestyle, Farmland or Stadium: 10,000+ seat capacity. · Farmland - includes all rating units used solely or principally for agricultural or horticultural or pastoral purposes. · Residential Heritage Bed and Breakfasts – includes all rating units meeting the following description: · Bed and breakfast establishments; and · Classified as commercial for rating purposes due to the number of bedrooms (greater than four); and · Either: · the majority of the establishment is at least 80 years old, or · the establishment has Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Registration, or · the establishment is a Dunedin City Council Protected Heritage Building as identified in the District Plan; and · The bed and breakfast owner lives at the facility. · Stadium: 10,000+ seat capacity – this includes land at 130 Anzac Avenue, Dunedin, Assessment 4026695, Valuation reference 27190-01403. 2 Differentials Based on Land Use and Provision or Availability of Service The Council uses these matters to differentiate the drainage rate and the commercial drainage rate. The differential categories based on land use are: · Residential – includes all rating units used for residential purposes including single residential, multi-unit residential, multi-use residential, residential special accommodation, residential communal residence dependant on other use, residential bach/cribs, residential carparking and residential vacant land. · Lifestyle - includes all rating units with Council's land use codes 2, 20, 21, 22 and 29. · Farmland - includes all rating units used solely or principally for agricultural or horticultural or pastoral purposes. · Commercial – includes all rating units with land uses not otherwise categorised as Residential, Residential Heritage Bed and Breakfasts, Lifestyle, Farmland, Residential Institutions, Stadium: 10,000+ seat capacity, Churches or Schools. · Stadium: 10,000+ seat capacity – this includes land at 130 Anzac Avenue, Dunedin, Assessment 4026695, Valuation reference 27190-01403. · Residential Heritage Bed and Breakfasts – includes all rating units meeting the following description: · Bed and breakfast establishments; and · Classified as commercial for rating purposes due to the number of bedrooms (greater than four); and · Either: · the majority of the establishment is at least 80 years old or · the establishment has Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Registration or · the establishment is a Dunedin City Council Protected Heritage Building as identified in the District Plan; and · The bed and breakfast owner lives at the facility. · Residential Institutions - includes only rating units with the Council's land use codes 95 and 96. · Churches – includes all rating units used for places of religious worship. · Schools - includes only rating units used for schools that do not operate for profit. The differential categories based on provision or availability of service are: · Connected – any rating unit that is connected to a public sewerage drain. · Serviceable – any rating unit that is not connected to a public sewerage drain but is capable of being connected to the sewerage system (being a property situated within 30 metres of a public drain). 3 Differentials Based on Provision or Availability of Service The Council uses this matter to differentiate the water rates. The differential categories based on provision or availability of service are: · Connected – any rating unit that is supplied by the water supply system. · Serviceable – any rating unit that is not supplied but is capable of being supplied by the water supply system (being a rating unit situated within 100 metres of the nearest water supply). Minimum Rates c) Approves that where the total amount of rates payable in respect of any rating unit is less than $5.00 including GST, the rates payable in respect of the rating unit shall be such amount as the Council determines but not exceeding $5.00 including GST. Low Value Rating Units d) Approves that rating units with a capital value of $6,000 or less will only be charged the general rate. Land Use Codes e) Approves that the land use codes attached to this report are adopted as the Council's land use codes for the purpose of the rating method. Separately Used or Inhabited Part of a Rating Unit f) Adopts the following definition of a separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit: "A separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit includes any portion inhabited or used by the owner/a person other than the owner, and who has the right to use or inhabit that portion by virtue of a tenancy, lease, licence, or other agreement. This definition includes separately used parts, whether or not actually occupied at any particular time, which are provided by the owner for rental (or other form of occupation) on an occasional or long term basis by someone other than the owner. For the purpose of this definition, vacant land and vacant premises offered or intended for use or habitation by a person other than the owner and usually used as such are defined as 'used'. For the avoidance of doubt, a rating unit that has a single use or occupation is treated as having one separately used or inhabited part." Lump Sum Contributions g) Approves that no lump sum contributions will be sought for any targeted rate. Rating by Instalments h) Approves the following schedule of rates to be collected by the Council, payable by four instalments. The City is divided into four areas based on Valuation Roll Numbers, as set out below:
Area 4 comprises ratepayers with multiple assessments who pay on a schedule. Due Dates for Payment of Rates i) Approves the due dates for all rates with the exception of water rates, which are charged based on water meter consumption, will be payable in four instalments due on the dates below:
Water meter invoices are sent separately from other rates. Where water rates are charged based on metered consumption using a meter other than a Smart Water Meter, invoices are sent on a quarterly or monthly basis and the due date for payment shall be on the 20th of the month following the date of the invoice as set out in the table below:
Where water rates are charged based on consumption calculated using a Smart Water Meter, invoices will be sent out on a monthly basis, with the due date being on the 20th of the month. Penalties j) Resolves to charge the following penalties on unpaid rates: 1 A charge of 10% of the unpaid rates instalment will be added to the amount of any instalment remaining unpaid the day after the instalment due date set out above. 2 Where a ratepayer has not paid the first instalment by the due date of that instalment, and has paid the total rates and charges in respect of the rating unit for the 2022/23 rating year by the due date of the second instalment, the 10% additional charge for the first instalment shall be remitted. 3 For amounts levied in any previous financial year and which remain unpaid on 1 October 2022, 10% of that sum shall be charged, including additional charges (if any). 4 For amounts levied in any previous financial year and which remain unpaid on 1 April 2023, 10% of that sum shall be charged, including additional charges (if any). Assessing and Recovering Rates k) Approves that the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Rates and Revenue Team Leader be authorised to take all necessary steps to assess and recover the above rates. |
BACKGROUND
2 The Annual Plan 2022-23 provides an update of year two of the 10 year plan 2021-31. The draft Annual Plan did not propose any significant changes to the 10 year plan, and while consultation was not required, comprehensive engagement was undertaken.
DISCUSSION
3 The rating method for the 2022-23 year incorporates the following changes:
· An increase in the community services targeted rate from $102.00 to $103.50 for the 2022-23 year.
· The differentiated stadium: 10,000+ capacity rates have been increased for the 2022-23 year by the June 2021 Local Government Cost Index of 1.4%.
4 Where water rates are charged based on metered consumption, invoices are currently sent on a quarterly or monthly basis, with the due date for payment the 20th of the month following the date of the invoice. With the introduction of Smart Water Meters, all invoices based on metered consumption will move to a monthly billing cycle, with the due date for payment being on the 20th of the month. Customers will transition to Smart Water Meters over the next 12-18 months.
Limit on "Fixed" Charging
5 Section 21 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 includes a limit on certain rates. In any one year, the Council may not collect more than 30% of its total rates revenue by way of:
· Any uniform annual general charge.
· Any targeted rate that is calculated as a fixed amount per rating unit or separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit (and which is not used solely for water supply or sewage disposal).
6 The Council does not use a uniform annual general charge. The relevant targeted rates for the 2022-23 year are the kerbside recycling rate, the community services rate and the drainage fixed charge. These rates equate to 21% of total rates revenue.
OPTIONS
7 The option provided is to set rates in accordance with the Local Government Act 2002 and the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 in order to provide rates funding in the 2022-23 year in accordance with the 2022-23 budget.
NEXT STEPS
8 The Council can now set and assess the rates described in its Funding Impact Statement.
Signatories
Author: |
Carolyn Allan - Senior Management Accountant |
Authoriser: |
Gavin Logie - Chief Financial Officer |
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Dunedin Land Use Codes |
122 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This decision enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities and promotes the social, economic, environmental and cultural well-being of communities in the present and for the future. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
This decision fits with the strategic framework because it provides the necessary rates funding to implement the activities outlined in the 2022/23 annual plan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement The 10 year plan 2021-31 provided a mechanism for Māori to contribute to local decision-making. DCC works with the Māori Participation Working Party, Aukaha and mana whenua to ensure there is process for Māori collaboration across the 10 year plan/Annual Plan work programme. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 year plan /Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The Council has adopted the Annual Plan 2022-23 and can now set and assess the rates described in its Funding Impact Statement for the 2022-23 year. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The Council has adopted the Annual Plan 2022-23 and can now set and assess the rates described in its Funding Impact Statement. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance The decision sets the rates for the 2022-23 year as outlined in the Annual Plan 2022-23. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external Community engagement was undertaken on the draft Annual Plan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal Internal engagement has occurred with staff in the relevant departments. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. Legal risks were considered and appropriate advice sought. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflicts of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards Community Boards may be interested in this report and were involved in the Annual Plan 2022‑23 engagement. |
Council 30 June 2022 |
Zero Carbon Policy
Department: Corporate Policy
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 The purpose of this report is to seek Council adoption of a revised Zero Carbon Policy (‘the Policy’).
2 The revised Policy:
· formalises existing emissions methodologies and reporting approaches for the DCC and Dunedin City emissions inventories
· formalises the DCC’s commitment to reducing emissions consistent with existing city-wide and internal DCC emissions reduction targets
· clarifies that, in pursuit of targets the DCC will prioritise gross emissions reductions, in line with work programme guiding principles
· provides key principles to help guide staff decision-making on new proposals and activities, in line with work programme guiding principles
· presents the Policy as clearly as possible, including the use of a ‘plain English’ style.
That the Council: a) Adopts the Zero Carbon Policy b) Notes that this replaces the Carbon Management Policy 2017 |
BACKGROUND
Zero Carbon strategic direction
3 Council has set strategic direction relating to climate change mitigation by adopting key elements of the DCC’s strategic and policy framework. Council has updated and clarified this direction through recent resolutions. A summary is provided in Attachment A.
4 Key Council resolutions include the 2019 setting of a ‘Zero Carbon 2030’ target for the city, the establishment of a work programme for climate change mitigation (the Zero Carbon work programme), and the 2022 adoption of interim guiding principles for the Zero Carbon work programme. The interim guiding principles are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Interim guiding principles for the Zero Carbon work programme.
How we work |
|
Uphold the Treaty of Waitangi |
We acknowledge our Treaty of Waitangi responsibilities and are committed to working in partnership to provide opportunities for Mana Whenua and Mataawaka to contribute to decision making processes and to have an active role in the city’s climate mitigation. |
Collaborative, constructive, and transparent |
We work in an open and transparent way alongside the local community, business, and organisations. |
Consider different spheres of influence |
We take action on what we can control directly, and work to influence areas outside of our control (for example, through advocacy to central government). |
How we think |
|
Thinking long-term |
We take a long-term view to 2030 and beyond, considering the interests of future as well as current communities. Dunedin will need to adopt actions that not only set it on a path to meet emissions reduction targets, but which sustain achievement of those targets beyond 2030. Meeting these goals requires a long-term view of investments and infrastructure developments. We also acknowledge the uncertainty of the future and work in a flexible, adaptable manner. |
Maximise co-benefits for people, planet, and economy |
We consider the impact of different approaches on equity and wellbeing, the environment, and the economy. We seek opportunities for co-benefits and consider how any negative impacts could be mitigated. |
Considering value |
We prioritise actions with higher value, accounting where possible for the costs and consequences of both action and inaction. |
Evidence-led |
We utilise data and evidence and strive to follow international best practice. We acknowledge the urgency of climate change mitigation and are committed to contributing to global efforts to limit warming to 1.5°C. |
Rationale for Policy review
5 The DCC’s existing Carbon Management Policy (adopted in 2017) is no longer fit-for-purpose. It does not reflect recent resolutions of Council relating to climate change mitigation, or significant changes in the national context.
6 The national context relating to climate change mitigation has changed significantly since 2017:
· The Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Act 2019 provides a framework for climate policies that contribute to the global effort to limit global average temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. It also established He Pou a Rangi | the Climate Change Commission, set out national emissions reduction targets for 2050 and requires the government to develop national emissions reduction plans to meet those targets (the first of which has recently been published).
· Changes to the legislative framework governing the Emissions Trading Scheme have led to the price of emissions units (NZUs) increasing significantly, with a June 2022 clearing price of $76/TCO2e.
· The National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 now requires a focus on achieving urban environments that support emissions reduction.
7 The primary purpose of the revised Policy is to give effect to existing strategic direction and resolutions of Council relating to climate change mitigation. It seeks to define technical parameters because methodologies used to generate the city-wide and DCC emissions inventories have not been formally adopted and there is ambiguity about which types of emissions the Zero Carbon work programme should focus on.
8 The revised Policy also responds to feedback from staff through the Climate 2030 Rapid Review (undertaken in 2020), which highlighted the need for clarity on technical parameters to enable staff to give effect to Council’s emissions-related ambitions in their work. This clarity is also needed to continue progressing the Zero Carbon work programme (particularly the development of a city-wide emissions reduction plan).
DISCUSSION
Policy development process
9 The Zero Carbon Team have undertaken an extensive process to identify issues, develop recommendations, and test the proposed changes to the Carbon Management Policy. This has involved seeking independent expert technical advice and broad-reaching consultation with DCC teams.
10 As the Policy seeks to give effect to Council’s existing strategic direction and resolutions in relation to climate change mitigation, the policy development process was informed by the overarching ‘Zero Carbon 2030’ target, and the interim Zero Carbon work programme guiding principles.
11 The following sections summarise the revised Policy and how the proposed changes relate to Council’s strategic direction and the work programme guiding principles. The revised Policy, along with changes from the 2017 version of the Policy, is included in Attachment B.
Formalise emissions methodologies and reporting for the DCC and city-wide inventories
City-wide methodology
12 The approach we take to monitoring emissions is important because what we count (and do not count) influences the focus of our emissions reduction interventions and investments.
13 The DCC has previously commissioned two city-wide greenhouse gas inventories (for 2013/14 and 2018/19), which provide an estimate of the Dunedin’s greenhouse gas emissions. These inventories have aligned with the methodology used by the Global Covenant of Mayors (GCOM), the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories BASIC+ (GPCI BASIC+). This methodology is also endorsed by the Ministry for the Environment and focuses primarily on emissions generated in Dunedin by activities within the city boundaries.
14 Evidence from the Climate Disclosure Project (CDP) suggests that most cities reporting through CDP (both in New Zealand and around the world) use the GPCI methodology. Expert advice suggests that, to meet international best practice, the DCC should continue to utilise the GPCI methodology for its city-wide inventory. The revised Policy formalises the use of the GPCI methodology and the GCOM requirement to publicly report on city emissions regularly.
15 In the longer-term, a trend in international best practice is including a more holistic set of emissions that include ‘consumption’ emissions (for example, emissions that are released elsewhere for goods that are then imported into the city). However, there is no standard methodology in use by a wide range of cities yet. Therefore, expert advice recommends that the DCC holds off formally expanding its methodology.
16 The GPCI BASIC+ methodology enables additional emissions sources to be added progressively over time. As clear best practice relating to ‘consumption’ emissions emerges, the DCC can therefore investigate measuring and targeting additional emissions sources, focusing on the areas of highest impact and influence.
DCC methodology
17 The DCC has been monitoring its organisational emissions since 2013/14, participating in an emissions measurement and management accreditation scheme called Toitū carbon reduce. This scheme uses the international ISO 14064 standard to measure emissions. Expert advice suggests that following this standard is international best practice. Use of this standard, and associated annual reporting, is formalised in the revised Policy.
Reflect the DCC’s commitment to reducing emissions consistent with existing targets
18 The targets section of the revised Policy reflects the 2019 ‘Zero Carbon 2030’ target and the Zero Carbon work programme guiding principles. It reflects that the DCC is seeking to:
· achieve (or exceed) city-wide emissions reduction targets and DCC organisational targets
· reduce emissions consistent with limiting global warming to no more than 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.
In pursuit of targets, the DCC will prioritise gross emissions reduction
19 The city-wide emissions reduction target set by Council has both 'net' and 'gross' elements. A 'net' target can be achieved by reducing gross emissions (preventing more carbon being released into the atmosphere), offsetting emissions (usually through investing in carbon sinks such as forests), or a mixture of both.
20 International best practice is to focus first and foremost on reducing gross emissions, and only offsetting residual hard or impossible-to-reduce emissions. Reliance on offsetting reduces flexibility by "locking up" land in carbon sinks and raises the risk that emissions reductions will not be sustained. Therefore, in line with the interim work programme guiding principles, a focus on gross emissions reduction is reflected in the revised Policy.
21 Staff will continue work on pathways modelling to determine various approaches for achieving the targets as part of city-wide emissions reduction plan development.
Principles to guide staff decision-making on new proposals and activities
22 To achieve the ‘Zero Carbon 2030’ target, the DCC will need to embed emissions reduction considerations into operations and decision-making processes. The need for clear direction and guidance on how to achieve this has been highlighted by feedback from staff.
23 The revised Policy sets out six key principles to guide Zero Carbon in decisions-making. These key principles, and how they give effect to existing Council resolutions, are summarised in Table 2.
Table 2. Summary of key principles to guide staff decision-making
Policy key principle |
Relevant Zero Carbon work programme guiding principle(s) |
Focus on city-wide emissions early |
· This principle reflects the ‘Zero Carbon 2030’ target, focusing on city-wide emissions over other emissions (such as the DCC’s emissions). · The largest opportunities for emissions reduction are in the early stages of a project’s development. Therefore, this principle reflects a “consider[ation] of different spheres of influence”, being “evidence-led” and “considering value”. |
Escalate the decision if an increase in city-wide emissions is likely |
· This principle reflects “maximis[ing] co-benefits for people, planet, and economy” and being “evidence-led”. It will require the emissions impact of projects to be explicitly considered alongside other potential benefits/impacts. · This principle also reflects the ‘Zero Carbon 2030’ target, focusing on city-wide emissions over other emissions (such as the DCC’s emissions). |
Prefer options that contribute most to city-wide emissions reduction targets |
· This principle reflects the ‘Zero Carbon 2030’ target, focusing on city-wide emissions over other emissions (such as the DCC’s emissions). · This principle also reflects being “evidence-led” and “considering value”. It aims to ensure that multiple options are considered as decision-making on the proposal proceeds, and that options with the greatest reduction in city-wide emissions are chosen. |
Minimise whole-of-life emissions |
· This principle focuses on minimising all types of emissions once the decision has been made to progress on a proposal. · This principle reflects being “evidence-led”, particularly “striving to follow international best practice”. Seeking to minimise all types of emissions aligns with international best practice. Embodied emissions are most relevant as design progresses. For example, material choice in the design can significantly impact the embodied footprint of an infrastructure project. |
Minimise exposure to climate change risks |
· This principle reflects “evidence-led”, particularly “striving to follow international best practice” and “maximis[ing] co-benefits for people, planet, and economy”. Effective climate policy involves a portfolio of diverse adaptation and mitigation actions. While the Policy focuses on climate mitigation, this principle aims to ensure this occurs within the wider systemic context of climate change. |
Clearly report emissions considerations |
· This reflects working in a “collaborative, constructive, and transparent” way and being “evidence-led”: it aims to ensure that Council has visibility of emissions information so that informed decisions can be taken. |
24 These principles will provide the foundations for a process guidance document to support operationalisation of the Policy.
Presenting the Policy as clearly as possible
25 Process-heavy content has been removed from the revised Policy to ensure it contains policy direction rather than process.
26 The Policy is drafted in a ‘plain English’ style so that it is easy to read and understand. It has also been renamed the “Zero Carbon Policy” from the “Carbon Management Policy” for this reason.
OPTIONS
Option One – Recommended Option
27 Adopt the Zero Carbon Policy.
Advantages
· Gives effect to existing strategic direction and resolutions of Council around climate change mitigation.
· Provides DCC staff with clarity about how to include emissions reduction considerations in their work.
· Supports progress towards the city-wide ‘Zero Carbon 2030’ target, and organisational emissions reduction targets.
Disadvantages
· None identified.
28 No other option is provided as the new Zero Carbon Policy gives effect to existing strategic direction and resolutions of Council relating to climate change mitigation.
NEXT STEPS
29 Should the revised Policy be adopted, staff will continue to work alongside technical experts on a process guidance document to support DCC staff to apply the revised Policy.
30 Staff will continue to progress the Zero Carbon work programme, including pathways modelling to inform the development of a city-wide emissions reduction plan.
Signatories
Author: |
Florence Reynolds - Senior Policy Analyst, Zero Carbon |
Authoriser: |
Jinty MacTavish - Principal Policy Advisor Sustainability Jeanette Wikaira - Manahautū (General Manager Māori Partnerships and Policy) |
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Summary of existing DCC strategic direction for climate change mitigation |
134 |
⇩b |
Zero Carbon Policy and summary of changes from 2017 policy |
138 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government The revised Policy is anticipated to promote the social, economic and environmental well-being of communities in the present and for the future, by supporting a transition to a low carbon economy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The revised Policy will help to advance city-wide and organisational emissions reduction targets.
The Zero Carbon work programme has been assessed as directly contributing to the goals of the Economic Development and Environment Strategies, with clear links to the 3 Waters Strategy, Spatial Plan and Integrated Transport Strategy, Energy Plan 1.0, and the DCC’s Emissions Management and Reduction Plan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement A Treaty of Waitangi analysis was undertaken during policy review. The analysis suggested that the content of the proposed revised Policy is unlikely to have any direct impacts for Māori, particularly given that the proposed changes to the policy seek to give effect to existing resolutions of Council. However, there are aspects of future steps in the Zero Carbon work programme that are likely to have effects on Māori; these will be explored further during city-wide emissions reduction plan development. The Zero Carbon team will work with Corporate Policy/Māori Partnerships staff on the development of process guidance, to ensure alignment with evolving DCC practice around Treaty considerations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability Climate change mitigation/emissions reduction efforts are considered key to sustainability. ‘Climate Action’ is one of the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals, reflecting the centrality of action on climate change to the achievement of sustainable development. The draft revised policy will support emissions reduction efforts. Without significant cuts to emissions, climate change impacts will further accelerate, with commensurate negative impacts on the social, environmental, cultural and economic wellbeing of New Zealand communities. Conversely, actions to reduce emissions generally have significant co-benefits in terms of community wellbeing. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy Funding for the Zero Carbon work programme, including the Policy review, was provided through the 2021 – 2031 10 year plan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The proposed changes to the policy seek to give effect to existing resolutions of Council. The implications for 10 year plan budgets are difficult to assess given that integration of emissions reduction ambitions can deliver financial savings or add additional cost, depending on the project. However, should the revised Policy influence budgeting needs for future DCC projects, funding will be sought as required through the usual processes. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance This decision is considered low significance as the proposed changes seek to give effect to existing resolutions of Council. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been no external engagement. However, the DCC has drawn on the technical advice of subject matter experts from WSP. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The following teams/subject specialists have been consulted with in the course of the policy review: 3 Waters, Enterprise Dunedin, City Development, Community Development and Events, Compliance Solutions, Corporate Policy, Finance, Housing, Project Management Office, Māori Partnerships, Parks and Recreation, Procurement, Property Services, Risk and Internal Audit, Quality and Improvement, Corporate Planning, South Dunedin Future, Transport, Waste and Environmental Solutions, Legal. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. It is considered that there are some reputational risks for the DCC associated with non-delivery on emissions reduction ambitions, given the target adopted by Council in 2019. This policy is within the Chief Executive Officer’s delegation but is being referred to Council because it relates to climate change and there are emerging legal considerations in this area. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest No conflicts of interest have been identified. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards There has been no engagement to date with Community Boards as part of the Zero Carbon work programme. |
Council 30 June 2022 |
Submission on Emissions Reduction Plan
Department: Sustainability Group
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report seeks approval of a Dunedin City Council (DCC) submission to the Environment Select Committee’s inquiry into the Government’s recently released Emissions Reduction Plan.
That the Council: a) Approves the DCC submission to the Environment Select Committee’s inquiry into the Government’s Emissions Reduction Plan, with any amendments b) Authorises the Chief Executive to make any minor editorial changes to the submission. |
BACKGROUND
2 The Environment Select Committee is undertaking an inquiry and inviting submissions on New Zealand’s Emissions Budgets, which were recently confirmed by Parliament, and the Government’s recently released Emissions Reduction Plan (the ERP).
3 The ERP sets out the policies and actions the Government intends to implement to achieve the emissions budgets it has set. These include several areas relevant to local government, especially in the sectors of transport, waste, and buildings.
4 The Environment Select Committee’s deadline for submissions was 27 June 2022. Staff have provided the draft submission to the Select Committee Clerk noting that it is subject to approval or amendment by Council, and any updates will be provided to the Committee.
DISCUSSION
5 The draft DCC submission is largely based on the points made in a previous submission that Council approved in November 2021 on the Emissions Reduction Plan Discussion Document. It also draws on the content of the DCC’s submission on the New Zealand Climate Change Commission’s advice to Government, approved by Council in March 2021.
6 The draft submission provides contextual information relating to the DCC’s climate change mitigation activities, as well as focusing on the following questions which the Environment Select Committee are particularly interested in for the purpose of their inquiry:
· What tools or initiatives would help implement the key actions in the Emissions Reduction Plan and why?
· Are there other key actions which can better achieve the emissions budgets than those in the Emissions Reduction Plan, what are they, and why are they more likely to succeed?
· What type of monitoring and reporting would enable you to be confident that the key actions in the Emissions Reduction Plan are being implemented, and that emissions are falling in line with the emissions budgets? Please state reasons.
7 The submission notes that the DCC’s Zero Carbon 2030 target has a more ambitious timeframe than national targets. The DCC urges accelerated action to reduce gross emissions in the first three budget periods, in particular the decade of 2030. It highlights areas where existing initiatives proposed in the ERP could be piloted in Dunedin and suggests additional areas of action central government agencies could undertake alongside local government to accelerate mitigation efforts.
8 As noted in the previous submission on the discussion document, the draft submission highlights the limited range of regulatory levers, tools and funding currently available to local government to assist in reducing emissions. There are several areas in which a stronger legislative mandate, clearer guidance and support for local government would assist with implementing the transition. These opportunities are further highlighted in the submission.
OPTIONS
Option One – Recommended Option – Approve the DCC submission on the Emissions Reduction Plan (with any amendments)
9 Approve the DCC submission to the Environment Select Committee’s inquiry into the Government’s Emissions Reduction Plan, with any amendments.
Advantages
· Aligns with the DCC submission on the Emissions Reduction Plan Discussion Document and previous submissions on the New Zealand Climate Change Commission’s draft advice
· Enables the DCC to advocate for higher national ambition on emissions reduction, which would in turn assist with achievement of the DCC’s Zero Carbon 2030 target
· Highlights opportunities for the DCC to work with central government agencies to accelerate implementation of initiatives in the Emissions Reduction Plan
Disadvantages
· There are no identified disadvantages to this option.
Option Two – Do not submit on the Emissions Reduction Plan
10 Do not approve the DCC submission to the Environment Select Committee’s inquiry into the Government’s Emissions Reduction Plan.
Advantages
· No identified advantages of this option
Disadvantages
· Missed opportunity to advocate for higher national ambition on emissions reduction in line with DCC’s Zero Carbon 2030 target.
· Missed opportunity to highlight areas where the DCC could work with central government agencies to accelerate implementation of initiatives in the Emissions Reduction Plan.
NEXT STEPS
11 The Environment Select Committee will be advised of the Council’s decision and the draft submission confirmed, amended or withdrawn, as required.
Signatories
Author: |
Rick Zwaan - Senior Policy Analyst, Zero Carbon |
Authoriser: |
Jinty MacTavish - Principal Policy Advisor Sustainability Jeanette Wikaira - Manahautū (General Manager Māori Partnerships and Policy) |
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Draft DCC Submission to Environment Select Committee on Emissions Reduction Plan |
152 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government DCC’s draft submission promotes the social, economic and environmental well-being of communities in the present and for the future, by supporting the facilitation of a transition to a low carbon economy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The draft submission contributes to the goals of the Economic Development and Environment Strategies, Social Wellbeing Strategy, Integrated Transport Strategy, Spatial Plan, Energy Plan 1.0, and the DCC’s Emissions Management and Reduction Plan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement In developing the Emissions Reduction Plan, the Ministry for the Environment has undertaken consultation with iwi on the plan. The Emissions Reduction Plan contains a chapter on empowering Māori with several associated actions. The DCC submission supports this focus. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability Climate change mitigation/emissions reduction efforts are considered key to sustainability. In line with the DCC’s Zero Carbon 2030 target and related strategic goals, the submission provides an opportunity to advocate for higher national ambition on emissions reduction. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy There are no implications of the submission on the 10 Year Plan, Financial Strategy or Infrastructure Strategy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations There are no financial considerations arising from the draft submission. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance The draft submission is considered of low significance in terms of the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external In preparing this submission, staff have spoken with staff from other councils, and liaised with staff at LGNZ. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The submission incorporates feedback from a range of departments, including Transport, Corporate Policy, and Waste and Environmental Solutions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no risks identified related to the draft submission. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest No conflict of interest has been identified. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards There has been no engagement with Community Boards on the draft submission. |
Council 30 June 2022 |
Submission on the Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Fees) Regulations
Department: Corporate Policy
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 The report seeks approval for the Dunedin City Council (DCC) submission (Attachments A and B) to the Ministry of Justice’s survey of Territorial Authorities on the Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Fees) Regulations 2013.
That the Council: a) Approves the DCC submission, with any amendments, to the Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Fees) Regulations 2013 consultation. b) Authorises the Chief Executive to make any minor editorial changes to the submission. |
BACKGROUND
2 Section 404 of the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 requires the Ministry of Justice to review the Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Fees) Regulations 2013 every five years.
3 The Ministry of Justice engaged Allen and Clarke to conduct a survey of territorial authorities on the cost recovery of fees and alcohol licensing functions as a part of the section 404 review.
4 The DCC’s District Licensing Committee (DLC) is responsible for alcohol licensing in the Dunedin Area. Information and data held by the DLC and the DCC has been used to form this submission.
5 In 2019 the DCC adopted the Dunedin Local Alcohol Policy that provides guidance to the DLC and to the Alcohol Regulatory and Licensing Authority, setting expectations about aspects of the sale and supply of alcohol in Dunedin.
DISCUSSION
6 The DCC submission provides information and data on the number of license applications and the number of licenses over time from the DLC.
7 The submission notes the DCC’s strong working relationship with Police and Medical Officers of Health. The DLC fulfils its licensing function with the Dunedin Police and Medical Officers of Health.
8 The DCC submits that there are insufficient means provided for by the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 for the mitigation of harm created by off-license consumption.
OPTIONS
Option One – Recommended Option – Approve the submission, with any amendments to the Ministry of Justice’s survey of Territorial Authorities on the Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Fees) Regulations 2013
9 Approve the draft DCC submission to the Ministry of Justice, with any agreed amendments.
Advantages
· Opportunity to show support for the efficient operation of New Zealand’s alcohol licensing regime.
· Opportunity to contribute to a strong evidence base informing government policy on the alcohol licensing regime and the reduction of harm caused by alcohol consumption.
Disadvantages
· No disadvantages have been identified.
Option Two – Do not approve the submission
10 Do not approve the DCC submission to the Ministry of Justice
Advantages
· No advantages have been identified.
Disadvantages
· Missed opportunity to show support for the efficient operation of New Zealand’s alcohol licensing regime.
· Missed opportunity to contribute to a strong evidence base informing Government policy on the alcohol licensing regime and the reduction of harm caused by alcohol consumption.
NEXT STEPS
11 If approved by Council, staff will submit the survey answers to the Ministry of Justice via Allen and Clarke.
Signatories
Author: |
Callum Wilson - Senior Policy Analyst |
Authoriser: |
Jeanette Wikaira - Manahautū (General Manager Māori Partnerships and Policy) |
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
DCC submission on Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Fees) Regulations 2013 survey |
168 |
⇩b |
Appended information and data to DCC submission on the Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Fees) Regulations 2013 survey |
191 |
⇩c |
Information Sheet - Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Fees) Regulations 2013 survey |
194 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This decision promotes the social well-being of communities in the present and for the future. This decision promotes the economic well-being of communities in the present and for the future. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
This submission is in alignment with the Social Wellbeing Strategy’s strategic directions of vibrant and cohesive communities and safe and healthy people. The Submission is also in alignment with DCC’s Local Alcohol Policy.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement Harm caused by alcohol disproportionately impacts Māori. Data from the Health Promotion Agency shows that hazardous drinking rates are higher for both Māori men and women across all age cohorts when compared to non-Māori. By reducing harm from drinking and reducing hazardous drinking, the Crown are more effectively meeting their obligations under the Treaty of Waitangi. Article Two of the Treaty of Waitangi guarantees Māori authority over their taonga, including their hauora (health). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy There are no implications for these documents. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations There are no financial considerations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance This decision has been assessed as low under the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There was no external engagement. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The Corporate Policy Team led the development of the submission and this cover report and engaged with the Alcohol, Drug and Gambling Advisor – DLC Secretary during this process. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflicts of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards There are no known implications for Community Boards. |
Council 30 June 2022 |
Notice of Motion - Learning Experiences Outside the Classroom
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 In accordance with Standing Order 26.1, the attached Notice of Motion was received from Mayor Aaron Hawkins at least five clear working days before the meeting, for inclusion on the agenda for the meeting being held on Thursday, 30 June 2022.
That the Council: a) Considers the Notice of Motion. |
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Mayor Hawkins NoM |
197 |
|
Council 30 June 2022 |
Notice of Motion - St Clair Groyne Reinstatement
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 In accordance with Standing Order 26.1, the attached Notice of Motion was received from Cr Jules Radich at least five clear working days before the meeting, for inclusion on the agenda for the meeting being held on Thursday, 30 June 2022.
That the Council: a) Considers the Notice of Motion. |
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Cr Radich NoM |
199 |
⇩b |
Submission for reinstatement of St Clair Groyne |
200 |