Notice of Meeting:
I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Dunedin City Council will be held on:
Date: Wednesday 26 February 2025
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Venue: Council Chamber, Dunedin Public Art Gallery, The Octagon, Dunedin
Sandy Graham
Chief Executive Officer
Council
UPDATED PUBLIC AGENDA
MEMBERSHIP
Mayor |
Mayor Jules Radich |
|
Deputy Mayor |
Cr Cherry Lucas
|
|
Members |
Cr Bill Acklin |
Cr Sophie Barker |
|
Cr David Benson-Pope |
Cr Christine Garey |
|
Cr Kevin Gilbert |
Cr Carmen Houlahan |
|
Cr Marie Laufiso |
Cr Mandy Mayhem |
|
Cr Jim O'Malley |
Cr Lee Vandervis |
|
Cr Steve Walker |
Cr Brent Weatherall |
|
Cr Andrew Whiley |
|
Senior Officer Sandy Graham, Chief Executive Officer
Governance Support Officer Lynne Adamson
Lynne Adamson
Governance Support Officer
Telephone: 03 477 4000
governance.support@dcc.govt.nz
Note: Reports and recommendations contained in this agenda are not to be considered as Council policy until adopted.
|
Council 26 February 2025 |
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Opening 4
2 Public Forum 4
3 Apologies 4
4 Confirmation of Agenda 4
5 Declaration of Interest 5
6 Confirmation of Minutes 17
6.1 Ordinary Council meeting - 11 February 2025 17
6.2 Ordinary Council meeting - 28 January 2025 25
Reports
7 Actions From Resolutions of Council Meetings 67
8 Forward Work Programme for Council - February 2025 79
9 9 Year Plan 2025-2034 Community Consultation 87
10 Financial Report - Period ended 31 December 2024 100
11 Election 2025 - Order of Candidate Names for Voting Document 130
12 Sustainability Update Report 133
13 Strategic Refresh Advisory Panel - Update Report 152
14 Approval to Grant Easement to Convey Water over part of St Leonards Reserve, St Leonards, Dunedin 156
15 Resolution to Stop Part of Sligo Terrace, Dunedin 173
16 Resolution to Stop Part of Hatfield Street, Dunedin 184
17 Proposed Event Road Closures 194
Resolution to Exclude the Public 206
|
Council 26 February 2025 |
Members of the Dhargyey Buddhist Centre will open the meeting with a prayer.
At the close of the agenda public forum registrations were still being taken. The speakers will be confirmed following closure of registrations 24 hours before the meeting begins i.e. 9am Tuesday 25 February 2025.
There are no apologies.
Note: Any additions must be approved by resolution with an explanation as to why they cannot be delayed until a future meeting.
|
Council 26 February 2025 |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. Members are reminded of the need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.
2. Elected members are reminded to update their register of interests as soon as practicable, including amending the register at this meeting if necessary.
3. Staff are reminded to update their register of interests as soon as practicable.
That the Council:
a) Notes/Amends if necessary the Elected Members' Interest Register attached as Attachment A; and
b) Confirms/Amends the proposed management plan for Elected Members' Interests.
c) Notes the proposed management plan for the Executive Leadership Team’s Interests.
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Councillor Register of Interest |
6 |
⇩b |
ELT Register of Interest |
15 |
|
Council 26 February 2025 |
Ordinary Council meeting - 11 February 2025
That the Council:
a) Confirms the public part of the minutes of the Ordinary Council meeting held on 11 February 2025 as a correct record.
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
A⇩ |
Minutes of Ordinary Council meeting held on 11 February 2025 |
18 |
|
Council 26 February 2025 |
Council
MINUTES
Minutes of an ordinary meeting of the Dunedin City Council held in the Council Chamber, Dunedin Public Art Gallery, The Octagon, Dunedin on Tuesday 11 February 2025, commencing at 1.03 pm
PRESENT
Mayor |
Mayor Jules Radich |
|
Deputy Mayor |
Cr Cherry Lucas
|
|
Members |
Cr Bill Acklin |
Cr Sophie Barker |
|
Cr David Benson-Pope |
Cr Christine Garey |
|
Cr Kevin Gilbert |
Cr Carmen Houlahan |
|
Cr Mandy Mayhem |
Cr Jim O’Malley |
|
Cr Lee Vandervis |
Cr Steve Walker |
|
Cr Brent Weatherall |
Cr Andrew Whiley |
IN ATTENDANCE |
Sandy Graham (Chief Executive Officer), Robert West (General Manager Corporate Services), Scott MacLean (General Manager Climate and City Growth), Paul Henderson (General Manager Customer and Regulatory - Acting), Hayden McAuliffe (Financial Services Manager), John McAndrew (Group Manager 3 Waters), Rory McLean (Senior Policy Analyst – Zero Carbon) and Sharon Bodeker (Special Projects Manager), Nic Jepson (Senior Planner, Resource Consents), Kathryn van Beek (Communications Team Manager) and Heath Ellis (Group Manager Parks and Recreation) |
Governance Support Officer Lynne Adamson
1 Public Forum
There was no Public Forum.
2 Apologies |
|
|
There was an apology from Cr Marie Laufiso. Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas): That the Council: Accepts the apology from Cr Marie Laufiso. Motion carried Motion carried (CNL/2025/058) |
3 Confirmation of agenda |
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas): That the Council:
Confirms the agenda without addition or alteration
Motion carried (CNL/2025/059) |
4 Declarations of interest
Members were reminded of the need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arose between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.
Cr Mandy Mayhem declared an update to her interest register.
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas): That the Council:
a) Amends the Elected Members' Interest Register attached; and b) Confirms the proposed management plan for Elected Members' Interests. c) Notes the proposed management plan for the Executive Leadership Team’s Interests. Motion carried (CNL/2025/060) |
Reports
5 Significant Forecasting Assumptions - Update |
|
|
A report from Civic sought Council approval for significant forecasting assumptions for 3 waters, levels of service and future legislative changes, that would be used in the development of the 9 year plan 2025-34 (the 9 year plan). |
|
The Special Projects Manager (Sharon Bodeker) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
Cr Carmen Houlahan entered the meeting at 1.07 pm.
|
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Jim O'Malley): That the Council:
a) Approves the significant forecasting assumptions to be used in the development of the 9 year plan 2025-34. b) Authorises the Chief Executive to make any minor amendments, following discussions, to the Significant Forecasting Assumptions. Motion carried (CNL/2025/061) with Cr Lee Vandervis recording his vote against |
|
A report from Civic presented the draft consultation document for the 9 year plan 2025-34 (9 year plan). It explained the Council’s proposals for the 9 year plan, in plain English, and was based on the decisions made by Council at its meeting on 28 – 30 January 2025. The report noted that the draft consultation document had been submitted to Audit New Zealand (Audit NZ), who were currently auditing it and its supporting documentation. Audit NZ would provide Council with an ‘Independent Auditor’s report’ on completion of the audit, scheduled for mid-March 2025. |
|
The Chief Executive Officer (Sandy Graham), Special Projects Manager (Sharon Bodeker) and the Financial Services Manager (Hayden McAuliffe) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
During discussion it was moved (Cr Cherry Lucas/Cr Kevin Gilbert):
That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting for five minutes.
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 2.42 pm and reconvened at 2.53 pm.
|
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas): That the Council:
a) Notes the draft Consultation Document. b) Authorises the Chief Executive Officer to make minor changes to the Consultation Document as discussed. Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Bill Acklin, Sophie Barker, David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Carmen Houlahan, Cherry Lucas, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Steve Walker, Brent Weatherall, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (13). Against: Cr Lee Vandervis (1). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 13 votes to 1
Motion carried (CNL/2025/062) |
7 Development Contributions Policy Update |
|
|
A report from Civic provided an updated draft Development Contributions Policy for consideration by Council. It incorporated the growth-related capital expenditure provided for in the 9 year plan 2025-2034 and the current growth projections for the city. |
|
The Special Projects Manager (Sharon Bodeker) and Senior Planner Resource Consents (Nic Jepson) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Cr Jim O'Malley/Cr Lee Vandervis): That the Council:
a) Approves the draft Development Contributions Policy for the purposes of consultation as part of the 9 year plan 2025-34. b) Notes that the final Development Contributions Policy will be considered as part of the 9 year plan deliberations. Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Bill Acklin, Sophie Barker, David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Cherry Lucas, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Lee Vandervis, Steve Walker, Brent Weatherall, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (13). Against: Cr Carmen Houlahan (1). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 13 votes to 1
Motion carried (CNL/2025/063) |
8 Financial Report - Period ended 30 November 2024 |
|
|
A report from Finance provided the financial results for the period ended 30 November 2024 and the financial position as at that date. |
|
The Financial Services Manager (Hayden McAuliffe) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
During discussion Cr Carmen Houlahan left the meeting at 3.32 pm and returned at 3.36 pm.
|
|
|
Moved (Cr Lee Vandervis/Cr Cherry Lucas): That the Council:
a) Notes the Financial Performance for the period ended 30 November 2024 and the Financial Position as at that date. Motion carried (CNL/2025/064) |
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Mandy Mayhem)
That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting for 5 minutes.
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 3.47 pm and reconvened at 4.01 pm.
9 Save our Southern Hospital Campaign Update |
|
|
A report from Communications and Marketing provided an update on the Save Our Southern Hospital campaign. The report noted that the Council had reignited the Save Our Southern Hospital campaign to fight the proposed cuts to the New Dunedin Hospital, which had now largely been reversed. |
|
The General Manager Corporate Services (Robert West) and Acting Communications Team Manager (Kathryn van Beek) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
During discussion Cr Bill Acklin left the meeting at 4.23 pm.
|
|
|
Moved (Cr Kevin Gilbert/Cr Christine Garey): That the Council:
a) Notes the update report on the SOS Hospital campaign. b) Formally records a vote of thanks to the clinicians, members of the steering group, project team and the Cliff group for all their work on the new Southern Tertiary Hospital project to date c) Notes that the Mayor would write a letter of thanks to members of all the relevant groups. Motion carried (CNL/2025/065) |
10 Appointment of Advisory Panel to consider Dunedin District Licensing Committee Applications |
|
|
A report from Civic sought approval for an Advisory Panel of up to five Councillors and one independent member (if required) be set to consider and make recommendations on expressions of interest received for new community representative positions for the District Licensing Committee. |
|
The General Manager Corporate Services (Robert West) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Cr Cherry Lucas/Cr Jim O'Malley): That the Council:
a) Appoints an Advisory Panel consisting of Crs Sophie Barker, Andrew Whiley; Steve Walker; Kevin Gilbert, Bill Acklin and one independent member (if required) to consider the applications received for the Dunedin District Licensing Committee. b) Approves the draft Terms of Reference (with any amendment) for the Advisory Panel. c) Notes that the Advisory Panel will make recommendations on the appointments to Council. Motion carried (CNL/2025/066) |
Resolution to Exclude the Public |
||||||||||||||||
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Steve Walker): That the Council:
Pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, exclude the public from the following part of the proceedings of this meeting namely:
This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, and the particular interest or interests protected by Section 6 or Section 7 of that Act, or Section 6 or Section 7 or Section 9 of the Official Information Act 1982, as the case may require, which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as shown above after each item.
Motion carried (CNL/2025/067) |
The meeting moved into confidential at 4.50 pm and concluded at 6.47 pm.
..............................................
MAYOR
Council 26 February 2025 |
Ordinary Council meeting - 28 January 2025
That the Council:
a) Confirms the public part of the minutes of the Ordinary Council meeting held on 28 January 2025 as a correct record.
Attachments
|
Title |
Page |
A⇩ |
Minutes of Ordinary Council meeting held on 28 January 2025 |
26 |
|
Council 26 February 2025 |
Council
MINUTES
Minutes of an ordinary meeting of the Dunedin City Council held in the Council Chamber, Dunedin Public Art Gallery, The Octagon, Dunedin on Tuesday 28 January 2025, commencing at 9:00 a.m.
PRESENT
Mayor |
Mayor Jules Radich |
|
Deputy Mayor |
Cr Cherry Lucas
|
|
Members |
Cr Bill Acklin |
Cr Sophie Barker |
|
Cr David Benson-Pope |
Cr Christine Garey |
|
Cr Kevin Gilbert |
Cr Carmen Houlahan |
|
Cr Marie Laufiso |
Cr Mandy Mayhem |
|
Cr Jim O'Malley |
Cr Lee Vandervis |
|
Cr Steve Walker |
Cr Brent Weatherall |
|
Cr Andrew Whiley |
|
IN ATTENDANCE |
Sandy Graham (Chief Executive Officer), Robert West (General Manager Corporate Services), Jeanette Wikaira (General Manager Arts, Culture and Recreation), Carolyn Allan (Chief Financial Officer), Scott MacLean (General Manager Climate and City Growth), David Ward (General Manager 3 Waters and Transition), Nicola Morand (Manahautū - General Manager Policy and Partnerships), Paul Henderson (Acting General Manager, Customer and Regulatory), Sharon Bodeker (Special Projects Manager), Hayden McAuliffe (Finance Services Manager), Jinty MacTavish (Principal Policy Advisor Sustainability), John McAndrew (Acting Group Manager, 3 Waters), Jonathan Rowe (Programme Manager, South Dunedin Future), Jeanine Benson (Group Manager Transport), Chris Henderson (Group Manager Waste and Environmental Solutions), Anna Nilsen (Group Manager Property), Heath Ellis (Acting Group Manager, Parks and Recreation), Glen Pleasants (Operations Manager, DPAG, Toitū, Lan Yuan and Olveston), Sian Sutton (Dunedin Destination Manager), Lisa Wilkie (Kaiarahi – Team Leader Creative Partnerships), Mark Mawdsley (Team Leader Advisory Services, City Development), Fraser Liggett (Economic Development Programme Manager), Suzanne Jenkins (Finance and Operations Manager), Dr Anna Johnson (City Development Manager), Hayley Knight (Assurance Manager), Dan Hendra (Team Leader – Events) and Alan Worthington (Resource Consents Manager) |
Governance Support Officers Lynne Adamson, Wendy Collard and Lauren Riddle
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Mayor acknowledged the recent passing of Martin Dillon, a member of the Mosgiel Taieri Community Board for 25 years from 1997 to 2022. He spoke of his work and achievements for the community and extended his deepest sympathy.
1 Opening
Rev Greg Hughson opened the meeting with a prayer on behalf of the Dunedin Interfaith Society.
2 Public Forum
There was no public forum for this meeting.
3 Apologies |
|
|
There was an apology for lateness from Cr Brent Weatherall and from Cr Marie Laufiso for absence from 9.00 am until 1.00 pm on Wednesday 29 January.
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Mandy Mayhem):
That the Council:
Accepts the apology for lateness from Cr Weatherall, and the absence on Wednesday 29 January, from Cr Laufiso.
Motion carried (CNL/2025/001) |
4 Confirmation of agenda |
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas): That the Council:
Confirms the agenda with the following alterations:
That Item 10 Zero Carbon Investment Packages be taken before Item 38 Grants Review Update and
That the meeting moves into non-public at 9.00 am on Wednesday 29 January 2025 and when it reconvenes in public, Item 40 – The Future of Dunedin Railways Limited will be the first report considered.
Motion carried (CNL/2025/002) |
5 Declarations of interest
Members were reminded of the need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arose between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.
Crs Steve Walker and Mandy Mayhem provided an update to their Interest Register.
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas): That the Council:
a) Amends the Elected Members' Interest Register; and b) Amends the proposed management plan for Elected Members' Interests. c) Notes the proposed management plan for the Executive Leadership Team’s Interests. Motion carried (CNL/2025/003) |
6 Confirmation of Minutes
6.1 Ordinary Council meeting - 10 December 2024 |
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Steve Walker): That the Council:
a) Confirms the public part of the minutes of the Ordinary Council meeting held on 10 December 2024 as a correct record. Motion carried (CNL/2025/004) |
Reports
7 CEO Overview Report - 9 year plan 2025-34 |
|
|
A report from the Chief Executive Officer and Finance provided an overview of the draft budgets and what would be included in the draft 9 year plan 2025-34 (the 9 year plan). It noted that the draft 9 year plan sets the direction for the Dunedin City Council (DCC) for the next 9 years. The Chief Executive Officer (Sandy Graham) and Chief Financial Officer (Carolyn Allan) spoke to the report and responded to questions. |
During discussion, Cr Carmen Houlahan left the meeting at 10.15 am. Cr Brent Weatherall entered the meeting at 10.38 am.
|
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas):
That the Council:
a) Adopts the draft 9 year plan 2025-34 forecast financial statements for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and engaging with the community. b) Notes that any resolution made in this meeting, relating to the 9 year plan reports may be subject to further discussion and decision by the meeting. Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Bill Acklin, Sophie Barker, David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Marie Laufiso, Cherry Lucas, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Steve Walker, Brent Weatherall, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (13). Against: Cr Lee Vandervis (1). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 13 votes to 1
Motion carried (CNL/2025/005) |
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas)
That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting for 10 minutes.
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 10.42 am and reconvened at 10.59 am.
8 Financial Strategy - 9 year plan 2025-34 |
|
|
A report from Finance provided a copy of the Financial Strategy. The report noted that it provided a guide for considering proposals for funding and expenditure, and made transparent the overall effects of proposals on services, rates, debt and investments. The Chief Executive Officer (Sandy Graham), Chief Financial Officer (Carolyn Allan) and the Finance Services Manager (Hayden McAuliffe) spoke to the report and responded to questions. |
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Steve Walker): That the Council:
a) Approves the draft Financial Strategy for consultation as part of the 9 year plan 2025-34. Motion carried (CNL/2025/006) with Cr Lee Vandervis recording his vote against |
9 Infrastructure Strategy - 9 year plan 2025-34 |
|
|
A report from Transport and 3 Waters sought approval for the draft Infrastructure Strategy for the purpose of public consultation for the 9 year plan 2025-34. The Chief Executive Officer (Sandy Graham), General Manager, 3 Waters and Transition (David Ward), General Manager Climate and City Growth (Scott MacLean), Group Manager Transport (Jeanine Benson) and Acting Group Manager, 3 Waters (John McAndrew) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
During discussion Cr Carmen Houlahan returned to the meeting at 11.30 am. Cr Mandy Mayhem left the meeting at 12.18 pm and returned at 12.19 pm.
|
|
|
Moved (Cr Jim O'Malley/Cr Brent Weatherall): That the Council:
a) Approves the draft Infrastructure Strategy, with any amendments, for public consultation purposes for the 9 year plan 2025-34. b) Notes the draft Infrastructure Strategy may be amended if needed to reflect any audit recommendations and/or any Council decisions on budgets. Motion carried (CNL/2025/007) with Cr Lee Vandervis recording his vote against. |
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Steve Walker):
That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting for 30 minutes.
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 12.32 pm and reconvened at 1.05 pm.
Cr Lee Vandervis entered the meeting at 1.20 pm.
|
A report from Quality and Improvement provided a copy of the statement of the intended Levels of Service (LOS) for each group of activities undertaken by Council. The report sought approval for proposed LOS statements for each group of activities, for inclusion in the draft 9 year plan 2025-34. The General Manager Corporate Services (Robert West) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas):
That the Council:
a) Approves the draft 2025-34 Levels of Service for inclusion in the draft 9 year plan and supporting consultation information. b) Authorises the Chief Executive Officer to make any minor amendments to the draft Levels of Service, as a result of this meeting for the purposes on consultation on the 9 year plan 2025-34. Motion carried (CNL/2025/008) with Cr Lee Vandervis recording his vote against |
|
A report from Finance sought approval of the draft capital budget for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and consulting with the community. The Chief Executive Officer (Sandy Graham) and the Chief Financial Officer (Carolyn Allan) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Kevin Gilbert):
That the Council:
a) Approves the draft capital budget programme, with any amendments, for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and consulting with the community. b) Approves the updated Significant Forecasting Assumption reflecting the NZTA Waka Kotahi subsidy rate for capital expenditure. Motion carried (CNL/2025/009) with Cr Lee Vandervis recording his vote against. |
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Steve Walker):
That the Council:
a) Extends the meeting beyond 6 hours.
b) Adjourns the meeting for 10 minutes.
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 2.48 pm and reconvened at 3.03 pm.
|
A report from 3 Waters provided an overview of the operating expenditure budgets for year one of the 9 year plan 2025-34, and the variations from the year one budget for years two to nine for the 3 Waters Group. The General Manager, 3 Waters and Transition (David Ward) and Acting Group Manager, 3 Waters (John McAndrew) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Cr Jim O'Malley/Cr Brent Weatherall): That the Council:
a) Adopts for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and consulting with the community: i) The draft operating budgets and funding impact statement for 3 Waters as shown at Attachments A, B and C of the report. ii) The draft 2025/26 fees and charges schedules for 3 Waters as shown at Attachment D of the report. Motion carried (CNL/2025/010) with Cr Lee Vandervis recording his vote against |
14 South Dunedin Flood Alleviation - Short-term options |
|
|
A report from Climate and City Growth provided options for undertaking short-term, ostensibly no-regrets actions, to support flood mitigation in South Dunedin. The General Manager, Climate and City Growth (Scott MacLean), Programme Manager, South Dunedin Future (Jonathan Rowe) and Acting Group Manager, 3 Waters (John McAndrew) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
It was agreed that discussion on this item would be continued on the morning of Wednesday, 29 January 2025.
|
Cr Carmen Houlahan left the meeting at 4.11 pm and returned at 4.19 pm.
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Kevin Gilbert
That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting for 10 mins.
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 4.29 pm and reconvened at 4.53 pm
Crs Bill Acklin, Lee Vandervis and Carmen Houlahan left the meeting at 4.54 pm
Resolution to Exclude the Public |
||||||||||||||||
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas:
That the Council:
Pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, exclude the public from the following part of the proceedings of this meeting namely:
This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, and the particular interest or interests protected by Section 6 or Section 7 of that Act, or Section 6 or Section 7 or Section 9 of the Official Information Act 1982, as the case may require, which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as shown above after each item. That the meeting is adjourned and reconvene at 9.00 am on Wednesday 29 January 2025. Motion carried |
The meeting resumed in non-public at 9.00 am on Wednesday, 29 January 2025 and moved back into public at 11.00 am.
Cr Andrew Whiley left the meeting at 11.00 am.
Public Forum
Dunedin Railways Limited
Paul Jackson from Pounamu spoke to his PowerPoint presentation on Dunedin Railways Limited and Pounamu’s proposal for running Dunedin Railways.
Mr Jackson responded to questions.
40 Future of Dunedin Railways Ltd - 9 year plan 2025-34 (11.15 am start) |
|
|
A report from Civic requested that under Standing Order 23.6, three resolutions that were passed at the 12 March 2024 Council meeting be revoked. These resolutions related to the preparation of an options assessment of rail, cycling and walking, governance options, and liaison with various groups interested in the future use of the rail corridor as part of the 9 year plan. The report also requested that Dunedin City Holdings Limited fund $2 million per annum, towards the renewals of the Taieri Gorge Line rail corridor. The Chief Executive Officer (Sandy Graham), the Chair of Dunedin City Holdings (Tim Loan), the Chairperson, Dunedin Railways Ltd (Adrian Januszkiewicz) and the General Manager Commercial Operations, Dunedin Railway Ltd (Rebekah Jenkins) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Cr Bill Acklin/Cr Mandy Mayhem): That the Council: a) Revokes resolution CNL/2024/034, c), d) and e) as follows: Revokes the direction to staff to prepare an options assessment of rail, cycling and walking in advance of the 9 year plan 2025-34, including the requirement to provide governance options that would align with any proposals in the Council’s Draft Investment Plan, and the direction to liaise with various groups interested in the future use of the rail corridor. b) Directs Dunedin City Holdings Limited to fund up to $2 million per annum to Dunedin Railways Limited, to fund the renewals of the Taieri Gorge Line rail corridor. c) Notes that the dividend from Dunedin City Holdings to Council would be reduced by $2 million for two years. Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Bill Acklin, Sophie Barker, David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Carmen Houlahan, Cherry Lucas, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Lee Vandervis, Steve Walker, Brent Weatherall and Mayor Jules Radich (13). Against: Nil Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 13 votes to 0
Motion carried (CNL/2025/011) |
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas)
That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting for 35 minutes
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 12.42 pm and reconvened at 1.21 pm.
Cr Andrew Whiley entered the meeting at 1.21 pm.
14 South Dunedin Flood Alleviation - Short Term Options - CONTINUED |
|
|
A report from Climate and City Growth provided options for undertaking short-term, ostensibly no-regrets actions, to support flood mitigation in South Dunedin. The General Manager, Climate and City Growth (Scott MacLean), Programme Manager, South Dunedin Future (Jonathan Rowe) and Acting Group Manager, 3 Waters (John McAndrew) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
Cr Carmen Houlahan entered the meeting at 1.27 pm during debate of the item.
|
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Jim O'Malley): That the Council:
a) Approves for inclusion in the draft budget funding of $44.214 million South Dunedin Flood Alleviation. b) Notes the South Dunedin Flood Alleviation Budget include the following projects: i. Diversion of the Bay View Rd and New St stormwater systems to a new pipe directly to the Portobello PS at a Class 5 Cost Estimate of $1.916 million. ii. Upsize Forbury Road pipe at a Class 5 Cost Estimate of $12.000 million. iii. Hillside Road mains disconnected and pumped to Orari St outfall at a Class 5 Cost Estimate of $15.298 million. iv. South Dunedin Flood Alleviation medium term option, $15.000 million c) Notes that this proposal represents a change in debt of $11.714 million compared to the draft budgets. d) Notes the additional operating costs for a project manager will be met within existing budgets. e) Notes that the additional interest cost of $10k will be offset within 3 waters operational budgets in year 1. Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Bill Acklin, Sophie Barker, David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Carmen Houlahan, Cherry Lucas, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Steve Walker, Brent Weatherall, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (13). Against: Cr Lee Vandervis (1). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 13 votes to 1
Motion carried (CNL/2025/012) |
17 Waste Minimisation - Draft Operating Budget 9 year plan 2025-34 |
|
Cr Bill Acklin left the meeting at 1.34 pm and entered the meeting at 1.43 pm Cr Marie Laufiso entered the meeting at 1.43 pm. |
|
|
A report from Waste and Environmental Solutions provided an overview of the operating expenditure (opex) budgets for year one of the 9 year plan 2025-34 and the variations from year one budget for years two to nine for the Waste Management Group. The General Manager, Climate and City Growth (Scott MacLean) and the Group Manager Waste and Environmental Solutions (Chris Henderson) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas):
That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting for 10 minutes.
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 1.45 pm and reconvened at 1.56 pm Cr Bill Acklin left the meeting at 1:56 pm.
|
|
|
It was agreed that the resolutions be taken in three sections a) –(i) and (ii), item b) and then item c).
|
|
Moved (Cr Jim O'Malley/Cr Brent Weatherall): That the Council: a) Adopts for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and consulting with the community:
i) The draft operating budgets and funding impact statement for Waste Minimisation. as shown/amended at Attachments A, B and C in the report.
ii) The draft 2025/26 fees and charges schedules for Waste Minimisation as shown/amended at Attachment D in the report. Motion carried (CNL/2025/013) with Cr Lee Vandervis recording his vote against.
|
|
Moved (Cr Jim O'Malley/Cr Brent Weatherall): That the Council: b) Uses the Waste Minimisation Reserve to fund the temporary costs of transporting organic and co-mingled kerbside waste to the processing plant in Timaru (estimated $1.713 million) until the processing facilities at Green Island begin to become operational in stages beginning late in 2025 or early 2026
Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Sophie Barker, David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Carmen Houlahan, Cherry Lucas, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Brent Weatherall, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (10). Against: Crs Kevin Gilbert, Marie Laufiso, Lee Vandervis and Steve Walker (4). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 10 votes to 4
Motion carried (CNL/2025/014)
|
|
Moved (Cr Jim O'Malley/Cr Brent Weatherall): That the Council: c) Reallocates the reduction of the Kerbside Rate (estimated $1.713 million) to the General Rate so the overall rate increase will remain at 9.95%. Motion carried (CNL/2025/015) with Cr Vandervis recording his vote against. |
|
|
18 Smooth Hill Update |
|
|
A report from the Executive Leadership Team provided the decision that was made in a non-public Council meeting and the in-principle decision to build Smooth Hill for inclusion of in the 9 year plan 2025-34. The Chief Executive Officer (Sandy Graham) spoke to the report.
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr David Benson-Pope): That the Council:
a) Notes this Smooth Hill Update Report. Motion carried (CNL/2025/016) with Cr Lee Vandervis recording his vote against |
15 Roading and Footpaths - Draft Operating Budget - 9 year plan 2025-34 |
|
|
A report from Transport provided an overview of the operating expenditure budgets for year one of the 9 year plan 2025-34, and variations from the year one budget for years two to nine for the Roading and Footpaths Group. The General Manager, Climate and City Growth (Scott MacLean) and the Group Manager Transport (Jeanine Benson) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Cr Jim O'Malley/Cr Brent Weatherall): That the Council: a) Adopts for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and consulting with the community iii) The draft operating budgets and funding impact statement for Roading and Footpaths as shown at Attachments A, B and C of the report. iv) The draft 2025/26 fees and charges schedules for Roading and Footpaths as shown at Attachment D of the report. Motion carried (CNL/2025/017) |
16 Peninsula Connection - Unfunded Sections |
|
|
Cr Bill Acklin returned to the meeting at 2.35 pm. A report from Transport provided options for funding the Peninsula Connection Road Safety project (Peninsula Connection) between Portobello and Harington Point (the unfunded sections), which were currently incomplete. The General Manager, Climate and City Growth (Scott MacLean) and the Group Manager Transport (Jeanine Benson) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Cr Christine Garey/Cr Andrew Whiley): That the Council: a) Notes the Peninsula Connection – Unfunded Sections report. b) Includes funding in the draft budget for the remaining three sections of the Peninsula Road Safety Connection project in priority order: i) $8m to be included to construct the Ellison Rd to Ōtākou Fisheries Wharf section ii) $6.9m to be included to construct the Tidewater Dr to Ellison Rd section iii) $3.6m to be included for the Portobello to Weir Rd (inland route) c) Notes the projects would be delivered in years 2, 3 and 4. d) Notes that there was no co-funding available from New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) Waka Kotahi available.
e) Notes that staff would continue to explore external funding opportunities.
f) Notes that if funded, the capital upgrades would require annual operating budget for interest, depreciation, and maintenance to be added to the budget following the completion of each section. |
|
There was discussion on the following amendment.
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Bill Acklin): That the Council: Amends Part C to read: d) Notes the projects would be delivered in years 3, 6 and 9.
|
|
With the leave of the meeting, Mayor Radich withdrew his amendment.
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Jim O'Malley): That the Council:
Withdraws the amendment as above e) Notes the projects would be delivered in years 3, 6 and 9. Motion carried (CNL/2025/018)
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas):
That the Council
Adjourns the meeting
The meeting adjourned at 3.00 pm and reconvened 3.22 pm
|
|
There was discussion on a further amendment.
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Bill Acklin): That the Council:
Amends Part C to read: Notes the projects will be delivered in years 2, 5 and 8. Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Bill Acklin, Cherry Lucas, Brent Weatherall and Mayor Jules Radich (4). Against: Crs David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Marie Laufiso, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Lee Vandervis, Steve Walker and Andrew Whiley (9). Abstained: Crs Sophie Barker and Carmen Houlahan (2).
The division was declared LOST by 9 votes to 4
|
|
The substantive motion was then put.
|
|
Moved (Cr Christine Garey/Cr Andrew Whiley):
That the Council: a) Notes the Peninsula Connection – Unfunded Sections report. b) Includes funding in the draft budget for the remaining three sections of the Peninsula Road Safety Connection project in priority order: iv) $8m to be included to construct the Ellison Rd to Ōtākou Fisheries Wharf section v) $6.9m to be included to construct the Tidewater Dr to Ellison Rd section vi) $3.6m to be included for the Portobello to Weir Rd (inland route) c) Notes the projects will be delivered in years 2, 3 and 4
d) Notes that there is no co-funding available from New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) Waka Kotahi available.
e) Notes that staff will continue to explore external funding opportunities.
f) Notes that if funded, the capital upgrades will require annual operating budget for interest, depreciation, and maintenance to be added to the budget following the completion of each section.
Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Sophie Barker, David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Marie Laufiso, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Steve Walker and Andrew Whiley (9). Against: Crs Bill Acklin, Carmen Houlahan, Cherry Lucas, Lee Vandervis, Brent Weatherall and Mayor Jules Radich (6). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 9 votes to 6
Motion carried (CNL/2025/019) |
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Mayhem)
That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting for 5 minutes
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 4.08 pm and reconvened at 4.16 pm.
Cr Acklin left the meeting during the adjournment.
49 Public Consultation Dates for the Draft Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2025 |
|
|
A report from Waste and Environmental Solutions sought approval for the change the dates for the public consultation on the Draft Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2025 (Draft WMMP). The report also sought the appointment of a Hearings Panel and noted the Hearings would be held in the first week of April 2025. The General Manager, Climate and City Growth (Scott MacLean), the Group Manager Waste and Environmental Solutions (Chris Henderson) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
Following discussion, it was agreed that a report would be presented to Council at its meeting being held on 11 February 2025 to appointment the Hearings Panel.
|
|
Moved (Cr Cherry Lucas/Cr Jim O'Malley): That the Council:
a) Approves changing the dates for the public consultation period for the Draft Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2025 to 30 January to 28 February 2025. Motion carried (CNL/2025/020) |
19 City Properties - Draft Operating Budget 9 year plan 2025-34 |
|
Cr Bill Acklin returned to the meeting at 4.27 pm. |
|
|
A report from Property provided an overview of the operating expenditure budgets for year one of the 9 year plan 2025-34, and variations from the year one budget for years two to nine for City Properties. The General Manager Corporate Services (Robert West) and the Group Manager Property Services (Anna Nilsen) spoke to the report and responded to questions. It was agreed that the resolutions be taken in two sections a) (i) and then item a (ii).
|
|
Moved (Cr Cherry Lucas/Cr Kevin Gilbert): That the Council:
a) Adopts for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and consulting with the community i) The draft operating budgets and funding impact statement for City Properties as shown/amended at Attachments A, B and C of the report. Motion carried (CNL/2025/021)
|
|
Moved (Cr Cherry Lucas/Cr Kevin Gilbert): That the Council: a) Adopts for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and consulting with the community ii) The draft 2025/26 fees and charges schedules for City Properties with the amendment to include fees for Sunday parking. Motion carried (CNL/2025/022) with Cr Carmen Houlahan recording her vote against
|
|
The General Manager Corporate Services (Robert West) and the Group Manager Property Services (Anna Nilsen) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Steve Walker)
That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting for 5 minutes.
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 5.03 pm and reconvened at 5.11 pm.
|
|
|
Moved (Cr Mandy Mayhem/Cr Christine Garey): That the Council: a) Notes the Public Toilets Programme - update report. b) Installs a Changing Places Bathroom in 2025/26, and includes a budget of $750k in the 9 year plan 2025-34 new capital budget. c) Notes that the Changing Places Bathroom would include three facilities consisting of an ambulatory bathroom; an accessible bathroom and a Changing Places Bathroom. Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Sophie Barker, David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Carmen Houlahan, Marie Laufiso, Cherry Lucas, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Steve Walker, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (12). Against: Crs Lee Vandervis and Brent Weatherall (2). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 12 votes to 2
Motion carried (CNL/2025/023) |
24 Sports Field Fees and Charges |
|
|
A report from Parks and Recreation outlined the sports field fees and charges review and the adjustments required alignment with the Revenue and Financing policy. The General Manager Arts, Culture and Recreation (Jeanette Wikaira) and the Acting Group Manager Parks and Recreation (Heath Ellis) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Steve Walker): That the Council:
a) Agrees to Increase the sports fields fees and charges to a Revenue and Financing policy setting of 95% rates funded and 5% user pays. Motion carried (CNL/2025/024) |
48 Updated meeting schedule 2025 |
|
|
A report from Civic provided an updated meeting schedule for 2025 Council meetings for approval, in accordance with Clause 19(6)(a) of Schedule 7 of the Local Government Act 2002. The Chief Executive Officer (Sandy Graham) spoke to the report and responded to questions. |
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas): That the Council:
a) Approves the revised meeting schedule for 2025 as attached to this report. Motion carried (CNL/2025/025) |
50 Proposed Event Road Closures |
|||||||||||
|
A report from Transport sought approval for temporary road closures for the following events: a) South Dunedin Street Festival b) Graduation Parade |
||||||||||
|
Moved (Cr Christine Garey/Cr Cherry Lucas): That the Council:
a) Resolves to close the roads detailed below (pursuant to Section 319, Section 342, and Schedule 10 clause 11(e) of the Local Government Act 1974 (LGA 1974)): i) South Dunedin Street Festival
ii) Graduation Parade
Motion carried (CNL/2025/026) |
Crs Mandy Mayhem and Steve Walker left the meeting at 5.27 pm.
45 Compliance with the Revenue and Financing Policy |
|
|
A report from Civic provided the level of compliance that the 2025/26 year of the draft 9 year plan 2025-34 had with the Revenue and Financing Policy (Policy), and made some recommendations for change to the draft Policy The Chief Financial Officer (Carolyn Allan) and the Special Projects Manager (Sharon Bodeker) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Cr Cherry Lucas/Cr Sophie Barker): That the Council:
a) Approves the updates to the Revenue Policy, with any amendments, for the following activities: · Cemeteries, · Olveston, · Governance and Support Services, · Transport, and · Visitors Centre. b) Notes the Revenue Policy Compliance report. Motion carried (CNL/2025/027) |
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas):
That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting until 8:30am on Thursday 30 January 2025.
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 5.29 pm and reconvened at 8:30am on Thursday, 30 January 2025.
39 City Profile Snapshot - 9 year plan 2025-34 |
|
|
A report from City Development and Enterprise Dunedin sought approval of the city profile snapshot supporting information that had been developed for the 9 year plan 2025-2034. The General Manager, 3 Waters and Transition (David Ward), the City Development Manager (Dr Anna Johnson), the Economic Development Programme Manager (Fraser Liggett) and the Team Leader Strategy, Research and Monitoring (Cameron Wood) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Cr Andrew Whiley/Cr Steve Walker): That the Council:
a) Approves, for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and consulting with the community, the city profile in Attachment A of the report. Motion carried (CNL/2025/028) |
Cr Bill Acklin entered the meeting at 8:40am.
42 Review of Significance and Engagement Policy - 9 year plan 2025-34 |
|
|
A report from Customer and Regulatory provided the revised Significance and Engagement Policy (the revised Policy) for consultation purposes and it noted that it would be included as a supporting document during the 9 year plan 2025 – 34 consultation process. The General Manager Arts, Culture and Recreation (Jeanette Wikaira) spoke to the report and responded to questions. |
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Mandy Mayhem): That the Council:
a) Notes the December 2023 Council decision to approve the revised Significance and Engagement Policy for consultation purposes. b) Approves the revised Significance and Engagement Policy, with any amendments, for consultation as part of the 9 year plan consultation process. Motion carried (CNL/2025/029) |
43 Waipori Fund SIPO Review |
|
|
A report from Finance sought approval for proposed changes to the Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPO) for the Waipori Fund (the Fund). The Chief Financial Officer (Carolyn Allan) and the Treasurer Dunedin City Holdings Ltd (Richard Davey) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
Cr Carmen Houlahan entered the meeting at 9:00am.
|
|
|
Moved (Cr Cherry Lucas/Mayor Jules Radich): That the Council:
a) Approves the revised Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives for the Waipori Fund. Motion carried (CNL/2025/030) |
44 Treasury Risk Management Policy Review |
|
|
A report from Finance sought approval for proposed changes to the Treasury Risk Management Policy (the Policy). The Chief Financial Officer (Carolyn Allan) and the Treasurer Dunedin City Holdings Ltd (Richard Davey) spoke to the report and responded to questions. |
|
Moved (Cr Lee Vandervis/Mayor Jules Radich): That the Council:
a) Approves the Treasury Risk Management Policy. Motion carried (CNL/2025/031) |
47 Rates Remission and Postponement Policy Review |
|
|
The report sought approval for proposed changes to the Rates Remission and Postponement Policy (the Policy) and the Policy be consulted on through the 9 year plan consultation process. The Chief Financial Officer (Carolyn Allan) and the Assurance Manager (Hayley Knight) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Cr Cherry Lucas/Mayor Jules Radich): That the Council:
a) Approves the proposed Rates Remission and Postponement Policy. b) Approves that the Rates Remission and Postponement Policy be consulted on through the 9 year plan consultation process. Motion carried (CNL/2025/032) |
36 Regulatory Services - Draft Operating Budget 9 year plan 2025-34 |
|
|
A report from Customer and Regulatory and Civic provided an overview of the draft operating budget for year one of the 9 year plan 2025-34, and variations from the year one budget for years two to nine for Regulatory Services The Acting General Manager Customer and Regulatory (Paul Henderson), the Resource Consent Manager (Alan Worthington), spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas): That the Council:
a) Adopts for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and consulting with the community i) The draft operating budgets and funding impact statement for Regulatory Services as shown/amended at Attachments A, B and C of the report. ii) The draft 2025/26 fees and charges schedules for Regulatory Services as shown/amended at Attachment D of report. Motion carried (CNL/2025/033) |
22 Community Recreation - Draft Operating Budget 9 year plan 2025-34 |
|
|
A report from Parks and Recreation provided an overview of the operating expenditure budgets for year one of the 9 year plan 2025-34, and variations from the year one budget for years two to nine for Community Recreation. The General Manager Arts, Culture and Recreation (Jeanette Wikaira) and the Acting Group Manager Parks and Recreation (Heath Ellis) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Cr Carmen Houlahan/Cr Jim O'Malley): That the Council:
a) Adopts for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and consulting with the community i) The draft operating budgets and funding impact statement for Community Recreation as shown/amended at Attachments A, B and C of the report. ii) The draft 2025/26 fees and charges schedules for Community Recreation as shown/amended at Attachment D of the report. Motion carried (CNL/2025/034) |
23 Destination Playground Options |
|
|
A report from Parks and Recreation provided options for the provision of modern destination playgrounds for inclusion in the 9 year plan 2025-34. The General Manager Arts, Culture and Recreation (Jeanette Wikaira), the Acting Group Manager Parks and Recreation (Heath Ellis), and John Brenkley (Parks Planning Manager) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas)
That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting for 10 minutes
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 10:00 am and reconvened at 10:30am.
|
|
|
Moved (Cr Andrew Whiley/Cr Sophie Barker): That the Council: a) Approves an overall playground budget of $16.816m for the period of the 9 year plan b) Notes that three destination playgrounds will be delivered in years 2, 5 and 8 of the 9 year plan in the following order: i) Marlow ii) Woodhaugh iii) Mosgiel c) Request staff to work with community groups and benefactors to support fundraising activities to enhance work and increased investment in playground equipment and amenities. d) Notes the rates impact would be calculated for inclusion in the consultation document.
Motion carried (CNL/2025/035) |
25 Creative and cultural vibrancy - Draft Operating Budget 9 year plan 2025-34 |
|
|
A report from Library and Arts and Culture provided an overview of the draft operating budget for year one of the 9 year plan 2025-34, and variations from the year one budget for years two to nine for Creative and Cultural Vibrancy. The General Manager Arts, Culture and Recreation (Jeanette Wikaira) and the Operations Manager, DPAG, Toitū, Lan Yuan and Olveston (Glen Pleasants) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Steve Walker)
That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting for 10 minutes.
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 10:54 am and reconvened at 11.03 am.
|
|
|
It was agreed that the resolutions be taken in two sections: a) (i ) and then a (ii).
|
|
Moved (Cr Steve Walker/Cr Kevin Gilbert): That the Council:
a) Adopts for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and consulting with the community i) The draft operating budgets and funding impact statement for Creative and Cultural Vibrancy as shown/amended at Attachments A, B and C. of the report. Motion carried (CNL/2025/036)
|
|
Moved (Cr Steve Walker/Cr Kevin Gilbert): That the Council:
a) Adopts for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and consulting with the community ii) The draft 2025/26 fees and charges schedules for Creative and Cultural Vibrancy with the removal of the proposed fees for room hire by the not for profit groups or individuals in the Mosgiel, South Dunedin and Port Chalmers libraries, as shown at Attachment D of the report. Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Carmen Houlahan, Marie Laufiso, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Steve Walker, Brent Weatherall and Mayor Jules Radich (10). Against: Crs Bill Acklin, Sophie Barker, Cherry Lucas and Lee Vandervis (4). Abstained: Cr Andrew Whiley (1).
The division was declared CARRIED by 10 votes to 4
Motion carried (CNL/2025/037) |
29 Potential Entry Charges at Cultural Institutions |
|
|
A report from Arts and Culture provided the investigation into the potential impact of introducing entry charges at Toitū Otago Settlers Museum (Toitū) and Dunedin Public Art Gallery (DPAG). The General Manager Arts, Culture and Recreation (Jeanette Wikaira) and the Operations Manager, DPAG, Toitū, Lan Yuan and Olveston (Glen Pleasants) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
Cr Bill Acklin left the meeting at 11:30am.
|
|
|
Moved (Cr Andrew Whiley/Mayor Jules Radich): That the Council: For the purposes of consultation on the draft 9 year plan: a) Adopts a $20 (incl. GST) International visitor entry fee for visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and DPAG. b) Notes no additional resource will be required to implement the proposed entry fee. c) Amends the schedule of fees and charges to include the new fee.
Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Sophie Barker, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Cherry Lucas, Mandy Mayhem, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (7). Against: Crs David Benson-Pope, Carmen Houlahan, Marie Laufiso, Jim O'Malley, Lee Vandervis, Steve Walker and Brent Weatherall (7). Abstained: Nil
An equality of votes was recorded 7:7 – The Mayor did not exercise his casting vote.
Motion Lost
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Andrew Whiley): That the Council:
a) Decides for the purposes of consultation, a possible entry charge for international visitors, for inclusion in the consultation document as follows: i) Option 1 (the status quo) - no charge would be introduced. ii) Option 2 (preferred option) – implement an entry charge of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and DPAG b) Notes that introducing the proposed entry charge will have an impact on rates which will be determined. Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Sophie Barker, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Carmen Houlahan, Cherry Lucas, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Steve Walker, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (10). Against: Crs David Benson-Pope, Marie Laufiso, Lee Vandervis and Brent Weatherall (4). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 10 votes to 4
Motion carried (CNL/2025/038) |
30 Vibrant Economy - Draft Operating Budget 9 year plan 2025-34 |
|
|
A report from Corporate Policy provided an overview of the draft operating budget for year one of the 9 year plan 2025-34, and variations from the year one budget for years two to nine for Vibrant Economy. Manahautū (General Manager Policy and Partnerships) (Nicola Morand), Fraser Liggett (Economic Development Manager), Suzanne Jenkins (Finance and Operations Manager) and Sian Sutton (Dunedin Destination Manager) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Cr Andrew Whiley withdrew from discussion on the Shanghai Sister City relationship.
|
|
Moved (Cr Christine Garey/Cr Carmen Houlahan): That the Council:
a) Adopts for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and consulting with the community i) The draft operating budgets and funding impact statement for Vibrant Economy as shown/amended at Attachments A, B and C of the report. ii) The draft 2025/26 fees and charges schedules for Vibrant Economy as shown/amended at Attachment D. of the report Motion carried (CNL/2025/039 with Cr Vandervis recording his vote against.
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Sophie Barker)
That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting for lunch and will resume at 1:30pm.
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 12:47 pm and reconvened at 1:31 pm.
Cr Bill Acklin returned to the meeting at 1.31 pm.
27 Ōtepoti Live Music - Draft Investment Plan for 9 year plan 2025-34 |
|
|
A report from Ara Toi provided a copy of the draft Ōtepoti Live Music Investment Plan to be considered for consultation purposes, as part of the 9 year plan 2025-34.
The General Manager Arts, Culture and Recreation (Jeanette Wikaira) and the Kaiarahi Team Leader Creative Partnerships (Lisa Wilkie) spoke to the report and responded to questions. |
|
Moved (Cr Steve Walker/Cr Mandy Mayhem): That the Council: a) Approves the draft Ōtepoti Live Music Investment Plan, for consultation purposes as part of the 9 year plan 2025-2034.
b) Notes the increase in rates of $137k pa and an additional $4k pa for years 2-4. Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Bill Acklin, Sophie Barker, David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Carmen Houlahan, Marie Laufiso, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Steve Walker, Brent Weatherall, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (13). Against: Crs Cherry Lucas and Lee Vandervis (2). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 13 votes to 2
Motion carried (CNL/2025/040) |
Moved Mayor Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas
That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting for 5 minutes.
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 2:17 pm and reconvened at 2:23 pm.
26 Draft Festival and Events Plan and Implementation Options |
|
|
A report from Enterprise Dunedin provided a copy of the draft 2025 Dunedin Festivals and Events Plan and requested consideration of the inclusion of funding options for implementation as part of the 9-year plan 2025-34. The Manahautū (General Manager Policy and Partnerships) (Nicola Morand) and the Dunedin Destination Manager (Sian Sutton), and Dan Hendra (Team Leader - Events) spoke to the report and responded to questions. |
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Laufiso)
That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting for 10 minutes.
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 2:47pm and resumed at 3:03pm
|
|
|
Moved (Cr Bill Acklin/Cr Andrew Whiley): That the Council:
a) Approves that $4.4 million be added to the draft budgets for the implementation of the Community Events and Major Events Implementation Plan for consultation purposes as follows: i. $800k in year 2025/26 ii. $1.2m each year from 2026/27 to 2028/29 b) Notes that the additional budget for the implementation of the plan will funded by rates. c) Notes that a report on the benefits and realisations will be presented to council in time for the 10 year plan 2027-37.
Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Bill Acklin, Sophie Barker, David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Carmen Houlahan, Marie Laufiso, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Steve Walker, Brent Weatherall, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (13). Against: Crs Cherry Lucas and Lee Vandervis (2). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 13 votes to 2
Motion carried (CNL/2025/041) |
28 Performing Arts Venue Proposal - 9 year plan 2025-34 |
|
|
A report from the Executive Leadership Team provided Council the performing arts venue proposal for consideration for the 9 year plan 2025-34. The General Manager Arts, Culture and Recreation (Jeanette Wikaira) and the General Manager Corporate Services (Robert West) spoke to the report and responded to questions. |
|
Moved (Cr Carmen Houlahan/Cr Mandy Mayhem): That the Council:
a) Reaffirms its commitment to support the performing arts community b) Requests staff continue to work with the Performing Arts Group on their proposal and how best to progress it including: i. Seeking legal advice on ownership and partnership structures ii. Investigating possible operating and funding models
c) Reports back to Council in time for deliberations on the 9 year plan on progress.
Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Bill Acklin, Sophie Barker, David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Carmen Houlahan, Marie Laufiso, Cherry Lucas, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Steve Walker, Brent Weatherall, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (14). Against: Cr Lee Vandervis (1). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 14 votes to 1
Motion carried (CNL/2025/042) |
10 Zero Carbon Investment Packages |
|
|
A report from Sustainability Group provided the Zero Carbon High and Medium investment packages (‘the packages’) for consideration for the 9 year plan 2025-34.. The General Manager, Climate and City Growth (Scott MacLean), Principal Policy Advisor, Sustainability (Jinty MacTavish) and Team Leader Regulation Management - Transport (Simon Speirs) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
Cr Sophie Barker returned to the meeting at 04:40 pm.
|
|
|
It was agreed that the resolutions be taken in two sections a) to b), and then items c) to d).
|
|
Moved (Cr Cherry Lucas/Cr Kevin Gilbert): That the Council:
a) Notes the Zero Carbon Investment Packages report. b) Acknowledges the work done to meet DCC goals of Carbon Zero through the 9 year plan draft budgets and as integrated part of developed work streams.
Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Bill Acklin, Sophie Barker, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Carmen Houlahan, Marie Laufiso, Cherry Lucas, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Lee Vandervis, Steve Walker, Brent Weatherall, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (14). Against: Cr David Benson-Pope (1). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 14 votes to 1
Motion carried (CNL/2025/045)
|
|
Moved (Cr Cherry Lucas/Cr Kevin Gilbert): That the Council: c) Decides not to include either high or medium options in the Draft 9 year plan because all the papers considered by Council as part of the 9 year plan had Zero carbon assessments. d) Requests an update report from the CEO at the 9 year plan 2025-2034 deliberations meeting in May 2025. The report is to include: 1. Modelling of the Zero Carbon impacts of the draft budget 2. Alignment of the Council’s position and OAG advice
Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Bill Acklin, Sophie Barker, Kevin Gilbert, Cherry Lucas, Lee Vandervis, Brent Weatherall, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (8). Against: Crs David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Carmen Houlahan, Marie Laufiso, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley and Steve Walker (7). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 8 votes to 7
Motion carried (CNL/2025/046)
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Kevin Gilbert): That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting until 5pm
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 4:48 pm and resumed at 5:02 pm. |
Cr Sophie Barker left the meeting at 04:49 pm
|
A report from Property provided an update Council on progress and the estimated costs of the Community Housing Development programme. The report requested that Council gives consideration for the continuation of the Community Housing Development Programme. The General Manager Corporate Services (Robert West) and the Group Manager Property Services (Anna Nilsen) spoke to the report and responded to questions. |
|
The Chief Financial Officer (Carolyn Allan) provided an update on the impact assessment of the report options with respect to the financial information .
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Bill Acklin):
That the Council:
a) Decides to continue with the redevelopment of Fitzroy Street only. b) Notes that there is no overall financial impact on the 9 year plan 2025-34 budgets.
Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Bill Acklin, Kevin Gilbert, Carmen Houlahan, Cherry Lucas, Lee Vandervis, Brent Weatherall, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (8). Against: Crs David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Marie Laufiso, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley and Steve Walker (6). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 8 votes to 6
Motion carried (CNL/2025/047) |
31 Governance and Support Services - Draft Operating Budget 2025/26 |
|
|
A report from Customer and Regulatory, Civic, Finance, Transport and Sustainability Group provided an overview of the draft operating budget for year one of the 9 year plan, and variations from the year one budget for years two to nine for Governance and Support Services The General Manager Corporate Services (Robert West) and the Chief Financial Officer (Carolyn Allan) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas): That the Council:
a) Adopts for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and consulting with the community i) The draft operating budgets and funding impact statement for Governance and Support Services as shown/amended at Attachments A, B and C of the report. ii) The draft 2025/26 fees and charges schedules for Governance and Support Services as shown/amended at Attachment D of the report. Motion carried (CNL/2025/048) |
32 Resilient City - Draft Operating Budget 9 year plan 2025-34 |
|
|
A report from 3 Waters and the Executive Leadership Team provided an overview of the draft operating budget for year one of the 9 year plan 2025-34, and variations from the year one budget for years two to nine for Resilient City. The General Manager, 3 Waters and Transition (David Ward) and the General Manager, Climate and Growth (Scott MacLean) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Mandy Mayhem): That the Council:
a) Adopts for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and consulting with the community i) The draft operating budgets and funding impact statement for Resilient City as shown/amended at Attachments A, B and C of the report. Motion carried (CNL/2025/049) |
33 Citywide Climate Resilience Framework |
|
|
A report from Climate and City Growth sought Council endorsement of a proposed citywide climate resilience framework and approval of a preferred option for implementation. The General Manager, Climate and City Growth (Scott MacLean) and the Programme Manager, South Dunedin Future (Jonathan Rowe) spoke to the report and responded to questions. |
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Lee Vandervis):
a) Notes the Citywide Climate Resilience Framework report. b) Agrees to the deferred implementation of the climate resilience framework c) Notes that staff will advise mana whenua and the Otago Regional Council of Council’s decisions and the timeframes. Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Bill Acklin, Carmen Houlahan, Cherry Lucas, Lee Vandervis, Brent Weatherall and Mayor Jules Radich (6). Against: Crs David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Marie Laufiso, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Steve Walker and Andrew Whiley (8). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared LOST by 8 votes to 6
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Lucas)
That the Council:
Adjourns the meeting for 5 minutes.
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 5:31 pm resumed at 5:41 pm. Cr Brent Weatherall left the meeting at 05:40 p.m.
|
|
|
Moved (Cr Kevin Gilbert/Cr Mandy Mayhem): That the Council:
a) Notes the Citywide Climate Resilience Framework report. b) Approves for the purposes of consultation a staged implementation of the climate resilience framework c) Notes that the staged programme will increase the rates as follows: i. $395k in year 1 (2025-26) ii. $308k in year 2 (2026-27) d) Notes that staff will partner with mana whenua and consult with the Otago Regional Council on the scope, design, and implementation of the framework. Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Carmen Houlahan, Marie Laufiso, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Steve Walker, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (10). Against: Crs Bill Acklin, Cherry Lucas and Lee Vandervis (3). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 10 votes to 3
Motion carried (CNL/2025/050) |
|
A report from City Development provided the proposed centres upgrades and minor amenity improvements programmes that were used to deliver upgrades in Dunedin’s commercial centres. The General Manager, 3 Waters and Transition (David Ward), the City Development Manager (Dr Anna Johnson), and Team Leader – Advisory Services (Mark Mawdsley) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Cr Bill Acklin/Cr Kevin Gilbert): That the Council:
a) Approves option one, funding to focus on Minor Amenity Improvements initially, followed by the Centres Upgrade Programme, for public consultation on the 9 year plan 2025-34. Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs Bill Acklin, David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Marie Laufiso, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Steve Walker, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (10). Against: Crs Carmen Houlahan, Cherry Lucas and Lee Vandervis (3). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 10 votes to 3
Motion carried (CNL/2025/051) |
35 Ōtepoti Dunedin Heritage Action Plan: Implementation Options |
|
|
A report from City Development sought endorsement of a proposed pathway to deliver the Ōtepoti Dunedin Heritage Action Plan (HAP) Implementation Plan. The report also provided a range of funding options to deliver on the HAP for Council to consider ahead of public consultation on the 9 year plan 2025-34. The General Manager, 3 Waters and Transition (David Ward), the City Development Manager (Dr Anna Johnson) and the Team Leader Advisory Services (Mark Mawdsley) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Cr Cherry Lucas/Cr Kevin Gilbert): That the Council:
a) Approves that accelerated support of $235,000 is provided each year for 2025/26 and 2026/27, for the implementation of the Ōtepoti Dunedin Heritage Action Plan, for consultation purposes.
b) Notes the accelerated support will be an increase in rates of $235,000 for each of the two years.
Division The Council voted by division
For: Crs David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Kevin Gilbert, Carmen Houlahan, Cherry Lucas, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Steve Walker, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (10). Against: Crs Bill Acklin, Marie Laufiso and Lee Vandervis (3). Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 10 votes to 3
Motion carried (CNL/2025/052) |
|
A report from Portfolio and Project Support Officer provided recommendations for the next steps for the Central City Plan, with options for Council to consider. The General Manager, Climate and City Group (Scott MacLean) spoke to the report and responded to questions.
|
|
Moved (Cr Kevin Gilbert/Cr Mandy Mayhem): That the Council:
a) Approves a pause on development of a NZTA-level business case but continues preparatory work and the review of the Central City Plan. Motion carried (CNL/2025/054) with Cr Lee Vandervis and Cr Cherry Lucas recording their vote against.
|
`
|
A report from Finance provided the draft budget for 2025/26 which proposed an overall increase in rates of 9.95%. The Chief Financial Officer (Carolyn Allan) spoke to the report and responded to questions. |
|
Moved (Cr Bill Acklin/Cr Steve Walker): That the Council:
a) Approves an increase in the Community Services targeted rate for the 2025/26 year of $4.00 to $121.00 including GST. c) Combines the Tourism/Economic Development targeted rate into the Commercial General Rate. d) Approves the current rating method for the setting of all other rates for the 2025/26 year. Motion carried (CNL/2025/055)
|
|
Moved (Cr Bill Acklin/Cr Steve Walker): That the Council: b) Approves an increase in the Stadium 10,000 plus seat differentiated rates for the 2025/26 year based on the June 2024 Local Government Cost Index of 3.3%. Motion carried (CNL/2025/056) with Cr Lee Vandervis recording his vote against. |
|
|
|
Discussion was held on the overall impact of the decisions of the meeting on the projected rates charge for inclusion in the draft 9 Year Plan consultation document. The Chief Financial Officer (Carolyn Allan) updated the percentage rate increase as per the draft budget, per year : · Year 1 – 10.5 · Year 2 - 10.2 · Year 3 - 10.1 · Year 4 - 7.3 · Year 5- 5.8 · Year 6 - 6.1 · Year 7- 5.8 · Year 8 - 5.9 · Year 9 – 6.0 Offsets for rates increases include projected Sunday parking revenue. A conservative budget would be set for revenue for the Toitu and Dunedin Public Art Gallery international visitors charge. Ms Allan advised that debt would increase by $33m for year 1. Debt increase were projected as: · Year 1 – $819 million · Year 2 - $892 million · Year 3 - $940 million · Year 4 - $1.004 billion · Year 5- $1.075 billion · Year 6 - $1.095 billion · Year 7- $1.092 billion · Year 8 – $1.1 billion · Year 9 – $1.117 billion
|
|
Moved (Mayor Jules Radich/Cr Cherry Lucas): That the Council:
a) Agrees to amend the rates limits provided for in the Financial Strategy to the following:
i. Year 1 12% ii. Year 2 – 3 12% iii. Year 4 8% iv. Year 5 -6 7% v. Year 7 -9 6%
b) Approves the changes to the draft 9 year plan 2025-34 forecast financial statements and supporting documentation for the purposes of developing the 9 year plan 2025-34 and engaging with the community.
Motion carried (CNL/2025/057) |
The meeting concluded at 6:47pm.
..............................................
MAYOR
|
Council 26 February 2025 |
Actions From Resolutions of Council Meetings
Department: Civic
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 The purpose of this report is to show progress on implementing resolutions made at Council meetings.
2 As this report is an administrative report only, there are no options or Summary of Considerations.
That the Council:
a) Notes the Open and Completed Actions from resolutions of Council meetings as attached. |
discussion
3 This report also provides an update on resolutions that have been actioned and completed since the last Council meeting. Note that items on the Forward Work Programme are not included in the attached schedules.
NEXT STEPS
4 Updates will be provided at future Council meetings.
Signatories
Author: |
Lynne Adamson - Governance Support Officer |
Authoriser: |
Scott MacLean - General Manager, Climate and City Growth |
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Open Action List |
69 |
⇩b |
Closed Action list |
74 |
Council 26 February 2025 |
Forward Work Programme for Council - February 2025
Department: Civic
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 The purpose of this report is to provide the updated forward work programme for the 2025 year (Attachment A).
2 As this is an administrative report only, there are no options or Summary of Considerations.
That the Council: a) Notes the updated Council forward work programme as shown in Attachment A. |
DISCUSSION
3 The forward work programme is a regular agenda item which shows areas of activity, progress and expected timeframes for Council decision making across a range of areas of work.
4 As an update report, the purple highlight shows changes to timeframes. New items added to the schedule are highlighted in yellow. Items that have been completed or updated are shown as bold.
NEXT STEPS
5 An updated report will be presented to future Council meetings.
Signatories
Author: |
Lynne Adamson - Governance Support Officer |
Authoriser: |
Scott MacLean - General Manager, Climate and City Growth |
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Forward Work Programme |
81 |
Council 26 February 2025 |
9 Year Plan 2025-2034 Community Consultation
Department: Corporate Policy
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides an outline of the proposed approach for consulting the community on the draft 9 Year Plan 2025-2034. It proposes methods for seeking feedback and seeks confirmation of the objectives of the consultation.
2 Consultation is scheduled to take place between Monday 31 March 2025 and Wednesday 30 April 2025, and forms part of the Council’s ongoing engagement with the community.
3 The consultation approach is designed to encourage wide community participation and feedback.
4 Consultation objectives and measures of success are proposed in the draft consultation plan.
5 The proposed consultation plan balances a cost-effective approach with the objective of achieving greater reach and feedback from the public.
That the Council:
a) Approves the proposed plan for community consultation on the Draft 9 Year Plan 2025-2034, including the measures for success.
BACKGROUND
6 The DCC’s engagement with the community on long term plans is undertaken in accordance with the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA). The key requirements are set out in s.93 (the long term plan), s.82 (the principles of consultation) and s.83 (the special consultative procedure). More detail is included in Attachment A.
7 Amendments to the LGA introduced in 2014 made the special consultative procedure less formal and provided for more flexibility in seeking and recording community feedback.
8 In February 2024 Council decided to complete an Annual Plan for the 2024-2025 year, and then complete a 9 year plan covering the 2025-2034 years. This was due to the Water Services Acts Repeal Act 2024, that provided transitional options for local authorities to consider in the preparation of their long-term plans.
9 Consultation for Local Water Done Well is occurring over the same time period as the 2025-2034 9 Year Plan consultation.
Development of the consultation plan
10 Community consultation on the 9 Year Plan forms part of ongoing engagement with the community. As outlined in the DCC’s Significance and Engagement Policy, ‘consultation’ forms part of the spectrum of participation and is used when public feedback is sought on options or decisions.
11 Early engagement was undertaken between 5 and 31 October 2023 for the development of the 2024-2034 10 Year plan, and then 9 and 23 October 2024 when Council decided to complete an Annual Plan for 2024-2025 and 9 Year Plan for 2025-2034. The goals were to inform the community, encourage feedback and to increase awareness of the long-term plan process prior to formal consultation. The feedback was used to inform the draft plan and the formal consultation.
12 Staff also used feedback from previous discussions and focus groups with mana whenua, Pasifika, youth and people from the business and arts sectors to shape the consultation plan. Feedback highlighted include;
a) The value of face-to-face interactions with Councillors
b) the benefits of utilising existing networks to enhance communications reach, and
c) the importance of stimulating discussions on the future of the city.
DISCUSSION
Key themes
13 The draft consultation document asks for feedback on two specific questions, one on the removal of 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets in the Significant and Engagement Policy, and one about introducing an entry charge of international visitors at Toitū Museum and the Dunedin Public Art Gallery.
14 Council is also considering options for the future delivery of water and will be consulting on preferred options concurrent to the 9 year plan consultation.
Objectives of the Community Consultation
15 The proposed consultation plan for the 9 Year Plan 2025-2034 is provided at Attachment B. the intended outcomes to be achieved are:
a) The whole community has had the opportunity to engage in the 9 Year plan consultation process.
b) Residents and citizens are well informed on the key opportunities and challenges facing the city.
c) People are informed on how they can provide feedback including engaging in the Council’s submission process.
d) The consultation is seen by residents as part of an ongoing programme of engagement.
16 The focus of the plan is on the quality of the consultation and ensuring that the whole community, and particularly those groups identified in DCC’s Social Wellbeing strategy as priority communities who have been under-represented in past consultations (such as Māori, Pasifika, and youth) can take part.
17 The objectives include obtaining feedback from the community on two key questions as well as more general feedback, to enable the creation of a robust 9 Year Plan. We also need to meet the legislative requirements, set out in the LGA.
Measures of Success
18 The following are some of the measures of success that were used in the 10 Year Plan 2021-2031 consultation. It is proposed to use these again to measure the effectiveness of the consultation and see trends across time.
a) Quantity of feedback: a count of submissions and other feedback items received.
b) Diversity of submitters: analysis of the diversity of the people who submit.
c) Councillor satisfaction: will be measured through a post-consultation evaluation.
The Consultation Plan
19 The key elements of the consultation plan include:
· Consultation document and feedback form will be available online.
· The April issue of FYI will be a double spread edition with a summary of the consultation document. FYI is delivered to all Dunedin residential households.
· Face to face opportunities with Councillors and staff including:
i) Drop-in centres – staffed by rostered Councillors and/or staff with collateral.
ii) Attendance at scheduled events in the community.
iii) Community boards, partnerships and other stakeholder groups supported with collateral to host local meetings.
· Information and feedback stands at Council facilities.
· Hui with mana whenua and mātāwaka.
· Social media, to stimulate interest and encourage participation in the consultation process.
· Public hearings
20 A range of communication tools will be used for raising awareness of the plan and inviting feedback. A summary website page linked to the consultation will be a primary tool used to inform online users. Other tools include: branded content; use of social media and local newspapers; digital displays around the city and online ads; radio campaign; double spread edition of Dunedin FYI; and resource packs for community boards, partnership groups and other stakeholder groups.
21 As part of DCC’s ongoing commitment to working in partnership with Māori, separate hui with mana whenua and mātāwaka are proposed.
Evaluation
22 Data on respondents will be gathered to determine the reach of the consultation. The measures of success from both the 2021-2031 and 2025-2034 consultations, will be analysed with this consultation to understand the depth of reach compared with a higher cost and a cost-effective approach.
Costs and resourcing
23 The plan balances the cost-effective approach with the objective of achieving greater reach and feedback from the public. If the plan is approved, the emphasis on engagement will primarily be with elected members and staff who represent specific subject matters. Staff from a range of departments will be encouraged to be involved and asked to prioritise the consultation, to ensure its success.
24 It is estimated that the time commitment for Councillors would be up to 28 hours each, spread over the four-week period of the consultation. This does not include time spent at hearings, social media management and attending meetings with your own networks.
25 This estimate is based on one councillor being rostered on, with staff, in the drop-in centres two hours per day (e.g., between 11am and 1pm daily). If councillors wish to commit further time for this aspect of the consultation, the scheduled times for councillor interaction could be increased (e.g., 10am to 2pm daily).
Table 1: Estimates of Councillor time commitment requirements.
9 year plan consultation activity resourcing. |
Estimated monthly time commitment per Councillor |
Attending drop-in centre – rostered on for 2 x 2 hour slots (11am -1pm) over one month. |
4 hours |
Attending DCC convened local face to face consultation stands in Council facilities. |
6 hours |
Attending events run by community businesses e.g., Farmers Market All Councillors will be welcome to attend all events. There will be a roster to ensure there is some Councillor attendance at each event. |
4-6 hours |
Councillors’ own network events (e.g., Sports and Rotary Clubs). |
Councillor choice |
Mana whenua and mātāwaka consultation activities (2x hui). |
6 hours |
Hui with priority communities (Youth, Disability, Migrant etc) |
4-6 hours |
Total estimated time commitment per Councillor over the 4-week period. |
28-30 hours |
OPTIONS
Option One – Approve the proposed plan for community consultation on the draft 9 Year Plan 2025-2034, including the measures for success. If option one is approved the next steps will include:
26 Developing the consultation collateral and confirm the consultation event schedule.
27 Councillors will be invited to consultation events, as well as provided with consultation material and social media content. Training and familiarisation will also be provided prior to the consultation period commencing.
Option Two – Approve a revised approach for community consultation. If option two is approved the next steps will include:
28 Developing a revised schedule and approach.
29 Developing the consultation collateral and confirm the consultation event schedule.
30 Councillors will be invited to consultation events, as well as provided with consultation material and social media content. Training and familiarisation will also be provided prior to the consultation period commencing.
Signatories
Author: |
Nadia Wesley-Smith - Corporate Policy Manager - Acting |
Authoriser: |
Nicola Morand - Manahautū (General Manager Policy and Partnerships) |
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Legislative requirements - community engagement on 9 Year Plan |
94 |
⇩b |
Community consultation Plan |
95 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This decision enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities. This decision promotes the social well-being of communities in the present and for the future. This decision promotes the economic well-being of communities in the present and for the future. This decision promotes the environmental well-being of communities in the present and for the future. This decision promotes the cultural well-being of communities in the present and for the future. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The 9 year plan is part of the Council’s strategic framework. Forecast budgets, projects and activities associated with the implementation of the other strategies are included in the 9 year plan and reviewed in each Annual Plan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement As part of DCC’s ongoing commitment to working in partnership with mana whenua, consultation and engagement processes for the 9 year plan will ensure there is opportunities for Māori to contribute to the decision making process through hui specifically for mana whenua and mataawaka |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability Consultation will provide an opportunity for the community to express their views and aspirations relating to DCC’s work towards Sustainability and wider climate change ambitions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zero carbon The consultation plan is not likely to materially impact city emissions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy Early engagement was undertaken in relation to the 9 Year plan and related strategies and policies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The actions outlined in option one can be resources from existing budgets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance Plans for consultation on the 9 Year Plan are of interest to the community and are an important part of the overall development of the Plan for the city. The significance of this report setting out the consultation plan for approval is assessed as low in terms of Councils Significance and Engagement Policy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external External engagement will take place as part of formal consultation outlined in this report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The approach in the report has been developed internally by Corporate Policy in consultation with other teams. Communications and Marketing, Finance, Community Partnerships and teams, with input from 3 Waters and Transport will be supporting the engagement. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There may be some health and safety risks relating to face-to-face public engagement. Risks will be managed as the plan is implemented. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflicts of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards As part of DCC’s ongoing commitment to working with the Community and Community Boards though the consultation and engagement processes for the 9 year plan, DCC will ensure there are opportunities for Boards to contribute to the decision making process through a series of meetings with each Board. |
|
Council 26 February 2025 |
Financial Report - Period ended 31 December 2024
Department: Finance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report provides the financial results for the period ended 31 December 2024 and the financial position as at that date.
2 As this is an administrative report only, there are no options or Summary of Considerations.
Financial Overview
For the period ended 31 December 2024
That the Council:
a) Notes the Financial Performance for the period ended 31 December 2024 and the Financial Position as at that date.
BACKGROUND
3 This report provides the financial statements for the period ended 31 December 2024. It includes reports on financial performance, financial position, cashflows and capital expenditure. Summary information is provided in the body of this report with detailed results attached. The operating result is also shown by group, including analysis by revenue and expenditure type.
DISCUSSION
4 This report includes a high-level summary of the financial information to 31 December 2024. Please refer to Attachment I for the detailed financial update.
Statement of Financial Performance
5 Revenue was $196.467 million for the period or $2.372 million less than budget.
6 Operating revenue (external and internal combined) was unfavourable $881k mainly due to lower-than-expected revenue from the Parking Services and Aquatic Services activities.
7 Grants revenue was unfavourable $2.346 million reflecting funding decisions by NZTA under the National Land Transport Programme, and timing of the transport contractor work programme.
8 Expenditure was $221.256 million for the period, or $7.648 million less than budget.
9 Personnel costs was unfavourable $526k, reflecting overtime payments for 3 waters and union negotiated contract increases, which is being managed with vacancy management. The month of December showed a favourable variance of $1.030 million, primarily driven by changes in the annual leave provision as a result of staff taking leave during the Christmas holiday period.
10 Operations and maintenance expenditure was favourable $1.093 million; however, this favourable variance was offset by an unfavourable $971k variance in internal costs, due largely to landfill disposal costs for kerbside collections now recorded as internal costs. Unfavourable Transport maintenance costs are more than offset by under expenditure in other activities, including Three Waters and Waste and Environmental Services. Transport costs included emergency works totalling $1.718 million associated with the October rain event.
11 Depreciation costs were favourable $7.036 million, mainly due to the revaluation of Three Waters assets, and to a lesser extent Property and Parks assets.
12 Interest costs were favourable $1.689 million, reflecting a lower interest rate than budgeted and the timing of new loan advances.
Statement of Financial Position
14 Capital expenditure was $70.535 million or 70.8% of the year-to-date budget. Capital expenditure in most activities was generally within budget for the period.
15 The loans balance at 31 December was $630.972 million which was $24.501 million less than budget. This a reflection of the capital expenditure programme, which was underspent by $29.067 million to December. Additional to the December loans balance there was accrued interest of $6.527 million.
16 Attachment A includes a chart showing actual group and DCC debt for the years ending June 2003-2024. It provides forecast information for the years ending June 2024-2027 based on the current Statements of Intent (SOI), and the first two years of the draft 9 year plan.
OPTIONS
17 As this is an administrative report only, there are no options provided.
NEXT STEPS
Signatories
Author: |
Hayden McAuliffe - Financial Services Manager |
Authoriser: |
Carolyn Allan - Chief Financial Officer |
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Dashboard Summary Financial Information |
104 |
⇩b |
Debt Graph |
105 |
⇩c |
Statement of Financial Performance |
106 |
⇩d |
Statement of Financial Position |
107 |
⇩e |
Statement of Cashflows |
108 |
⇩f |
Capital Expenditure Summary |
109 |
⇩g |
Capital Expenditure Detailed Programme |
110 |
⇩h |
Operating Variances |
117 |
⇩i |
Detailed Financial Update |
118 |
Council 26 February 2025 |
Election 2025 - Order of Candidate Names for Voting Document
Department: Civic
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 The purpose of this report is to outline three options available for ordering candidate names on voting documents for the October 2025 election, being random, pseudo-random and alphabetical. In the past three elections, Council used the random order.
2 Council is asked to approve the use of random order for ordering candidate names on voting papers for the 2025 election and any by-elections.
That the Council:
a) Approves the continued use of random order for candidates names for the voting papers.
BACKGROUND
3 The Local Electoral Act and Regulations allow the Council to make a decision on matters relating to election processes. A decision on the order of candidate names on voting documents is an option open to it under the Local Electoral Regulations 2001.
DISCUSSION
4 Regulation 31 of the Local Electoral Regulations 2001 allows the Council to decide whether the names are to be arranged on the voting documents in random order of surname, pseudo-random order, or alphabetical order. In the absence of any Council resolution approving another arrangement, the candidates' names must be arranged in alphabetical order of surname.
5 Under random order, the names of the candidates for each issue, i.e., Council and Community Boards, are shown in a different order on each voting document, utilising software which permits the names of the candidates to be printed in a different order on each paper.
6 Under pseudo-random order, the candidate names for each issue are drawn at random then placed on all voting documents in the order in which they are drawn.
7 Under alphabetical order, the names of candidates for each issue appear in alphabetical order of surname.
8 The Council adopted random order for its voting documents for the last three elections.
OPTIONS
9 It should be noted that regardless of which option is chosen, the candidate information booklet containing profile statements will still list the candidates in alphabetical order.
10 There is no difference between the three options in the cost of printing the voting documents.
Option One – Random Order (Preferred Option)
11 Under this arrangement, the names of the candidates for each issue, i.e. Council and Community Boards, are shown in a different order on each voting document. This was the option used at the previous election.
Advantages
· No candidates are disadvantaged by the name order effect.
Disadvantages
· In a long list of candidates, it can be difficult for voters to find the names of the candidates for whom they wish to vote.
Option Two – Pseudo Random Order
Impact assessment
12 Under this arrangement, the candidate names for each issue are drawn at random then placed on all voting documents in the order in which they are drawn.
13 The Regulations provide that if a local authority has determined that pseudo-random order is to be used, the Electoral Officer must state, in a public notice required to be given, the date, time and place at which the order of the candidates' names will be arranged. Any person is entitled to attend while the order of the candidates' names is determined.
Advantages
· Candidates who have names later in the alphabet have an opportunity to draw a position higher in the list, but this may result in a corresponding disadvantage for other candidates.
Disadvantages
· Candidates who draw a position at the top of the ballot are likely to have an advantage over those further down the list.
· It is administratively more complex (tight timeframes after the close of nominations) and more expensive with additional public notices than the other options.
Option Three – Alphabetical Order
14 The names of candidates for each issue appear in alphabetical order of surname.
Advantages
· It is easy for voters to find the names of the candidates for whom they wish to vote.
Disadvantages
· Research has shown that the name order effect provides advantages for some candidates and disadvantages for others.
NEXT STEPS
15 The order of candidate names decided upon will be used on the 2025 voting papers for the Council and Community Board elections.
Signatories
Author: |
Jennifer Lapham - Governance Support Officer |
Authoriser: |
Scott MacLean - General Manager, Climate and City Growth |
There are no attachments for this report.
|
Council 26 February 2025 |
Sustainability Update Report
Department: Corporate Policy
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 The purpose of this report is to:
a) summarise the work to date on the development of a Sustainability Framework for the Dunedin City Council (DCC) based on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG).
b) incorporate the results of one externally facilitated SDG workshop that Councillors attended in August 2024 and further consecutive analysis that staff conducted up to date.
c) seek Council decision on next steps.
2 The analysis for this report in Attachments A, B, and C aimed at:
a) prioritising the 17 SDGs and their relevant targets to the DCC and focus efforts effectively.
b) align the SDGs and relevant targets with the DCC strategies, including, the current four DCC strategies included in the concurrent Strategic Framework Refresh project: Ara Toi, Te Ao Tūroa, Economic Development Strategy, and Social Wellbeing Strategy (Appendix A.1).
c) align the SDGs and relevant targets with the DCC Integrated Transport Strategy, Three Waters Strategy, Parks and Recreations Strategy, Future Development Strategy, and Zero-carbon Policy (Attachment B), and Te Taki Haruru – the Māori Strategic Framework (Attachment C). This alignment requires further review from staff in the related departments with further progress in developing the Sustainability Framework.
3 The analysis is based on three levels of prioritisations:
d) Councillors’ prioritisation of five SDGs that were considered as having the greatest potential for DCC influence and impact. The remaining twelve SDGs were included as a second tier, reflecting the interconnectedness of the SDG goals and their application to both external and internal work streams.
e) Targets for all the 17 SDGs were then prioritised according to their relevance to the function of local governments globally based on ‘The Sustainable Development Goals: What Local Governments Need to Know’ by the United Cities and Local Government. This process dropped the targets from 169 to 92 targets.
f) Targets were tested and further narrowed down corresponding to their relevance to the DCC role as: provider, funder, partner, facilitator, advocate, and regulator. This process dropped the final number of targets across all the 17 goals to 45 targets.
4 The report outlines the alignment between the Council’s four strategies and the SDGs, with all the targets that apply to the Council’s role.
5 The Council’s ongoing engagement with the community involves a consultation on the draft 9-year plan 2025-2034, which is scheduled to take place from 31 March 2025 to 30 April 2025, and will include gathering community feedback on the draft Sustainability Framework.
That the Council:
a) Notes the progress made so far in developing the SDG-based Sustainability Framework for the DCC, as summarised in this report.
b) Decides on next steps in relation to the ongoing Strategic Framework Refresh and the community consultation timeline for the draft 9-year plan 2025-2034.
BACKGROUND
6 In August 2024, Councillors attended a workshop on the SDGs, facilitated by consultants from Bead and Proceed Limited. The four SDGs that Councillors identified as having the greatest potential for DCC influence and impact were SDG 6: Clean Water and Sanitation, SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities, SDG13: Climate Action, and SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure. Councillors highlighted SDG17 (Partnerships for the Goals) as being crucial to the delivery of sustainable action. They emphasised that collaboration with organisations, partners, stakeholders, and residents as key to implementing services, actions and policies that align with the DCC strategies.
7 The consultant’s report also mentioned that in the workshop on the SDGs, it was highlighted that while SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions, SDG 5: Gender Equality, SDG 1: No Poverty, and SDG 10: Reduced Inequality were not areas DCC directly impacted through its services, they were goals that could be modelled internally.
8 The report suggests that if DCC were to use the SDGs to align and articulate their sustainability framework, they could divide the report by "External Sustainable Impact" and "Internal Sustainable Impact", noting that such inside-out approach illustrates conviction and authenticity towards the SDGs and strengthens the Council’s credibility and valuing the principles behind the SDGs as core to its identity, rather than merely external obligations.
9 On 10 December 2024, a report from Corporate Policy provided an update on the progress towards creating a Sustainability Framework for the DCC, incorporating a review of local examples of SDG-based Sustainability Framework, with emphasis on the University of Otago Tī Kōuka Sustainability Strategic Framework 2022-2030. The Council voted by division the following:
Moved (Cr Sophie Barker/Cr Kevin Gilbert):
That the Council:
a) Adopts the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as the basis for the development of the Dunedin City Council’s Sustainability Framework;
b) Requests a facilitated workshop for Councillors to prioritise and align SDG goals and targets with Council’s strategies;
c) Requests a report, by the end of February 2025, on the outcome of the workshop Division
The Council voted by division
For: Crs Bill Acklin, Sophie Barker, Kevin Gilbert, Cherry Lucas, Mandy Mayhem, Jim O'Malley, Brent Weatherall, Andrew Whiley and Mayor Jules Radich (9).
Against: Crs David Benson-Pope, Christine Garey, Carmen Houlahan, Marie Laufiso, Lee Vandervis and Steve Walker (6).
Abstained: Nil
The division was declared CARRIED by 9 votes to 6
Motion carried (CNL/2024/239)
10 In January 2025, staff approached the consultant, Beads and Proceed Limited, to organise for a second workshop for Council based on the Motion (CNL/2024/239). Due to conflicting schedules, it was not possible to arrange for the second externally facilitated workshop requested for February.
11 The Strategic Refresh Advisory Panel (the Panel) was made aware of these updates and the Councillors requested that staff proceed with further analysis and an update report to date.
DISCUSSION
Refining and prioritising the Sustainable Development Goals and Targets
12 Since the last update report presented to Council on 10 December 2024, staff approached the consultant to organise for a second externally facilitated workshop for Councillors to prioritise and align SDG goals and targets with Council’s strategies.
13 The conflicting schedules of Council and the consultant have pushed the earliest possible date to end of February or early March 2025.
14 Councillors advised staff to progress the analysis to provide alignment between the SDGs and relevant targets with Council’s current strategies.
15 Staff proceeded with a two-tier analysis for external and internal sustainable impact that includes the five SDGs indicated in Point 5 of this report, marked as "External Sustainable Impact”, and the remaining 12 SDGs marked as "Internal Sustainable Impact".
16 The analysis then moved to examine the underlining targets for each SDG, filtering out targets that were not related to the role of local government in general.
17 The analysis narrowed down the list of targets to those that are relevant to the role of the Council, starting from direct functions like a provider, funder, and regulator, and ending with other possible functions as a partner, facilitator, and advocate.
18 This examination of targets in relation to the Council’s role is in line with the interconnectedness of the SDG under this framework and enables the Council’s to impact and contribute to sustainability areas beyond the conventional understanding of the DCC Levels of Services.
19 The analysis was limited to targets that are achievable within the medium term that will not require immediate changes to the delivery of services or demand additional budgeting.
Aligning the SDGs and relevant targets with the DCC eight strategies, the Zero Carbon Policy, and Te Taki Haruru – The DCC Māori Strategic Framework.
20 The final list of relevant targets was examined against all the eight strategies, Zero Carbon, and Te Taki Haruru.
21 This part of the analysis was done knowing that the four strategies under the Strategic Framework Refresh: Ara Toi, Te Ao Tūroa, Social, and Economic Development Strategies are currently being updated simultaneously.
22 The alignment between Te Taki Haruru and the under-development SDG-based Sustainability Framework offers an opportunity for Ōtepoti Dunedin to incorporate Mātauraka Māori (knowledge) and values into the framework and overcome challenges of recognition and respect for indigenous knowledge.
23 Attachments A, B, and C shows that some targets might align to one of more of the strategies. Across all the 17 UN-SDGs, the Council has a role to play showing the interconnectedness of the goals and the breadth of the Council’s role albeit being stronger in some areas than others.
OPTIONS
Option One – Progress the development of the SDG-based Sustainability Framework for the DCC based on the current analysis and alignment
Advantages
· Progressing the DCC Strategic Framework Refresh programme.
· Advancing the DCC SDG-based Sustainability Framework.
· Bringing different DCC work streams to function together for the delivery of services to rate payers and improving DCC sustainability practices.
· Better preparing Ōtepoti Dunedin for the challenges of climate change and geo-political shifts that may impact the city’s abilities to anticipate and contingency plan for those changes.
Disadvantages
· SDG-based frameworks can be extensive; however, this is overcome by the prioritisation of targets that are most relevant to the Council’s role as a local government organisation in the context of Aotearoa New Zealand.
· SDG-based frameworks require further attention to ensure indigenous knowledge is respected and valued equally alongside the SDG goals. This is overcome through alignment between the SDG goals and selected targets with the values of Te Taki Haruru – The DCC Māori Strategic Framework.
Option Two – Conduct a second externally facilitated workshop in early March
Advantages
· More time to develop the framework with both internal and external input.
Disadvantages
· This option may cause the Council to miss on the window to get the draft Sustainability Framework ready for the community consultation on the 9-year plan starting on 31 March 2025.
· Missing the opportunity to incorporate Te Taki Haruru into the Sustainability Framework for the DCC and meet the challenge of cultural heritage preservation.
· Additional cost to run an externally facilitated workshop.
NEXT STEPS
24 A further workshop will be held with Councillors on the alignment of SDGs.
25 Progress a draft copy of the SDG-based Sustainability Framework ready for the community consultation on the 9-year plan.
26 Develop community engagement plan.
Signatories
Author: |
Rula Talahma - Senior Policy Analyst |
Authoriser: |
Nadia Wesley-Smith - Corporate Policy Manager - Acting Nicola Morand - Manahautū (General Manager Policy and Partnerships) |
|
Title |
Page |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
⇩a |
Appendix A.1 : Analysis of UN-SDGs and relevant targets and alignment with the four strategies under the current Strategic Refresh work for the DCC |
140 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
⇩b |
Appendix A.2: Analysis of UN-SDGs and relevant targets and alignment with infrastructure strategies and the Future Development Strategy for the DCC |
144 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
⇩c |
Appendix A.3: Analysis of UN-SDGs and relevant targets and alignment with principles of the DCC Māori Strategic Framework - Te Taki Haruru |
149 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government Under the Local Government Act 2002, the establishment of the DCC Sustainability Framework offers a holistic framework to work on promoting the social, economic, cultural, and environmental wellbeing and community goals for all residents of Ōtepoti Dunedin now and for future generations. It allows the different workstreams at the DCC to work collaboratively and efficiently to advance the sustainability goals and targets under this framework.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The Strategic Refresh project had at its core the need for a Sustainability Framework showing the Council’s commitment to Sustainability. The Sustainability Framework will align with the eight DCC strategies, the Zero-Carbon Policy, and Te Taki Haruru – Māori Strategic Framework. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement The Sustainability Framework goals and targets will be aligned with the DCC Māori Strategic Framework, which allows to incorporate mana whenua’s input and aspirations into the Sustainability Framework. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability Finalising and adopting the Sustainability Framework for the DCC will potentially have a positive long-term implication (economic, social, and environmental) on Ōtepoti Dunedin. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zero carbon The Sustainability Framework is likely to contribute to lowering both city-wide and DCC emissions through rigorous alignment with the Zero Carbon Policy and Plan and further alignment with Te Ao Tūroa – the Environmental Strategy for the DCC. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy The draft Sustainability Framework is intended to be ready for community consultation alongside the draft 9-year plan. Because the draft 9-year plan was developed prior to advancing the draft Sustainability Framework, the latter will not have a direct effect in all areas, except for workstreams where alignment has prior existed. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The current draft Sustainability Framework is aligned with the Environmental, Social, Cultural, Economic Development, Integrated Transport, 3 Waters, Parks and Recreation, and Future Development Strategy. There are not further financial requirements anticipated in the short-medium term given that the Sustainability Framework is based on consolidating only the SDG targets that relate to and contribute to the DCC role. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance The overall assessment of the significance of the decision is low. The draft Sustainability Framework is aligned with the Council’s community outcomes, strategies, and policies. The creation of this draft is consistent with previous Council decisions. There are no immediate financial costs associated with the decision to advance the draft Sustainability Framework. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There were no further external engagements made during the preparation of this update report. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal There were no further internal engagements made during the preparation of this update report. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no legal/health and Safety risks associated with this report. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There is no noted conflict of interest. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards This is a city-wide framework that is intended to have a city-wide positive impact. |
Council 26 February 2025 |
Strategic Refresh Advisory Panel - Update Report
Department: Corporate Policy
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report to Council provides an update on activity undertaken on the Strategic Refresh Project, part of the Strategy, Planning and Engagement Committee (SPEC) Forward Work Programme.
2 The report covers activity undertaken in the quarter since October 2024.
That the Council:
a) Notes the content of this report.
b) Notes the next steps included in this report.
BACKGROUND
3 At its meeting on 13 February 2024 the Strategy, Planning and Engagement Committee (SPEC) agreed to establish the Strategic Refresh Advisory Panel (the Panel), to oversee the process of refreshing the Dunedin City Council’s four wellbeing strategies (Ara Toi, Economic Development Strategy, Social Wellbeing Strategy and Te Ao Tūroa).
Moved (Cr Barker / Cr Cherry Lucas)
That the Committee:
a) Establishes the Strategic Refresh Advisory panel to oversee the process of refreshing the DCC’s four wellbeing strategies with terms of reference as outlined in Attachment A
b) Appoints Councillor Cherry Lucas as Chairperson of the Panel and Councillors Carmen Houlihan, Andrew Whiley, Marie Laufiso and Sophie Barker as members of the Panel.
Motion carried (SPEC/2024/001) with Cr Garey recording her vote against.
4 Two previous update reports have been provided to SPEC since the establishment of the Panel.
DISCUSSION
5 In the last quarter, the Panel has met three times: 21 October 2024, 4 November 2024 and 29 November 2024.
6 Key topics discussed included:
a) Shared reflections from the two workshops for Councillors in October 2024; one focused on Economic Development, and one focused on Cultural Wellbeing.
b) Update on the refreshed content within each of the four strategies.
c) Incorporating Te Taki Haruru and Sustainability frameworks into the refreshed strategies.
d) Discussion on the timeline for completion of the Strategic Refresh Project.
e) Discussion on community engagement for the refreshed strategies
7 Work is progressing on the development of a Sustainability framework based on the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This will be incorporated into the refreshed strategies once a Sustainability framework has been adopted by Council.
8 Drafts of each refreshed strategy and a community engagement plan will be presented to SPEC at its meeting scheduled for 20 March 2025.
9 Feedback from the community engagement will be presented to SPEC at its meeting on 24 April 2025.
10 Final drafts of the refreshed strategies will presented to Council for approval in June 2025
OPTIONS
11 There are no options as this report is for noting
NEXT STEPS
12 Staff will progress work on drafts of each of the refreshed strategies to present to SPEC in March 2025.
13 Staff will develop a community engagement plan to present to SPEC in March 2025.
Signatories
Author: |
Nadia Wesley-Smith - Corporate Policy Manager - Acting |
Authoriser: |
Nicola Morand - Manahautū (General Manager Policy and Partnerships) |
There are no attachments for this report.
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This decision enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities. This decision promotes the social well-being of communities in the present and for the future. This decision promotes the economic well-being of communities in the present and for the future. This decision promotes the environmental well-being of communities in the present and for the future. This decision promotes the cultural well-being of communities in the present and for the future. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
The refresh of the DCC’s four well-being strategies is a critical piece of work that is overseen by the Panel. The four strategies are intrinsically linked with Te Taki Haruru the DCC’s Māori Strategic Framework. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement Alignment of the four well-being strategies with Te Taki Haruru, the DCC’s Māori Strategic Framework is integral to this work. Each refreshed strategy includes directions and action which impact on mana whenua and mātāwaka in Ōtepoti Dunedin. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability Alignment of the four well-being strategies with Council’s commitment to sustainability is integral to this work. The DCC’s Sustainability Framework, currently under development, will be incorporated into each refreshed strategy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zero carbon This project is not likely to materially impact city emissions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy There are no implications for current levels of service and/or performance measures. It should be noted that refreshed well-being strategies will help with DCC’s future long term and annual planning. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations There are no financial implications associated with this update report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance As this is a report for noting, there are no decisions and so it is considered low in terms of the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been no external engagement since the last quarterly update report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal The Corporate Policy team has worked with lead staff from Enterprise Dunedin, South Dunedin Future, Creative Partnerships and Community Partnerships to progress each strategy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no known risks associated with this report, and no request for decisions on the matters outlined in this report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no conflicts of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards There are no implications for Community Boards associated with the matters outlined in this report. |
|
Council 26 February 2025 |
Approval to Grant Easement to Convey Water over part of St Leonards Reserve, St Leonards, Dunedin
Department: Parks and Recreation
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report discusses an application by Dunedin City Council – 3 Waters (the Applicant), for the grant of an easement over part of the St Leonards Reserve (the Reserve) for installation of a new mains water pipeline and related infrastructure within the reserve. This project is part of the major upgrade to drinking water supplies as part of the Port Chalmers Water Supply (PCWS) project, as noted in Council’s Long-Term Plan. This Report recommends the easement be granted.
2 The Council is making two decisions. First a decision in its capacity as the administering body of the Reserve which is a reserve subject to the Reserves Act 1977 and second, a decision to exercise the Minister of Conservation’s delegation.
That Council: a) Acting in its capacity as the administering body of the St Leonards Reserve pursuant to the Reserves Act 1977: i) Grants an easement to convey water over part of the St Leonards Reserve at 69 St Leonards Drive, St Leonards, Dunedin, subject to the conditions outlined in this report. ii) Approves waiving the annual rental for use of the St Leonards Reserve. iii) Decides that the criteria for exemption from public notification has been met. b) Acting under delegation from the Minister of Conservation dated 12 June 2013, and pursuant to section 48 of the Reserves Act 1977, consents to the grant of an easement to convey water over part of the St Leonards Reserve at 69 St Leonards Drive, St Leonards, Dunedin, subject to the conditions outlined in this report. |
BACKGROUND
3 The Reserve is described as Lot 1-6 and Lot 8 Deposited Plan 8391 and Lot 2, Lot 4 and Lot 6 Deposited Plan 12156 all held in fee simple by Council in Record of Title OT4C/394. It also includes Lot 7 DP 8391 also held in fee simple by Council in Record of Title OTB2/727. All the land is recreation reserve by NZ Gazette 1985 page 5631 and subject to the Reserves Act 1977.
4 The Applicant has a major new water main project to supply drinking water to Port Chalmers. The part of the new pipeline will traverse Takahe Terrace at St Leonards. The Reserve is located near to the northern end of Takahe Terrace at St Leonards, with the new water main to be laid along the southern boundary of the Reserve to St Leonards Drive.
5 An alternative alignment for the new pipeline using Tui Street to connect to St Leonards Drive was deemed by the Applicant’s consultants to be undesirable, requiring two shallow foul sewer crossings, due to the close proximity of the water and foul sewer services at the Tui St/St Leonards Dr intersection.
6 By following Takahe Terrace to, and then through the Reserve and into St Leonards Drive this avoids the conflict with these other in-ground services and allows for straighter uninhibited runs of pipe for a more cost-effective installation to reach St Leonards Drive. See Attachments A and B.
7 The Applicant’s consultants also investigated whether the new water main could be installed along the line of an existing gravel pathway through the Reserve. The pipeline installation will require a trench 600mm wide with a minimum overlay cover of 600mm. Due to the location of the foul sewer beneath this pathway, it is not possible to maintain a clearance of 1 metre from the foul sewer without destroying the existing planted area along the path edge. See Attachment C.
8 The preferred location for the new water pipeline is within the grassed area, as close to the planted area as possible. This is shown in the Layout Plans for the new Port Chalmers Water Supply pipeline through the Reserve. See Attachment D.
9 This alignment would give sufficient space between the edge of the playing field and the planted area at the Reserve to avoid directly affecting the playing field. There is minimal planted vegetation at the Takahe Terrace bend into the Reserve which will be removed, and replanting will be required after the conclusion of the works. Council’s Parks and Recreation Services has been working with 3 Waters in reviewing the proposed use of the Reserve and supports the preferred alignment.
10 The Reserve is known to be a wet area in the winter months, so the physical works would not be undertaken until the warmer months or when there has been a prolonged dry period. This will minimise any issues around working in wet conditions such as excess mud.
11 As Council will be the owner of the new pipeline within the Reserve, the Applicant seeks a formal easement as the best way to formally record the presence and use of this. A new LT Plan will be drawn to show the ‘as-built’ pipeline for the proposed ‘Easement to Convey Water’. All costs associated with the physical works, reserve remediation including new planting, creating the easement including survey and any legal costs will be met by the Applicant.
12 The Applicant is seeking approval of the Council, as the administering body of the reserve and as the Minister of Conservation’s delegate, to grant the easement to convey water pursuant to Section 48 of the Reserves Act 1977.
DISCUSSION
13 The Council, in its capacity as administering body of the reserve, has the responsibility for ensuring compliance with the requirements of the Reserves Act 1977 and to consider the merits of the request for a grant of easements.
14 Section 48 of the Reserves Act 1977 provides the statutory authority for the grant of easements to convey water over reserves.
15 Section 48 of the Reserves Act 1977 requires public notification of the intention to grant an easement unless it can be demonstrated that:
a) the reserve is vested in an administering body and is not likely to be materially altered or permanently damaged; and
b) the rights of the public in respect of the reserve are not likely to be permanently affected by the establishment and lawful exercise of the easement.
16 Following installation of the pipeline within the Reserve, the affected land will be remediated back to grass, with appropriate plantings to mitigate the loss of plantings resulting from the works. This means that the Reserve is not likely to be materially altered or permanently damaged. The rights of the public in respect of the Reserve are not likely to be permanently affected by the establishment and lawful exercise of the easement, particularly given that public use of the structure location itself is minimal and use of the area will remain largely unaffected.
17 The effects on the Reserve of any future maintenance or repairs to the pipelines will be temporary and are expected to impact the playing field on the Reserve.
18 Section 48 of the Reserves Act 1977 empowers the reserve's administering body (the Council), to grant easements over reserve lands subject to the Resource Management Act and the consent of the Minister of Conservation. The Minister of Conservation has delegated powers of consent to the Council, without limitation under instrument of delegation dated 12 June 2013.
19 The Reserve Management Plan General Policies (General Policies) provides for easements to be granted over reserves as long as they do not prevent the use of the reserve for its primary purpose which in this instance is as recreation reserve. They also require an assessment of alternative pipe locations and why these cannot be used.
20 Consideration has been given to the use of either Tui Street or, along the gravel pathway through the Reserve for the new water main. In both cases, there would be a conflict with existing foul sewer pipelines and to mitigate this would be difficult. The alignment through the Reserve avoids the foul sewer, has the least impact, and would not affect use of the playfield on the Reserve. Under this proposal, the public pathway will not be affected.
21 The General Policies recommend a maximum term equivalent to the useful life of the asset and state that easements in perpetuity “will not be granted”. The Council has previously agreed to easements in perpetuity for essential infrastructure assets. In this instance, use of the Reserve in perpetuity is supported.
22 The General Policies provide for an annual fee to be payable in some cases. To date Council has generally not charged annual fees for similar pipeline infrastructure. In this case it is recommended that Council not charge an annual easement fee for the pipeline.
Iwi Consultation
23 The Applicant has obtained an archaeological authority for the Port Chalmers Water Supply from Heritage New Zealand. As a part of that process, Te Rūnaka o Ōtākou, the kaitiaki rūnaka whose takiwā includes the site the application relates was consulted via Aukaha. Te Rūnaka o Ōtākou advised it had no specific concerns with the water pipeline proposal.
24 It is proposed that an easement creating a right to convey water over part of the Reserve in favour of Council be granted on the condition that the Applicant must meet all costs associated with the design, construction and installation of the pipeline, and survey and legal costs of the easement. This includes all the costs of installing the pipeline within the Reserve as well as meeting all costs relating to remediation of the site works, revegetation of the surrounds to the satisfaction of Council (Parks and Recreation), as-built survey and, preparing, executing, and registering the easement documentation. On-going maintenance of the pipeline within the Reserve will be the responsibility of the Council’s 3 Waters Department.
25 The proposed key elements of the easement would include:
Statute Granted pursuant to section 48 of the Reserves Act 1977 on Council's standard terms and conditions.
MEMORANDUM OF PROPOSED EASEMENT IN GROSS
Right to Convey Water |
Over that part of the land in Record of Titles OT4C/394 and OTB2/727 that will have the pipeline described in this report. |
In favour of Dunedin City Council |
Term In perpetuity
Rental Nil
26 The terms and conditions of the easement are to be finalised by the Council’s solicitors.
27 In the absence of any other more practical option at this time, it is considered that permitting the new water main pipeline to cross the Reserve is the preferred option available to the Applicant.
28 Appropriate conditions will be incorporated into agreements with the Applicant to ensure the works do not cause any lasting impact to the state of the Reserve or to the public’s use of the reserve.
29 As noted above, all costs associated with the design, installation, survey, and legal costs associated with the formalisation of the easement will be met by the Applicant.
30 The Council, as the Minister of Conservation’s delegate, has a supervisory role in ensuring that the decision on whether or not to grant the easement has been arrived at in compliance with the requirements of the Reserves Act 1977. In particular, the Council as the Minister’s delegate, needs to be satisfied that the status of the land has been correctly identified, that there is statutory power to grant the easement, that the necessary statutory processes have been followed, that the classification has been appropriately considered, and the decision is a reasonable one.
OPTIONS
OPTIONS (Acting as administering body of ST LEONARDS RESERVE)
31 Council, acting as the administering body for the Reserve, grants an easement to convey water across part of the Reserve on the terms and conditions outlined in this report.
Advantages
· The proposed easement is unlikely to significantly impact the use or users of the Reserve.
· Supports improvements to drinking water as part of the Port Chalmers Water Supply (PCWS) project.
· Facilitates asset management processes by formally identifying the pipeline.
Disadvantages
· There are no material disadvantages. The pipeline will be underground through the Reserve and improved drinking water for Port Chalmers is a priority in the Long-term Plan.
· The presence and location of the underground pipeline in the Reserve are not seen as being material given the playing field is not affected by the pipeline installation at this location.
32 Do not grant an easement to convey water across part of the Reserve.
Advantages
· No material advantages.
Disadvantages
· Would mean the improvements to drinking water as part of the Port Chalmers Water Supply (PCWS) are delayed while issues with other alignments are resolved.
· Does not facilitate asset management.
33 As Council exercising its delegated legislative power, consents to the grant of the easement to convey water across part of the Reserve upon the terms and conditions outlined in this report.
Advantages
· Confirms that the Council, as administering body of the Reserve, has fully considered the merits of the proposed easements, and has fully complied with the requirements of the Reserves Act 1977.
Disadvantages
· There are no material disadvantages.
34 Do not consent to the grant of an easement to convey water across part of the Reserve.
Advantages
· No material advantages.
Disadvantages
· To take this option, the Council (as the Minister’s delegate) would need to determine the reasons that the Reserves Act 1977 has not been fully complied with and/or the decision to grant the easements is not a reasonable one.
NEXT STEPS
35 If Council consents to granting the easement to convey water across part of the Reserve and is satisfied the legislative requirements are met:
a) The Applicant will undertake the works on the basis that all costs associated with the new pipeline (including survey and legal costs) will be met by the Applicant. Once the works have been completed, the Council’s in-house legal team will prepare an easement instrument to register on the record of titles for the Reserve.
Signatories
Author: |
Owen Graham - Senior Leasing and Land Advisor |
Authoriser: |
Heath Ellis - Acting Group Manager Parks and Recreation Jeanette Wikaira - General Manager Arts, Culture and Recreation |
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Aerial photo showing St Leonards Reserve, Dunedin and new water main alignment |
165 |
⇩b |
Photos of St Leonards Reserve showing approx. alignment for water pipeline |
166 |
⇩c |
Photos showing gravel path and planted area where foul sewer located |
168 |
⇩d |
St Leonards Reserve_ Layout Plans for new Port Chalmers Water Supply pipeline |
169 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This decision relates to ensuring a major drinking water pipeline upgrade for the Port Chalmers community proceeds, and the alignment through St Leonards Reserve is considered a pragmatic solution. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
Ensuring the ability for this new drinking water pipeline to cross the reserve land in this location is the preferred solution for this major infrastructure project. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement Te Taki Haruru is DCC’s Māori Strategic Framework that provides direction for staff to operationalise Council’s commitment to the Treaty of Waitangi and partnership with Kāi Tahu mana whenua and Council’s commitment to the wider Māori community in Ōtepoti Dunedin. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability The new drinking water pipeline will benefit Port Chalmers community significantly. An appropriately developed and maintained pipeline will contribute to social and economic sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy There are no implications on Parks and Recreation from this proposal for the LTP or the Annual Plan. The proposal supports the 3 Waters upgrade to drinking water supplies as part of the Port Chalmers Water Supply (PCWS) project, as noted in Council’s Long-Term Plan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations The Applicant will meet all the costs of the pipeline installation within the Reserve, site remediation, survey and preparing and executing the easement documentation. On-going maintenance of the pipeline will be the responsibility of 3 Waters. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance The decision has been assessed from the perspective of Parks and Recreation as being of low/medium significance although, the drinking water pipeline is of higher significance to 3 Waters being a major infrastructure project noted in Council’s Long-Term Plan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external 3 Waters has engaged with vNo other external consultation has been undertaken by Parks and Recreation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal There has been regular engagement with Council’s 3 Waters team as details of the proposal have been reviewed by Parks and Recreation operations team to assess the alignment and any potential impacts on St Leonards Reserve and its users. The Council’s In - House Legal Counsel has provided advice in relation to the Reserves Act requirements. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are considered to be no material risks associated with the easement decision. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflicts of interest within Council. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards The subject area is located in the West Harbour Community Board area. |
Council 26 February 2025 |
Resolution to Stop Part of Sligo Terrace, Dunedin
Department: Property
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report recommends concluding the road stopping process for 46m2 of land at City Rise, Dunedin, as the public notification process has been completed and no objections were received.
That the Council:
a) Resolves that under Section 342 of the Local Government Act 1974 the portion of unformed road described as Section 1 SO 551865 is stopped.
b) Notes that no objections were submitted during the notice period.
c) Authorises a public notice declare that the road is stopped.
BACKGROUND
1 The owners of 59 Sligo Terrace, City Rise, applied to stop an unformed portion of legal road adjacent to their property, to better align the existing physical boundary. The application was reported to the Infrastructure Networks and Services Committee on 15 April 2019, which resolved as follows:
Moved (Cr Jim O'Malley/Cr Doug Hall):
That the Committee:
a) Approves the publishing of a public notice of the intention to stop a portion of legal road adjacent to 59 Sligo Terrace, Dunedin, subject to the applicant agreeing to:
i) Pay the Council the non-refundable fee for processing the stopping.
ii) Pay the Council the actual costs involved in the stopping, regardless of whether or not the stopping reaches a conclusion, AND the value of the stopped road, assessed by the Council’s valuer.
iii) Amalgamate the stopped portion of the road with the title of the adjacent land that is owned by the applicant, namely OT254/108.
iv) Accept the application of the standards contained within the Dunedin City Council Code for Subdivision and Development to the stopped road.
v) Register any easements on the stopped portion of road in favour of utility companies, if needed.
Motion carried (INF/2019/001)
DISCUSSION
2 The applicants and the Council entered into a conditional sale and purchase agreement in accordance with the Committee resolution.
3 The area of road to be stopped was surveyed and the road stopping was publicly notified on 28 September and 12 October 2024. No objections were received during the 40-day notification period.
4 The Council is now able to formally resolve to stop the portion of road shown as Section 1 SO 551865.
OPTIONS
Option One – Recommended Option
Impact assessment
5 As no objections have been received, the Council may declare the portion of road to be stopped.
Advantages
· This option is consistent with the Infrastructure Services Committee decision of 15 April 2019.
· This option will enable the creation of a practical boundary for both the unformed road and the adjacent private land.
· Modest proceeds of sale (assessed at market value) will be received and the rateable area of private land will increase following amalgamation of the title.
Disadvantages
· There are no disadvantages identified.
Option Two – Status Quo
Impact assessment
6 The Council may decide not to declare the portion of road to be stopped.
Advantages
· There are no identified advantages.
Disadvantages
· This option would be inconsistent with the Infrastructure Services Committee decision of 15 April 2019.
· This option would not resolve the boundary alignment.
· This option would result in no increase in the rateable area of private land and no receipt of proceeds of sale.
NEXT STEPS
7 If agreed, a public notice formally declaring the road stopping will be published in the Otago Daily Times. A new Record of Title will be raised for the land and an easement in favour of Aurora Energy Limited will be registered (for existing infrastructure). The Title will then be transferred to the adjoining property owners at 59 Sligo Terrace, and the Title for the stopped road will be amalgamated with the title for 59 Sligo Terrace.
Signatories
Author: |
Paula Dickel - Property Officer Advisory |
Authoriser: |
Anna Nilsen - Group Manager, Property Services Karilyn Canton - Chief In-House Legal Counsel Robert West - General Manager Corporate Services |
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Title Plan SO 551865 |
178 |
⇩b |
Aerial Photo |
183 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This decision enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
There is no contribution to the Strategic Framework |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for Māori. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no known impacts for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zero carbon There is no impact on greenhouse gas emissions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy There are no implications for these plans/strategies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations Costs incurred in the process are recovered from the applicant. A modest financial sum will be received as proceeds from the sale of land. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance This decision is considered low in in terms of the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external A full public notification process was carried out and no objections were received. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal Transport, Parks and Recreation Services, Customer and Regulatory Services, City Planning, City Development and Three Waters were consulted when the process was initiated. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no risks identified. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest No conflict of interest has been identified. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards There are no implications for Community Boards. |
Council 26 February 2025 |
Resolution to Stop Part of Hatfield Street, Dunedin
Department: Property
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This report recommends concluding the road stopping process for 191m2 of land at Opoho, Dunedin, as the public notification process has been completed and no objections were received.
That the Council:
a) Resolves that under Section 342 of the Local Government Act 1974 the portion of unformed road described as Section 1 SO 601279 is stopped.
b) Notes that no objections were submitted during the notice period.
c) Authorises a public notice declaring that the road is stopped.
BACKGROUND
2 The owners of 6 Balmoral Street, Opoho, applied to stop an unformed portion of legal road (Hatfield Street) adjacent to their property, to enable a boundary adjustment as they developed their property. The application was reported to the Infrastructure Services Committee on 15 February 2021, which resolved as follows:
Moved (Cr Steve Walker/Cr David Benson-Pope):
That the Committee:
a) Approves the publishing of a public notice of the intention to stop a portion of legal road adjacent to 6 Balmoral Street Opoho, subject to the applicant agreeing to:
i) Pay the Council the non-refundable fee for processing the road stopping;
ii) Pay the Council the actual costs involved in the road stopping, regardless of whether or not the process reaches a conclusion, AND the market value of the stopped road, assessed by the Council’s valuer;
iii) Amalgamating the portion of stopped road with the adjoining owner’s land held in Record of Title OT326/228;
iv) Accepting the application of the standards contained within the Dunedin City Council Code for Subdivision and Development to the stopped road; and
v) Registering any easements in favour of utility companies and/or relocate any utilities as required.
Cr Doug Hall returned to the meeting at 03:26 p.m.
Motion carried (ISC/2021/001)
DISCUSSION
3 The applicants and the Council entered into a conditional sale and purchase agreement in accordance with the Committee resolution.
4 The area of road to be stopped was surveyed and the road stopping was publicly notified on 28 September and 12 October 2024. No objections were received during the 40-day notification period.
5 The Council is now able to formally resolve to stop the portion of road shown as Section 1 SO 601279.
OPTIONS
Option One – Recommended Option
Impact assessment
6 As no objections have been received, the Council may declare the portion of road to be stopped.
Advantages
· This option is consistent with the infrastructure Services Committee decision of 15 February 2021.
· This option will enable the creation of a practical boundary for both the unformed road and the adjacent private land.
· Modest proceeds of sale (assessed at market value) will be received and the rateable area of private land will increase following amalgamation of the title.
Disadvantages
· There are no disadvantages identified.
Option Two – Status Quo
Impact assessment
7 The Council may decide not to declare the portion of road to be stopped.
Advantages
· There are no identified advantages.
Disadvantages
· This option would be inconsistent with the Infrastructure Services Committee decision of 15 February 2021.
· This option would not resolve the boundary alignment.
· This option would result in no increase in the rateable area of private land and no receipt of proceeds of sale.
NEXT STEPS
8 If agreed, a public notice formally declaring the road stopping will be published in the Otago Daily Times. A new Record of Title will be raised for the land and the Title will then be transferred to the adjoining property owner at 6 Balmoral Street, and the Title for the stopped road will be amalgamated with the title for 6 Balmoral Street.
Signatories
Author: |
Paula Dickel - Strategic Property Advisor |
Authoriser: |
Anna Nilsen - Group Manager, Property Services Robert West - General Manager Corporate Services |
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Title Plan SO 601279 |
189 |
⇩b |
Aerial Photo |
193 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This decision enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
There is no contribution to the Strategic Framework. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement There are no known impacts for Māori. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no known impacts for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zero carbon There is no impact on greenhouse gas emissions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy There are no implications for these plans/strategies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations Costs incurred in the process are recovered from the applicant. A modest financial sum will be received as proceeds from the sale of land. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance This decision is considered low in terms of the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external A full public notification process was undertaken, and no objections were received. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal Transport, Parks and Recreation Services, Customer and Regulatory Services, City Planning, City Development and Three Waters were consulted when the process was initiated. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no risks identified. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest No conflict of interest has been identified. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards There are no implications for Community Boards. |
Council 26 February 2025 |
Proposed Event Road Closures
Department: Transport
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 The DCC has received temporary road closure applications relating to the following events:
a) 2025 Otago Rally
2 This report recommends that Council approves the temporary closure of the affected roads.
That the Council:
a) Resolves to close the roads detailed below (pursuant to Section 319, Section 342, and Schedule 10 clause 11(e) of the Local Government Act 1974 (LGA 1974)):
i) 2025 Otago Rally
Ceremonial Rally start
Friday, 4 April 2025 |
12.00pm to 8.00pm |
· Octagon Central Carriageway, between George Street and Princes Street |
|
3.00pm to 8.00pm |
· The Lower Octagon, from George Street to Princes Street · Lower Stuart Street, from the Octagon to Lower Moray Place · Access will be maintained on Bath Street
|
|
SS 3 and SS 6 Bald Hill
Saturday, 5 April 2025 |
9.15am to 4.30pm |
· Bald Hill Road from, Moonlight Road to Hummock Runs Road · Moonlight Road, from DCC/WDC boundary to Bald Hill Road |
Special Stage 4 Longdale
Saturday, 5 April 2025 |
9.30am to 3.00pm |
· Longdale Road, from Four Mile Road to DCC/WDC boundary · Four Mile Road, from Hyde-Macraes Road to Longdale Road |
Special Stage 5 Hartfield South
Saturday, 5 April 2025 |
10.00am to 3.00pm |
· Hartfield Road, from Moonlight Road to Hyde-Macraes Road |
Special Stage 7 Nenthorn
Saturday, 5 April 2025 |
12.00noon to 5.30pm |
· Ramrock Road, from Waitaki District Council/DCC boundary to Mt Watkin Road |
Special Stage 8 Super Stage
Saturday, 5 April 2025 |
9.00am to 9.00pm |
· Sturdee Street, from Wickliffe Street to Halsey Street · Halsey Street, from Sturdee Street to Ward Street · Ward Street, from Halsey Street to Wickliffe Street · Wickliffe Street, from Ward Street to Jutland Street · Jutland Street, from Wickliffe Street to Akaroa Street · Ward Street overbridge, from Anzac Avenue to Ward Street |
Service Park
Saturday, 5 April 2025 |
2.00pm to 7.00pm |
· Jutland Street, from Akaroa Street to Devon Street |
Special Stage 13 Waipori Gorge
Saturday, 6 April 2025 |
11.00am to 4.00pm |
· Waipori Gorge Road, from Central Otago District Council/DCC boundary to Koefords Road |
Special Stage 15 Kuri Bush
Saturday, 6 April 2025 |
1.00pm to 6.00pm |
· Otokia-Kuri Bush Road East, from Brighton-Taieri Mouth Road to Big Stone Road · Big Stone Road, from Otokia-Kuri Bush Road to Rapid 141 Big Stone Road |
Rally finish
Saturday, 6 April 2025 |
1.00pm to 6.00pm |
· Brighton Domain |
BACKGROUND
3 Council’s Dunedin Festival and Events Plan supports the goal of a successful city with a diverse, innovative, and productive economy and a hub for skill and talent.
4 The areas proposed to be used for these events are legal roads and can therefore be temporarily closed to normal traffic if statutory temporary road closure procedures are followed. The procedures are set out in Section 319 of the LGA 1974 and give Council the power to stop or close any road (or part of a road) within the parameters of Section 342 and Schedule 10 of the LGA 1974 (Schedule 10 is included as Attachment A).
5 These procedures include:
· Consultation with the New Zealand Transport Authority Waka Kotahi and the Police.
· Public notice being given of the proposal to close any road (or part of a road), and public notice of a decision to close the road.
· Council being satisfied that traffic is not likely to be unreasonably impeded.
6 A resolution of Council is required where a proposal to temporarily close a road relates to public functions.
7 Council is required to give public notice of its decision. This notice will be published after this meeting and prior to the event, if approved.
DISCUSSION
Consultation and Notification
8 The Police and the New Zealand Transport Authority Waka Kotahi have no objections to the proposed road closures.
9 On Saturday, 18 January 2025, the proposed temporary road closures were advertised in the Otago Daily Times (Attachment B) with a deadline for feedback.
10 The event organisers contacted those considered affected prior to submitting their application, and no objections were received.
11 Schedule 10 clause 11(e) states a road cannot be closed more than 31 days in the aggregate in any one year. This limit will not be exceeded by the approval of the proposed temporary road closures.
Traffic Impacts
12 The event locations of these events have had identical road closures for the same, or similar event(s) in prior years without causing unreasonable delays to the travelling public.
13 Emergency services and public transport services will be managed through the temporary traffic management process.
14 The Temporary Traffic Management Plan process ensures that other issues such as temporary relocation of certain parking (e.g. taxi, mobility and Authorised Vehicles Only) are managed.
OPTIONS
15 Note any amendment to this report’s recommendations cannot be implemented without further consultation with the affected parties, New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi, the Police, and verifying that traffic impacts are acceptable.
Option One – Recommended Option
16 That the Council closes the sections of road as recommended in this report.
Advantages
· Roads can be closed, and the event will be able to proceed.
· The closures will assist in realising the economic, social, and cultural benefits associated with the events.
Disadvantages
· There will be temporary loss of vehicular access through the closed areas. However, there are detours available, and safety can be assured using temporary traffic management.
Option Two – Status Quo
17 That the Council decides not to close the roads in question.
Advantages
· There would be no detour required for the travelling public, and the roads would be able to be used as normal.
Disadvantages
· The events would not be able to go ahead, and the benefits of the events would be lost.
NEXT STEPS
18 Should the resolution be made to temporarily close the roads, Council staff will accept the temporary traffic management plans that have been received for the events and notify the public of the closures.
Signatories
Authoriser: |
Jeanine Benson - Group Manager Transport Scott MacLean - General Manager, Climate and City Growth |
|
Title |
Page |
⇩a |
Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 10 |
200 |
⇩b |
ODT Advert - 18 January 2025 |
205 |
SUMMARY OF CONSIDERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with purpose of Local Government This decision promotes the social well-being of communities in the present and for the future. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fit with strategic framework
Events contribute to the Strategic Framework. Events contribute to the Economic Development Strategy, the Social Wellbeing Strategy. There is a Festival and Events Plan 2018-2023. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Māori Impact Statement Mana whenua have not been directly engaged with in relation to these road closures. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability There are no implications for sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTP/Annual Plan / Financial Strategy /Infrastructure Strategy There are no implications, as the decision is a regulatory one and there are no direct costs to Council. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial considerations There are no financial implications. The cost of the proposed road closure is not a cost to Council. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance This decision is considered low in terms of the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement – external There has been external engagement (as required by the LGA 1974), with the Police and New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi. Affected parties were notified and provided a time period for feedback. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engagement - internal There has been engagement with DCC Events and Transport. There is support for the events to proceed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks: Legal / Health and Safety etc. There are no identified risks should the recommended resolution be made. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest There are no known conflicts of interest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Boards There are no implications for Community Boards. |
|
Council 26 February 2025 |
Resolution to Exclude the Public
That the Council excludes the public from the following part of the proceedings of this meeting (pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987) namely:
This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, and the particular interest or interests protected by Section 6 or Section 7 of that Act, or Section 6 or Section 7 or Section 9 of the Official Information Act 1982, as the case may require, which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as shown above after each item.